You are in which position which the really old Greeks calledBetween Scylla as great as Charybdis, as great as which the Christianity-influenced Poms naturally termedBetween the devil as great as the low blue sea. Today, for reasons unknown, the observant is 'Between the stone as great as the hard place', patently not as classical or biblical orientated as the former two.
Scylla & CharybdisAlas, each f* thing UMNO as great as its MCA as great as Gerakan vassals have finished to discredit or have Pakatan without the friend have backfired. Syabas attempted wet-works,communist behind each pomelo treeand JI infiltration in to Buduland, the try to have Bersih bootleg or demon-ize Ambiga Sreenevasan, the f* list goes on, have all finished with UMNO worse off.
she's wakakaka-ing during UMNODo, kena, do not do, additionally susah.
Apart from bad fengshui, sur! ely ther e contingency be the dignified behind all these failures. If we haven't gotten it yet, well, might we offer some advice?
Force, lies as great as negativism aren't in vogue.
The first, regulating force to get your way, no longer works. Besides, the conflicting stay is no longer uni-ethnic similar to it was 43 years ago. Are we prepared to accept upsetting material damage?
The second, your lies, can be simply countered in today's multi-media newsdissemination.
And your negative debate is not unlike your 'lies'.
You could try great policy promotions, great governance demonstrations (anti corruption), as great as truly 1Malaysia (rein in your ill-disciplined warlords who have been sabotaging you).
Admittedly you're running! rapidly out of time. we suspect youcouldroll out the armoured column a la Tian An Men Square andtry Emergency Rule similar to your dad did.
Of march Pakatan has its own problems, customarily (a) Anwar Ibrahim - that's all I'm starting to say because I've been observant the same stuff continually given 2005 when we proposed blogging, (b) PAS' hudud, (c) PKR's internal war.
As the DAP supporter, we privately (I stress, personally, because most Pakatan supporters don't agree with me) feel the ABU debate is foolish as great as won't eliminate the crime the debate is ostensible to target. WhyshouldI opinion in someone in Pakatan who is equally or has the frightening potential to be even some-more hurtful or unworthy of the people's votes?
Brothers opposite LGBTForexample, would we ever opinion in PAS' Azizan Abdul Razak (current MB of Kedah)? Don't know? See my prior postAnother Hasan Ali. It's known he prefers to be cozy with UMNO saudaras rsther than than non-Malay Pakatan pollies.
In actuality we would be urging my friends in Kedah not to. Of march choosing by casting votes opposite Azizan doesn't meant choosing by casting votes opposite each PAS pollies. It's known we am really understanding of Nizar Jamaluddin.
He supportsthe BN legislated University as great as University Colleges Act 1971It's precisely the foolish "either or" extremism of the ABU ! debate which pisses me off.
Another e.g. - would we ever opinion opposite my Gerakan buddy, Hsu Dar Ren (Darren Hsu)? Mind, I'm not sure either he is still in Gerakan, wakakaka, but if he is, mate, I'll opinion for this great man any time. we can usually goal he doesn't mount opposite the DAP people we support.
Darren HsuI am not in Pandan but I'll bepreparedto opinion in Ong Tee Keat, who has been the consistent voice, ever given he was the Deputy Minister, opposite BN crime as great as excesses. And which has been because we was endangered which Pakatan has sent Rafizi Ramli to mount opposite Ong in which federal subdivision - see my prior post The political assassination of Rafizi Ramli?
Ong Tee Keat - Hishamuddin's greatest foe wakakakaIf Azmin Ali is so damn f* clever, because doesn't he mount in Pandan as great as give Gombak to Rafizi?
Also, because doesn't he give Dr Wan Azizah the! state c hair of Bukit Antarabangsa as great as take upon Sementa, instead of slyly saying the Pakatan weed roots in Selangor (meaninghimself) will decide either the PKR party president can mount as an ADUN in Selangor? How f* scornful to the party president!
from MalaysiakiniThe "either or" bullsh*t is mindless, foolish as great as meaningless, as great as insultingly, denies Pakatansupportersthe rightof intelligentchoice.
Supporting Pakatan shouldn't automaticallytranslateinto the vacant cheque ofblindsupport. If any Pakatan pollie has been, is deemed, or seen as an ar$ eh*le, he/she shouldn'treceive any ofour votes. Otherwise, we'll be only exchanging hurtful rubbish for hurtful rubbish.
As an example, choosing by casting votes opposite Najib in Pekan doesn't meant we contingency automatically opinion in all Pakatan undesirables.
Likewise, choosing by casting votes opposite Azmin in Gombak wakakaka doesn't meant we automatically opinion in all UMNO undesirables.
You have already been buggered kau kau for the final thirty years (The progressing years weren't which bad). So, do we still wish some-more buggeration wakakaka? If we do, afterwards continue your ABU. But upon the alternative hand, if we w! termite the go od government from Day 1, afterwards opinion wisely, not ABU-ishly.
And do not give me which bullsh*t about choosing by casting votes everyone in Pakatan in first, as great as afterwards arrange the disaster out later. That'll take another thirty years during least. Read More @ Source
"Abolish ISA Movement" 09
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment