Datuk Bandar KL: Which GLOBAL-ly known company was awarded the new ITIS Project?



The Auditor General has finished a ban report upon theIntegrated Transport Information System(ITIS) rubbed by DBKL in a 2011 Report. The unsuccessful ITIS with a visible picture pointer (VMS) has been reduced to displaying "Selamat Hari Raya", "Selamat Deepavali", "Selamat Tahun Baru Cina" as good as alternative greetings.The ITIS/ VMS was not meant for displaying festive greetings though togather, share as good as make accessible accurate as good as up-to-date trade informationto road users to help palliate their trade woes in Klang.
ITIS have been at large as good as successfully implemented in major cities around a world as good as have been handling with no major problems. Unlike a ITIS underneath DBKL which was a unsuccessful complement which price DBKL as good as a Federal GovernmentRM365.74 million!
The unsuccessful ITIS should have price reduction thanRM365.74 millionbut upon handing over a ITIS in 2005 a inexhaustible DBKL saw it fit to endowment a maintenance contract worth aboutRM30 milliona year. One would have thought which this supposed maintenance contract was totally nonessential as all products together with CCTV, VMS, mechanism complement as good as etc were underwarrantyat least for a initial year.
The unsuccessful ITIS was awarded toa supposed consortium consisting ofIntelligence Technology Services Sdn Bhd(company series 203316-K) as good as dual alternative companiesElelink Sdn BhdandAnekasaga Resources Sdn Bhd. The family ofEn Mohd Muazam bi Abdullah Bukhariof Pasir Mas, Kelantan, were endangered in both a companies Elelink Sdn Bhd as good as Anekasaga Sdn Bhd. Perhaps someone in DBKL could provide some-more report either DBKL was traffic with ! officers of these 3 companies or supposed consortium or alternative some-more successful players.
DBKL tip ranking officers as good as those in Jabatan Pengankutan had to be appraised of a actual state of affairs of a unsuccessful ITIS. If they do not know, afterwards DBKL tip ranking officers should seek help from MACC as good as alternative authorities to uncover who were thekey playersin a unsuccessful ITIS. Just meditative aloud, maybe there wereTWOvery significant pass players endangered in a unsuccessful ITIS. Don't read as good most in to this. Yours in truth was meditative aloud only!
During a assembly upon 30-11-2012 between Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur, Yg Bhg Datuk Ahmad Phesal bin Taib, as good as a MPs in Wilayah Persekutuan, yours in truth did bring up a unsuccessful ITIS for discussion as good as Datuk Bandar KL did residence a issues brought up though he has given an assurance which an open proposal will be called to designate brand brand brand new user for a brand brand brand new ITIS Project as good as which a pronounced 3 companies will not be considered. Syabas! What a comforting reassurance indeed.
Did DBKL learn from a approach in which a unsuccessful ITIS awarded? Yours in truth had to think aloud when traffic with ITIS as good as a similar to because no item report could be found within DBKL bulletins or website.
Rumour has it, yours in truth meant RUMOUR, which Jabatan Pengangkutan underneath a highly qualified hands ofIR Dr Leong Siew Munand his special cabinet looking in to a brand brand brand new ITIS Project. This special cabinet has shortlistedFOURcompanies eligible to be deliberate by tip ranking officers and/or Datuk Bandar KL. If this rumour was loyal afterwards a shortlisting of a FOUR companies was in accordance with TRANSPARENCY.
But no one outward a inner round knew a shortlisting for this supposed brand brand brand new ITIS Project costing another RM200 millions (thinking al! oud agai n ok) was for dual separate tenders for MAINTENANCE of a ITIS underneath DBKL Tender No:2011/A058) as good as CCTV (under DBKL proposal No:2011/A059) in 2011. The dual pronounced tenders contingency have been evaluated as good as shortlisted though no decision was finished for reason best known to those concerned. Yours in truth is meditative aloud again here which no decision was finished because a shortlisted companies were not a "RIGHT" companies to be selected! Maybe usually ok!
Yours in truth is meditative aloud again here which aFRESHtender was called on3-9-2012underONEDBKL Tender No:A/2012/A212. The brand brand brand new proposal contingency have been finished in a pure manner. Strangely sufficient a pronounced Tender Number was for total range of work forITIS/VMSandCCTV. Please do not read as good most in to this. It was only a matter of liking. Clever people regularly have crafty ideas in tendering out project especially with tall worth similar to this brand brand brand new ITIS Project price of aboutRM200 million!
Rumour has it again which a thoroughly deliberate ITIS Project costing another whooping RM200 million to DBKL has been awarded to a well-known association underneath a common PRACTICE in DBKL. Rumour has it which this well-known association has good known chairman at a back of it as good as he is a "well-known" consultant in IT IS!
Rumour has it which this well-known association with well-known chairman at a back of it was not a FOUR companies shortlisted by a special cabinet underneath IR Dr Leong.
Surely you cannot rest upon rummours. It is well-suited moment for Ir Dr Leong Siew Mum or Datuk Bandar KL to publicly endorse a name of a association which has GLOBAL reputation has been awarded a pronounced ITIS as good as either this association with GLOBAL reputation was partial of a FOUR companies shortlisted by a Special Committee underneath IR Dr Leong.!
Hopefully DBKL could explain a on top of rummours in a course of a next couple of dual days.
Thank you
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: