A opposite perspective upon sex with a minor
Social media is abuzz about a story of a inhabitant ten-pin bowler who had his judgment of being "bound over" upon good poise for 5 years easy by a Court of Appeal here.
The facts
It would crop up which a bowler, when aged about 18 or 19, had consensual sex with a lady who was afterwards aged thirteen years as well as 4 months. After a girl's father gave evidence, a bowler altered his counterclaim to a single of guilty as well as after what seem to have been an impassioned counterclaim in mitigation, a bowler was condemned to being bound over. It was reported inHarian Metroas follows:-
Semalam ditetapkan untuk perbicaraan hari pertama kes itu, namun selepas saksi pendakwaan pertama iaitu bapa mangsa memberi keterangan, tertuduh melalui peguam bela Azrul Zulkifli Stork memberitahu mahkamah dia mahu menukar pengakuannya.Abu Bakar dalam penghakimannya turut meneliti semua fakta kes yang dikemukakan Timbalan Pendakwa Raya, Ifa Sirrhu Samsudin serta rayuan peguam.Mengikut pertuduhan, Nor Afizal didakwa merogol gadis berkenaan yang ketika kejadian berusia thirteen tahun empat bulan antara jam 12.30 pagi hingga 5 pagi, di bilik bernombor 225, tingkat dua, Hotel Kings, Ayer Keroh pada 5 Julai 2010.Tertuduh didakwa mengikut Seksyen 376 Kanun Keseksaan jika disabitkan boleh dipenjara sehingga twenty tahun dan dikenakan sebatan.Sementara itu, Azrul merayu mahkamah menggunakan budi bicara peruntukan Seksyen 294 Kanun Acara Jenayah kerana tertuduh adalah pesalah muda! yang pe rlu diberi peluang selain dia masih atlet dan itu adalah kesalahan pertamanya.Beliau juga menyatakan tertuduh adalah atlet yang mengharumkan nama negara dan negeri serta menanggung keluarga kerana ibu bapanya tidak bekerja.Katanya, kepentingan awam juga membawa maksud tertuduh diberi peluang kerana mempunyai masa depannya cerah selain pertuduhan itu adalah rogol bawah umur dan tiada unsur paksaan.Ifa bagaimanapun meminta mahkamah menjatuhkan hukuman berat ke atas tertuduh sebagai pengajaran atas perbezaaan usianya nineteen tahun manakala mangsa pula 13, ketika kejadian.Katanya, sebagai atlet, kesalahan dilakukan tertuduh turut mencemarkan imej negara dan negeri.
The Prosecution appealed against a sentence, arguing which it was as well lenient. Apparently, a Melaka High Court imposed a 5 year sentence. That judgment was overturned by a Court of Appeal progressing this week, as well as a order which a bowler be bound over by a Sessions Court was restored. Since this matter started in a Sessions Court, no further interest can be made.
(The New Straits Timesreportsthat a bowler's warn pronounced a bowler was essentially 18 during a time of a offence, not 19.The Sunand theMalaysian Insideralso inform a story.)
There is right away an uproar over this. A couple of points, however, should be noted.
Rape as well as orthodox rape
1.What a bowler did was positively "rape", as tangible in what is right away territory 375(g) of a Penal Code.
A male is pronounced to commit "rape" who, except in a case hereinafter excepted, has passionate re! tort wit h a lady underneath resources descending underneath any of a following descriptions(g) with or but her consent, when she is underneath sixteen years of age.
It's called "statutory rape", since it does not matter if a lady consented or not. Traditionally, rape means forcing a person to have sex.
But note which a lady was thirteen years as well as 4 months aged during a time (as seen from a Harian Metro article) while a boy was 18 or 19, not twenty-one asCharles Santiago as well as most others you am certain seem to think. (He was twenty-one when a Court of Appeal listened a matter. So a lady is right away fifteen or 16).
UPDATED: Charles Santiago has corrected his perspective piece after a publication of this article.
So, effectively, what this case is all about is a Form 6 boy who had sex with a Form 1 girl. The law says he is a rapist. Perhaps he was a well-spoken talker, or perhaps a lady looked most comparison as well as they were experimenting. you don't know.It was his initial offence, as far as you know, as well as it looks as if it was completely consensual (though, of course, a single could argue which a girl's agree is of small value since her tender age).
Young Man's Defence
The law in Malaysia does not concede any leeway even when a age difference between a offender as well as a plant in a orthodox rape case is small. However, most jurisdictions have seen a injustice in this, as well as their laws reconize which there is a opposite in kind in a nature of a corruption when an comparison male has sex with a immature girl, as well as when two immature people have been experimenting. So, for example, in England,section 6(3) of a Sexual Offences Act 1956provides that
(3) A male is n! ot guilt y of an corruption underneath this territory since he has unlawful passionate retort with a lady underneath a age of sixteen, if he is underneath a age of twenty-four as well as has not previously been charged with a like offence, as well as he believes her to be of a age of sixteen or over as well as has reasonable means for a belief.
This was called a "young man's defence". The law in England has been amended, but it would crop up not nonetheless in force. This counterclaim will soon be open to any man, so prolonged as he pretty believed which a lady was over a age of 16. Seesection 9 of a Sexual Offences Act 2003(not nonetheless in force). Significantly, a burden remains with a prosecution to infer which a male could not have pretty believed which a lady was over 16, as well as not for a indicted to infer this. (For a little chronological background, as well as a procedure for this legislative change, seeRegina v K [2001] UKHL 41.)
In England, a Crown Prosecution Service summarizes theirguidelineson when prosecutors should take to court offences such as this by saying which "a male who is extremely comparison which a lady is likely to be prosecuted, especially if he owed her a duty of care; whereas it may not be required to take to court a immature male with whom a lady has been carrying a consensual relationship."
The immature man's counterclaim is not accessible in Malaysia, nor is there a counterclaim to a male who pretty believes which a person he is carrying sex with is a lady aged over 16. As prolonged as a plant is underneath 16, it is an offence, as if even if a "rapist" is additionally underneath 16.
Get a little perspective prior to condemning So, a bowler has still been convicted of an offence. The only thing is which his judgment has been easy to a judgment creatively imposed upon him. He has not been sent to prison for 5 years for what a little may call a youthful indiscretion.
From a journal reports, you cannot know either or not thisman is a passionate predator. We do know which he is very young, as well as possibly has a splendid future. We don't know either he believed a lady was comparison than she was, as well as either which idea was reasonable. We do know which prison time would certainly have destroyed his life, job prospects as well as bowling career. All since he had consensual sex with a Form 1 lady when he was in Form 6.
Bear all this in mind prior to you go as well as reject a Court of Appeal judgment restoring a original sentence.
LB: This has not been a initial time Shanmuga K has inextricable himself in an conflict upon women's groups. Read hisOy! Women! Wake Up as well as Smell a Coffeeon whatis right away territory 375(f) of a Penal Code [at which time,a proposed territory 375(g)].
- Loyarburok
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment