we look with a disgust a offer which possibilities from all political parties should be screened through by a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) before a 13th General Election.
On a aspect such a offer looks good, until a single starts to flay a skin as well as see how rotten a idea is at a core.
First, a MACC is underneath a budding apportion himself. For this same reason, notwithstanding evidence which came out of a French judiciary which Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak could be involved in a high-profile crime case in a Scorpene deal, no review has been carried out by a MACC.
This is notwithstanding a chief earnest which all cases would be investigated without fright or favour; not even his predecessor is well known to be neutral politically when his vast mouth boasted which a MACC has sufficient evidence to assign Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim (MB of Selangor) when such a decision to prosecute should usually be made a Attorney General's Chamber.
MACC itself is corrupt
Secondly, a single finds it hard to forget which dual men have died at a MACC office, inside of just a camber of a couple of months. Despite a commentary by a Royal Commission of Inquiry on Teoh Beng Hock's death, what has MACC finished to a dual officials who were blamed for presumably causing Teoh's death? The MACC is ostensible to be an organisation with a top integrity, but it has not proven itself nonetheless at least to me, as a rakyat as well as an observer.
Thirdly, with a Sabah Chief Minister, Musa Hassan's case of RM40 million, a single wonders because a MACC! has not kickstarted any review into a origins of a money, generally when a income is from an abroad source, as well as a ICAC has said it will open a file again. One cannot repudiate a actuality that, if NGOs can embrace appropriation from unfamiliar sources, Umno could even be receiving funds from perhaps Israeli sources, given a start of a income as vast as RM40 million is still unanswered.
Perhaps, it could be from an additional of George Soros' organisations given we mostly hear such rationale being used by an Umno-led supervision to accuse NGOs of being saved by Israelis or George Soros in order to destablise a country. In my opinion, it is probable that, if Soros had longed for to destablise Malaysia, it would use Umno against Umno; therefore, a theory of a income entrance from him should be investigated, as well as at most appropriate be proven wrong, so which a genuine source can be well known to all.
Till now, a MACC has not satisfactorily answered a questions raised by rakyat as to a start of a RM40 million.
Reporting to Parliament instead of PM
Fourthly, in a approved nation, a MACC should be reporting to a Parliament instead of an individual.
If a MACC does not report to a parliament, because should a selection routine of intensity possibilities for a GE13 be motionless by a MACC? It makes no sense at all, generally when a MACC could have put a possibilities on a radio detector from a beginning.
Political parties should have a ultimate option in selecting a candidates, unless of course, Umno is willing to put a MACC underneath a jurisdiction of a parliamentary cabinet instead of being an additional agency controlled by a budding apportion himself.
Finally, my point is simple: what if MACC finds a candidate carrying some record of corruption? Is it reliable of a MACC or any one for a matter, if report is leaked out, to create an emanate during a General Election so as to cha! nge a pe ople's perception?
MACC, in my opinion, should not concede itself to be used by Umno in a smear campaign, as well as we certitude which there are sufficient people inside of a MACC to oppose such an try should it arise.
MAILBAG
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment