But what will happen, say, in 2057, 100 years after Merdeka, when the young kids as well as grandchildren of those 3 million pendatang -- who by afterwards might series 5 million as well as reason Malaysian temperament cards given they were innate in Malaysia -- all wish to opinion as abroad electorate yet they had left the nation the prolonged time ago as well as never once went behind to Malaysia?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
There have been those who conflict the Islamic rapist law of Hudud. When you ask them as to given they conflict Hudud they will reply which it is given underneath the Hudud law they cut off the hands of thieves. Hence Hudud is the very barbarous law. Rather than cut off the hands of thieves they should instead be killed with the bullet in the head similar to what they do to highway robbers as well as alternative thieves in China, hurtful officials as well as womanlike robbers included.
Well, you suppose the bullet in the head is reduction barbarous than carrying to live with usually the single hand.
Let's contend for argument's sake you argue: so what if they cut off the hands of thieves? Why have been you so worried about which if you have been not the thief? Aren't you the ones who have been complaining about the extremely tall crime rate in Malaysia? Aren't you the ones alleging which the military have been not doing their job? Maybe you need the law such as Hudud to solve the serious crime complaint which appears to be spinning out of control.
Only thieves should be worried about as well as conflict Hudud. If you have been so opposite to Hudud afterwards which can usually meant the single thing -- you have been the thief. If you have been not the burglar afterwards given have been you so opposite t! o Hudud? And it appears similar to some-more non-Malays than Malays conflict Hudud. This can usually meant which there have been some-more non-Malay thieves than Malay thieves.
you suppose this statement creates as much clarity as the statement which if you do not await Pakatan Rakyat afterwards you contingency be the Barisan Nasional believer (if you do not await Hudud afterwards you contingency be the thief). There can be no alternative judicious reason for you to not await Pakatan Rakyat only similar to there can be no alternative judicious reason for you to not await Hudud.
Can you see which when you request your same proof to an additional incident your proof no longer sounds logical?
And which is the complaint with most of you. Your proof is not universal. It can be used usually to await your biased view though when applied to an additional argument it sounds real silly.
The Sedition Act as well as the Internal Security Act have been draconian laws. Why have been they draconian laws? Well, given these laws have been used opposite the opposition, to stifle dissent, as well as to repudiate Malaysians their leisure of speech. Hence the Sedition Act as well as the Internal Security Act contingency be abolished. And if Pakatan Rakyat ever takes over the sovereign supervision this is the single of the initial things they contingency do -- annul the Sedition Act as well as the Internal Security Act.
However, prior to they annul these laws, they contingency initial be used opposite those upon the 'other side'. Once those from the 'other side' have been dealt with usually afterwards should these laws be abolished.
In fact, if Pakatan Rakyat takes over, you should exercise Hudud as well as make use of which law to cut off the hands of those crooks from the ruling party. Once all their hands have been cut off you can afterwards annul the Hudud law.
What have been you fighting for? We have been fighting for justice. And h! ow do yo u get justice? We get probity by abolishing bad laws as well as by reforming the system. Should you do all which now? No, you do which usually after you have taken punish upon the enemies. Is punish justice? Yes, though usually if taken opposite the alternative side, not if taken opposite the own people.
It is not fair which Malaysians who have left the nation for longer than 5 years as well as have not returned to the nation for during slightest thirty days over those 5 years have been not authorised to opinion as an abroad voter. Even if those Malaysians left the nation thirty or 40 years ago as well as never once went behind to Malaysia they should still be authorised to opinion (as prolonged as they still have an temperament card, of course, given you need this to vote).
What happens if the single million of the 3 million foreigners who right away retain Malaysian temperament cards go home to their strange countries? Can they be authorised to opinion as abroad voters? Your entitlement to opinion depends upon you possessing the Malaysian temperament card. Hence if you have the Malaysian temperament label afterwards you have been entitled to vote.
And what happens if these people had left Malaysia some-more than ten years ago as well as never once came behind to Malaysia? Should they still be authorised to vote?
You might argue which they should not be authorised to opinion given yet they retain Malaysian temperament cards they were not innate in Malaysia. Ah, though afterwards their young kids were. Their young kids retain Malaysian temperament cards which uncover they were innate in Malaysia yet they left Malaysia ten years ago as well as right away live in an additional country. So given can't they be authorised to vote?
Back in 1957, when Malaya initial gained independence, the Chinese as well as Indians came from China as well as India as well as were given Malaysian citizenship. Subsequently, the young kids of those 'pendatang'! were in nate in the country. Hence the descendants of these pre-1957 immigrants have been Malaysian innate as well as should not be called 'pendatang'.
Agreed, it is wrong to call the present era Malaysians of Chinese as well as Indian descent 'pendatang'. Their relatives or grandparents might have been pendatang behind in 1957. But the present stand of Malaysian-born Chinese as well as Indians have been not pendatang as well as should not be treated as pendatang or called 'pendatang'.
But what will happen, say, in 2057, 100 years after Merdeka, when the young kids as well as grandchildren of those 3 million pendatang -- who by afterwards might series 5 million as well as reason Malaysian temperament cards given they were innate in Malaysia -- all wish to opinion as abroad electorate yet they had left the nation the prolonged time ago as well as never once went behind to Malaysia?
Sometimes you need to demeanour reduced term, such as over the subsequent dual months heading to the entrance ubiquitous election. Sometimes you need to demeanour prolonged term, contend thirty years down the road. And sometimes you need to balance in between short-term as well as long-term goals.
When the supervision came out with the education process it looked reduced tenure as well as not prolonged term. And now, most years down the road, you have been paying for this short-sighted as well as short-term strategy.
But the repairs has been done. It is not going to be which easy to redress things. It might take the whole era to correct the mistakes of the past -- as well as even afterwards usually if you have been rebuilt to bite the bullet as well as have been rebuilt to humour the tall casualty rate.
Are you rebuilt to allow the Malays to become casualties in the interest of the improved education system formed upon meritocracy? Neither Najib Tun Razak nor Anwar Ibrahim would dare contend 'yes' to this question.
Things have been going t! o get wo rse prior to they become better. The cure might be as painful as the disease. But you am sure conjunction Barisan Nasional nor Pakatan Rakyat would be rebuilt to take the risk of the domestic fallout out if they try to shift the education system as well as see Malays tumble by the wayside given they have been only not great enough.
It is similar to earnest no taxation as well as earnest to give all the oil income behind to the states. How would you finance the country? No disbelief which type of promise is going to assistance win votes. But what do you do after you win the votes?
To have income you need to plant oil palm trees. To plant oil palm trees you need to bake down the forests. When you bake down the forests you create an ecological problem. So you do not bake down the forests to prevent an ecological problem. But given you do not bake down the forests you can't plant oil palm trees. And given you can't plant oil palm trees you can't have money.
Life is full of infamous cycles. And Malaysia can win the bullion award in infamous cycles if which happened to be an eventuality in the Olympic games.
*****************************************
Use of Sedition Act is wrong
Yin Shao Loong, The Malaysian Insider
Bar Council boss Lim Chee Wee settled which the Sedition Act should be used upon Ibrahim Ali given the latter had advocated the blazing of bibles.
Even though Lim acknowledged which the Bar binds which the law should be repealed, it should yet be used opposite Ibrahim if the supervision is charging antithesis leaders such as Karpal Singh underneath it.
Burning any book as the domestic action is vulgar, uncultured as well as should be condemned. Invoking the make use of of the draconian law to punish book burning, or incitement to bake books, is the defeat to authoritarianism.
By taking this stance, Lim as well as the Bar ! he leads have undermined any explain to scrupulous antithesis to the Sedition Act. Their rationale is same to those who proposed maintaining the Internal Security Act (ISA) so it could be used the single last time opposite the puppet master of Operation Lallang.
Even if Lim's vigilant was to underline how the present supervision selectively enforces the law, his argument was feeble selected given it was formed upon the proof which dual wrongs would have the right.
The Sedition Act has been the convenient as well as objectionable tool of peremptory power in Malaysia due to the broad applicability opposite anything which could be construed as raising malignity or feeling within society or opposite the authorities.
Anyone can explain they had feelings of malignity or feeling raised by someone's statement or action, ensue to record the military report, as well as have someone investigated for sedition. Of course, the contingency of successful charge would improve if the accused happened to be someone not favoured by the government.
Historically, mutiny was compared with absolutist monarchies. Undemocratic governments criminalise mutiny given they fright gainsay will destabilise management formed upon force, heredity or property. The order of the couple of over the most requires some form of institutionalised discrimination, fright as well as termination of criticism.
Democracies soak up critique into their system of supervision as well as allow the most to make use of their votes to initiate peaceful, nurse changes in government.
As prolonged as you have well known it, the Bar Council has stood for the scrupulous movement towards bone-fide inherent democracy in Malaysia. Supporting the make use of of the Sedition Act is the back step contrary to human rights.
Lim has already remarkable which any book-burning action or incitement to such action can be prosecuted underneath those sections of the Penal Code which understan! ding wit h abetment as well as trespass.
Additionally, sections 298 as well as 298A of the Penal Code understanding with acts designed to equates to harm upon eremite grounds, territory 504 covers intentional insult with vigilant to provoke the crack of the peace, as well as territory 505 refers to statements compelling public mischief.
It is in accord with to record the military report, or call for laws to be employed, where the actions in question have been criminal, incompatible those bona fide forms of gainsay criminalised by the Sedition Act, ISA, Printing Presses as well as Publications Act, as well as so forth.
One organisation of adults is hostile the barbarous action of book blazing by mouth-watering people to join in celebration of the mass holy books any books, in fact underneath the trees during KLCC play ground upon Sunday.
Others have filed the military inform opposite Ibrahim, citing most of the Penal Code sections referred to above, though without chance to the Sedition Act or any of the odious bedfellows.
These have been civilised equates to of hostile an barbarian act.
If you wish to pierce Malaysia out of the shade of authoritarianism you cannot condone the very methods of authoritarianism. This equates to which race-baiting, odious laws as well as parole contingency be abandoned in favour of scrupulous debate, pacific protest, accountability as well as reform.
Read More @ Source More
Barisan Nasional (BN) |
Pakatan Rakyat (PR) |
Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of
Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buz! z
< br/>
The three- part of row headed by Justice Ramly Ali unanimously authorised Rosli's(right) application for a stay of Kuala Lumpur High Court Justice Hue Siew Kheng's Jan 3 
KUALA TERENGGANU, January twenty-five PAS will field non-Muslim possibilities from a Non-Muslim PAS Supporters Congress (DHPP) in a 13thgeneral choosing following approval of a party's Syura Council, pronounced report arch Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man.
