
Big Dog, uninformed from ketupat as well as rendang during a Johor Istana, warns a Pengerang authorities of a need to ward off a Phantoms of Pengerang and keep a people sensitive as well as not make a same mistakes a authorities during Lynas did.
August 22, 2012
www.thestar.com.my
A recent book by an Asian spectator of Asian societies breathes new hold up in to some old(er) ideas.
I SPENT most of the 1990s presumably essay or reading about the Asian Values debate. It's tough to suppose now, yet in the years leading up to the 1997 monetary crisis, books by Pakistan's Muhammad Iqbal as well as Iran's Ali Shariati, not to mention the really own Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as well as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, were tip of my reading list.
So, it was with the degree of fear which you first picked up Pankaj Mishra's latest book: From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt Against the West as well as the Remaking of Asia. Fearing the repeat of those tiresome, discredited arguments, you turned the pages warily.
However, Pankaj's spritely comment of turn-of-the-century Asian intellectual hold up approaches the subject from an exactly some-more exciting vantage point. For the start, he starts with an comment of the Battle of Tsushima in May 1905 of the Russo-Japanese War.
Over the century ago, the outcome seemed the foregone conclusion. How could the Japanese presumably strike the perfect might of Imperial Russia? Everything seemed to foster the Europeans as they systematically subjugated the Asiatic world.
However, as well as roughly unbelievably, Admiral Togo's fleet was to emerge victorious. In the single fell swoop, Korea, Ma! nchuria as well as most of the western Pacific were to become an extension of Japanese energy setting in motion the series of events culminating with the nuclear attacks upon Hiroshima as well as Nagasaki 40 years later.
Nonetheless, Japan's victory was additionally to have an fast stroke intellectually across Asia galvanising the generation. Men such as the Iranian-born pan-Islamist Jamal Al-Din Al-Afghani, Liang Qichao of China as well as the Indian Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore, the arch protagonists of Pankaj's book, had witnessed their civilisations continue the period of degrading defeats.
For them as well as others Sun Yat Sen, Ataturk (then well known as Mustapha Kemal) as well as Nehru Tsushima brought hope. It authorised them to suppose what their peoples were able of if they embarked (like the Japanese) upon the tour of political as well as economic transformation.
Interestingly, in an era long prior to the advent of mass democracy, all 3 group recognised which cordial (and maybe despotic) care was vicious in order to achieve governmental shift volatile sufficient to repel the Europeans.
Uttar Pradesh-born as well as Allahabad-trained Pankaj Mishra has constructed the remarkable book something which you were striving for back in the 90's yet never produced.
From the Ruins of Empire is radically an Eastern canon of political thought linking Indian, Chinese as well as Arab/Muslim total as well as ideas. Pankaj (right) reveals how their responses to the indignity of colonialism were to figure their future nation-states.
This heir of V.S. Naipaul's layer is in actuality really identical to his 3 selected subjects. Growing up upon the diet of the American critic Edmund Wilson, Pankaj is himself the firm follower in the energy of ideas as well as it's th! is joini ng to intellectualism (unlike Dr Mahathir as well as Anwar Ibrahim who trusted in raw power) which propels his narrative.
Moreover, as the world-class person arriving as well as essayist, Pankaj's writings have the sure contemporary resonance. He traces the skein of ideas, identical to the expansion of Wahhabism as well as the intermingling with specifically Egyptian experiences of Hassan al-Banna as well as Sayyid Qutb the process which was to lead to the quick globalisation of Wahhabi thought.
At the same time, Pankaj's contingent were conscious which the blind adoption of Western modes would rob Asia of the informative heritage as well as turn the Occident's vices in to the own.
Each of the group sought the "middle-path", job upon their societies to equip themselves with modern scholarship as well as thinking yet to reject the grosser aspects of Western modernity with greater informative confidence.
Sadly, all 3 group were to be grievously disappointed. Whilst they sought to find an acceptable compromise in between East as well as West, they were not to live to see any of their ideas come to fruition, on top of which their intransigence was to come during good personal cost.
Al-Afghani, arguably the father of political Islam, lived the hold up of constant re-invention. Dying in obscurity, this latter-day "Scarlet Pimpernel" was to charity his focus upon normal Muslim elites, most of whom abandoned his call for the pan-Islamic revival.
Liang, whose reformist activities made him the longed for man in Qing dynasty China, wound up the Confucian regressive arguing after the disillusioning outing to America which "the Chinese people contingency for right away accept authoritarian rule; they cannot enjoy freedom."
Even Tagore's calls for Asia to say the cultures was violently deserted by revolutionary-minded thinkers (including the immature Mao Zedong) during his lecture tours! of Chin a, the preface to the mortal Cultural Revolution.
Their failures are warnings for Asian leaders today. As Pankaj argues in his glorious Epilogue, China as well as India have right away unthinkingly paid for in to the gospels of globalised capitalism which "looks set to create reservoirs of nihilistic fury as well as beating among hundreds of millions of have-nots."
Pankaj's book is as the result not some uncomplicated paean to "Asian values." He warns which you Asians should not gloat over the West's decline as well as the prosperity.
Rather, the disaster of the chosen to, in Pankaj's words, forge the "convincingly universalist response to Western ideas of politics as well as economy, even yet the latter seem increasingly febrile as well as dangerously unsuited in large parts of the world" condemns us to repeat the mistakes of the West.
This is the auspicious book which cannot be abandoned by Asia moving forward. How you instruct Pankaj had written it all those years ago. It would have saved me the lot of effort.
August 22, 2012
LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) Fareed Zakaria, the Time Magazine Editor-at-Large as well as CNN horde who not long ago admitted to plagiarism, resigned from his in front of upon Yale University's house to reevaluate his veteran life, the Yale spokesman told TheWrap.
In the letter to Yale President Richard Levin, Zakaria the Yale alumnus pronounced he planned to concentration upon his work in the wake of the piracy exploration which raised questions about the sincerity of the distinguished reporter's vast oeuvre of journalism.
"I am reexamining my veteran hold up as well as I have recognized that, in order to concentration upon the core of my work, I will have to strew the little of my alternative responsibilities," Zakaria wrote in the letter, performed by TheWrap. "My service during Yale is the singular largest commitment of time, appetite as well as attention outward of my letter as well as television work."
Time as well as CNN briefly dangling Zakaria this month for light paragraphs from the New Yorker letter about gun control as well as re-purposing them, almost verbatim, in his Time column.
Yale additionally launched the examination of Zakaria's in front of upon the house final week, but which process was curtailed after the journalist's resignation."My colleagues as well as I have been deeply beholden for Fareed Zakaria's inexhaustible grant of time as well as service to the Yale Corporation these past 6 years," Levin pronounced in the make a difference to TheWrap. "His penetrating intelligence as well as extended knowledge of universe affairs have enlightened the di! scussion s, as well as his appearances upon campus have benefited the students as well as faculty. We will miss him as the colleague, the contributor as well as the friend."
But final week, both news outlets pronounced they found no alternative instances of plagiarism, termed the make a difference an "isolated incident" as well as backed Zakaria. He is expected to return to CNN upon Sunday, Aug 26.
August 22, 2012
www.thestar.com.my
A recent book by an Asian observer of Asian societies breathes brand new hold up in to some old(er) ideas.
I SPENT many of the 1990s either essay or reading about the Asian Values debate. It's hard to suppose now, yet in the years heading up to the 1997 monetary crisis, books by Pakistan's Muhammad Iqbal as well as Iran's Ali Shariati, not to mention the really own Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as well as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, were tip of my reading list.
So, it was with the degree of dismay which you first picked up Pankaj Mishra's latest book: From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt Against the West as well as the Remaking of Asia. Fearing the repeat of those tiresome, discredited arguments, you turned the pages warily.
However, Pankaj's spritely comment of turn-of-the-century Asian intellectual hold up approaches the subject from an altogether more exciting vantage point. For the start, he starts with an comment of the Battle of Tsushima in May 1905 of the Russo-Japanese War.
Over the century ago, the outcome seemed the foregone conclusion. How could the Japanese presumably strike the perfect competence of Imperial Russia? Everything seemed to favour the Europeans as they systematically subjugated the Asiatic world.
However, as well as roughly unbelievably, Admiral Togo's quick was to arise victorious. In the singl! e fell s woop, Korea, Manchuria as well as many of the western Pacific were to spin an prolongation of Japanese energy setting in motion the series of events culminating with the nuclear attacks upon Hiroshima as well as Nagasaki 40 years later.
Nonetheless, Japan's victory was also to have an enduring impact intellectually opposite Middle East galvanising the generation. Men such as the Iranian-born pan-Islamist Jamal Al-Din Al-Afghani, Liang Qichao of China as well as the Indian Nobel Laureate Rabindranath Tagore, the arch protagonists of Pankaj's book, had witnessed their civilisations endure the succession of degrading defeats.
For them as well as others Sun Yat Sen, Ataturk (then known as Mustapha Kemal) as well as Nehru Tsushima brought hope. It allowed them to suppose what their peoples were capable of if they embarked (like the Japanese) upon the journey of domestic as well as economic transformation.
Interestingly, in an epoch prolonged prior to the advent of mass democracy, all 3 group recognised which enlightened (and maybe despotic) care was critical in order to achieve governmental change volatile sufficient to repel the Europeans.
Uttar Pradesh-born as well as Allahabad-trained Pankaj Mishra has constructed the remarkable book something which you were striving for back in the 90's yet never produced.
From the Ruins of Empire is radically an Eastern canon of domestic suspicion linking Indian, Chinese as well as Arab/Muslim figures as well as ideas. Pankaj (right) reveals how their responses to the ignominy of colonialism were to shape their future nation-states.
This successor of V.S. Naipaul's layer is in fact really identical to his 3 selected subjects. Growing up upon the diet of the American censor Edmund Wilson, Pankaj is himsel! f the or ganisation believer in the energy of ideas as well as it's this joining to intellectualism (unlike Dr Mahathir as well as Anwar Ibrahim who trusted in tender power) which propels his narrative.
Moreover, as the world-class person arriving as well as essayist, Pankaj's papers have the sure ? la mode resonance. He traces the skein of ideas, similar to the expansion of Wahhabism as well as the intermingling with privately Egyptian experiences of Hassan al-Banna as well as Sayyid Qutb the process which was to lead to the quick globalisation of Wahhabi thought.
At the same time, Pankaj's trio were conscious which the blind adoption of Western modes would sack Middle East of the informative heritage as well as spin the Occident's vices in to the own.
Each of the group sought the "middle-path", job upon their societies to supply themselves with complicated scholarship as well as thinking yet to reject the grosser aspects of Western modernity with larger informative confidence.
Sadly, all 3 group were to be grievously disappointed. Whilst they sought to find an acceptable concede between East as well as West, they were not to live to see any of their ideas come to fruition, besides which their intransigence was to come at great personal cost.
Al-Afghani, arguably the father of domestic Islam, lived the hold up of constant re-invention. Dying in obscurity, this latter-day "Scarlet Pimpernel" was to rue his focus upon normal Muslim elites, many of whom abandoned his call for the pan-Islamic revival.
Liang, whose reformist activities made him the longed for man in Qing dynasty China, wound up the Confucian regressive arguing after the disillusioning outing to America which "the Chinese people must for right away accept authoritarian rule; they cannot suffer freedom."
Even Tagore's calls for Middle East to maintain the cultures was violently rejected by revolutionary-minded thinkers (! includin g the young Mao Zedong) during his harangue tours of China, the preface to the destructive Cultural Revolution.
Their failures have been warnings for Asian leaders today. As Pankaj argues in his glorious Epilogue, China as well as India have right away unthinkingly bought in to the gospels of globalised capitalism which "looks set to create reservoirs of nihilistic rage as well as beating among hundreds of millions of have-nots."
Pankaj's book is hence not some uncomplicated paean to "Asian values." He warns which you Asians should not swank over the West's decline as well as the prosperity.
Rather, the failure of the chosen to, in Pankaj's words, shape metal the "convincingly universalist response to Western ideas of politics as well as economy, even yet the latter seem increasingly febrile as well as dangerously unsuited in large tools of the world" condemns us to repeat the mistakes of the West.
This is the prophetic book which cannot be abandoned by Middle East relocating forward. How you instruct Pankaj had written it all those years ago. It would have saved me the lot of effort.
Read More @ SourceAugust 22, 2012
LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) Fareed Zakaria, a Time Magazine Editor-at-Large as well as CNN horde who recently certified to plagiarism, resigned from his position upon Yale University's house to reevaluate his professional life, a Yale orator told TheWrap.
In a letter to Yale President Richard Levin, Zakaria a Yale alumnus pronounced he planned to concentration upon his work in a arise of a piracy exploration which lifted questions about a veracity of a prominent reporter's vast oeuvre of journalism.
