By Clara Chooi
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
We like it when Dr Mahathir speaks as often as he wants to. While I have often described him as a male who can walk upon water, in this article he is Captain Ahab to Najib's Starbuck as distant as a UMNO mother boat is concerned. UMNO boat is a Pequod which sails out underneath Captain Ahab looking punish upon a spermatazoa whale Moby Dick. Captain Ahab is completely used up by punish to find out as well as kill off Moby Dick. Because Moby Dick has bitten off a portion of a single of his legs.
What's with Dr Mahathir really? The ghosts of misdeeds past have been haunting him? Have you a people bitten off part of his left leg? Right leg? Well, you know eventually a boat went down bringing along Ahab to his watery grave.
Please do not stop him. We want Dr Mahathir to verbalise some-more about Malaysian politics. The some-more he says, a faster is a demise of UMNO. Apparently he has forgotten why Pak Lah in 2004, got a largest majority in a story of BN. Dr Mahathir as well as NOT Pak Lah was a categorical cause giving BN a largest mandate.
Not which a people thought Pak lah would be a good PM. He incited out to be a sleepy head upon a many issues facing a country. History will substantially recollect him as a PM you got as a outcome of a mistake.
The categorical reason why Pak Lah got a biggest majority was which a people were rejoicing during a exit of Mahathir, a male who started Malaysia upon a road of destruction. Malaysia is today what Africa was twenty years ago. Malaysia is fast becoming a limit town with gunslingers around. You have a apportion who abducted a male as well as had him knocked about mercilessly. We additionally have a son of a apportion who might have instructed his minder to beat up a security guard. More recently, you review about a case of a part of of a Johor Royal House violence another person ruthlessly.
Since 1981 to be exact, UMNO has altered in character completel! y. It ha s developed into an immorality sovereignty devouring a resources of a nation by a formidable network of cronies as well as a labyrinth of untrustworthy deals heading back eventually to a top reaches of a UMNO leadership. The buck does in truth stop there.
How does a Malay male conflict to a constant list of criminal acts? I find it distressing when grown up men, intelligent ones during that, justifying as well as rationalizing all a immorality which UMNO has done as excusable given they have been committed by Malays. When a Malay rapes as well as pillages, which is all right as well as excusable given he is a single of us? Has UMNO given 1981, evolve into an old boy network of thieves as well as murderers?
When a Malay contractor gets a project during an UMNO price, it's ok given during least a Malay got it. The Malay gets 20-30%, a rest goes to his Chinese subcontractor. The UMNO Malay is a profiteering parasitic egghead gnome.
Where will UMNO as well as BN get their votes? From a over 60s which have been not which vast number? Those who have crossed over to a alternative GOOD side have been not expected to come back to BN. UMNO as well as BN will additionally get votes from a instant Malaysians- a immigrants who came as well as were given mykads.
Perhaps arcane to a biggest electoral fraud ever in a history, Captain Ahab wants to help drive a UMNO boat to a ocean grave. We contingency inspire Dr Mahathir to find out Moby Dick. Moreover, you have a sore duck PM who has declared fight upon a people. The PM is additionally inattentive which a people, who made a inapplicable designation of wrongly voting in a final elections, were in a 49% organisation of renouned voters. The 51% organisation contingency have gotten it right. Stick to it people.
Luahan hati seorang penuntut keturunan India beragama Hindu di Universiti Malaya tentang kesulitan mendapatkan makanan vegetarian di kampus tersebut mungkin tidak merupakan sesuatu yang perlu diambil perhatian berat oleh mereka yang tidak berkenaan.
Namun apabila dia menyatakan kemusykilan tentang bagaimana makanan dari Iran lebih mudah didapati di kampus itu, kita yang prihatin mesti tertanya-tanya apakah yang telah berlaku. Dia mengakhiri dengan bertanya adakah ini sesuatu yang tidak disengajakan ataupun memang merupakan satu arahan baru.
Makanan yang diyakini halal adalah perkara wajib dalam kehidupan seorang penganut agama Islam. Lihat sahajalah bagaimana orang Islam akan bertanya sama ada ayam yang disajikan telah disembelih secara halal.
Mungkin ramai yang tahu penganut agama Islam tidak memakan babi tetapi ada juga yang tidak sedar bahawa makanan yang dibenarkan dalam Islam juga ada syarat-syaratnya. Salah satu syarat yang kadang-kadang terlupa diambilkira ialah sembelihan juga mestilah yang halal.
Penganut agama Islam juga semakin lama semakin prihatin tentang kandungan bahan-bahan yang terdapat di dalam makanan yang telah diproses. Penganut-penganut agama lain tidak terkecuali daripada mempunyai corak pemakanan mereka yang tersendiri yang mesti mematuhi hukum-hakam agama mereka.
Contoh yang mudah ialah makanan vegetarian yang dinyatakan tadi adalah salah satu asas dalam prinsip mereka yang beragama Hindu. Mereka yang benar-benar menghayati ajaran agama masing-masing akan cuba sedaya upaya menjalani hidup seharian dengan pemakanan yang diyakini telah disediakan menurut peraturan yang telah ditetapkan.
Makanan adalah asas hidup kita dan ramai yang yakin bahawa pemakanan yang t! elah diy akini bersih dan menurut peraturan agama masing-masing boleh membantu perjalanan hidup seterusnya. Kita yakin berjaya mencapai matlamat menjadi penganut agama yang lebih baik dengan bantuan makanan yang telah disediakan menurut syarat-syarat agama. Apa yang dimakan mencerminkan tingkah laku masing-masing dan yang baik membuahkan hasil yang baik pula.
UM boleh begitu alpa?
Berbalik kepada kemusykilan kenapa tidak ada lagi makanan vegetarian yang terdapat di kampus universiti tadi. Kalaulah kesukaran mendapatkan makanan tersebut berpunca daripada kelalaian pihak pentadbiran kampus yang tidak mengambilkira pemakanan penuntut bergama Hindu, kita mungkin boleh memaafkannya.
Tetapi bukankah Universiti Malaya telah ditubuhkan sejak 1962 dan itu adalah satu tempoh yang lama untuk mengetahui apakah bangsa dan agama penuntut-penuntutnya serta keperluan khusus masing-masing termasuk pemakanan. Kita yakin pentadbiran universiti telah mempunyai sistem selia yang diamalkan sejak penubuhannya dan boleh digunapakai sehingga sekarang. Persoalan akan bertambah jika tiba-tiba kaedah penyelenggaraan selama ini bertukar dan mendatangkan masalah kepada warga kampus.
Kalau sistem sedia ada dikatakan ditukar supaya pengurusan di kampus bertambah baik, kealpaan tentang pemakanan bukanlah sesuatu yang boleh dibanggakan.
Keprihatinan pentadbiran terhadap keperluan setiap warga kampus mesti sentiasa dikawalselia bukan sahaja yang meliputi pemakanan tetapi juga mobiliti yang mudah dan selamat untuk mereka yang kurang upaya.
Setiap golongan minoriti memerlukan bantuan yang mungkin kelihatan amat remeh tetapi sesuatu yang wajib disediakan untuk mereka supaya perjalanan hidup lebih selesa dan terjamin.
Universiti itu adalah pusat pendidikan untuk semua yang ingin menimba ilmu tidak kira bangsa dan agama. Semua yang layak dan telah terpilih ke situ mahu memperbaiki diri masing-masing melalui pengetahuan dan pergaulan sesama sendiri. Mereka mahu menumpukan perhatian menjad! i warga kampus yang berjaya menerap segala ilmu yang dicurahkan dan tentulah tidak mahu dibebankan dengan persoalan asas seperti pemakanan.
Ketiadaan makanan vegetarian telah mengurangkan pilihan yang ada di kampus dan mereka yang memerlukannya perlu berbelanja lebih untuk mendapatkannya. Bukan semua yang mampu berbuat demikian tambahan pula kos hidup seharian semakin meningkat.
Ketiadaan makanan vegetarian juga merupakan satu kehilangan bagi penuntut-penuntut lain juga. Mereka tidak akan mengerti dan faham tentang keperluan seorang rakan yang berbeza agama. Mereka juga tidak berpeluang menikmati pilihan makanan yang lebih pelbagai di kampus. Bukankah ini satu kekurangan dalam mengenal adat resam serta budaya bangsa dan agama lain?
Mungkin ada yang menasihatkan mereka yang memerlukan makanan vegetarian supaya tidak berpegang terlampau kuat terhadap kehendak agama mereka. Bertolak ansurlah dan anggap keadaan itu satu darurat. Apa perasaan golongan agama lain jika dinasihatkan demikian.
Apa yang lebih memusykilkan dalam senario ini ialah kewujudan pemilihan makanan dari Iran yang lebih mudah didapati di kampus berbanding ketiadaan makanan vegetarian. Setahu kita, warga negara Iran bukanlah warga negara Malaysia ataupun tanpa disedari mereka memang telah menjadi rakyat negara ini sejak Malaya mencapai kemerdekaan pada tahun 1957 atau ketika Malaysia ditubuhkan pada 1963.
Mungkin mereka telah dikategorikan dalam golongan 'yang lain-lain'. Apa yang nyata ialah bangsa India beragama Hindu telahpun wujud dalam setiap statistik tentang Malaysia. Malahan pengaruh dari benua India selain dari negara China telah terbukti wujud di negara ini sejak zaman berzaman lagi.
Terlepas pandang penganut agama Hindu
Begitulah kita rakyat Malaysia memang terkenal berbudi bahasa dan mengalu-alukan kehadiran orang dari luar. Walhal penduduk tempatan juga memerlukan perhatian dan dalam kes ini, sesuatu yang paling asas iaitu pemakanan.
Apa yang lebih pelik ialah keut! amaan ya ng diberikan kepada keperluan warga kampus dari Iran kerana setakat ini majlis agama Islam Malaysia memang tidak mengiktiraf fahaman syiah yang diamalkan oleh penganut agama Islam dari Iran.
Bukankah kehadiran makanan dari Iran memberi peluang secara tidak langsung fahaman syiah akan berkembang-biak di kalangan penganut agama Islam Malaysia.
Kehadiran makanan vegetarian versi penganut agama Hindu berkemungkinan besar tidak akan mempengaruhi penganut agama lain beralih arah. Kalau ada yang tersasar kerana makanan vegetarian, pasti itu kerana kehendaknya sendiri dan makanan itu tidak harus dipersalahkan.
Mereka yang waras dan mampu berfikir boleh menerima kehadiran makanan lain selain daripada yang telah sedia ada kerana tidak ada sesiapa yang akan memaksa kita menjamah sesuatu yang tidak disukai.
Kehadiran makanan yang diperlukan oleh penganut agama lain bermanfaat besar kepada mereka dan yang lain boleh mencubanya jika berkeinginan. Memang ketiadaan makanan vegetarian dengan harga yang berpatutan di kampus terasa seperti satu beban yang berat bagi penganut agama Hindu. Bolehkah keadaan ini diperbetulkan?
Kenapa kita menyusukan kera di hutan tetapi membiarkan anak sendiri mati kelaparan?
Pua pronounced a only reason for a early payout was to shield KDSB from losses. File pic
In a matter yesterday, a regulator for Malaysias largest pier pronounced it paid a bondholders to avoid serve implicating a PKA for crack of stipulate in light of a ongoing litigation involving a multibillion project.
DAP publicity arch Tony Pua subject a PKAs matter since which there is no stipulate tenure which requires remuneration by PKA to KDSB or a bondholders if a required building a whole functions have been not completed.
It makes positively no sense for a supervision to demand on creation a remuneration when it disagrees which work has been carried out.
In fact, a criminal crack of trust offence [would be] committed if PKA continues to have a applicable payments despite discovering which a functions have not been executed or a claims were fraudulent, a Petaling Jaya Utara MP pronounced in a statement.
Former ride apportion Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat revealed which a supervision has paid out RM3.039 billion to KDSB bondholders so distant despite a authorised brawl over PKFZ works.
Ong, who was private from a Cabinet after being ousted as MCA boss in 2010, had pronounced a supervision should not pay a scheduled amounts, of which an additional RM733.37 million is due in June, until a cases have been settled.
Pua alleged which underneath a down remuneration agreement, KDSB was to cover any shortfall in remuneration from a supervision due to incomplete functions as well as gives bondholders a power to sue a company in such an event.
These actions will patently mean substantial wa! ste by K DSB, a company owned by Barisan Nasional (BN) Backbenchers chairman, Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing.
The only possible reason for a PKA as well as a apportion of Transport, Datuk Seri Kong Cho Ha, to demand on creation a remuneration is to strengthen KDSB, Pua said.
The antithesis lawmaker pointed out which PKAs explain contradicts a recommendation from a authorised counsel during a tenure of a former chairman, Datuk Lee Hwa Beng, who had specifically urged which remuneration be funded so they could recoup all their waste in a event rascal is proven.
The project, initially tagged during an estimated RM1.1 billion in 1997 when it was mooted by afterwards ride apportion Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik, some-more than quadrupled to RM4.6 billion by 2007.
A in front of examination by top accounting organisation Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) revealed in 2009 which a sum price together with seductiveness from debt repayments could reach RM12.5 billion.
Since December 2009, six people have been charged in court, together with ex-MCA boss Dr Ling as well as his inheritor as ride minister, former MCA emissary arch Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy, who have been both indicted of fibbing to a Cabinet.
Lee, who was PKA arch from Mar 2008 to Mar 2011, told The Malaysian Insider in a recent interview which this was just a tip of a iceberg.
He pronounced some-more would be revealed through a money trail if a corruption charge was ever brought to justice or if there was a change in supervision as a new ride apportion as well as PKA arch would not be obstructed by vested interest.