Written by Teh Chi-Chang Friday, twelve October 2012 10:13
Commentary
This is a statement by not-for-profit research institute REFSA (Research for Social Advancement) expelled upon Friday, twelve October 2012.
Budget 2013: Federal supervision subsidies go up in abandon whilst bad Malaysians watch
We write to plead Dr Lim Teck Ghee's assertion which "There is small empirical research to behind up what has become an increasingly renouned line of argument" which sweeping subsidies such as for bad motor fuel as well as sugarine "benefit upper-class Malaysians who devour most some-more than their poorer c! ousins1" .
These have been a basic facts:
1. The sovereign supervision funding check is expected to exceed RM42 billion this year.
2. If we can agree which subsidies should go only to a poor, as well as we conclude a bad as a bottom 1/3rd of households, there will be 2.3 million households or scarcely 10 million Malaysians2 who will get subsidies.
3. RM42 billion is sufficient to give these bottom 1/3rd of households RM1,650 per month - which will some-more than stand in their stream incomes of RM1,500 per month!
Quite clearly, sovereign supervision subsidies have been not starting where they should. RM42 billion is sufficient to give a poorest 1 of 3 households RM550 each 10 days, as opposed to a occasional RM500 BR1M payment. Note which in further to a RM42 billion sovereign supervision subsidies, Petronas bears another RM20 billion or so per year in provision bad gas to a eccentric power producers as well as alternative industries.
Let's not poke away resources upon nonessential ivory-tower analysis. The simple truth is which a bulk of a subsidies goes to bad fuel which is burnt, as well as a abounding male browns some-more than a poor. Just ask a normal male upon a small motorbike how most he spends upon motor fuel as well as contrariety which to what a male driving a radiant new BMW spends.
Figure 1: Who uses some-more petrol?
Figure 2: And who takes some-more sugar?
Cartoons from UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget, Teh Chi-Chang & Johnny Ong, REFSA, Jul 2012.
Dr Lim also says these subsidies have been a "necessary burden" in a "highly skewed capitalist economy like Malaysia". We would prominence which income lack of harmony in Malaysia remains high3 despite a q! uadrupli ng of subsidies underneath Dato? Sri Najib's administration. The funding check has soared from RM10 billion in 2007 to over RM42 billion today4.
The large 4-fold increase in subsidies has obviously not been effective. In their stream form, a large volume spent upon subsidies is literally starting up in flames, whilst a immeasurable infancy of Malaysians remain lowly-skilled as well as poorly-paid. 77% of a work-force has SPM-level qualifications, during best; as well as a bottom 40% of a households tarry upon RM50 per day5.
It is in this context which IDEAS (Institute for Democracy as well as Economic Affairs) as well as REFSA expelled a joint-statement6 expressing shock during a ballooning sovereign supervision funding bill7 as well as calling for sweeping subsidies such as for bad motor fuel as well as sugarine to be restructured so which a bad rsther than than a abounding would benefit. REFSA calls for a helpful national sermon upon restructuring a funding policies. This sermon should centre around 3 main issues:
1. Who should embrace subsidies?
All Malaysians? Or only a bad as well as marginalised as well as alternative selected groups?
2. How most should they get?
Should all Malaysians get a same volume each? Or should a volume be calibrated according to need?
3. In what form should a subsidies be since as well as should there be a time limit?
Should it all be in cash? Or should it be in a form of an enhanced social reserve net which includes, for example, housing, child-care, educational, skills-training as well as micro-financing support? And should there be a time extent for some or all of these subsidies?
It is obvious a existent subsidies have been poorly delivered. Even a currently 'targeted' subsidies, such as bad fuel for fishermen have been dissipated as some fishermen choose to sell a fuel as well as have an evident distinction instead of essentially starting out to fish8.
We hold subsidies should be destined t! owards a most disadvantaged segments of a community, including singular relatives as well as a disabled. Let's work together to identify a disadvantaged groups which need support as well as craft funding policies which encounter their needs, with a aim of in conclusion lifting as many Malaysians as possible from a need for welfare.
The bard is Research for Social Advancement senior manager director
***********
1 REFSA as well as IDEA's misplaced focus upon critiquing subsidies in a budget. Dr Lim Teck Ghee, 1 Oct 2012. Available during http://english.cpiasia.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2419&catid
=118&Itemid=162 Retrieved 6 Oct 2012.
2 Number of households interpretation from Endnote 17 of UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget. Teh Chi-Chang as well as Johnny Ong, REFSA, Jul 2012.
3 Data from a 2009 Household Income Survey shows a Gini fellow (a measure of income inequality) rising somewhat to 0.441 in 2009 from 0.440 in 2007. It is small altered from 0.443 in 1999.
4 Subsidies have increased dramatically underneath Dato' Sri Najib Razak's administration. Federal supervision subsidies were only RM10.5 billion in 2007. In 2010, which had doubled to RM23.8 billion; as well as in 2012 have been now some-more than quadrupled to RM42.4 billion. The sovereign supervision projects a funding check to tumble to RM37.6 billion in 2013, but this is upon a expectancy of lower global oil prices rsther than than due to funding reform.
5 As discussed in Sections 1.7 as well as 4.3 of UMNO-Nomics: a Dark Side of a Budget.
6 Budget 2012: The shocking blast of sovereign supervision subsidies. Wan Saiful as well as Teh Chi-Chang, 28 Oct! 2012. A vailable during www.refsa.org.
7 The original volume budgeted for subsidies in 2012, as settled in a Economic Report 2011/2012 expelled last year, was RM33.2 billion. In a ultimate Economic Report 2012/2013, it is now estimated which a funding check will hit RM42.4 billion in 2012.
8 For example, fishermen near Sepang buy subsidised motor fuel during RM1.30 per litre as well as then sell it during RM1.80. Reported in Fishermen offered subsidised motor fuel as well as motor fuel to others. Stuart Michael, Star Metro, 15 Feb 2012. Available during www.thestar.com.my. Retrived upon 8 Oct 2012.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment