Judges regulate over cases that they upon purpose draw towards upon for years as good as then, upon the day of judgment, deliver the verdict of 'acquittal as good as discharge' in the couple of minutes.
COMMENT
When someone lodges the complaint opposite crime as good as corruption but is subsequently abandoned by the slew of lawful bodies, including the courts, what else is the man to do? Take the law into his own hands?
The shoe-throwing imam Hoslan Hussein is being punished, for the third time, for perplexing to do his open duty.
Another shameful aspect about this situation is that his shoe-throwing has shocked the comparatively pliable as good as timid Malaysian open who are ignoring the reasons for his starting to court.
In essence, the open are behaving only as badly as the judiciary. The law only wants to silence Hoslan. The shoe-throwing has dreaming us from the corruption he was perplexing to disclose in court.
If you were to understand his angst, afterwards some-more of us competence await him as good as his reasons for starting to court, rsther than than voice await for throwing his shoe during the symbol of government, only because we, too, are undone with the authorities.
The Chief Judge of Malaya Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin claimed that the grace of the probity would be redeemed only if the unbending custodial sentence were meted out upon Hoslan for throwing his shoes during 3 Federal Court judges upon Feb 22.
The probity of open opinion disagrees with Zulkefli.
Ever given former budding minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad stripped the law of its independence, our courts ! have bee n reduced to puppets dancing to the tune of their domestic masters. Will probity be accessible for anyone?
Zulkefli pronounced that Hoslan will be able to reflect upon his actions during his incarceration. Zulkefli competence similar to to consider that if judges liberated their duties but fright or favour, the rakyat competence trust as good as respect them.
Despite claims that he gimlet no grudges opposite Hoslan, Zulkefli's oppressive visualisation only shows his vindictiveness. The arch decider contingency be aware that Hoslan is substantially the breadwinner with the wife as good as seven children, as good as his aged parents to take caring of.
More to the point, Zulkefli is treating the symptom as good as not the "disease" itself; the "disease" being the manner in that probity is dispensed, by the corrupted judiciary.
Hoslan's knowledge is normal for any Malaysian starting through the Malaysian authorised system. It is an expensive, painful as good as long-drawn-out experience. The probity dispensed is laughable as good as an annoyance for the country.
Zulkefli pronounced that Hoslan had scandalised the probity with his disorderly conduct: "A scurrilous attack upon the presiding judges to show his disappointment as good as disgust during the decision, that was unfavourable to him, is obviously an affront to the forthrightness of the judges of the peak probity as good as to the law as an institution."
Without fright or favour
Zulkefli should consider the views of the lawyer as good as MP, M Manogaran, upon the disappointment of litigants with the courts.
Manogaran said, "Wh! at is wr ong with judges extenuation or fluctuating some-more time, after all he [Hoslan] was not represented. The probity contingency allot probity to the people, that is what the open expects them to do. Judges are tasked with dispensing probity but fright or favour."
"Courts contingency not function as the corporate body in hurrying to dispose of justice. 'Stop the monkeying' upon the bench. They are making the mockery of the probity system."
Hoslan, the former imam during the Al-Rahimah Mosque in Kampung Pandan, had made countless complaints about corruption as good as abuse of power during the Ar Rahimah mosque in Kampung Pandan. He approached the police as good as the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). Both abandoned him. Instead, he was evicted from the mosque.
Mahathir additionally stripped the mosques of their independence. Under Mahathir, sermons frequency lonesome community issues but were vehicles for Umno's domestic messages. The captive Muslim audiences still dare not criticism about these domestic sermons.
Hoslan's problems substantially started when he refused to review the stipulated khutbah (sermons) as compulsory by the Federal Territory Islamic Affairs Council (MAIWP).
In the lead-up to Bersih 2.0 final year, the Friday oration during his mosque advised the people not to attend the rally. Hoslan claims that when he listened this, he carried his robe in protest, as good as showed the congregation his yellow Bersih T-shirt.
Hoslan claimed, too, that Umno is allegedly manipulating MAIWP during the back of the scenes, to have him removed.
He told an online news portal that the single of the abuses he stumbled upon was the alleged payment of the monthly price by the eminent restaurant, to the mosque cabinet member who authorized the restaurant's use of land belonging to the mosque. The mosque cabinet did not receive any of this money.
When Hoslan was called up to the 3 judges in the Federal Cour! t final month, he suspicion that his claims of corruption as good as abuse of funds would eventually be heard.
Hoslan told the mainstream paper, "I suspicion the slightest they could do was listen to my defence as this is my final lifeline to eventually get out of this disaster we was in.
"To my surprise, my interest was rejected, only similar to that, but them reading it. we was really angry as good as disappointed."
Anyone in Hoslan's shoes would be livid. Instead of carrying his box heard, he was afterwards accused of indiscipline as good as warding off to review from the stipulated oration as compulsory by MAIWP.
Ridiculous statements
When passing sentence upon Hoslan, the Chief Judge of Malaya said, "Such the serious as good as deliberate attack has obviously undermined the grace as good as management of this court, that cannot as good as contingency not be condoned."
The judges have undermined the grace of the courts in most cases, such as MAS versus its former arch Tajuddin Ramli, as good as Zambry Abdul Kadir vs Nizar Jamaluddin. The list goes on: the VK Lingam case, Sodomy I, Sodomy II, the Port Klang Free Trade Zone
In the some-more new Langkawi R&D Academy Sdn Bhd case, the Court of Appeal decider had called for witnesses to testify, afterwards called off the hearing during the final minute.
We have the ridiculous statement by the decider in the Altantuya case, that ".motive, although relevant, has never been essential to consecrate murder." (sic)
Malaysian courts are the joke. Judges regulate over cases that they upon purpose draw towards upon for years as good as then, upon the day of judgment, deliver the verdict of "acquittal as good as discharge" in the couple of minutes.
Malaysian judges have mislaid their sense of citation as good as the rakyat should await calls for Hoslan to be expelled as good as the judges to be dismissed.
! Mariam M okhtar is the FMT columnist.
Read More @ Source More
Barisan Nasional (BN) |
Pakatan Rakyat (PR) |
Sociopolitics Plus |
