August 30, 2012
by Din Merican
I review a supposed rebuttal by a Foreign Minister's Political Secretary which you posted earlier upon this blog with considerable concern. It is a ultimate in a prolonged list of evidence of insufficiency as well as lack of professionalism in a Foreign Ministry, or Wisma Putra as it commonly known.
If anything, a come-back exemplifies a motto "It's improved to be wordless as well as suspicion a fool, than to speak up as well as mislay all doubt" for it usually done a Minister look worse than he actually is. Why purported? Well, Dato Norhaidi is not just well well well known for his fluency in English. Therefore, it is doubtful which this wayward come-back could be done by him. Furthermore, domestic secretaries have not been well well well known to do this kind of work.
A Ghost Written Rebuttal
The come-back is some-more expected to be a work of Ahmad Rozian Abdul Ghani, Wisma Putra's Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy as well as External information who was roasted in this blog a little months ago. Or it could have been created by a large committee headed by Rozian as well as approved by Kedah-born Tan Sri Radzi Bin Abdul Rahman, a Secretary-General? In any event, you goal which a genuine author would clarify things for a benefit.
However, it is not fair to lay a blame wholly upon a F! oreign M inister with whom you have exchanged views as well as ideas upon a palm phone, as well as upon this blog. He is after all a statesman as well as not a professional diplomat. The blame must, therefore, be borne by a Secretary -General as well as his comparison officers.
I have upon record as well as others toosaid which a benefaction set up in Wisma Putra is a most dysfunctional ever. The Minister is amateurish to conduct his comparison officers. Thinking which they have been quietly revolting against him, Minister Anifah, a non-Peninsular Foreign Minister, doesn't engage his officers.
Apparently, even a mandatory weekly meetings, introduced in a 1960s by a legendary King Ghaz (left) as "Friday prayers" where issues have been discussed, have been a thing of a past.
Without ministerial control as well as supervision, Radzi's underling par perfomance is serve ruining Wisma Putra.
To have himself look good, he has filled up key positions with sycophants as well as officers who had served with him rsther than with officers selected upon a basement of merit as well as expertise. That is how insufficiency perpetuates itself, similar to turtles all a approach down.
Wisma Putra: A Toxic Set-Up
I am told which even a Minister's requests to mislay amateurish officers have been apparently routinely disregarded.In management-speak Wisma Putra would be a great e.g. of a toxic organisation. It's easy to theory a state of a Ministry. There is a glaring absence of shared purpose as well as compelling clarity of mission. With insufficiency being routinely rewarded, resentment is tall as well as spirit low in Wisma Putra today.
Recently, a Secretary-General wrote a square in a Star entitled "Creating an ASEAN Community". Although which square was far superior to his earlier unfilled square upon a Ministry's consular services, his ultimate square also stands an e.g. of his inability to clear foreign process issues obviously as well as cogently beyond cutting-and-pasting tactful phrases taken from official communiqus which have been written some-more to conceal rsther than than elucidate issues.
Tan Sri Radzi (right) talks about ushering a community by 2015. What does this
meant for a typical Malaysians? We have been endangered which you could be during a fork of a dangerous lapse to a bad old days when Southeast Asia was referred to as "Balkans of a East".
As Malaysians, you have been very endangered which untrammeled major power rivalry, namely US-China relations vis-a-vis a Asia-Pacific, could mutilate assent as well as stability which you had well well well known for most of a lives.
It would have been much some-more responsible for him to express a concerns which ASEAN is right away upon a wrong track. It would be responsible for him to share a little extended thoughts upon Malaysia's main objective during a Nov 2012 Summit in Phnom Penh.
How would Malaysia, as a singular of a main petitioner states, work with others to safeguard which a abominable discord displayed in April would not be repeated? Without restoring ASEAN's liberty as a section of peace, leisure as well as neutrality, looking forward to declaring an ASEAN Community during a Chairmanship would merely be an empty PR exercise which would be bereft of definition or purpose.
Even if Tan Sri Radzi wishes to speak of a ASEAN Community, he could during least have explained which a ASEAN Community is not envisaged as a duplicat! e of a E uropean Community. If it not starting to be similar to a EU, what afterwards have been we, a typical citizens to expect?
What do these mean?
"Under a APSC, a part of states have affianced to regard their security as fundamentally related to a singular an additional as well as bound by geographic location, usual prophesy as well as objectives."
"When you have an ASEAN Economic Community, you shall see a giveaway flow of goods, services, investment as well as capital, estimable economic development through reduced poverty as well as socio-economic disparities. The objective is to spin Asean in to a singular marketplace as well as prolongation bottom by harnessing a diversity which characterises a shred in to opportunities to spin it in to a stronger shred of a global supply chain."
Obviously these conceptual questions have been too much for him as well as a Ministry.
Given a approach a Foreign Ministry is run these days, it is rarely expected which Malaysia will be able to fool around any meaningful purpose in more advanced an enlightened Foreign Policy.
2015 is an important year for Malaysia. As mentioned by Tan Sri Radzi, you will be a ASEAN Chair in 2015. The Foreign Minister also mentioned which Malaysia would find a non-permanent security council chair for 2015-2016.
It's best for Wisma Putra if a benefaction Secretary-General moves upon quickly as well as leave in his place a group of officers selected upon a basement of their proven ability so which during least you will have during least dual years to fully hope for to have sure which you have been up to a symbol to take upon these responsibilities.
Read More @ Source August 31, 2012
by B A Hamzah
The good powers in Middle East have been redefining their vital interests as they correlate with any alternative as well as alternative states in a Asia-Pacific region. Key players have been a United States, China, Japan as well as India. Russia underneath Putin is slowly though certainly convalescent a influence.
The background of a renewed US-China adversary is well documented. However, with courtesy to a South China Sea, a adversary became some-more heated following Obama administration department preference to lapse to a segment (2010) as well as some-more recently (2012) by a process to redeploy infantry to a segment following a preference to disengage from Iraq as well as Afghanistan.
The US process to focus to Middle East Pacific is a counsel try to rebalance its
worldwide infantry deployment with an eye upon China. In seeking larger access to a region, a US has sent some-more marines to Darwin upon rotation basis; it has conducted exercises with a little ASEAN states in a South China Sea without due courtesy for a flighty infantry environment.
Washington has also concluded to station a little littoral combat ships in Singapore, as if to protect a interests in a South China Sea as well as in a Straits of Malacca. This process is really much in line with President Barrak Obama's debate of reassurance during a Australian Parliament (November 2011) which America remains a Pacific power. The universe will decider a actions: whether it is starting to be a peaceable power, a soft energy or a destructive p! ower.
US brand brand new adversary in a Middle East Pacific Region: China?
Despite denials to a contrary by various process makers, any step which a US has undertaken bears a symbol of a counsel process to enclose China's rise. Kissinger, in his book (China, 2011) elaborates since China fears encirclement.
In a long- run, it will be formidable for a US to conduct China's climb in ways which do not diminish US interests in a region. The following reasons have been among a reasons offered:
China views US in a decrease mode. The US in undergoing a proviso in vital decrease in conditions of ability to change general events. Various writers gave alluded to this inevitability. Johan Galtung, who foresee a dissection of a Soviet Union, has predicted in 2004 which a US would tumble detached in 2020. Norman Davies' statement which "All states as well as nations, however great, freshness for a deteriorate as well as have been replaced" is prophetic as well as germane to any power, together with a US.
China views geo-economics as well as made during home governing body have been during contingency with US expansive foreign policy.
The US vital overreach has mercantile cost. Today a US is a most gladdened republic in a universe estimated during US $ 16 trillion as well as notwithstanding quantitative exercises(QE) over a years, it has unsuccessful to stop a mercantile rot, which might right widely separated criticise Obama's chances of retaining a Presidency this November.
The US mercantile malaise has caused Washington to cut a infantry spending by some-more than $ 100 billion over a decade. This cut will start a US ability to plan energy over a shores.
The unlucky global mercantile situation has a debilitating stroke upon a US manage to buy as well as boundary a energy projection capability.
Geography favours China. The South China Sea waters rinse China's southern shores; Hawaii, a home pier of a 7th Fleet is! 8,000 n autical miles away. All infantry operations have to cause in stretch as well as geography. China is not Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, or Pakistan.
US-Sino Rivalry in a South China Sea
The US-China adversary has caused temperatures to climb in a South China Sea. 
The Nation of Bangkok warns in a brand new paper that: "If a stream tragedy continues in South China Sea, generally in in in between a Philippines as well as China, it could lead to an all-out war. This is not an alarmist's warning though a real concern. With poisonous tongue as well as flourishing tension, there is a possibility which opposing parties would cranky a line. This could be a outcome of miscalculation."
This paper refers to a corner over a Scarborough Shoal. While a corner would not lead to an "all out-war", a odds of a distortion is scary. In a perspective of a Nation, it (war) "can be a most dangerous diversion in town."
China has been accused of stoking tensions upon a South China Sea.It has perceived bashing over a Scarborough Shoal standoff as well as over a investiture of a infantry garrison as well as arrangement of Sansha City upon Woody Island.
The hype over Sansha City as well as a infantry garrison is unnecessary. The City was formalised in 2007. The Peoples' Liberation Army (PLA) occupied a Paracels archipelago given 1974 as well as given then it has infantry upon a islands.
Many have accused China of hidden hands during a 45th ASEAN Foreign 
Ministers Meeting during Phnom Penh. When a Ministers unsuccessful to emanate a Joint Communiqu, a censure was put upon China .
No a single denies which China has been noisy in a South China Sea given it removed a South Vietnamese infantry from a Paracels (including a Woody Island) upon Jan 19. 1974. In Apr 1988, it fought a short naval fight with Vietnam as well as in 1995, it occupied a Mischief Reef.
Like China, Vietnam, Malaysia as well as a Philippines have garrisoned their territories in a South China Sea. Taiwan has a greatest infantry garrison upon Itu Aba. Brunei is a usually petitioner which does not send infantry to occupy any island or stone feature.
Incident during Scarborough in Apr 2012
On Apr 10, 2012, Manila sent a largest warship, BRP Gregorio del Pilar
(former US Coast Guard Cutter USS Hamilton) to detain Chinese fishermen during a Scarborough Shoal for "breaching Philippines sovereignty as well as nautical jurisdiction"- an substitution for illegal entry, illegal fishing as well as poaching.
Two Chinese civilian vessels from a Bureau of Fisheries Administration rushed to a stage just in time to stop a physical condition of 8 fishing vessels; a catch was, however, impounded.Of course, this was not a initial detain of Chinese fishing vessels for illegal fishing as well as poaching in a area. For example, in Jul 1997 a PI Navy arrested twenty-one Chinese fishermen for illegal entrance in a vicinity of a Scarborough Shoal.
Manila has based a explain of a Scarborough Shoal upon "effective function as well as in effect office given independence". Manila has discounted vicinity as a basis of a claim. On Apr 2012, a Department of Foreign Affairs admits which a sovereignty as well as office over a Scarborough Shoal (Bajo de Monsiloc) is NOT premised upon vicinity or "the fact which a rocks have been within a 200 nautical miles or continental shelf underneath! UNCLOS. "
ASEAN contingency not allow a indecisiveness over a word to criticise a pacific process which ASEAN has assiduously grown over a years with China. The Code of Conduct (COC) negotiation should not turn warrant to a little resistant inner politics. ASEAN has some-more dire larger geo-strategic issues to worry.
Driven by vital considerations as well as a prospects for nautical resources, all claimants have been expanding their infantry as well as enforcement capabilities in a doubtful South China Sea. Buoyed by nationalist sentiments, a little claimants have sought outside help. The participation of outmost forces could criticise a infantry energy balance in a region. In which sense, US-China adversary might mystify issues
Without a little confidence- building mechanisms similar to a proposed COC, Incidents-at- Sea Agreements or Joint Development Projects in in in between a claimants, a nautical confidence situation in a South China Sea might take a turn for a worse. So, petitioner states bordering a South China Sea contingency seek uninformed solutions to their divergent interests.
Scarborough Shoal & ASEAN Unity
ASEAN is widely separated upon a Scarborough Shoal. Writing in a Wall Street Journal, Ian Storey criticised ASEAN's failure to tighten ranks over a Scarborough Shoal incident. He forked out in a essay which ASEAN partial of states were widely separated due "to differing inhabitant interests, together with a worth they place upon their relationships with China." This has resulted in a lack of cohesion as well as inaction in dealing with China in a South China Sea.
Singling out China for a corner does not insist a entire story. Before May 2010, a confidence situation in a South China Sea was tolerable, notwithstanding China's noisy! policy.
In 1995, for example, following a Mischief Incident, Manila as well as Beijing sealed a formula of conduct pledging to compromise their brawl by pacific means. A year after (November 1996), President Fidel Ramos of a Philippines concluded with President Jiang Zemin which both parties would settle their disputes in a South China Sea, together with a Scarborough Shoal around corner development.
The tipping indicate was Jun 2010 in Singapore. Robert Gates' statement in Singapore in Jun 2010 as well as Hillary Clinton's reaffirmation of a US process of returning to a segment after a prolonged duration of neglect during a ASEAN Regional Forum in Hanoi upon Jul 23, 2010 introduced a brand brand new component in informal confidence dynamics.
Beijing views a US lapse to a Middle East Pacific as well as infantry engagement in a South China Sea as containment. In reply to a US containment policy, China has turn some-more defensive. Beijing has proposed to upgrade a infantry capabilities in a South China Sea to oppose a US infantry presence.
US-China adversary as well as ASEAN
The US-China adversary has caused a little states to take sides. This action will have a long-term effect upon a energy balance in Southeast Asia. The corner during Scarborough has ramifications over China as well as a Philippines; it has brought non-claimant parties in to a fray. The dispute will some-more formidable to finalise with a involvement of a others who have been regulating a South China Sea dispute to criticise China's confidence interests.
Claimant states can turn pawns in a US-China rivalry. The adversary can in conclusion criticise ASEAN confidence as well as cohesiveness if a make a difference is not rubbed properly.
It would crop up which a 45th ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting during Phnom Penh has put ASEAN's credit upon line. Some say ASEAN has lost a centrality, others think ASEAN will turn not pertinent after a Foreign Ministers unsucc! essful t o emanate a Joint Communiqu, a initial in forty-five years. Many have ridiculed ASEAN's credibility.
So what if ASEAN cannot coble a consensus? Does it mean ASEAN will tighten shop after it unsuccessful to determine upon a communiqu? Is a communiqu so vital which without it, a entire ASEAN mild bid will tumble apart?
It is puzzling how critics could omit a jot down of ASEAN given a first in 1967, together with forging a community by 2015. Everything contingency be seen in a correct context. A tiny window creates sense usually in a context of a altogether architecture . Looking during a Scarborough Shoal without a good of a larger geo-strategic pattern as well as landscape together with a US-China adversary would distort a story.
ASEAN is not a single-issue organisation. The Scarborough Shoal corner in in in between China as well as a Philippines will finalise itself as well as it will not hole ASEAN unity. Both Philippine as well as China will vegetable patch up shortly if third parties stop instigating.
ASEAN has weathered worst storms in a existence as well as it gets stronger after any crisis. The Philippines -Malaysia family was bedeviled by a former explain to partial of Sabah shortly as Malaysia was shaped in 1963.The slow explain has not caused ASEAN to collapse.
In 1968, for example, critics cried tainted when Singapore hanged dual Indonesian marines for a bombing of a MacDonald House in 1965.The nationalists in Indonesia demanded retribution. Diplomatic family were ruffled.
In 1991, a Philippines removed a Ambassador from Singapore for unresolved a maid who confessed to a crime. When situation cooled down, tactful family resumed. I hope which a recall of a Cambodian Ambassador from Manila in August 2012 will not permanently damage tactful family in in in between a dual ASEAN states.
In 1979, Vietnam reoccupied Amboyna Cay which Malaysia enclosed in a 1979 continental shelf map. In a same year, a Philippines infantry also reclaimed Commodore! Reef in a South China Sea from Malaysia.
ASEAN has overcome some-more critical territorial disputes in in in between a neighbours. Indonesia as well as Malaysia went to a International Court of Justice to determine who own Sipadan as well as Ligitan. The ICJ in 2002 awarded a dual islands to Malaysia.
Singapore as well as Malaysia took their territorial disputes for litigation twice. In Sep 2003, for example, Malaysia sought provisional measures from a International Tribunal upon Law of a Sea (ITLOS) during Hamburg upon Singapore's land reclamation in as well as around a Straits of Johor. In May 2008, a ICJ rendered a preference upon Pedra Branca (Pulau Batu Putih). When a Court found which Singapore has sovereignty over Pedra Branca, it brought to a closure a complaint which has been a thorn in a family in in in between both states.
In Feb 1979, Thailand as well as Malaysia concluded to mutually rise a doubtful area in a Gulf of Thailand; similarly, in 1992, Vietnam as well as Malaysia sealed a Memorandum of Understanding to mutually exploit for mineral resources in an overlapping nautical area.
In 2009, Malaysia as well as Vietnam made a corner acquiescence to a United Nations Commission upon a Limits of a Continental Shelf for their continental shelf over 200 nautical miles in a South China Sea. Both corner growth agreements have withstood time as well as right widely separated all parties have been reaping a earnings from their blurb ventures.
Because territories have been sacrosanct, most would have thought which petitioner parties in a South China Sea would come to blows. Malaysia maintains cordial family with a Philippines notwithstanding a Sabah explain as well as a function of a Commodore Reef. Likewise, Malaysia as well as Vietnam have opted for a corner growth plan as well as concluded to postpone their territorial disputes in a South China Sea.
The Scarborough Shoal situation is considerate compared with a territorial problems. The Scarborough Shoal co! rner is in in in between China as well as a Philippines as well as it could be amicably resolved. In 1996, in Manila President Ramos as well as Jang Zemin concluded to postpone their brawl in foster of corner development.
In 1992, Manila inked a ASEAN Declaration upon a South China Sea as well as gave a undertaking which it would finalise all sovereignty as well as jurisdictional issues in a South China Sea by pacific means, without resort to force. In 2005, China as well as a Philippines (later Vietnam) concluded to undertake a short-lived Joint Maritime Seismic Survey (JMSU) in a Palawan nautical area. One authority upon a South China Sea even hailed a Arroyo's presidency as a "golden era" in Manila-Beijing relations.
Failure to qualification a Joint Communiqu is equally considerate if you view ASEAN in a larger geo-strategic as well as geo-economic context. In a light of a brand brand new consensus upon a six- point- beliefs voiced by a ASEAN Foreign Ministers following a Phnom Penh impasse, you should tighten a Cambodian chapter as well as move forward.
Few have removed how ASEAN had overcome a formidable days. One of a most formidable times in ASEAN story was in 1986 when a ASEAN Heads of States summoned their moral strength to attend a third ASEAN limit during Manila after a lapse of 10 years. Credit for reinvigorating a Bangkok declaration during Manila contingency go in particular to President Corazon Aquino for her efforts to get Asean back upon a rail. She bent back to greatfully most ASEAN leaders; she concluded to limited carry out of a airspace over Manila during a summit. She available a little states to send warships to Manila Bay in box something went wrong during a Summit.
Looking back, a 1986 Summit during Manila was ASEAN's branch point; it renewed a spirit of regionalism. And, it was probable partly since of President Corazon's trust in regionalism.
Let us hope which a 21st ASEAN Summit in Nov 2012 during Phnom Penh will not get bogged down with another considerate event. Cambodian Prime Minister Samdech Hun Sen could follow in a footsteps of a late President Corazon Aquino as well as put ASEAN back upon track.
Concluding remarks
New geo-economic dynamics in a Middle East Pacific Region benefaction opportunities for Southeast Asian countries to redefine their relationship with China as well as a US. However, it will take a far larger arrangement of pragmatism as well as realism upon both sides.
Factors opposition closer family include: made during home politics, infantry energy in- balance in a Middle East Pacific segment (complicated by a brand new US process to rebalance a forces to enclose China); Chinese single-handedness to modify a South China Sea in to an inner lake similar to what a US did in a 19th Century in a Caribbean.
Also likely to be warrant to a US-China adversary is a counsel process to confuse jurisdictional emanate (like territorial claims) with rights underneath general law to use a sea (like a freedom of navigation). Topping it all is competing nationalism. Unbridled, it can be a spoiler in progressing law as well as order in a South China Sea.
While I remain bullish upon ASEAN as a informal confidence as well as mercantile organisation, a US-China adversary which comes upon a heel of a Pax Americana in decrease might spell danger; story is replete with stories of powers in decrease misbehaving. As it struggles to keep dominance, as a energy in passing from one to another Pax Americana might rivet in dangerous policies to infer critics wrong. This risk might manifest in a South China Sea. What starts as a bilateral emanate might metamorphose in to larger than a large energy adversary when riv! al power s rivet in proxy wars.
One of a most likely proxies in a dispute is a Philippines, which has been putting vigour upon a US to honour a 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty in in in between a Republic of a Philippines as well as a United States of America. Thus far, a US has been wisely resisting vigour from Manila to plead a Treaty.
It is needed for ASEAN, generally states with overlapping claims in a South China Sea, to anticipate a consequences of US-China rivalry. ASEAN contingency not allow this adversary to criticise a unity.
Read More @ Source August 31, 2012
by Zairil Khir Johari (via e-mail)
Sometimes it takes fresh eyes to notice a obvious, even when it has always been staring us right in a face.
My moment of epiphany came during a Tariq Ramadan harangue in Penang final month. The Oxford enclose was in a surrounded by of expounding upon his house pet subject socio-cultural temperament conflict when he began to curve into a sensitive Malaysian secular debate.
Now, Tariq Ramadan is no stranger to temperament issues. He is, as he describes himself, both a European as well as a Muslim, dual labels which he does not wear loosely. If anything, he is an unashamed Westerner as well as an unapologetic Islamist an oxymoronic concept if a single subscribes to Samuel Huntington's dichotomous paradigm. However, Ramadan has proven which both identities have been not usually reconcilable, though innately compatible. Battling this polemic has been his lifelong raison d'tre, hence it is no surprise which he could rught away recognize as well as have clarity of a patterns of temperament politics in a country.
"Malaysia," Ramadan surmised, "is a multicultural society formed upon mutual mistrust."In a single elementary sentence, he had succinctly framed a Malaysian dilemma. As a realization of his remarks began to set in, Ramadan goes upon to indicate out a underlying source of a nation's malady: "What your nation lacks is a truly thorough inhabitant narrative."
"It is not enough," added a grandson of Hassan Al-Banna, "to be a citizen by law. It is some-more necessary to be partial of a inhabitant account which integrates e! veryone. "
In essence, Ramadan was describing what he viewed to be a nation with 
split, if not divergent, identities. We may all call ourselves Malaysians, though not all of us have been truly embraced as members of a Malaysian nation. This is due to a reality that, over empty sloganeering as well as costly open relations campaigns, a leaders have not unequivocally expended real efforts to qualification a unifying account as well as a usual understanding of what being partial of a Malaysian nation actually equates to as well as entails.
After 55 years of nationhood, a single would think which you would have a transparent thought of what it equates to to be Malaysian. Unfortunately, what you have is a mixture of varying concepts tangible in slight community terms. This was certified to even by a longest-serving prime minister of a nation when he pronounced which a 1 Malaysia slogan combined by this benefaction supervision "clearly equates to conflicting things to conflicting races." This direction can in reality be traced behind to a country's genesis.
August 31, 1957 saw a birth of dual conflicting countries. For a single half of a newly-independent people, a nation was called Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Meanwhile, a alternative half saw it as Malaya. Two names for a single country, as well as both with vastly anomalous connotations. These differences were afterwards institutionalised, ensuing in a precarious incident which you have today, in which there have been a little Malaysians who have been considered to be some-more Malaysian than others.
Now, you do not doubt a motivations behind a crafters of a ! Constitu tion. Certainly, a former colonial masters felt a need to have amends for all their impolitic meddling. After a century as well as a half of exploiting a land, resources as well as people, as well as not to discuss drastically re-engineering a local demography, a little discerning fixes were indispensable to reduce their guilt.
Hence, a Malays (its modern definition being in reality a colonial construct) were constitutionally accorded a "special position" in sequence to protect them from a vast as well as economically some-more developed immigrant population. For a consequence of unity as well as convenience, this was concluded to by all stakeholders, including a non-Malay leaders. Economic equality for a Malays in sell for domestic equality for a non-Malays. At a time, it seemed similar to a best concede for everyone.
However, this arrangement also meant which if inhabitant growth was a race, afterwards a competitors had been lined up confronting conflicting directions. As a race got under approach it was inevitable which a socio-cultural gap would dilate as any raced further as well as further away from a other.
Today, while alternative nations around a universe fastener with globalisation as well as compete for a share of a global economic pie, you have been still stuck in an
anachronistic quagmire. The imperial bequest of sequence as well as rule continues to be a inhabitant ethos. We have been led by race-based domestic parties. Our inhabitant policies have been guided by a secular framework.
Our open tongue revolves around slight socio-cultural issues. We can't even confirm what denunciation should be used to learn a children.We need to pierce over this.
The reality is which scarcely each Malaysian is, at a little in! dicate i n their lineage, of immigrant background. Some have been merely comparison immigrants. To explain or worse, to institutionalise secular supremacy formed upon such lax as well as incomprehensible foundations is disingenuous, especially when a nation has right away constructed three generations of pristine Malaysians. What is indispensable right away is to move all of us together in a usual cause towards a usual destination. To paraphrase Tariq Ramadan, we should no longer ask about where you came from though focus upon where you have been going together.
This is a brand new inhabitant account which is needed. One which enjoins us together as Malaysians; subsequent to prior to a law, cool as citizens as well as collectively contributing towards inhabitant development. But in sequence to grasp this, you have to initial unshackle ourselves from a subjugating chains of secular stratification.
And so, as you celebrate a 55th National Day, you contingency indispensably ask ourselves: do you want to outlay a subsequent 55 years struggling to concede as well as endure a single another, arguing over language, over secular superiority, over who deserves special rights, over who is some-more Malaysian?Or are you prepared to press a reset button?
Read More @ Source August 31, 2012
by Neil Khor@www.malaysiakini.com
COMMENT: In this second partial of my essay in reply to a growing
criticism of Dr Mahathir Mohamad's "devil you know" remarks, Pakatan Rakyat can opposite a BN's war of ideas by describing to Malaysians what sort of supervision you will get post-BN.
Here are five major issues which you goal Pakatan will address as partial of their pass policies.
First, making multitude some-more equitable, yet some-more prepared as great as rival globally. The BN, a Pakatan said, has failed. There have been pockets of wealth, preparation is upon a decline in standards as great as Malaysia is generally not rival if subsidies have been removed.
How will Pakatan improved a BN in creation multitude some-more equitable? Higher spending upon preparation has not worked so long as preparation is not managed rationally as great as with a merit-based complement in place. More importantly, who in a Pakatan will lead this initiative?
Second, race as great as religion will go upon to be thorny issues. More so when joined with economic development or a miss of it, as in a case of certain segments of a Indian Malaysian community.
Cross-Generational poverty
Hindraf leaders have been scold when they ask a BN as great as PR to insist their strategies to alleviate cross-generational misery as great as a compared amicable ills which have plagued certain segments of a Indian Malaysian community. you dare contend which there have been additionally equally critical pockets of misery in Sabah as great as Sarawak.
Ultimately, in effect as great as tolerable policies to understanding with this complaint have to take in to consideration how Malaysia is predicated upon ethnicity as great as eremite divisions.
Inherited from a British, racial categorisation has given climb to racial profiling. This has resulted in certain racial groups getting a severe as great as short-end of a "stick". In what way will Pakatan understanding with this complaint which is some-more a single after another as great as in effect than a BN?
Can Pakatan report these policies as great as how it will safeguard which policies have been ultimately translated in to practice? The BN additionally has a raft of very great policies though they have been not implemented. If a BN's failure is systemic, meaning which a ethnic-based policies have been partial of a problem, what is Pakatan's solution?
Ultimately, a genuine measure of success will be a finish of movements similar to Hindraf, when Malaysians of whatever racial complexion find little need to support ethnic-based affirmative action.
Third, it has to do with a transformation of a Malaysian
economy. There is no doubt which you cannot go upon to rely upon Petronas to subsidise everything from Proton to sugar. We must get productivity up but spending a children's legacy.
Her e, crime is usually a single reason since there is drawn out anger against a BN. But how will Pakatan get to grips with a underlying problem? Malaysia is just not as fit as great as productive as it should be.
Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng will be a initial to discuss it you which there is usually so many cost-cutting measures as great as assets from crime will go. After a honeymoon duration is over, how will Penang pierce brazen in to a post-industrial era?
Services will be a single answer, though how to up standards when three-quarters of a workforce is not properly trained or educated? Penang suffers from a outrageous brain-drain: so, how to spin a situation around as great as emanate brain-gain?
Whatever happens to Penang will happen to Malaysia, solely which Malaysia will not do as well. It was so during a days of trade as great as commerce; as great as it was so during a manufacturing duration where Penang's growth was upon normal 2% points higher than which of Malaysia.
So, here is a complaint which involves both short- as great as long-term policy changes. Can someone in Pakatan greatfully discuss it us how they have been starting to understanding with it? Once again, who will lead a charge?If a 'angel' turns out to be worse?
Next comes a question of BN bequest issues. Pakatan has left to town inventory a raft of BN wrong-doings. From independent power-producers to a judiciary; how will Pakatan overhaul a complement to have certain which a crow is not killed in a routine of reform?
In many countries which knowledge system of administration change for a initial time, there have been two ways which things pan out. First, similar to in Kenya, a "ange! l you do n't know", turns out to be worse than a system of administration you kicked out. It is "our spin to eat" as they contend in Kenya.
With former UMNO elements in PKR, together with Anwar Ibrahim, this is a very genuine concern. Next, things spin really bad prior to they get any better. One sees this in many European countries in a early modern period. Again, how will Pakatan go about instilling fortify among a ranks as great as creation certain which all a members follow a new manners as great as standards it intends to set?
Finally, democratisation is pass to creation certain equipment a single to four have been kept in great order. The BN is right divided you do window dressing, replacing unpleasant laws which umpire particular leisure with ones which have been worse as great as even some-more draconian.
Even a BN's own rank-and-file have been not happy with newly passed legislation. 
Pakatan has highlighted this as great as a miss of internal turn democracy similar to internal elections as partial of it public manifesto, a Buku Jingga.
How will Pakatan go about guaranteeing a freedoms of a own critics but resorting to a law, a courts as great as Police to overpower them? Even if they have been as "extreme" as PERKASA, how will Pakatan understanding with demonstrations, student activism as great as polite multitude movements?
If it reintroduces internal elections as great as a strong antithesis to it emerges, what will Pakatan vouch not to do to have certain which internal elections as great as internal supervision indeed become a third turn of approved representation?
Devolving of energy from Putrajaya
Equally important ! as great as associated to democratisation is a devolving of energy from Putrajaya to a state capitals. This involves giving states some-more incentives to change their budgets as great as putting larger vigour upon non-performing state governments to become some-more efficient.
At a same time, those states which have been you do improved should be rewarded with some-more fiscal autonomy. Will Pakatan have a necessary sacrifices during federal turn to give divided energy to a states?
The five issues above have been all inter-related as great as Pakatan should have a a single after another effort to report how a supervision it leads can do improved than a stream BN upon all these matters. Of course, there is a single thing which Mahathir said, which might be loyal if Pakatan comes to power, a BN might never recover.
This is not so many since Pakatan will make make use of of a management to crush a BN though since a BN is a bloc of convenience. Once energy is removed, a reason for being dissolves. It is not which Pakatan will make make use of of extra-constitutional equates to to forestall a BN from coming back, it is a BN that, but power, will disintegrate.
That is additionally an result which you do not wish for Malaysia. It is most appropriate to keep a two domestic camps alive, competing as great as in perpetual "gratefulness" to a electorate.
If politicians have been all power-hungry as great as hurtful untamed beasts, it is improved to have two groups of thieves jealously guarding against any other, rather than being contingent upon any one. In a end, there have been no angels in politics, just whiter devils.
Part 1: The demon you know
Read More @ Source 
SHARE
AND
DISCUSS
Joshua Shelton, 21, cut off energy to a battery chicken plantation in Maryland, US, depriving a birds of food, water as well as cooling fans, The Sun quoted military as saying.
He right away faces charges of burglary, antagonistic destruction of property as well as trespassing for a final Friday night incident.
According to justice documents, within only fifteen minutes, tens of thousands of chickens across three large poultry houses began to perish in a breathless conditions.
Shelton was found upheld out wearing only a T-shirt as well as boxers in a farm's energy control strew near a tiny town of Delmar in California.
Only 100 surviving chickens could be found of a slaughtered $ 20,000 group a next morning.
August 31, 2012
by Neil Khor@www.malaysiakini.com
COMMENT: In this second partial of my essay in reply to a growing critique of Dr Mahathir Mohamad's "devil we know" remarks, Pakatan Rakyat can counter a BN's fight of ideas by describing to Malaysians what sort of supervision we will get post-BN.
Here are 5 major issues which we goal Pakatan will address as partial of their key policies.
First, making multitude some-more equitable, yet some-more educated as good as rival globally. The BN, a Pakatan said, has failed. There have been pockets of wealth, preparation is upon a decline in standards as good as Malaysia is generally not rival if subsidies have been removed.
How will Pakatan improved a BN in creation multitude some-more equitable? Higher spending upon preparation has not worked so long as preparation is not managed rationally as good as with a merit-based system in place. More importantly, who in a Pakatan will lead this initiative?
Second, race as good as religion will go upon to be thorny issues. More so when joined with economic expansion or a miss of it, as in a case of certain segments of a Indian Malaysian community.
Cross-Generational poverty
Hindraf leaders have been correct when they ask a BN as good as PR to insist their strategies to assuage cross-generational misery as good as a compared amicable ills which have tormented certain segments of a Indian Malaysian community. I dare say which there have been additionally similarly serious pockets of misery in Sabah as good as Sarawak.
Ultimately, in effect as good as sustainable policies to understanding with this complaint have to take in to care how Malaysia is predicated upon ethnicity as good as religious divisions.
Inherited from a British, racial categorisation has since rise to racial profiling. This has resulted in certain racial groups getting a severe as good as short-end of a "stick". In what approach will Pakatan understanding with this complaint which is some-more a single after another as good as in effect than a BN?
Can Pakatan describe these policies as good as how it will ensure which policies have been ultimately translated in to practice? The BN additionally has a raft of unequivocally good policies though they have been not implemented. If a BN's failure is systemic, definition which a ethnic-based policies have been partial of a problem, what is Pakatan's solution?
Ultimately, a genuine measure of success will be a finish of movements similar to Hindraf, when Malaysians of whatever racial complexion find little need to await ethnic-based affirmative action.
Third, it has to do with a transformation of a Malaysian economy. There is no doubt which we cannot go upon to rely upon Petronas to subsidise everything from Proton to sugar. We must get capability up without spending o! ur child ren's legacy.
Here, crime is only a single reason why there is drawn out annoy opposite a BN. But how will Pakatan get to grips with a underlying problem? Malaysia is just not as fit as good as productive as it should be.
Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng will be a initial to discuss it we which there is only so most cost-cutting measures as good as savings from crime will go. After a honeymoon duration is over, how will Penang move brazen in to a post-industrial era?
Services will be a single answer, though how to up standards when three-quarters of a workforce is not scrupulously trained or educated? Penang suffers from a outrageous brain-drain: so, how to spin a situation around as good as create brain-gain?
Whatever happens to Penang will occur to Malaysia, except which Malaysia will not do as well. It was so during a days of trade as good as commerce; as good as it was so during a production duration where Penang's expansion was upon average 2% points aloft than which of Malaysia.
So, here is a complaint which involves both short- as good as long-term process changes. Can someone in Pakatan please discuss it us how they have been going to understanding with it? Once again, who will lead a charge?If a 'angel' turns out to be worse?
Next comes a question of BN legacy issues. Pakatan has left to locale inventory a raft of BN wrong-doings. From independent power-producers to a judiciary; how will Pakatan renovate a system to have certain which a goose is not killed in a process of reform?
In many countries which knowledge system of administration shift for a initial time, there have been dual ways which things pan out.! First, similar to in Kenya, a "angel we don't know", turns out to be worse than a system of administration we kicked out. It is "our spin to eat" as they say in Kenya.
With former UMNO elements in PKR, including Anwar Ibrahim, this is a unequivocally genuine concern. Next, things spin unequivocally bad before they get any better. One sees this in many European countries in a early complicated period. Again, how will Pakatan go about instilling discipline among a ranks as good as creation certain which all a members follow a brand new rules as good as standards it intends to set?
Finally, democratisation is key to creation certain equipment a single to four have been kept in good order. The BN is right divided we do window dressing, replacing odious laws which umpire particular leisure with ones which have been worse as good as even some-more draconian.
Even a BN's own rank-and-file have been not happy with newly upheld legislation. Pakatan has highlighted this as good as a miss of internal turn democracy similar to internal elections as partial of it public manifesto, a Buku Jingga.
How will Pakatan go about guaranteeing a freedoms of a own critics without resorting to a law, a courts as good as Police to overpower them? Even if they have been as "extreme" as PERKASA, how will Pakatan understanding with demonstrations, student activism as good as civil multitude movements?
If it reintroduces internal elections as good as a strong opposition to it emerges, what will Pakatan vouch not to do to have certain which internal elections as good as internal supervision truly turn a third turn of democratic representation?
Devolving of energy from Putraja! ya
Equally critical as good as associated to democratisation is a devolving of energy from Putrajaya to a state capitals. This involves giving states some-more incentives to change their budgets as good as putting larger vigour upon non-performing state governments to turn some-more efficient.
At a same time, those states which have been we do improved should be rewarded with some-more mercantile autonomy. Will Pakatan have a required sacrifices during sovereign turn to give divided energy to a states?
The 5 issues upon top of have been all inter-related as good as Pakatan should have a a single after another bid to describe how a supervision it leads can do improved than a stream BN upon all these matters. Of course, there is a single thing which Mahathir said, which might be true if Pakatan comes to power, a BN might never recover.
This is not so most because Pakatan will make use of a management to vanquish a BN though because a BN is a bloc of convenience. Once energy is removed, a reason for being dissolves. It is not which Pakatan will make use of extra-constitutional means to prevent a BN from coming back, it is a BN that, without power, will disintegrate.
That is additionally an outcome which we do not wish for Malaysia. It is most appropriate to keep a dual political camps alive, competing as good as in perpetual "gratefulness" to a electorate.
If politicians have been all power-hungry as good as corrupt untamed beasts, it is improved to have dual groups of thieves envy guarding opposite any other, rather than being contingent upon any one. In a end, there have been no angels in politics, just whiter devils.
Part 1: The devil we know
Read More @ Source
By R Kengadharan
By S JayasankaranDomestic direct continues to be Malaysias expansion storyGrowth in a second entertain of 2012 surged by an astonishing 5.4 per cent from a year ago contra a revised 4.9 per cent in a previous entertain as well as violence all a streets expectations of 4.3 per cent.The Financial Times called it gravity defying. Such adjectives might not be unnoticed as a total universe is struggling to regulate to formidable economic times. Indeed, Malaysia has outstripped a neighbours in a expansion stakes, a monument during any time.Whats clear is that Prime Minister Najib Razaks giveaway programme is working. Couple that to his Econom! ic Trans formation Programme as well as a results have been a revelation.Granted that a former is an choosing kicker though a latter, that has been at large regarded with skepticism, might nonetheless absolve him.The generous government hand-outs as well as stronger investment spending underneath a ETP has obviously helped to progress growth. Domestic direct increasing by a whopping 13.8 per cent from 9.7 per cent in a previous quarter. Investment spending rose massively: 26.1 per cent from 16.1 per cent in a initial entertain whilst government spending stretched by 9.4 per cent opposite 7.3 per cent in a previous quarter.Unsurprisingly, exports were down, flourishing usually 2.1 per cent from almost 3 per cent previously. But private spending some-more than done up for it.Almost all sectors chipped in.Growth was led by building a total (22.2 per cent versus15.5 per cent previously). Services grew by 6.3 per cent and, even, manufacturing stretched by 5.6 per cent.Mining expansion rebounded (2.3 per cent contra 0.3 per cent in a initial quarter) upon aloft wanton oil output, whilst usually expansion in a cultivation shred contracted ( reduction 4.7 per cent) due to lower wanton palm oil production.Clearly, people were spending. That was supported by "firm labor marketplace conditions, robust income expansion as well as improved consumer sentiment", to quote a central bank.Mr Najib has staked his electoral chances by spending as well as spending big. Hes since handouts to a bad as well as hes raised civil use salaries whilst embarking upon some of a many ambitious infrastructure programmes in a countrys history. Its a risky gamble as a rating agencies have been breathing down his neck. But a been! so dist ant so good with a deficit, as well as debt as a suit to gross done during home product, disappearing as expansion balloons.Economists are raising Malaysias expansion forecasts for a year. The Bank of America-Merrill Lynch raised a 2012 GDP foresee to 4.7 per cent (from 4.2 per cent) simply formed upon a countrys second entertain performance.And a central bank seems quire sanguine about a total thing. Bank Negara expects a strong support supposing by done during home direct to be postulated starting forward, "although downside risks emanating from outmost developments remain".Inflation remains, during 1.4 per cent, a lowest in a long time. The trick for Mr Najib is to interpret these feel good factors into realpolitik. That is, of course simpler pronounced than done, though there is talk that he might opt for a full tenure that equates to April next year.But many people are tired of a continuous politicking. Perhaps a premier should wait for no longer as well as call a general choosing sooner rsther than than later.
