In theory, these 10 positions have been merely rite with no executive powers. In practice, however, a 10 Monarchs swing some-more energy than you think. And if a Sultan can sequence a troops to catch his own hermit as well as a troops will imitate (read a headlines object below) do you not consider which a Rulers can sequence a troops to do what they feel is indispensable for this country?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Mentally sick male attacks drunk
(The Star) - A drunk was shaken out of his stupor when his mentally sick next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour pounded him with a machete.
The next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour approached a male who was sitting outward his residence in Cheras as well as drinking yesterday afternoon.
The next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour pounded a man, injuring him upon a head.
The male escaped as well as ran to a circuitously troops station.
Police detained a 35-year-old neighbour.
*********************************************
Neighbour 1: "I thought you pronounced you do not splash any more."
Neighbour 2: "I don't. you splash only a same amount as you regularly drink. you do not splash any some-more than usual."
Neighbour 1: "That's equates to you do not splash any reduction either then."
Neighbour 2: "No, you do not splash any less, though you additionally do not splash any more."
Neighbour 1: "Aiyah. You ni dah mabuk lah!"
Neighbour 2: "Ah, yes, though tomorrow you will be sober whilst you will still be"
And whi! ch was w hen next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour 1 pounded next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour 2 with aparang. And what would a dignified of this story be? The dignified of a story is: never disturbance with a insane chap. When they lose a argument they will review to violence.
And this is what you crop up to be seeing in Malaysia of late. Malaysian governing body is hovering around a fringes of violence. It is not which serious yet. It is still usually striking of red paint, breaking of windscreens, throwing of stones, sparring as well as cuts as well as bruises upon a face, etc. But afterwards which is how it all starts, isn't it so?
Tempers have been rising. People have been beginning to concede a suppressed feelings of disappointment to surface. Both sides feel which a 13th General Election is a final path which will determine who is starting to take energy come cooking time of Polling Day. It is right away or never. Hence a coming ubiquitous selecting has to be an no holds barred competition where leader takes all as well as loser loses all.
And this is why a ante has been upped. In a complement where leader takes all as well as loser loses all, there is no margin for compromise. It is an all or zero situation. And if you wish all rather than nothing, afterwards you need to fight tooth as well as spike to win given losing cannot be an option.
Have you maybe forgotten a strange objective of a ubiquitous election? Why do you even have a ubiquitous selecting in a initial place? The goal of a ubiquitous selecting is to concede a people (citizens) to sequence themselves. This is opposed to a aged kingdom complement where a Ruler manners over a people.
In a kingdom system, energy is hereditary. Basically, God decides who manners over you. And God creates this preference through a successors of a Ruler (in Islam calledCaliph). Hence a people have no preference a! s to who manners over them given a preference is in a hands of God.
Since afterwards a complement has changed somewhat. For Malaysia which would be Aug 1957 -- as well as about 100 years progressing for Europe as well as 200 years progressing for a US. Malaysia has what you call a Constitutional Monarchy. That equates to a people get to choose who they wish to sequence over them with a Monarchy being basically a equates to to maintain a small checks as well as balances.
That is in theory, of course. But is this how it works in practice? Actually, in use anything goes. The Sultan can banish a dentist who was late starting to a house as well as a dentist can be escorted out of a state immediately. The Sultan can exclude a preference of Chief Minister (Menteri Besar) if he does not similar to a chap. The Sultan can sequence a apprehension of his own hermit as well as mother.
In short, a Rulers can do quite a lot, far over what their powers under a Constitution allow.
Is this legal? Well, if a Ruler does something far over what a Constitution allows afterwards of march it is not legal. But who is starting to disagree with a Sultan? The OCPD? The CPO? The IGP? The Minister of Home Affairs? The Prime Minister?
Technically, a troops or supervision can exclude a Sultan. In practice, no a single wants to be a rodent which bells a cat. Hence, in practice, a Sultan can sequence a troops to flog you out of a state if His Highness does not similar to a colour of your shirt. And a troops will do only which though arguing with a Sultan which this action is not authorised under a law.
Now, a troops take orders from a government, especially a Minister. The military, however, have a opposite sequence of command.
Have you beheld which most times it is a Colonels who conduct troops coups? Well, which is given most times a Colonels have been a Camp Commanders as well as a troops has been trained to take orders from their Commanders. Hen! ce a Col onels take charge of a troops coups as well as they can even sequence a arrest or execution of a generals.
Now, a British, in their wisdom, have made all a 9 Rulers a Colonels-in-Chief of a assorted branches of a armed forces. And a Agong is a Commander-in-Chief of a Armed Forces. Hence you have 9 Colonels-in-Chief with a single Commander-in-Chief who is additionally a Supreme Head of a Federation.
In theory, these 10 positions have been merely rite with no executive powers. In practice, however, a 10 Monarchs swing some-more energy than you think. And if a Sultan can sequence a troops to catch his own hermit as well as a troops will imitate (read a headlines object below) do you not consider which a Rulers can sequence a troops to do what they feel is indispensable for this country?
In theory, a 9 state Rulers have been supposed to action upon a recommendation of a Chief Ministers (Menteris Besar) whilst a Agong is supposed to action upon a recommendation of a Prime Minister. But can you be assured which this will regularly be a case?
Let us demeanour during a hypothetical situation. Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak seeks an assembly with a Agong to ask a dissolution of Parliament. At a same time, a 9 Menteris Besar additionally seek an assembly with a 9 state Rulers to ask permission to disintegrate a 9 State Assemblies. And a 3 Chief Ministers in Penang, Melaka, as well as Sabah additionally do a same (but with a Governors of a States).
Parliament as well as a twelve State Assemblies (except Sarawak) have been afterwards dissolved.
Technically, there is no longer a supervision as well as Malaysia is headed by a caretaker Prime Minister. The nation is run by a civil use whilst a Elections Commission (SPR) takes charge of a federal as well as state elections as well as is answerable to a Rulers.
Yes, a civil use is right away using a nation with SPR using a elections. And a State Secretaries will 'report' to ! a state Rulers whilst a KSN will 'report' to a Agong. The SPR conduct will additionally 'report' to a Agong. And a troops will be upon standby in case a Rulers confirm which an Emergency needs to be spoken given of a breakdown in law as well as order.
So you see, even though in speculation a in front of of a Constitutional Monarchs is purely ceremonial, in use they essentially have some-more energy than you think. And whilst you may disagree which Malaysia's complement does not concede a troops takeover with a Monarchs heading an Emergency government, who is starting to go face a Rulers to disagree with them?
Did not Chairman Mao say which energy comes out from a barrel of a gun? So, in whose hands have been these 250,000 or so guns? And if a stream striking of red paint, breaking of windscreens, throwing of stones, sparring as well as cuts as well as bruises upon a face, etc., escalates to something some-more serious similar to which case of a mentally sick guy slashing his drunk next door next door next door next door next door next door neighbour with aparang,do you consider a Rulers will only spin away as well as do nothing?
you consider you should cold a tempers a bit. We have been now usually hovering around a fringes of violence. But it takes really small to pierce from a fringes in to a centre. The right (or wrong) difference as well as a shouting match can spin in to a melee.
you have tried, again as well as again, to warn you readers ofMalaysia Todayto tinge down a tongue a bit. you know when you can post insults behind a confidence of your computer though carrying to exhibit your identity everybody can be brave. And you see most 'brave' readers posting comments inMalaysia Todaybecause they need not exhibit themselves.
But in a future a mocking as well as insults will quit to a higher level. And when which happens it will be as well late to behind down. Elections should be about a people selecting who they ! wish to sequence over them for a next 5 years. But when it is marked down to a spin of a single competition (or religion) 'fighting for survival' opposite another, afterwards governing body takes upon a whole new dimension, which you consider most Malaysians would not wish to experience.
Kerana mulut, badan binasa.Always recollect that. Don't test a finalise of a Rulers to end this stream madness called 'Malaysian domestic culture'. It is not a kind of culture you will enjoy seeing. And as has been proven in most alternative countries, once you adopt this culture it is really difficult to spin behind a clock. Wounds do not heal so simply as well as grudges can be retained over most generations, again, as has been proven in most alternative countries.
*********************************************
I did not dedicate any offence, says Tengku Fakhry
(Bernama) - The Sultan of Kelantan's brother, Tengku Muhammad Fakhry Petra told a High Court yesterday which he had not committed any rapist corruption upon thirty Jul 2009, a day he was cramped by police.
Tengku Muhammad Fakhry, 34, testified which he was neither informed of any rapist indiscretion nor a reason for his apprehension by a troops in a Istana Mahkota grounds, in Kubang Kerian, Kelantan.
"I was cramped for during slightest an hour by a troops as well as not authorised to leave a house drift which day," he pronounced during a record opposite Inspector General of Police (IGP), Tan Sri Ismail Omar as well as 3 others associated to his alleged wrongful confinement upon Jul thirty 2009.
He added which his lawyer, Datuk Mohd Haziq Pillay, was additionally in a automobile with him during a time.
The fifth plaintiff' declare said, only prior to he was detained by a troops he had driven out a Bentley Brooklands automobile which belonged to his father, Sultan Ismail Petra, from a house garage.
Tengku Muh! ammad Fa khry pronounced prior to which day his father had instructed him to expostulate a automobile down to Singapore.
However, as he was about to expostulate a automobile out of a house drift a Volvo had shut off his approach as well as a categorical gates were closed.
Tengku Muhammad Fakhry described a incident as frightful saying he saw multiform armed policemen moving in as well as out of a palace.
During cross-examination by senior federal counsel, Azizan Md Arshad, who represented a defendants, Tengku Muhammad Fakhry pronounced he was not aware of a sequence issued by his brother, a behaving Sultan of Kelantan during a time, Tengku Muhammad Faris Petra, prohibiting him from receiving a automobile out of a palace.
He additionally refuted Azizan's suggestion which a troops had essentially prevented a Bentley Brooklands from being taken out of a house drift as well as had not cramped him.
The plaintiff filed a RM150 million fit upon Dec 9 last year, fixing a IGP; a Kelantan Sultan's arch personal bodyguard, ASP Norazman Ismail; Kelantan troops arch during a time, Datuk Abdul Rahim Hanafi, as well as a Royal Malaysian Police as a initial to fourth defendants respectively.
In his statement of claim, Tengku Muhammad Fakhry alleged which he was wrongfully cramped upon Jul 30, 2009 in a compound of Istana Mahkota, Kubang Kerian as he was about to leave in a Bentley Brooklands car.
He is seeking RM100 million in ubiquitous damages, RM50 million in aggravated as well as model damages, seductiveness during a rate of 4 per cent, costs as well as alternative service deemed fit by a court.
The hearing prior to Judge Datin Zabariah Mohd Yusof resumes today.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasi! onal (BN ) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment