Klang MP as well as Coalition Against Water Privatisation coordinator Charles Santiago speaks to FMT about a H2O squabble in in between a sovereign as well as Selangor state governments.
PETALING JAYA: Central to a "water war" in Selangor is an abundance of money, Umno cronies as well as a miss of correct information. This was a outline according to DAP's Charles Santiago, who, in reserve from being a Klang MP, additionally has an activist background as well as has been during a forefront of a H2O emanate in a state for a little time.
The Coalition Against Water Privatisation (CAWP) coordinator spoke to FMT about because he insisted which a "water crisis" was a single which was "manufactured"; what he predicted would happen after this; as well as how he thinks it can be resolved.
The people of Selangor, he admitted, would suffer from this enlarged delay in in between a state as well as a sovereign governments, which Santiago described as a "water war".
He pronounced a most appropriate approach to finalise this would be to reason an eccentric review upon Syabas by a association from another country though any vested interests.
The supposed "water war" proposed when Syabas voiced final week which it was formulation to implement H2O rationing in a Klang Valley following a shortfall of treated with colour with colour water.
This prompted an immediate reply from a Selangor government, with Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim observant a state supervision intended to take over a supervision of Syabas in two weeks.
Pakatan Rakyat leaders as well as sure NGOs accused Syabas of indulging in poli! tics by "manufacturing" a predicament in order to hasten building a total of a RM3.6 billion Langat 2 diagnosis plant.
The Pakatan-run state supervision had denied which Selangor was regulating reduced of water, observant which all seven dams in Selangor had superfluous H2O levels. Several Pakatan leaders even visited a dams as well as diagnosis plants to "show" which there was no crisis.
The sovereign supervision additionally responded by announcing a setting up of a Cabinet committee, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, to hoop a dispute in in between a Selangor supervision as well as Syabas.
On Monday, a committee pronounced which a supervision had motionless to disallow a Selangor supervision from receiving over a operations of Syabas.
Muhyiddin pronounced which a sovereign supervision would go forward with building a Langat 2 H2O diagnosis plant though Selangor state's approval.
He additionally pronounced which there was no need to allotment H2O supply to Selangor as well as a surrounding areas in a Federal Territories.
The issue, according to Muhyiddin, had come to a "critical level" as there were several areas in a Klang Valley where "water is not forthcoming".
Below have been excerpts from a interview
FMT: What's your take upon a 'water crisis' issue? There seems to be a miss of plain report to debunk possibly side. Is there a approach to explain a confusion? Santiago: The initial indicate to note here is which there is a corner of information, which is all controlled by a sovereign government, Water Association of Selan! gor, Kua la Lumpurand Putrajaya (SWAn) [headed by Sybas' Rozali Ismail]. All of them have been regulating Syabas' figures. So in terms of information, you have been during a forgiveness of Syabas. The report which they have been not giving us have been things like:
- outflow of tender H2O from dams as well as pumping stations in to diagnosis plants from January 1 to Jul 15 this year;
- metre readings of a outflow of treated with colour with colour H2O in to diagnosis plants for a same period;
- metre readings of a outflow of treated with colour with colour H2O in to consumer distribution complement (via Syabas);
- certified logbooks as well as calibrated metres;
- electricity bills for a same period;
- chemical use for a same period; and
- Puncak Niaga/ Syabas payment bills for H2O sold for a same period.
Why have been you looking this information, especially in in between these specific dates of January 1 as well as Jul 15?
Because Syabas is telling us there is a trend of 3 months (of increased H2O demand), you wish to see if which is loyal during all. If this report is released, you can have the experts examine it. As distant as you have been concerned during a moment, a total "water crisis" is manufactured.
When you contend it is "manufactured", have been you referring to this supposed conspiracy made by BN-Umno as claimed by Pakatan?
you am not a conspiracy theorist though you am observant which this entire thing is all about money. The total H2O send plan from Pahang to Selangor is starting to price a little RM9 billion, so there is a lot of income involved. From what you assimilate from my attention sources, Umno boys have been removing a lot of a contracts. you am articulate about contracts for things similar to laying a pipes to others. Industry sources additionally tell m! e which Puncak Niaga is additionally removing a stipulate to operate as well as manage this.
But didn't a sovereign supervision contend which there would be a tender process for this?
That's a nice things which they have been saying. But you wish to ask them straight up, have you betrothed this plan to Puncak Niaga? Yes or no?
So, you're telling us which everything is "manufactured" for sure parties to get money?
Yes. Because a National Water Resources Study 2000-2050 (carried out by SMHB Sdn Bhd in cooperation with Ranhill Bersekutu Sdn Bhd as well as Jurutera Perunding Zaaba) showed which investments for H2O infrastructure growth costs around RM50 billion as well as right away you have been articulate about in in between RM80 billion as well as RM100 billion. Like you said, there is a lot of income to be made in this industry. And anyone with a connections will hasten to get a piece of it. One of them is Puncak Niaga.
What, in your opinion, would be a most appropriate approach to finalise this? You have referred to which an eccentric review is a usually way. How do you consider you should go about this?
The state as well as sovereign governments contingency come up with a third-party eccentric audit. It would be improved to have a state-run (foreign) review company; in this way, they would not have any interests, possibly with a Selangor state or a sovereign government. The approach you look during it, everyone in Malaysia has taken sides in this issue. On a single side you have Syabas, a sovereign government, as well as a mainstream media as well as upon a alternative side, you have us, a state. The law is not entrance out. What you have been conference is "their truth". They have vested seductiveness to overpower a state.
You credit a mainstream media of receiving sides as well as having "vested seductiveness to overpower a state", how do you clear that?!
The Star belongs to MCA, Syabas belongs to (Selangor) Umno treasurer (Rozali Ismail), a NST is additionally an Umno-linked company. Look during a time when a emanate of garbage collection pennyless out, it was played up in a mainstream media. But a actuality was Selangor saved about RM800 million. The quit rent forsaken by 25% as well as as you can see, a benefits have been distributed to help a people. Yes, there were teething problems when it was initial introduced though it is right away better. Look during 2011-2012, Selangor has saved about RM2 billion, it is unprecedented.
you consider a reason Muhyiddin says there is no more need for rationing is which his Special Branch studies show which people have been only pissed off over this issue. His reply is right away patently a political a single instead of something based upon facts.
Why is a Selangor supervision so adamant which Langat 2 should not proceed?
Firstly, you contingency ask: who is starting to compensate for a cost, a expenditure of RM9 billion for a project? Somebody has to bear a costs. The people of Selangor, Putrajaya, Klang Valley will be a ones who will be forced to compensate for it by increased tariffs. Secondly, they cannot clear because they need to build it. What is a basement for it? The National Water Resources Study 2000-2050 embellished a design which Selangor will have a H2O drought somewhere in 2012, 2013, or 2014. But a problem is which a study had used a aloft economic growth of 8% when a realistic figure is about 4% to 5%. The population growth they used was additionally aloft than a actual figures. So having these "over" projections compared to what is really function right now, does not clear having this H2O send plan similar to Langat 2.
Furthermore, because have been they focusing usually upon a large projects when you should be articulate about upgrading of existing plants, rebate of consumption, as well as conservation? We sh! ould be asking people to stop wasting so much: do not clean the cars with processed water, cut down usage, sleet H2O harvesting during houses, as well as diminution non-revenue H2O such as broken pipes. All these should be put in place though instead, nothing. Syabas has partial of a responsibility in doing all these.
You referred to which you need report from Syabas, as well as a disaster to provide this report will outcome in your NGO, Coalition Against Water Privatisation (CAWP), receiving alternative more extreme action, together with legal action. What next, will you go to a streets to protest?
There won't be a criticism yet, though this week, you will be handing over a memorandum to them to demand a report you asked for. Syabas has publicly betrothed which they would be happy to supply this information. We have been additionally looking during legal action, depending upon what happens. Let's see how it goes.
Looking during a approach things have been going, have been you presaging which a make a difference would end up in court?
All a tendencies show which it would. But you hope it won't come to that. Look during a case you brought in 2007 asking a justice to acknowledgement a review report as well as a 2004 benefaction agreement sealed in in between Syabas, a Selangor supervision as well as a sovereign government. But until today, it is still in a interest court. It has been 5 years. There is a need to giveaway information. Yes, you do not wish to contend people have been utilizing a information. But you have doubts about a report you have been given as well as you have been not removing answers from Syabas.
There has been a idea to reason a referendum to let a people of Selangor decide if they would accept (or reject) a Selangor supervision receiving over Syabas. What's your perspective of this?
you still consider which an eccentric third-party review is a most appropriat! e soluti on. It has to happen. you do not consider having a referendum would be an easy process.
What do you predict would happen after this? Would this, if you might call it "political game", draw towards upon as well as outcome in a suffering of a Selangor folk?
Looking during a approach a sovereign supervision is starting forward with a Langat 2, though correct justification, you see that, yes, you can contend which a ordinary folk will be a victims here. But interestingly, a Selangor supervision is caught up with this "water war". Because if BN is not adamant about Langat 2, which is basically helping Umno cronies, Selangor wouldn't be inciting these issues unncesssarily.
The H2O emanate in in between a Selangor as well as sovereign governments is not new, as well as in actuality has been brewing for a little time. You have been a single of a people during a forefront campaigning for giveaway H2O as well as a improved supervision of water. Could you share with us what alternative report people might have ignored in this entire emanate this time around?
Here, you have a house land a state supervision as well as open to ransom. you can see similarities with this as well as a liaison of a a right away defunct US appetite giant Enron. Both had made a predicament only to secure contracts. (In 2000, Enron had reportedly pushed for aloft tariffs as well as infrastructure following announcements which there was a vicious appetite predicament within California.)
A similar thing is function here, you have a privatised association supposedly entrusted to provide affordable H2O as well as when you ask for information, they can't even give us. This goes to show how much has left wrong (in the country).
Read More @ Source More
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment