I refer to a make a difference by a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Operations Review Chairman, Hademan Abdul Jalil which senior lawyer, Tan Sri Cecil Abraham, was not a celebration to a panel's preference to stop a review in to in isolation eye, P Balasubramaniam's second orthodox declaration.
The make a difference is an utter disappointment since it appears which a MACC Operations Review Panel is some-more endangered with fortifying a preference to stop a review than to ensure MACC discharge a duties in carrying out a correct as well as thorough review in to wrongdoings as well as charging a offenders but fear or favour.
Don't cover up - REOPEN probe
The MACC Operations Review Panel Chairman should, instead of attempting to rinse a Panel's hands, rught away free investigations in to a matter. There is some-more than sufficient justification from a disclosures done by Deepak Jaikishan for a MACC as well as a military to commence investigations in to various offences such as a making of a fake orthodox declaration, perjury, kidnap, extortion, bribery, corrupt practices, murder as well as a attempted covering-up of such offenses.
To date, a authorities have not taken up any review on a critical allegation by in isolation investigator P. Balasubramaniam which he was intimidated as well as enticed to alter his orthodox stipulation on 1 Jul 2008. Now a ultimate revelations by businessman Deepak Jaikishan concurred with a make a difference by P.I. Bala, as well as it to illustrate confirmed which crimi! nal offe nses have been committed as well as warrant critical action.
The MACC as well as a military contingency rught away investigate, talk as well as jot down a statements of a following persons who allegedly to have concerned in this case:
1) P. Balasubramaniam who had gone public with his first orthodox stipulation in a m! orning on 2 Jul 2008 as well as withdrew it with a second orthodox stipulation a next day;
2) Deepak Jaikishan who has confessed to have contacted Bala as well as negotiated for a modification of a first orthodox declaration;
3) Nazim Tun Razak, a Prime Minister's brother, who is purported to have provided a money as well as represented a Prime Minister in a assembly with Bala;
4) Lawyer Cecil Abraham who is purported to have rebuilt a second orthodox declaration; and
5) Lawyer Arulampalam who appeared with Bala in a press conference to emanate a second orthodox stipulation which Bala had previously pronounced was done underneath compulsion as well as fear for a safety of his mother as well as children.
To date, a authorities have not taken up any review on a critical allegation by in isolation investigator P. Balasubramaniam which he was intimidated as well as enticed to alter his orthodox stipulation on 1 Jul 2008. Now a ultimate revelations by businessman Deepak Jaikishan concurred with a make a difference by P.I. Bala, as well as it to illustrate confirmed which crimi! nal offe nses have been committed as well as warrant critical action.
The MACC as well as a military contingency rught away investigate, talk as well as jot down a statements of a following persons who allegedly to have concerned in this case:
1) P. Balasubramaniam who had gone public with his first orthodox stipulation in a m! orning on 2 Jul 2008 as well as withdrew it with a second orthodox stipulation a next day;
2) Deepak Jaikishan who has confessed to have contacted Bala as well as negotiated for a modification of a first orthodox declaration;
3) Nazim Tun Razak, a Prime Minister's brother, who is purported to have provided a money as well as represented a Prime Minister in a assembly with Bala;
4) Lawyer Cecil Abraham who is purported to have rebuilt a second orthodox declaration; and
5) Lawyer Arulampalam who appeared with Bala in a press conference to emanate a second orthodox stipulation which Bala had previously pronounced was done underneath compulsion as well as fear for a safety of his mother as well as children.
MACC's own image during stage
Malaysian laws outline which swindling to falsify or subvert sworn make a difference is a criminal offense. Those concerned in abetment as well as swindling to give fake justification can be charged underneath Section 107 of Penal Code, or Section 120a criminal conspiracy, Section 191 fake justification underneath Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
Malaysian laws outline which swindling to falsify or subvert sworn make a difference is a criminal offense. Those concerned in abetment as well as swindling to give fake justification can be charged underneath Section 107 of Penal Code, or Section 120a criminal conspiracy, Section 191 fake justification underneath Statutory Declaration Act 1960.
The authorities have shown which are means to lift out investigations fast as well as meticulously such as which carried out by a six agencies against SUARAM, a Companies Commission of Malaysia, Malaysia Communications as well as Multimedia Commission, Bank Negara,Registrar of Societies, a military as well as Home Ministry.
Unless a MACC as well as a military act immediately,! a taint to their reputation as well as image will be tarnished further.
Tian Chua isVice President, Parti Keadilan Rakyat
Member of Parliament for Batu
Tian Chua isVice President, Parti Keadilan Rakyat
Member of Parliament for Batu
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment