Do you think I care a shit?


You Pakatan Rakyat supporters have been still as well immature. And which is because Pakatan Rakyat is not ready to run the country. Pakatan Rakyat supporters initial need to benefit some infancy prior to Pakatan Rakyat can be authorised to form the sovereign government. You need to suffer an additional tenure underneath Barisan Nasional. This pang might afterwards arise we up as well as only when we arise up can we speak about the shift of government.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
"More we read your articles, some-more we have an inclination which we unequivocally have been upon the BN payroll." --bengali kunday.
*************************************
That was what the reader starting by the nickname of 'bengali kunday' said. Well, concede me to reply to that.
First of all, even if we am upon the payroll of Barisan Nasional, so what? There have been people similar to those inMalaysiakini,Malaysia Chronicle, as well as so on, who have been upon Pakatan Rakyat's payroll. In fact, sites likeHarakahand many others actually go to as well as have been financed by Pakatan Rakyat or parties inside of Pakatan Rakyat. And they do not censor which actuality or have been apologetic or abashed about serving the seductiveness of the domestic party, notwithstanding the actuality which it is an antithesis party.
Are we implying which it is fine to be upon Pakatan Rakyat's payroll though not fine to be upon Barisan Nasional's payroll? Are we additionally implying which democracy as well as freedom of preference as well as freedom of organisation means we must be upon Pakatan Rakyat's payroll though not upon Ba! risan Na sional's payroll?
What sort of democracy is this when we have been restricted to serving the single party's seductiveness though not the other? What sort of democracy is this when we have no freedom of preference or freedom of organisation as well as have been thankful to offer the single party's seductiveness though not the other?
You take the dignified high belligerent whenever we feel which someone is serving Barisan Nasional's seductiveness though we do not demonstrate which same dignified snub if someone is upon Pakatan Rakyat's payroll. So-called 'independent' human rights organisations such asSuaramopenly work for Pakatan Rakyat though which is not nauseating to you. Only if they offer Barisan Nasional's seductiveness is it repulsive.
Secondly, when we write articles really deleterious to Barisan Nasional as well as Umno -- such as my dual recent articles this week inThe Corridors of Powerregarding Umno Sabah -- we do not cruise which as being upon Pakatan Rakyat's payroll. However, if we write only the single article which is somewhat uncomplimentary to Pakatan Rakyat (in fact, the article which we wrote in which we posted which criticism is not even about Pakatan Rakyat or uncomplimentary to Pakatan Rakyat) we cruise which as being upon Barisan Nasional's payroll.
To we Pakatan Rakyat supporters, the decent thing to do is to offer Pakatan Rakyat's interest. Serving any alternative seductiveness is an faulty thing to do. You confirm the dignified bounds as well as boundary of goodness as well as any one who does not pass your understand as well as thirty-six-inch ruler of probity as well as goodness is vilified. Who appointed we the defender as well as trustee of probity as well as decency?
How different have been we from the religionists who confirm what is dignified as well as what is decent as well as levy their standards of p! robity a s well as goodness upon others? Since Muslims paint the infancy race in Malaysia can Muslims then, starting by the didactic discourse of democracy where infancy rules, levy their Islamic understand of probity as well as goodness upon the minority?
Since the infancy dictates the belligerent rules afterwards certainly what is compatible to Islam should prevail as well as anything nauseating to Islam should be barred. In which case the Islamic Sharia law, Hudud included, should be the law of the land. Muslims who have been the infancy in Malaysia should confirm what is dignified as well as what is decent as well as Islam must be the formula of conduct which all Malaysians should live by.
Religionists such as Muslims, even if they have been the infancy in Malaysia, should not levy their will upon Malaysians, even upon associate Muslims, let alone upon the non-Muslims. So because should we levy your will upon others? The believers of Islam should not vilify those who have been not of the Muslim faith. Why should the believers of Pakatan Rakyat vilify those who have been not of the antithesis faith?
When misled Muslims adopt the 'either we have been with us or we have been opposite us' religious doctrine, we find which revolting, faulty as well as immoral. But we can adopt the 'either we have been with us or we have been opposite us' domestic didactic discourse as well as it is not revolting, faulty as well as immoral.
What kind of hypocritical stand in customary is this? You resent it when others levy their will upon we as well as when they confirm what is tolerable, dignified as well as decent. But we can levy your will upon others as well as confirm what is tolerable, dignified as well as decent. Can we see the hypocrisy which is so thick we can cut it with the knife?
Do we consider we caring the shit about Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat? Do we consider we caring the shi! t either Barisan Nasional retains energy or Pakatan Rakyat gains power? Do we consider my hold up is only about the general elections as well as about who gets to impetus in to Putrajaya? That is the really slight way to demeanour during life.
Do we overtly consider which my goal in hold up is to have certain which Barisan Nasional does not get kicked out? Do we overtly consider which my goal in hold up is to ensure which Pakatan Rakyat gets to form the next sovereign government? You have the really slight goal in life. Do not imagine which my goal in hold up is as slight as yours.
Politicians have been politicians, never mind from which side of the domestic divide. And the slight objective of all politicians is merely to get in to power. What makes we consider which which is additionally my really slight objective? If we consider which afterwards we have not been reading scrupulously what we have been writing over these final 35 years.
You Pakatan Rakyat supporters have been still as well immature. And which is because Pakatan Rakyat is not ready to run the country. Pakatan Rakyat supporters initial need to benefit some infancy prior to Pakatan Rakyat can be authorised to form the sovereign government. You need to suffer an additional tenure underneath Barisan Nasional. This pang might afterwards arise we up as well as only when we arise up can we speak about the shift of government.
Yes, do keep whacking me. Continue to vilify me. And when we do we will do all inside of my energy to have certain which the entrance general election is starting to result in the huge startle as well as beating for you.
Never give the flower to the monkey, the Malays would say. That is similar to throwing pearls to swine, the English say. And which is how we demeanour during some of we Pakatan Rakyat supporters, monkeys as well as hog which have been not ready to be entrusted with power.
So we wish to fight. So let's fight. we have zero to remove because we don't caring the shit which side is starting to win the entrance general election. That is what we want. That is not what we want. Just because which is what we wish we have this mistaken notion which which is what we additionally want.
What stupid people we are. If we support Pakatan Rakyat afterwards we am God. If we do not support Pakatan Rakyat afterwards we am the Barisan Nasional stooge. Well, let me break it to we gently. we am neither God not the Barisan Nasional stooge. we am an independent-spirited particular who does not caring the shit about losers similar to you.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: