KUALA LUMPUR, December 22 Retired comparison policeman Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim questioned currently a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) panel chief's new reason to tighten a record upon P. Balasubramaniam's argumentative sworn statement over a 2006 murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu.
The former KL Criminal Investigation Department arch pronounced Tan Sri Hadenan Abdul Jalil as well as a Operations Review Panel (PPO) a latter chairs have no energy to examination MACC's charge cases, based upon a MACC Advisory Board's previous reply to him in a apart case.
"PPO has no energy to examination a box decision," a ex-police maestro pronounced currently in an open minute to Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar, urging a latter to action upon a ongoing charge over Balasubramaniam's(picture)two opposing orthodox declarations (SDs) which has implicated several top-ranking supervision officials as well as politicians. Mat Zain was responding to Hadenan's reason two days ago saying which prominent lawyer Tan Sri Cecil Abraham who also sits upon a PPO was not partial of a graftbuster examination group which had closed a record upon a former in isolation eye's argumentative second sworn statement over a 2006 murder.
Hadenan pronounced a case, which was related to which of carpet merchant Deepak Jaikishan, had been presented during a PPO pre-meeting upon Nov 8.
"Tan Sri Hadenan's statement should be questioned," Mat Zain said.
He demanded Hadenan explain a drift for a PPO's management to examination a MACC's as well as a DPP's preference relating to Balasubramaniam's second SD as had perceived a very different reply formerly when he appealed to a MACC's Advisory Board (LPPR) 3 years ago to examination a graftbuster's preference upon a military inform antiquated Jul 1! , 2008 l odged by Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim accusing Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, then-IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan, a healing doctor as well as Mat Zain himself of fabricating evidence in a infamous "black-eye" incident.
He pronounced his interest minute had been copied to every member upon a LPPR, including Hadenan, as well as which he had perceived a reply from a LPPR secretariat upon Jul 23, 2009 which was sealed by a board chairman, Tun Abdul Hamid Mohamad, a former Chief Justice.
"For your report Y Bhg Dato', LPPR's energy as supposing under territory 13 of a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act (MACC) (Act 694) DOES NOT embody reviewing any preference which has been made by a MACC as well as a open prosecutor in a case," Abdul Hamid had written to Mat Zain in a minute antiquated Jul 23, 2009.
Mat Zain pronounced he was perplexed because LPPR stated it had no management to examination decisions by MACC as well as a open prosecutor in which letter, but still had 3 indepth meetings to plead his appeal, as it had listed in a same letter, upon April 20, Jun 15 as well as Jun 25 of 2009.
"It is not wrong for me to interpretation which such an answer was given to 'cover up' a crime by Gani Patail as well as Musa Hassan to forestall them from being punished by a law," he pronounced today.
"So who is speaking a law in this matter? Tun Abdul Hamid or Tan Sri Hadenen?" Mat Zain asked.
He described Hadenan's statement upon Abraham as small some-more than a "whitewashing exercise" as a PPO's discussions have no outcome upon a MACC's as well as DPP's preference regarding a Balasubramaniam SD case.
The former policeman called for a probe in to a PPO's past reviews following Hadenan's new remarks.
He suggested a PPO's examination of a A-G's preference upon a legal temptation allegations lifted opposite comparison lawyer Datuk V.K. Lingam as well as a MAS monetary liaison involving ! tycoon T an Sri Tajudin Ramli to kickstart investigations.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment