Sabah NCR land issue politicised without understanding fact
Fate twice punished Anwar Ibrahim's impatience
The post revealed which AAB was the collateral repairs in Anwar's 916 bid, where according to his manmanlai Gospel, 82 Pakatan MPs could stump 140 BN MPs.
Apart from the shamefully sum deformasi of blatant frogology, it would seem Anwar even had the effrontery to wish to benefaction his bizarre arguments to HM the Agong to claim control of sovereign parliament.
Tell me please, where in the approved world would the celebration (or coalition) of 82 MPs direct the statute party, holding 140 out of the 222 in Parliament, obey supervision to it, the minor bloc, or alternatively, to reason uninformed ubiquitous elections?
But such was his mesmerizing obscurity of manmanlai malarkey which even the lawyer similar to sweetie Hannah Yeoh upheld his 916 frogological manoeuvre d'tat as the correct constitutional process. It chargined me ('pissed me off' would be the some-more laconic description), still does, which anyone, generally the DAP person, would allow to which sinister shameful overthrow of the ballot box, which PKR in contemptuous double-face has frequently accused UMNO of.
Hannah Yeoh wrote: "Those who disagree which the domestic predicament in Perak right away is the taste of Pakatan Rakyat's own disinfectant the reference to Sept sixteen destroy to see the pass differences in between the two."
To me, both 916 as good as the Perak coup d'tat had the same frogological stench. So okay, you admit you am the single of those who failed to see the pass differences. Pr! ay enlig hten me.
Hannah continuing: "When Anwar claimed to have the numbers ! to form the sovereign government, he wrote to Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, requesting him to assemble an puncture sitting of Parliament. This was rejected by the budding minister."
Anwar claimed to have the numbers? What numbers? If you recall, the outcome of the March 2008 elections, which in reality gave Pakatan infancy rule in 5 states as good as denied BN the 2/3 majority, supposing Pakatan 82 sovereign seats opposite AAB's 140. you regret carrying to contend which the single of Hannah' 3R's, namely 'rithmetic, was positively most wanting. It's only as good she studied law instead of maths or accountancy. Anyway, what next?
"The subsequent constitutional choice was to press for the retraction of Parliament to make way for uninformed elections. This as well was not entertained."
"Constitutional option"? Which domestic party, carrying won 140 seats out of the max probable of 222 would dissolve council for uninformed elections? It would be same to leaping down from the 14th office building of the high rise building. If dear Hannah was not mesmerized by the manmanlai obscurity of malarkey, urge discuss it me what was she pang from? Anyway, the Tasmanian lerned lawyer continued:
"Anwar exhausted each constitutional equates to accessible to him. If Pakatan were to act unconstitutionally as good as captivate defections, afterwards you will be carrying the brand brand new supervision today. So, you can't contend which Najib's manoeuvre in Perak as good as the Pakatan devise Sept sixteen were the single as good as the same."
"If Pakatan were to act unconstitutionally as good as captivate defections, "? Dei my beloved sweet tangachee, what did you think 916 was about?
916 might have been an utter failure, which a! ccording to RPK was due to John Soh refusing to dole out RM300 million for an unguaranteed defection of thirty BN MPs! , though it was positively undeniably indisputably sum frogology, dreamed out by Anwar Ibrahim who contingency have illusory he could repeat his 1994 UMNO-ish election trash in Sabah. In plain simple English, Anwar's 916 was based totally upon his intent to captivate thirty BN MPs to forsake over to Pakatan PKR.
Or, maybe Hannah had illusory the EC came rushing up to Anwar with wonderful news which it had done the mistake in the March 08 counting in thirty sovereign parliamentary constituencies?
Hannah Oh Hannah! It's the single thing to be stupid (where you can afterwards sense from it to be better persons) though it's an additional to be 'converted' to the vile manmanlai ideology of deformasi. Power corrupts, as you witnessed in Anwar's 916, as good as absolute energy ...? That's what kaytee is disturbed about.
Every time you criticize Anwar Ibrahim (yes, you do wakakaka) you would regularly be criticized in turn for focusing usually upon Anwar as good as ignoring the alternative side, similar to Najib, etc.
Tell me, do you need to hentam Najib as good as UMNO-BN upon issues such as NFC, 1Care, tolls, PKFZ, submarine commission, puzzling APC price differences, Felda Global Ventures, Terengganu Stadium Collapse, MRR2 repair, Tourism graduation bullsh*t, PSC Naval dockyard, puzzling non-accountable awards of contracts, payouts to contractors without contracts being fulfilled, curved overpass compensation, Bank Bumi, Bank Islam, Maminco, Betting in unfamiliar sell futures by Bank Negara, Perwaja Steel, Valuecap Sdn. Bhd, corrupt practices together with lu tolong wa wa tolong lu-ism, secular politics, condoning conceited sincere acts of seditions by Utusan, Perkasa, BTN-ized racism by headmasters as good as make use of of books with bigoted contents, politicized police, MACC, judiciary, civil servants, muftis, AG, etc?
Everybody in Malaysia together with UMNO, MCA as good as MIC members themselves know all a! bout the ! discuss ed issues. Those who gain act dunno; those who don't make noises wakakaka; those similar to PAS as good as DAP demonstrate their outrage each day.
Sure, kaytee can add to the already tsunamic quantum of sound solely of impetus I'd pull the line opposite sparse puerile pathetic low class things similar to when the single shoal statesman raved about how he managed to get absolved of Rosmah Mansor from the titular position of pro chancellor of the university tranquil by the PKR Selangor state supervision - Yeah, f* earth-shaking man!
Whatever, I'll be only adding the small dump in to an sea of annoy opposite UMNO-BN dodgy-ness. Why squander my profitable time upon what most bloggers together with tip guru RPK are already doing, as good as with some-more report than you could obtain.
I'm some-more interested in ripping the sheepskins off wolves.
Anyway, you have been quite captivated by (as done accessible by RPK's post) the final paragraph of the Secret Report from the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur to Washington upon 19th September 2008, which stated (commenting upon AAB as the collateral repairs in Anwar's frogological bid):
Tian Chua stated which the Opposition was benefiting from the disarray in Abdullah's government, as good as was pleased which Najib was no longer Defense Minister. He added which if he became Prime Minister, Najib would be most some-more formidable competition as good as some-more likely to make use of oppressive measures to stop the Opposition, the view you have listened consistently from Anwar as good as senior Opposition leaders.
Why should PKR be endangered about Najib being the Defence Minister when it should be about him becoming PM? And upon which point, guess what would occur when AAB suffered mortal repairs to his station in UMNO since of 916? And it happened!
So unless the US Embassy report got their Tian Chua quotes incorrect, it showed the Taikoe of PKR Chinese subsect! ion as b eing the unequivocally confused person.
But nonetheless, it demonstrated how Fate once ag! ain puni strew Anwar Ibrahim for his impatience.
Impatience? Please review my 2008 post The Achilles heel of Anwar Ibrahim (extracts as follows)
RPK had told Guang Ming:
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim altered after he became the Deputy Prime Minister cum Finance Minister. Umno altered him, pronounced Raja Petra Kamarudin. He became only an additional "Umno man".
"He wore RM3,000 suits, distinct the time when you wore traditional Malay costumes. Before he joined the celebration he pronounced he longed for to shift Umno though instead he was the a single who was altered by Umno," Raja
Petra said.
Thereafter, Raja Petra did not get concerned with Anwar any longer though instead became active in Pas.
He wrote for the English Section of Pas' Harakah as good as in some of his pieces he even criticised Anwar. Anwar was unequivocally indignant during which time. When Anwar was sacked in 1998, he told Anwar that: "You deserve it! You can plea Ghafar Baba, though not Mahathir."
Raja Petra pronounced which Anwar thought after simply overthrowing Tun Ghafar Baba he could simply depose Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad as well. Eventually, he failed as good as Dr Mahathir did him in instead.
Anwar brought the whole Humpty Dumpty wall down upon his conduct since he couldn't only wait for the couple of some-more months for Dr Mahathir to retire. He thought he had everything in UMNO sown up.
Due to his impatience as good as his miscalculations, as good as not forgetful his disregard for his elders, he fell upon his own UMNO keris.
Of impetus when he was diminished he metamorphosed OVERNIGHT
into the domestic reformer wakakaka how can he expect people, even if they hadn't already gifted his (Educati! on)! m iniste rial policies, to hold him?
In an additional post The torture as good as impatience of Anwar Ibrahim you wrote (extracts only):
Not confident with the Pakatan achieving the tsunamic victory (alas, there was zero for him personally, when UMNO one after another to impugn him), he sought to destabilize the democratically inaugurated government.
In the 6-months long process of snapping during AAB's heels as good as attempting to crush Najib's wayward balls, he has pushed himself as good as his Pakatan in to the blind alley, where he right away cannot extricate himself if he doesn't turn PM by sixteen September 2008.
What he should have done was to connect the Pakatan's brand brand new power, shaped the shadow cupboard to train his colleagues upon ministerial functions, as good as developed the 5 Pakatan hold States as models of democracy, freedom as good as giveaway speech, non-corruptibility, good governance with full transparency as good as open accountability, as good as race-less equivalence as good as opportunity.
And he would have simply turn PM in 2012.
Thus by contributing to the early ouster of AAB, something Dr M was already operative towards, Anwar bought for himself the distant tougher as good as some-more divergent competition in to the PM's seat, to his (Anwar's) larger disadvantage.
Stumped by his own impatience or only as well clever by half?
Anti-ISA criticism during masjid jamek Aug 1
Protesters demanding ISA be abolished attempting to mangle out from Masjid Jamek to impetus to Istana Negara to benefaction direct for abolishment ! of the d raconian Internal Security Act Video Rating: 4 / 5More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Carta Hati (^_^)"
Oil royalty promise: Another Anwar lies?
And thus democracy makes cowards of us all Farish A. Noor
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Pakatan states proof of economic success, proper governance, say leaders
By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Stop harassing Jessie Ooi, says MCA
MCA has called upon netizens to "stop personal attacks" upon a Selangor Beliawanis arch Jessie Ooi, who has been at large ticked off for her aggressive demeanour in asking a subject during a MCA-DAP leaders' discuss final Saturday.
"Netizens as well as bloggers should not be excessively spooky with or speculate upon a subject of Ooi's question, so as to keep a concentration of a discuss upon a debaters," pronounced Wanita MCA Beliawanis arch Tee Hooi Ling.
Ooicaught open attentionfor a demeanour in which she acted a subject to Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng during his discuss in Kuala Lumpur with MCA boss Dr Chua Soi Lek.
"The claims made as well as circulated around a Internet as well as in open have been at large exaggerated...
"Ooi herselfhas admittedto being over-excited upon which day due to a actuality which she was not given enough time to convey her subject properly, which resulted in a misunderstanding," explained Tee, propelling a open to stop haranguing Ooi.
She additionally slammed critics for verbally abusing Ooi as well as badgering her with Photoshop images which have left viral upon a Internet.
Tee additionally defended Ooi for perplexing to convey a concerns of a people in Penang, as well as reminded critics to not "twist" her questions.
"Such coarse practice! s do not conform to a complement of democracy in our republic as well as are just plain wrong," she stressed.
Meanwhile, MCA Youth secretary-general Chai Kim Sen additionally came to Ooi's defence, observant which Malaysians should be aiming their gun at Lim for "evading questions" relating to a antithesis coalition's domestic platform.
Chai pronounced Lim had failed to address a questions acted by a MCA president, yet antithesis supporters chose to target Ooi instead.
"During a debate, Chua had asked Lim to insist a socio-economic indication which will be implemented by Pakatan Rakyat," he said.
Lim was asked how Pakatan would have Malaysia a high-income nation, yet he only gave a brief response, with no clear elaboration of a strategy, he said.
However, Ooi became a "victim", lamented Chai, who went upon to credit Pakatan supporters of stooping to "dirty tactics" to strengthen Lim.
"Instead of wasting their time insulting as well as criticising Ooi, Pakatan should sit down as well as concentration upon a social-economic indication of governance.
"Even yet a discuss is over, Pakatan cannot censor a actuality which it is not in in ideas upon how to govern a nation," pronounced Chai. Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
En route to FGV Listing. Not a bed of roses.-Part 2
Berapa kali pulak nak tunda, Anwar?
Penat Berlakon Sinetron, Mikha Tambayong Cuba Nasib di Malaysia
EPISODE 12: Pak Lah was ousted because of 16th September
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
FELDA forms unit to invest in FGVH, replacing KPF
UPDATED @ 06:24:25 PM 22-02-2012
Editor
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Win to continue nation-building
Flawed conditions to pacify public
In an additional development, a supervision announced which an independent monitoring section will be shaped to undertake a building a whole audit during a Lynas' refinery plant in Gebeng.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Hooray, the Non-Malays have gone: Malaysia is now all ours!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
KUNYIT HANGIT! ANWAR LA DALANGNYA MALAYSIA ISRAEL BERDAGANG!
... kerajaan Malaysia ada satu polisi dan pendirian yang jelas bahawa kita tidak ada hubungan politik dan hubungan diplomatik dengan Israel, walaupun sebagai ahli Parlimen saya sedar bahawa ada perdagangan di antara kedua-dua negara.
Tetapi perdagangan itu adalah diantara syarikat, contohnya syarikat antarabangsa yang berpengkalan di Malaysia yang memerlukan bahan mentah dan tidak boleh diperolehi dari negara-negara lain.
Syarikat ini terpaksa impot dari Israel sebab ada syarikat yang tidak dimiliki oleh rakyat mahupun negara Israel yang berpengakalan di situ, contohnya, Intel.
Intel mempunyai kilang di Israel yang menyediakan bahan untuk membuat mikrocip, semi-konduktor atau bahan untuk dibuat peralatan komputer. Intel yang berpengkalan disini terpaksa impot dari Intel (yang berpengkalan di Israel). Kelonggaran ini telah diberi.
Namun saya ingin memaklumkan Anwar Ibrahim jangan hipokrit dalam hal ini. Hari ini dia kata kerajaan Malaysia membenarkan perdagangan dengan kerajaan Israel, seolah-olah beliau tidak tahu.
Saya mahu umumkan disini bahawa kawalan terhadap perdagangan dengan Israel dikawal dibawah Akta Kastam. Kastam berada dibawah Kementerian Kewangan.
Kelonggaran untuk syarikat-syarikat berdagang dengan syarikat-syarikat di Israel dibuat pada tahun 1996 oleh jemaah Menteri.
Jika sebelum itu kita tidak boleh berdagang dengan Israel. 1996, siapa Timbalan Perdana Menteri dan Menteri Kewangan. Tidak lain tidak bukan Anwar Ibrahim.
Petikan dariGelombang Wangsa Maju
IMPACTFUL AND TIMELY PIECE, J D.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Video of UiTM Students 'expressing their displeasure' on VC UiTM @datosahol
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Another we dont need you syndrome
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Felda to form special unit for settlers to invest in FGVH
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Eight years to 2020, Malaysia is still divided by race, religion and food!
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Auto industry, Bank Negara to discuss loan guidelines
Too Big To Jail
February 22, 2012
Too Big to Jail: It sounds familiar!
Among a elemental principles of any functioning probity complement is a following: Don't lie to a judge or reproduce papers submitted to a court, or we will go to jail. Breaking an promise to tell a law is perjury, as well as fibbing in official papers is both perjury as well as fraud.
These have been serious rapist offenses, though assumingly not if we have been during a heart of America's monetary system. On a contrary, key individuals there crop up to be good compensated for their crimes.
As Dennis Kelleher of Better Markets has argued, a recent so-called "robo-signing" allotment in which five large banks "settled" their legal liability for carrying out fake foreclosures upon mortgages is a complete sell-out to a monetary industry.
First, there was no serious rapist charge meaning which no a single will be charged with a felony, as well as no a single will go to jail. In conditions of inspiring executives' incentives, this is a usually thing which matters.
Even a terminology used to frame a contention is wrong. Kelleher, an attorney with extensive experience in private practice as well as a open sector, tells it like it is: "'robo-signing' is massive, systematic, fraudulent, rapist conduct." Alternatively, as he points out, we could only call it "lying, cheating, as well as stealing."
Second, a polite penalties in this allotment a form of excellent have been diminutive relations to a size of a companies involved. As Shahien Nasiripour, a single of a best reporters upon this issue, dr! yly put it: "None of a five lenders have pronounced they expect to incur a material charge due to a settlement." In other words, from a corporate perspective, a penalty is a trifling affair.
Third, such fines are, in any case, paid by a companies' shareholders, not by their management team or board members (all of whom lift insurance). In a singular cases in which fines have been levied upon individuals, possibly their word policies picked up most of a bill, or a penalties were pardonable relations to a money remuneration which they perceived while committing their crimes or both.
As if all of this weren't bad enough, a banks reportedly will be means to have use of government money to write down a worth of mortgages, which amounts to subsidizing them to compensate their own meaningless fines.
The Obama administration department department as well as a allies have worked difficult to sell a roughly $ twenty billion allotment with a banks as a single which will have a suggestive impact upon a housing market. But nothing could be further from a truth. As Kelleher points out, a United States has "more than 10 million homes underneath water" (the outstanding debt exceeds a house's value). "Twenty billion dollars doesn't have a dent in that: a single million homes during $ 20,000 loan forgiveness is it."
In fact, a Obama administration's allotment with a debt lenders is unchanging with a track jot down upon all of a policies associated to a monetary sector, which has been abysmal. But it is additionally puzzling. Why would a administration department department go upon to bend over backwards to be kindly towards tip bankers underneath these circumstances?
I overtly do not believe which a administration's position reflects any form of crime payments done to individuals or even to domestic campaigns. And, in this cas! e, it do es not even crop up to reflect a lobbying energy of large monetary players. That energy certainly explains because a Dodd-Frank monetary reforms enacted in 2010 were not stronger, as well as because there is right away so much opposition to effective doing of which legislation (for example, there is currently a huge fight around a "Volcker rule," which would limit proprietary trading by megabanks). But debt lenders' rapist activities have been an additional matter.
Indeed, during interest in a debt allotment have been elemental as well as systemic breaches of a order of law perjury as well as fraud upon an economy-wide scale. The Justice Department has, though question, all of a energy which it needs to prosecute these alleged crimes fully. And nonetheless America's tip law-enforcement officials have consistently as well as right away utterly corroborated off.
The categorical motivation behind a administration's indulgence of serious steal evidently is fright of a consequences of taking difficult movement upon particular bankers. And may be officials have been right to be afraid, since a large size of a banks in subject relations to a economy. In fact, those banks have been bigger right away than they were prior to a crisis, and, as James Kwak as well as we documented during length in our book 13 Bankers, they have been much larger than they were twenty years ago.
Top bankers wish to have a lot of money. They additionally wish to stay out of prison. Political leaders can pant as well as puff as much as they want, but, though a credible threat of poverty as well as time behind bars, bankers have no reason to comply with a law. For them, it's all about a trade as well as we can be a sucker in open policy as easily as we can be a sucker in an particular loan agreement.
The summary to bank management team today is simple: build your bank to be as large as probable as well as then ! keep gro wing. If we conduct to turn large enough, we as well as your employees have been not only too large to fail, though additionally too large to jail.The Obama administration department department has only done everyone else a sucker.
Simon Johnson, a former arch economist of a IMF, is co-founder of a leading economics blog, http://BaselineScenario.com, a professor during MIT Sloan, a senior fellow during a Peterson Institute for International Economics, as well as co-author, with James Kwak, of 13 Bankers.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2012.
www.project-syndicate.org
Like this:
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
A Fool is a Fool, Selangor MCA
According to the military report, Liew noted which Lim had spoken "PAS never killed the Chinese" during the wrap-up session of the head-to-head discuss which was radio programme live.
Liew said which the Chinese community did not understand the loyal meaning of this acknowledgement as well as felt disturbed as well as afraid as Lim was playing upon the secular issue.
Thus, he wants the military to investigate Lim upon either he had disregarded "any secular emanate laws".
Allan Liew contingency be pang from the same intellectually challenging seizure like Jessie Ooi. Taking the CM's acknowledgement literally, it equates to PAS did not commit any serious offence opposite the Chinese. How can such the acknowledgement be deemed racist or dangerous?
This is the categorical complaint with MCA. The celebration is acting as well as working in the uncanny as well as unsuitable manner. While it has the complaint with Dap's partnership with Pas, it ! does not have any complaint ancillary Perkasa activities or Malaysia Politics's efforts to court Pas for the merger.
The celebration has the complaint with corrupt allegations opposite Pakatan though it has tolerated crime inside of its own coalition.
If Allan is so keen to board the military inform opposite Lim Guan Eng, he should board the inform opposite the organizers of the event for allowing Lim to make use! of the theatre to commit his 'crime'. He should board the military inform opposite those unethical politicians who had bashed up Islam, Hudud as well as shown disgusting disregard towards Muslims.
What about Hasan Ali as well as his furious imagination as well as allegations opposite the Christians? Or Ibrahim Ali's insult of the Chinese by handing out white envelopes (pak kam) during Chinese New Year?
These actions distant outweigh Lim's assertion upon "Pas never killed the Chinese". I goal Alan will not emanate an reason which you have listened him wrongly again, ala Jessie Ooi, which he had in error Lim for observant " Pas did killed the Chinese!".
If MCA wants to scratch back support, it has to do it by credible, responsible, clever as well as prolific ways.
What would the center group consider of the celebration whos! e leader s have been acting likedumb-asses?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |