More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Despite graft claims, Sabah BN praises Musa for hard work
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
What Does "Moderate" Mean in Malaysia?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Don't pay your summons, protect your money
Don't ever give in to this kind of scam by a ruling Government. Put up a fight and make certain you protect your money.
We have R.A.H.M.A.N
We have Feng Shui.
We have a numbers.
Do a right thing.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Mr Harrington, the Edelman boss, needs to improve his PR
The principal emanate where certitude (towards a internal media) is lacking is when theres a hypothesis which theres an untold story, as well as which it isnt being common fully, thus causing readers to be more cynical. - Matthew Harrington, Edelman tellurian CEOThis Mat Saleh PReacher needs to talk to his internal pr boys as well as girls to get a improved design of a internal media scene. Seriously. A open relations man perplexing to tell journalists as well as editors what certitude is about?
Untold story? Do not get me started, Mr Harrington. We know Edelman is BIG in Malaysia, which you guys get a lot of supervision jobs, generally with PEMANDU. In fact, Edelman has become almost a monopoly where government-related agencies have been concerned.
And yet, a level of distrust in a Malaysian Government (according to your barometer) remains high. How is that, Mr Harringto?
According to the2012 Edelman Trust Barometerfor Malaysia, Malaysians placed a high level of certitude in NGOs as well as business, with 58% of a general population guileless both institutions to do what is right.
This compares with a open certitude in Government (52%) as well as media (46%), upon condition which business as well as NGOs a permit to lead a agenda to build increased certitude as well as deeper relationships with a Malaysian public.Not most disproportion is! there!? Public certitude in Government (52 per cent) as well as media (46 per cent). How does Mr Harrington propose to urge open certitude in Government? Increase subsequent year's budget for Edelman, perhaps? Give ALL supervision PR works to Edelman?
Why am we worked up? Journalists as well as pr dudes have a special down payment in Malaysia, you understanding with any alternative a great understanding upon a every day basis. We teach as well as guide a pr friends upon how to get their messages into a pages as well as air time. We both know which if a piece of headlines is as well p.r.-ish, readers will not certitude us (the media0.
Mmmm. Maybe which is what's happening: as well most PR in supervision as well as media. Too most Edelman.
p.s. NOTE TO EDITORS: we suspect which if you guys should stop sending your reporters to cover events organized by Edelman, a barometer of certitude in you guys will unexpected as well as mysteriously urge in Harrington's report subsequent year. Try it.
Read a StarBiz's talk with Harrington, published today,here.
The headlines upon a barometer in NST in January NGOs, businesses most trusted institutions in Malaysia, survey says
SEKINCHAN IKAN BAKAR AT BALAKONG & SECTION 7 SHAH ALAM CLOSED!!!!!
GOOD MORNING associate Malaysians
& Happy Saturday!
Some GOOD NEWS! And right away SEKENCING...I mean "Sekinchan Ikan Bakar" Restaurant in BALAKONG, SELANGOR has CLOSED down!
At least right away this dilemma lot competence shortly have something BETTER to reinstate it soon! :-)
A few days ago, another of his opening was closed:
Ooops! "Sekinchan Ikan Bakar" Restaurant in SECTION 7 of SHAH ALAM is now...
"CLOSED" lol!
Stepping upon a PUBLIC...he is paying a price....isn't it, folks...
PEOPLE'S POWER at its working!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- [Curi] Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | So ciopolitics Plus |
Hudud no longer a fear factor - MERDEKA!!!!!
IF CHUA SOI LEK THINKS HE CAN GET THE PEOPLE TO VOTE THE MCA BECAUSE OF THE HUDUD HE IS WRONG, TERRIBLY WRONG, IN FACT HE IS BORDERING ON MADNESS AND SHOULD BE SENT FOR SOME SERIOUS CHECKING AT THE TANJUNG RAMBUTAN HOSPITAL.
He should be looking during a PKFZ scandal, a liaison which involved his party, which has suddenly left out of a governments shade together with a MCA leader who mooted movement against it.Ong Tee Keat was changed out as well as in came Chua Soi Lek as well as everyone knows which Ong Tee Keat was changed out so which a PKFZ liaison could be swept under a runner which is what has actually happened.
If Tee Keat had handled it most people would have been taken to charge as well as most people in a BN competence have been exposed as well as which is a single reason I'd pretence Chua is passed frightened of hudud.
Like all pick scandals of this regime which liaison is being swept under a carpet, it now seems which after Mahahthir Mohamed's sworn statement all is alright in a PKFZ.
Any surprise?
That of course is what everyone approaching with a stream attorney ubiquitous during a helm, as well as Mahathir Mohammed as his arch declare a really poorly acted three ring circus.
Chua Soi Lek's tangible in front of is Minister agaisnt Hudud, he is placed there to ensure which a hands of most BN Parliamentarians as well as their cronies have been safe.
Given which in front of he is now with a ministerial in front of nonetheless you might not realise it, Najib can't tell a Malays he has since him which in front of so it is on a quiet.
Look during what Chua is so preoccupied with these days, he has zero though Hudud on his mind though Hudud.
Why? Because most people in "Pakatan Rakyat" as well as a rest of BN have been fearful they might be c! ursed to walk a town as a single arm bandits if a Hudud is implemented. "Pakatan Rakyat" ministers as well as MPs can't come out in a open as well as conflict Hudud since which will be against Islam, so they get Chua to do a shouting for them.
Consider this weren't passed bodies snatched from bereaving families claiming a passed had converted to Islam when even their subsequent of family were not aware of it? One wonders because so most Muslims have been converting to Islam though letting their subsequent family know abou! t a same, should they not be proud of a fact they converted?
This passed body kidnappings have left unchecked by this government, what has Chua finished about it? He talks so much about Hudud what has he finished agaisnt a body snatching. Has he ever come out plainly to conflict it as well as has he won on any of those occasions? Has he got any assurances which this will not occur again, has he managed to put a stop to it?
The law is as you all know this man is zero though an "Pakatan Rakyat" lackey, his in front of even in MCA is "Pakatan Rakyat" controlled as well as in fact MCA is a extension of "Pakatan Rakyat" a subvertion wing to ensure which a Chinese aspirations have been controlled.
Every time he opens his mouth, as well as each time his son opens his mouth some-more as well as some-more people get angry as well as turn away from a MCA as well as a BN in general.
Chua has a lot of things to cruise when he tries to scare a people with Hudud. Yes, "Pakatan Rakyat" has not introduced a Hudud, so did this have a "devil" to quote Mahathir any better? They have finished distressing things as well as which is because they can't even consider about a hudud, they dread a hudud some-more than any a single else.
If you wish to set up a temple, a Church or any pick place of ceremony it is almost unfit a supervision will give you no end of trouble. Today you have been since places in Industrial Zones subsequent t! o factor ies to set up places of worship.
In Shah Alam a Church was since land near an burning pond, a village went forward though to set up a Church, for some reason a burning pool was removed, as well as after a Christian Community had completed a piling as well as as a building was work in swell a a entire structure was torn down by a a then Menteri Besar Muhamad Taib garbage bin Muhamad, as well as after prolonged delays as well as changeable of sites from a single place to another a Church was finally since a square of land in an Industrial site with manners which it should not look similar to a Church from a outside.
The subsequent Menteri B! esar of S! elangor became a Champion of destroying Hindu temples, he got broken in a process.
Even a Bhori Muslims have been not alowed to place a sign to indicate which their Mosque in Klang is a Masjid, they have been Shite Muslims as well as they have been not allowed this.
We all know how "Pakatan Rakyat" as well as a supporters marched with a cows head in blatant disregard for a feelings of a Hindus in protesting about a Hindu Temple, which was not PAS led neither was it PAS initiated, nonetheless some UMNo infiltrators into PAS championed a cause. All this was not Hudud it was "Pakatan Rakyat" so because dismay us with Hudud?
Chua Soi Lek usually similar to his boss Najib Tun Razak have been desperate as well as broke for ideas as well as will try anything now to win a renouned vote.
It is a opinion of a people which if a Barisan looses this elections most of their leaders will rush a country, a single ex leader a tip figure we do not have to mention a name is so fearful he has come out as well as in front of a BN as a Devil as well as a antithesis head as an Angel, observant "it is improved a known devil than an unknown angel."
Some people have been usually so darn frightened they'd try anything from letting a Pakatan win, though a Pakatan feat is a foregone end as well as zero contingency be finishe! d to cri ticise a coming elections, if which is finished this supervision has to be hold responsible.
Hudud seems a improved pick than "Pakatan Rakyat" as well as you have all seen it, "Pakatan Rakyat"s' governance is zero though deceit, in Hudud if you take you'll have your hand chopped off, we reckon a hurtful have a lot to fear since they have stolen as well as hudud will not take which lightly as well as which is because a BN is so frightened of Hudud.
We shall see most a retired BN politicians with usually a single arm if a hudud is implemented, in "Pakatan Rakyat" elections when a vote is carried out by a uncover of hands some "Pakatan Rakyat" group might not have hands to show, as well as these have been a people who have been creation a lot of sound about a Hudud us! ing their! new minister.
PAS would proceed with usually implementing Hudud for a Malays, a Syariah courts will exercise Hudud law for a Malays to proceed with.
So Hudud is no bogeyman to us a citizens right now all seems improved an pick than "Pakatan Rakyat" as well as a lackeys.
So Chua Soi Lek greatfully ensure your hands have been clean, if it is not, come out in a open as well as confess it now similar to you did your sex case, or if you have anything to censor which can be construed as theft, you might be walking parsimonious rope, a Pakatan is starting to win.
Everything pronounced it is a Pakatan which is starting for victory, not PAS alone, so PAS will not be able to exercise hudud though a await of a pick parties as PAS by itself will not command a majority usually similar to "Pakatan Rakyat" has right now, any way compared with what you have now under a BN we consider any pick pick looks better.
Now if a BN politicians wish their hands saved they had improved be satisfactory with a antithesis of man we can usually lay as well as consternation all a single armed people will have most hands which they can use for transplant.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Rosmah hanya penaung, Usah heret anak2 dalam kancah politik!
Idea untuk menubuhkan PERMATA muncul pada tahun 2006. Cetusan thought untuk menubuhkan PERMATA muncul kerana masalah gejala-gejala sosial yang semakin hari semakin meningkat.
Seperti yang kita tahu semakin hari dunia semakin moden dan cabaran kepada ibu bapa untuk menjaga anak-anak juga semakin meningkat.
Dengan niat yang baik pada tahun 2006 Datin
Governing Malaysia: A Different Point of View
October 13, 2012
Governing Malaysia: A Different Point of View
by Zairil Khir Johari, Executive Director, Penang Institute
@www.themalaysianinsider.c0m (10-12-12)
A prime line of conflict adopted by a Barisan Nasional (BN) supervision these days is a accusation which a Opposition is usually capable of creation empty promises as well as as a result by import it is incompetent to govern.
To uphold this premise, a Prime Minister recently suggested 3 points, namely: which a Opposition bloc has unsuccessful to formalise itself under a usual party symbol, which a inability to delineate a shade Cabinet reveals a lack of credibility, as well as which a Opposition's sweet promises have been in being "venomous poison" which will eventually bring monetary ruin to a country. In stressing a final point, he even went so distant as to contend which a Buku Jingga, a Opposition's central process manifesto, "is not worth a paper it is printed on."
Now, it's all really fine for a Prime Minister to partake in showboating, especially when a mainstream media will suggest no space for a rejoinder by a Opposition. Unfortunately, even with a near-monopoly of report which he enjoys, it is unsatisfactory which a Prime apportion has to resort to mischievous half-truths, unashamed pomposity as well as undisguised lies in order to assail a opposition.
Take a initial point, upon a make a difference of a usual symbol. It is loyal which after 4 years of! working together as a de facto coalition, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is still not a purebred entity. But what a Prime Minister has in a centre unsuccessful to discuss is a actuality which an application had actually been submitted 3 years ago, as well as has since been sitting during a doorsteps of a Home Ministry available approval. Thus, a Prime Minister has a audacity to accuse PR for "failing" to register as a singular party!
The British Parliamentary System
The second bone of contention has arguably a little some-more merit. It cannot be denied which a PR bloc has to date not drawn up a "shadow Cabinet" (although Utusan Malaysia has kindly taken upon itself to furnish one upon a behalf). While this is an oft-repeated criticism, we feel which it is rarely discussed in a correct context.
No apply oneself for a Malaysian Opposition
Many who verbalise of a shade Cabinet often refer to a British equivalent. Yet there have been dual great dissimilarities during fool around here. Firstly, unlike a British Parliament, a Malaysian Parliament accords no institutional space for an "official opposition". Members of a would-be shade Cabinet would be conjunction recognized nor since a same amount of standing, apply oneself or entrance as their British counterparts. In fact, a approach our parliamentary sessions have been conducted, even a Opposition personality has no real opportunity to debate without delay with a Prime Minister.
Secondly, when Labour was in energy prior to to a stream Conservative-Liberal Democrat bloc government, both a Conservatives as well as a Liberal-Democrats had their own separate shade Cabinets. This is due to a inlet of multi-party democracy in Britain, in which coalitions have been ad-hoc as well as not formalised arrangements. In our country, you have a make up "two-coalition" system with entirely opposite dynamics. Added to a actuality which a formalisation of a Opposition bloc under a si! ngular u mbrella is being upon purpose shut off by a government, a direct for a shade Cabinet is grossly unfair.
No "Shadow" President in a US
That said, to say, as a Prime Minister did, which a shade Cabinet is "fundamental" in proof governing capability is disingenuous. Take a United States, for example. There, whichever party in a Opposition does not have a "shadow president" until a presidential claimant is chosen in a lead-up to a inhabitant elections. And even then, besides selecting a using mate, a alternative president does not go further by fixing a shade Cabinet.
Need a Capable Opposition
What Malaysia really needs some-more than a shade Cabinet is a capable antithesis which is able to "check" a supervision by inspiring accountability as well as indicating out shortcomings. And in this regard, we hold a PR leaders have been doing their job. For example, can anyone stop prior to to 2008 a inhabitant Budget being scrutinised as meticulously as is done today? Furthermore, various scandals, leakages as well as problems have been successfully unearthed as well as done public in a final couple of years due to diligent investigator work by Opposition MPs.
Finally, is it not an practice in pomposity for a Barisan Nasional to conflict Pakatan Rakyat for not having a shade Cabinet when a Barisan Nasional themselves have been incompetent to form shade senior manager councils for any of a 4 Pakatan Rakyat governed states? At least all 3 parties in Pakatan Rakyat have publicly concluded upon an alternative Prime Minister (Anwar Ibrahim) does a Barisan Nasional even know who their Menteri Besar/Chief Minister-designates are?
Moving upon to Najib's third indicate which Pakatan Rakyat is incompetent to oversee as w! ell as i s usually great during mouthing populist policies which will bankrupt a country. This is of march a serious matter. After all, Malaysians wish to be assured which they have been voting for a convincing alternative government.
In rebutting this point, we will not try to clap off a string of achievements which have been achieved by a "inexperienced" Pakatan Rakyat state governments over a final 4 years, particularly their success in overcoming fiscal deficits, plugging leakages, shortening corruption, augmenting investments, as well as implementing receptive to advice gratification policies.
Instead, we would similar to to make a couple of observations about a Federal government. Let us consider a little of a some-more new process decisions by Putrajaya. Firstly, there is a recently-launched Go-KL giveaway bus use in a middle city. we contingency contend which giveaway public ride is a illusory approach to foster tolerable urban mobility.
I would additionally hail it as an innovative idea if it weren't for a actuality which a similar use had been pioneered in Penang through a inner-city CAT (Central Area Transit) buses as well as a bridge-crossing BEST (Bridge Express Shuttle Transit) service, both supposing giveaway (wi-fi included) pleasantness of a Penang state government.
And afterwards you have an announcement in a new inhabitant Budget about a programme to provide women with giveaway mammogram scans for cancer showing as well as early intervention. An excellent idea indeed, as well as we am rebuilt to accept which a resemblance to a MammoSel programme introduced by a Selangor state supervision dual years ago is purely coincidental.
Next, it is impossible to omit a barbarous BR1M gratification assistance programme. Giving money aid to poor families now where have we listened which done before? Surely not in an "irresponsible" PR state?
It contingency be an additional coincidence, along with a preference of a aim organisation of households earning reduction than RM3,000 monthly income, a key demographic creatively highlighted by a "worthless" Buku Jingga.
Speaking of irresponsible policies, a Buku Jingga's proposal to annul highway tolls by nationalising fee companies has, of course, been a aim of stinging ridicule. Yet was it not usually final month which a Prime Minister voiced a proposed supervision takeover of a Eastern Dispersal Link in Johor Baru in order to make it toll-free?
Let us not additionally dont think about a extermination of a ISA as well as a arrangement of a Royal Commission of Inquiry to investigate a problem of bootleg immigration in Sabah, dual some-more Buku Jingga proposals which have since been adopted by a Barisan National government. At a rate it is going, all a "poisonous" promises in a Buku Jingga have been set to be fulfilled in one form or another.
Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Mitt Romney got everything wrong on Economic Policy
October 13, 2012
www.nst.com.my
Mitt Romney got all wrong upon Economic Policy
by Paul Krugman
if Mitt Romney wins a election, a GOP will certainly consider a mercantile ideas vindicated. In alternative words, politically great things competence be about to occur to really bad ideas. And if that's how it plays out, a American people will compensate a price.Nobel Laureate in Economics Paul Krugman
IN these shutting weeks of a US presidential campaign, any side wants you to hold which it has a right ideas to fix a still-ailing economy. So here's what you need to know.
If you look during a lane record, a Obama administration department department department has been wrong about a little things, mainly since it was as well confident about a prospects for a quick recovery. But Republicans have been wrong about everything.
About which misplaced optimism: in a now-notorious January 2009 forecast, economists operative for a incoming administration department department department predicted which by now most of a goods of a 2008 monetary crisis would be behind us, as well as a stagnation rate would be below six per cent. Obviously, which didn't happen.
Why did a administration department department department get it wrong? It wasn't exaggerated conviction in a power of a impulse plan; a inform predicted a fairly fast liberation even but stimulus. Instead, President Barack Obama's people unsuccessful to conclude something which is now co! mmon kno wledge among mercantile analysts: serious monetary crises inflict postulated mercantile damage, as well as it takes a prolonged time to recover.
This same observation, of course, offers a partial excuse for a economy's slow weakness. And a question you should ask given this unpleasant being is what policies would offer a best prospects for healing a damage.
Obama's camp argues for an active supervision role; his final major mercantile proposal, a American Jobs Act, would have tried to accelerate liberation by sustaining public spending as well as putting money in a hands of people expected to have use of it. Republicans, upon a alternative hand, demand which a path to prosperity involves sharp cuts in supervision spending.
And Republicans have been passed wrong.The latest devastating proof of which wrongness comes from a International Monetary Fund, which has only released a World Economic Outlook, a inform mixing short-term prophecy with judicious mercantile analysis. This inform is a grave as well as unfortunate document, revelation us which a universe manage to buy is doing significantly worse than expected, with rising risks of global recession.
But a inform isn't only downbeat; it contains a clever research of a reasons things have been starting so badly. And what this research concludes is which a jagged share of a bad news is coming from countries pursuing a kind of austerity policies Republicans want to impose upon America.
Okay, it doesn't say which in so most words. What a inform actually says is: "Activity over a past few years has disappointed some-more in economies with some-more aggressive fiscal consolidation plans." But which amounts to a same thing.
For leading Republicans have really most scored equally themselves to a perspective which slashing spending in a vexed manage to buy "fiscal consolidation" in IMF-speak is good, not bad, for pursuit creation. Soon after a mid-term elections, a new Republican majority in a House of Representati! ves issu ed a manifesto upon mercantile process titled, "Spend less, owe less, grow a economy" which called for low spending cuts right divided as well as pooh-poohed a total notion which fiscal consolidation (yes, it used a same term) competence lower a economy's slump. "Non-Keynesian effects," a manifesto declared, would have all all right.
Well, which turns out not to be remotely true. What a monetary fund shows is which a countries pursing a biggest spending cuts have been additionally a countries which have gifted a deepest mercantile slumps.
Indeed, a evidence suggests which in brushing aside a standard perspective which spending cuts mistreat a manage to buy in a reduced run, a GOP got it exactly wrong. Recent spending cuts appear to have done even some-more mistreat than most analysts together with those during a IMF itself expected.
Which brings us to a question of what form mercantile policies will take after a election.If Obama wins, he'll presumably go behind to pushing for modest stimulus, aiming to modify a light liberation which seems to be underneath way into a some-more fast lapse to full employment.
Republicans, however, have been committed to an mercantile didactic discourse which has proved false, indeed disastrous, in alternative countries. Nor have been they expected to change their views in a light of experience.
After all, contribution haven't gotten in a way of Republican orthodoxy upon any alternative aspect of mercantile policy. The celebration remains opposed to in effect monetary law despite a disaster of 2008; it remains spooky with a dangers of acceleration despite years of fake alarms. So it's not expected to give up a politically convenient views about pursuit creation.
And here's a thing: if Mitt Romney wins a election, a GOP will certainly conside! r a merc antile ideas vindicated. In alternative words, politically great things competence be about to occur to really bad ideas. And if that's how it plays out, a American people will compensate a price. New York Times
Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Penny Wise, Pound Foolish
Bila puak UMNO tidak dapat menangkis hujjah, mereka akan attack peribadi. Atau serang technicalities. Sebagai contoh. Yang jadi masaalah hal SUARAM dengan mahkamah di Perancis apahal? Tiba2 SUARAM jadi isiu. Jika menerima sumbangan wang dari pihak asing menjadi masaalah, bagaimana pula sumbangan wang asing kepada NGO pro kerajaan? Menerima wang dari asing oleh SUARAM mengensel angkara durjana yang dilakukan oleh orang tengah dalam kes pembelian Scorpene?
Rasuah RM 500 juta bagaimana? Pembunuhan Altantuya bagaimana? Rasuah ok sebab penerima nya Melayu? Warga Mongolia dibunuh tidak mengapa sebab dia high class call girl?
Hakikat nya, mahkamah Perancis mendapati firma yang membekalkan kapal selam Scorpene melakukan bebarapa jinayah rasuah. Sebagai ekstensi, perbuatan serupa boleh berlaku keatas orang tengah/firma yang membroker pembelian kapal selam scorpene untuk kerajaan Malaysia.
Suddenly you find the little faded as well as jaded luminaries of the old media heaping scorn as well as disbelief during whether the French courts have been posterior the Scorpene Case or not. They have been poorly aped as well as mimicked by the little of the using dogs as well as apologists of the UMNO regime. These people have been spending their last days underneath the dying regime. We will reserve for them the special section in the brand new wings during Bamboo River Resort for criminals.
Rakyat tidak kira sama ada mahkamah perancis buat atau tak buat. Saya sendiri tidak mengikuti perkembangan tersebut. Yang menarik minat rakyat ialah bagaimana pembelian kapal selam tersebut menyebabkan kita membayar komisyen kepada Razak Baginda. Kita berminat kenapa Altantuya kena bunuh. Isiu2 ini lagi besar daripada SUARAM menerima sumbangan dari pihak asing. Macamlah UMNO tidak menerima wang sumbangan dari sumber2 yang mencurigakan.
Kita nak tahu kaitan Razak Baginda dengan pemimpin politik Malaysia.! Kita mi nat nak tahu bagaimana RM 500 juta itu diagihkan? Was it loyal as told to me by UMNO insiders Pak Lah was paid RM 160 million? We will never know unless you put Razak Baginda in the dock.
Fakta nya, Razak Baginda dapat komisyen RM 500 juta lebih. Kita akan tahu bila partner dia membawa kes mereka ke mahkamah kerana mereka tidak dapat share yang dijanjikan.
Apa servis yang dia buat sehingga kita bayar dia RM 500 juta lebih? Kita minat jugak nak tahu Razak Baginda pandai tak bertutur dalam bahasa Mongolia maklum sajalah, sudah bulan2 bertukar air liur.
Adakah orang melayu boleh memaafkan perkara excessive ini? skendel tersebut menyebabkan pembunuhan seorang warga Mongolia. Rakyat Malaysia, apatah lagi orang Melayu yang beragama Islam, tidak boleh memaafkan nya.
Tapi tidak mengapa. Bila Pakatan Rakyat memerintah, kita akan summons Razak Baginda, put him on the mount as well as prosecute him justly. Those who have subverted probity will find probity meted out to them. You can run, but you can't run forever. All Malaysians want to find out; who does Razak fenced the income for?
Jika orang melayu buat tak tahu dan memaafkan jinayah dan rasuah yang berlaku, maka suatu hari nanti Razak Baginda masuk rumah kamu , meniduri isteri kamu atau anak perempuan kamu, kamu kata tidak mengapa. Mungkinkah orang UMNO sahaja yang kata, hal demikian tidak mengapa?
Sebab? Sebab dia orang Melayu.! Kepada rakyat Malaysia lain yang dismissive mengenai apa yang telah dilakukan oleh Razak Baginda as well as gang, the same thing applies. One day, he enters your house as well as sleeps with your wife or young daughter, you will say, it's all right, he's the patriot, the loyal Malaysian.
Melayu, Islam dan kristianisasi.
Apa masaalah orang Melayu yang beragama Islam? Saya ingin bertanya. Boleh kah orang kristian mengkristiank! an Nik A ziz atau Hj Hadi? Bolehkah mereka mengkristiankan Zulkifli Nordin atau mamat yang bernama Ibrahim Ali? Kalau mereka tidak mampu mengkristiankan Zulkifli Nordin, Hasan Ali dan Ibrahim ali, apa pasal puak UMNO ini merasakan puak kristian boleh mengkristiankan orang Melayu lain? Islam orang lain tidak sekuat Islam Zul Nordin, Hasan Aqidah Ali atau Ibrahim Ali kah?
Apa masaalah orang Melayu? Jumlah orang Melayu ialah 18 juta orang. Ertinya, mereka infancy dan infancy ini beragama Islam. Aqidah mereka terlalu rapuh kah sehinggakan orang kristian yang tak sampai 1 juta di Malaysia ini dapat menguasai bumi Malaysia?
Agama Kristian tidak pernah pun menjadi isiu besar selama ini- tiba2 penahan lukah di pergentingan membesar besarkan isiu ini untuk menakutkan orang Melayu. Jika mubaligh dan paderi Kristian mengkristiankan orang asli dalam hutan atau orang pribumi Sabah dan Sarawak, yang jadi masaalah kepada orang Islam mengapa? elok kita jaga aqidah dan Islam kita sendiri daripada menyibukkan diri dan menyemakkkan kepala keatas perkara kecil. isiu yang lebih besar0 korapsi, kezaliman, kerajaan yang tidak cekap, tidak hendak pula dibahaskan!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Pembangkang dan kritikan bodoh terhadap Rosmah
Susah nak faham ...
Apalah perlu isteri Perdana Menteri yang bukan orang politik dan tidak ada masuk campur hal urusan kerajaan perlu dijadikan bahan kritikan politik untuk menimbulkan marah dan benci rakyat terhadap parti dan kerajaan?
Dato Najib tiada bincang urusan
Najib refuses to disclose source of Sabah Umno's political donation ...
No fears over possible BN-friendly PJ mayor
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Response by Refsa on subsidy contentions
Commentary
This is a statement by not-for-profit research institute REFSA (Research for Social Advancement) expelled upon Friday, twelve October 2012.
Budget 2013: Federal supervision subsidies go up in abandon whilst bad Malaysians watch
We write to plead Dr Lim Teck Ghee's assertion which "There is small empirical research to behind up what has become an increasingly renouned line of argument" which sweeping subsidies such as for bad motor fuel as well as sugarine "benefit upper-class Malaysians who devour most some-more than their poorer c! ousins1" .
These have been a basic facts:
1. The sovereign supervision funding check is expected to exceed RM42 billion this year.
2. If we can agree which subsidies should go only to a poor, as well as we conclude a bad as a bottom 1/3rd of households, there will be 2.3 million households or scarcely 10 million Malaysians2 who will get subsidies.
3. RM42 billion is sufficient to give these bottom 1/3rd of households RM1,650 per month - which will some-more than stand in their stream incomes of RM1,500 per month!
Quite clearly, sovereign supervision subsidies have been not starting where they should. RM42 billion is sufficient to give a poorest 1 of 3 households RM550 each 10 days, as opposed to a occasional RM500 BR1M payment. Note which in further to a RM42 billion sovereign supervision subsidies, Petronas bears another RM20 billion or so per year in provision bad gas to a eccentric power producers as well as alternative industries.
Let's not poke away resources upon nonessential ivory-tower analysis. The simple truth is which a bulk of a subsidies goes to bad fuel which is burnt, as well as a abounding male browns some-more than a poor. Just ask a normal male upon a small motorbike how most he spends upon motor fuel as well as contrariety which to what a male driving a radiant new BMW spends.
Figure 1: Who uses some-more petrol?
Figure 2: And who takes some-more sugar?
Cartoons from UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget, Teh Chi-Chang & Johnny Ong, REFSA, Jul 2012.
Dr Lim also says these subsidies have been a "necessary burden" in a "highly skewed capitalist economy like Malaysia". We would prominence which income lack of harmony in Malaysia remains high3 despite a q! uadrupli ng of subsidies underneath Dato? Sri Najib's administration. The funding check has soared from RM10 billion in 2007 to over RM42 billion today4.
The large 4-fold increase in subsidies has obviously not been effective. In their stream form, a large volume spent upon subsidies is literally starting up in flames, whilst a immeasurable infancy of Malaysians remain lowly-skilled as well as poorly-paid. 77% of a work-force has SPM-level qualifications, during best; as well as a bottom 40% of a households tarry upon RM50 per day5.
It is in this context which IDEAS (Institute for Democracy as well as Economic Affairs) as well as REFSA expelled a joint-statement6 expressing shock during a ballooning sovereign supervision funding bill7 as well as calling for sweeping subsidies such as for bad motor fuel as well as sugarine to be restructured so which a bad rsther than than a abounding would benefit. REFSA calls for a helpful national sermon upon restructuring a funding policies. This sermon should centre around 3 main issues:
1. Who should embrace subsidies?
All Malaysians? Or only a bad as well as marginalised as well as alternative selected groups?
2. How most should they get?
Should all Malaysians get a same volume each? Or should a volume be calibrated according to need?
3. In what form should a subsidies be since as well as should there be a time limit?
Should it all be in cash? Or should it be in a form of an enhanced social reserve net which includes, for example, housing, child-care, educational, skills-training as well as micro-financing support? And should there be a time extent for some or all of these subsidies?
It is obvious a existent subsidies have been poorly delivered. Even a currently 'targeted' subsidies, such as bad fuel for fishermen have been dissipated as some fishermen choose to sell a fuel as well as have an evident distinction instead of essentially starting out to fish8.
We hold subsidies should be destined t! owards a most disadvantaged segments of a community, including singular relatives as well as a disabled. Let's work together to identify a disadvantaged groups which need support as well as craft funding policies which encounter their needs, with a aim of in conclusion lifting as many Malaysians as possible from a need for welfare.
The bard is Research for Social Advancement senior manager director
***********
1 REFSA as well as IDEA's misplaced focus upon critiquing subsidies in a budget. Dr Lim Teck Ghee, 1 Oct 2012. Available during http://english.cpiasia.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2419&catid
=118&Itemid=162 Retrieved 6 Oct 2012.
2 Number of households interpretation from Endnote 17 of UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget. Teh Chi-Chang as well as Johnny Ong, REFSA, Jul 2012.
3 Data from a 2009 Household Income Survey shows a Gini fellow (a measure of income inequality) rising somewhat to 0.441 in 2009 from 0.440 in 2007. It is small altered from 0.443 in 1999.
4 Subsidies have increased dramatically underneath Dato' Sri Najib Razak's administration. Federal supervision subsidies were only RM10.5 billion in 2007. In 2010, which had doubled to RM23.8 billion; as well as in 2012 have been now some-more than quadrupled to RM42.4 billion. The sovereign supervision projects a funding check to tumble to RM37.6 billion in 2013, but this is upon a expectancy of lower global oil prices rsther than than due to funding reform.
5 As discussed in Sections 1.7 as well as 4.3 of UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget.
6 Budget 2012: The shocking blast of sovereign supervision subsidies. Wan Saiful as well as Teh Chi-Chang, 28 Oct! 2012. A vailable during www.refsa.org.
7 The original volume budgeted for subsidies in 2012, as settled in a Economic Report 2011/2012 expelled last year, was RM33.2 billion. In a ultimate Economic Report 2012/2013, it is now estimated which a funding check will hit RM42.4 billion in 2012.
8 For example, fishermen near Sepang buy subsidised motor fuel during RM1.30 per litre as well as then sell it during RM1.80. Reported in Fishermen offered subsidised motor fuel as well as motor fuel to others. Stuart Michael, Star Metro, 15 Feb 2012. Available during www.thestar.com.my. Retrived upon 8 Oct 2012.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Anti-graft watchdog wants full disclosure of Musa Aman political contributions
More! Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Another high-rise project near Highland Towers?
Unsafe hillslopes
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No fears over possible BN-friendly PJ mayor
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Suaram decries police extortionists
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Najib refuses to disclose source of Sabah Umnos political ...
3 Chief Ministers, a wedding, a divorce & a donation: But ZERO ACTION from MACC!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
IMAGINE, if Michael Chia's RM40mil was a donation to Anwar or PR and not UMNO!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
CALLING ALL CHRISTIANS: Vote wisely in GE13 - throw out the Christian bashers!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
SELANGOR KECUNDANG TERUK DI TANGAN KELANTAN, INI SEMUA SALAH KALID GAGAP
Atau Khalid dah understanding ngan Nicky Ajis untuk sengaja kalah sebab takut tak masuk sorga kalau lawan tok garu PAS ni? Apa joke ini semua salah Khalid gagap sebab letak nama MBI kat atas baju, mereka joke confuse, mungkin pemain ingat mereka ditaja oleh MAJLIS BANDARAYA IPOH!
So apa joke Khalid Gagap la puncanya. Jangan politikkan sukan, ini aku kasi nasihat untuk semua parti politik! Stay away from sports. Aku harap sesiapa yang ada jawatan politik supaya berambus dari sukan pale diminati oleh Rakyat Malaysia!
Tahniah lagi sekali Kelantan! Aku sedih Selangor kalah tapi adat permainan kalah menang biasa la.
JAUHI SUKAN DARI POLITIK!