"I am reexamining my professional hold up as well as I have recognized that, in order to concentration upon a core of my work, I will have to strew a little of my alternative responsibilities," Zakaria wrote in a letter, performed by TheWrap. "My use during Yale is a singular largest joining of time, energy as well as attention outside of my letter as well as television work."
Time as well as CNN briefly suspended Zakaria this month for lifting paragraphs from a New Yorker letter about gun carry out as well as re-purposing them, almost verbatim, in his Time column.
Yale additionally launched a examination of Zakaria's position upon a house last week, but which process was curtailed after a journalist's resignation.
"My colleagues as well as I have been deeply beholden for Fareed Zakaria's generous contribution of time as well as use to a Yale Corporation these past 6 years," Levin pronounced in a matter to TheWrap. "His penetrating intelligence as well as extended believe of universe affairs have enlightened our discussions, as well as his a! ppearanc es upon campus have benefited our students as well as faculty. We will miss him as a colleague, a writer as well as a friend."
But last week, both news outlets pronounced they found no alternative instances of plagiarism, termed a matter an "isolated incident" as well as reinstated Zakaria. He is approaching to return to CNN upon Sunday, August 26.
Read More @ SourceAugust 21, 2012
Comment: I have been understanding of a Bruno Manser Fund's efforts to bring a predicament of a Penans as well as other natives in Sarawak to a attention.
But when it comes to a Olympic Bronze Medalist Pandelela Rinong Pamg, a Fund is greedy to suggest her not to accept a prerogative for her achievement. I think she should accept a endowment for dual reasons. First, it is an endowment from a State, not Pehin Sri Taib Mahmud himself. The Chief Minister made a oath upon interest of Sarawakians who are of course unapproachable of her achievement. It is wise that her own state recognizes this immature as well as humble lass. Second, she should not be drawn into politics as she is a sports personality.
Leave her alone. So Rinong, greatfully accept a endowment from your state as well as use a money for your preparation in a United States or elsewhere where you can be exposed to competitive sports whilst you earn your degree. Prepare yourself well for RIO2016, as well as might you win Gold.Din Merican
www.malaysiakini.com
Swiss Human Rights organisation Bruno Manser Fund (BMF) has urged Sarawakian Olympic medallist Pandelela Rinong Pamg not to accept any rewards from Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud, citing concerns of "political manipulation".
"We call upon Pandelela not to let herself be politically manipulated as well as suggest her to politely turn down Taib's 'special gift'," review BMF's statement yesterday.
The arch minister had reportedly betrothed a present shortly after she had won ! a bronze medal during a Women's 10-metre diving eventuality upon August 10, creation her a initial Malaysian womanlike Olympic medalist.
Without disclosing a nature of a gift, Taib was quoted saying that he would prerogative her after he had met her. Pandelela reportedly arrived during Kuching International Airport earlier today.
"Taib has abused his domestic power as well as done more mistreat to Sarawak's inland peoples than any other Malaysian politician.
"He lacks a dignified legitimacy to make a special present to an outstanding Bidayuh champion like Pandelela," BMF pronounced in a statement today, pointing to allegations that Taib had supposedly abused his power by granting logging concessions to his family members, who collectively are additionally stakeholders in some 400 companies.
BMF has played a vital role in highlighting Taib's purported wrongdoings, including a on top of allegations.
"It is feared that Taib is formulation to abuse Pandelela's Olympic success to progress his own dwindling popularity.
"The only present Pandelela should accept from Taib is his resignation as arch minister, that would be a relief to a whole of Sarawak." a NGO added.
August 21, 2012
ONE denote which Malaysia's place in a universe would shift drastically underneath Datuk Seri (now Tun) Dr Mahathir Mohamad came early, as a United States Ambassador in Kuala Lumpur done a courtesy call upon a newly installed Prime Minister. The ambassador cheerfully sensitive him that, yet it was not easy, he was making arrangements for Dr Mahathir to encounter with President Ronald Reagan in Washington.
Although an assembly with a Leader of a Free World was a imprimatur sought by a head of roughly each non-communist government, "I didn't wish to have anything to do with America", Dr Mahathir said later. He told his Foreign Ministry to discuss it a Ambassador which he would not revisit a US anytime soon.
It was not so much which Dr Mahathir was anti-American, yet a executive strand in his general opinion "I was deliberately opposite people who swing a large stick" ensured he would clash often with a US.
It was some-more a case of Dr Mahathir being sceptical of a West in general, as well as some-more than a little miffed by a Ambassador's assumption which Malaysia would do what was expected of it. The disaster to acknowledge Malaysia's eccentric standing was a cardinal impiety in Dr Mahathir's book, an affront to him, a Malays as well as a entire nation.
"The large countries take you for granted, sometimes demeanour upon you with disdain", whilst tiny countries "appreciate a friendship" more, he said.
With an instinct of sympathy for a underdog, whilst seeking respect and ! retaliat ing opposite anyone perceived to have given offence, Dr Mahathir repositioned Malaysia, forging a some-more eccentric as well as romantic unfamiliar policy.
A tiny nation in a distant dilemma of a world, Malaysia punched upon top of a weight, appropriation many of a attributes of a middle power.
It was driven hard as well as roughly solo by Dr Mahathir, who refused to cgange his disintegrating as well as outspoken style for a consequence of tactful etiquette. More than any pick non-Western domestic leader of his time, wrote domestic scientist Johan Saravanamuttu, Dr Mahathir proved to be "the quintessential fomenter of universe politics".
In essence, Dr Mahathir was continuing a nationalistic line in Malaysian unfamiliar policy, which he aggressively makeshift as well as pugnaciously delivered, which could be traced to a 1969 secular riots, when pro-British Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman effectively lost power.
Tunku's rivals who took over set about carving out a distinctive purpose for a nation in general affairs. Confident which Malaysia's domestic maturity as well as standing fit a some-more eccentric countenance in a general arena, a post-1970 care sought approval as well as acceptance as an equal.
Dr Mahathir, never a single to do anything by halves, came close to perfectionist it. The countries which found it hardest to regulate to a shift were those prone to demeanour back nostalgically to a Tunku years, generally Britain as well as Australia.
Often correcting march melodramatically, Dr Mahathir used unfamiliar process to expostulate a growth of Malaysia, regularly his executive design enlivening exports, opening brand new markets, securing unfamiliar investment, appropriation record as well as finding opportunities for Malaysian entrepreneurs to invest in building countries.
Nevertheless, he imposed sanctions upon Britain to remind a former colonial master, as well as a traditionally Anglophile Malaysian elite, which a master-servant day! s were p rolonged gone. Extolling "Asian values", he clashed with a Australians, dogmatic them too deficient in manners as well as pale of skin to join Asian institutions.
He cursed a US for attempting to levy a complement of liberal democracy as well as neo-liberal economics upon ill-prepared building countries. In seeking east to Japan, Dr Mahathir found an pick growth model which did not seek to export unwanted values along with a products as well as capital.
Blunt as well as seemingly fearless, Dr Mahathir targeted a general economic system, which he believed was fraudulent in favour of a industrialised West which devised it, to a crippling waste of poor countries.
Taking up a means of all victimised economies, he voiced a criticisms which others dared not complete as well as became a spokesman for a Third World.Along a way, he added a plight of a Palestinians as well as pick high-profile Islamic causes to his portfolio, making himself a hero to Muslims from Pakistan to Gaza as well as Bosnia.
With his credit anchored in a clever mercantile opening whilst maintaining peace in a multi-ethnic, Muslim-majority society, a peripatetic Dr Mahathir rebuked a West as well as preached tellurian restructuring. Conferring with overseas leaders as naturally as he once done house-calls upon ill farmers in Kedah, he put Malaysia upon a map as well as gave most Malaysians a reason to take honour in a country.
In his memoirs, Dr Mahathir summed up his opening colourfully as well as with viewable satisfaction. "Some say to be a large frog in a tiny pool is no great achievement, though we have proven which even a little frog in a large pool can ride a nose at a largest, most powerful toad."
The upon top of excerpt is from a second edition of Malaysian Maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in Turbulent Times, with b! rand new references to A Doctor in a House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad
August 21, 2012
ONE indication which Malaysia's place in a universe would change drastically under Datuk Seri (now Tun) Dr Mahathir Mohamad came early, as a United States Ambassador in Kuala Lumpur done a courtesy call upon a newly commissioned Prime Minister. The ambassador cheerfully sensitive him that, yet it was not easy, he was creation arrangements for Dr Mahathir to encounter with President Ronald Reagan in Washington.
Although an audience with a Leader of a Free World was a imprimatur sought by a head of roughly every non-communist government, "I didn't want to have anything to do with America", Dr Mahathir pronounced later. He told his Foreign Ministry to discuss it a Ambassador which he would not visit a US anytime soon.
It was not so many which Dr Mahathir was anti-American, yet a central strand in his ubiquitous outlook "I was upon purpose opposite people who swing a large stick" ensured he would clash often with a US.
It was some-more a box of Dr Mahathir being distrustful of a West in general, as good as some-more than a small miffed by a Ambassador's arrogance which Malaysia would do what was approaching of it. The failure to acknowledge Malaysia's independent standing was a cardinal sin in Dr Mahathir's book, an affront to him, a Malays as good as a entire nation.
"The large countries take we for granted, infrequently demeanour upon we with disdain", whilst tiny countries "appreciate a friendship" more, he said.
With an instinct of magnetism for a underdog, whilst seeking apply oneself and retaliating opposite anyone viewed to have since offence, Dr Mahathir repositioned Malaysia, forging a some-more independent as good as romantic unfamiliar policy.
A tiny nation in a distant dilemma of a world, Malaysia punched upon top of a weight, acquiring many of a attributes of a middle power.
It was driven hard as good as roughly solo by Dr Mahathir, who refused to cgange his abrasive as good as outspoken style for a sake of tactful etiquette. More than any other non-Western domestic leader of his time, wrote domestic scientist Johan Saravanamuttu, Dr Mahathir proved to be "the quintessential fomenter of universe politics".
In essence, Dr Mahathir was stability a patriotic line in Malaysian unfamiliar policy, which he aggressively makeshift as good as pugnaciously delivered, which could be traced to a 1969 secular riots, when pro-British Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman effectively mislaid power.
Tunku's rivals who took over set about figure out a distinctive purpose for a nation in ubiquitous affairs. Confident which Malaysia's domestic majority as good as standing justified a some-more independent countenance in a ubiquitous arena, a post-1970 leadership sought recognition as good as acceptance as an equal.
Dr Mahathir, never a single to do anything by halves, came close to perfectionist it. The countries which found it hardest to adjust to a change were those prone to demeanour back nostalgically to a Tunku years, generally Britain as good as Australia.
Often correcting march melodramatically, Dr Mahathir used unfamiliar process to expostulate a growth of Malaysia, regularly his central design encouraging exports, opening brand new markets, securing unfamiliar investment, acquiring technology as good as finding opportunities for Malaysian entrepreneurs to deposit in building countries.
Nevertheless, he imposed sanctions upon Britain to remind a former colonial master, as good as a traditiona! lly Angl ophile Malaysian elite, which a master-servant days were prolonged gone. Extolling "Asian values", he clashed with a Australians, dogmatic them too deficient in manners as good as dark of skin to stick upon Asian institutions.
He cursed a US for attempting to impose a complement of liberal democracy as good as neo-liberal economics upon ill-prepared building countries. In seeking east to Japan, Dr Mahathir found an alternative growth indication which did not find to export unwanted values along with a products as good as capital.
Blunt as good as seemingly fearless, Dr Mahathir targeted a ubiquitous economic system, which he believed was rigged in foster of a industrialised West which devised it, to a crippling disadvantage of bad countries.
Taking up a cause of all victimised economies, he voiced a criticisms which others dared not complete as good as became a spokesman for a Third World.Along a way, he combined a plight of a Palestinians as good as other high-profile Islamic causes to his portfolio, creation himself a hero to Muslims from Pakistan to Gaza as good as Bosnia.
With his credit anchored in a strong mercantile performance whilst progressing peace in a multi-ethnic, Muslim-majority society, a peripatetic Dr Mahathir rebuked a West as good as preached global restructuring. Conferring with abroad leaders as of course as he once done house-calls upon ill farmers in Kedah, he put Malaysia upon a map as good as gave many Malaysians a reason to take pride in a country.
In his memoirs, Dr Mahathir summed up his performance colourfully as good as with obvious satisfaction. "Some say to be a large frog in a tiny pool is no good achievement, but we have proven which even a small frog in a large pool can ride a nose at a largest, many powerful toad."
The upon to! p of exc erpt is from a second book of Malaysian Maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in Turbulent Times, with brand new references to A Doctor in a House: The Memoirs of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad