While everyones' lips have been pouting soppy in support for PKR Strategy Director Rafizi Ramli notwithstanding his violation of BAFIA, zero many has been pronounced of or for Johari Mohamad, the source of the trickle of trusted bank documents. Much to the displeasure of the little quarters, state supports by the hundreds of thousands have been being used to only rescue Rafizi. Johari is not mentioned. This all appears very fishy. Is there the lot some-more starting upon than Bank Negara Malaysia primarily suspected?Fabiani Azmisharpens his nose as well as discovers mixture for the Frederick Forsyth novel ..
Johari Mohamad, the clerk from Public Bank Berhad, pronounced it all during the news conference upon 14 May which he wasn't the onehttp://www.malaysiakini.tv/video/23923/bank-clerk-unlawfully-interrogated-over-nfc.html. He claimed which he was summoned by his employer as well as interrogated for leaking trusted report of the bank's customers. He pronounced the investigations were conducted following the complaint in which twenty-one breaches were reported. He denied he had the entrance to such absolved patron report as he was merely the clerk. He additionally claimed which he was tormented to the edge by his employer as well as Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) resulting in his premature resignation.
If what Johari says which he had no entrance is true, afterwards it begs the subject who had the management as well as entrance to download the trust! ed banki ng report to share with Rafizi Ramli? Were there others in collusion with Rafizi? Or did hackers penetrate the bank's patron report systems? Or was Johari only the solo conduit? These as well as alternative dire questions make many an enquiring thoughts endangered to know. Whoever, whichever, whatever, however, it is no wonder which it took BNM this long to investigate as well as charge.
This is where the poser as well as amour begins
This BAFIA saga creates for an interesting investigation which smacks of espionage. It is the box of infiltrating the cumulative systems of the bank, obtaining report which is considered secret or trusted but the accede of the protector of the information, let alone which of the patron or even BNM, the solitary management who decides if bank patron report might be given. Espionage is inherently clandestine, as well as in many cases bootleg as well as punishable by law. Contravening BAFIA supplies of Section 97 spell the RM3 million fine as well as the three-year prison tenure or both. This is the prospect of Rafizi as well as Johari.
Supporters have been apt to hold which Johari is merely the plant of circumstances in this intrigue, used as well as revealed by Rafizi. Johari had no access, he said. He was additionally employed in the branch not connected to the customer. Johari even went upon to contend he had never met the authority of NFCorp. In the apart statement, NFCorp authority Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Salleh Ismail additionally pronounced he had never known of Johari. If all this is true, afterwards who had unlocked the vault of information?
An interesting facet of this BAFIA saga is which BNM has not taken movement opposite the bank for being careless with the customer's banking information. Their cumulative systems seem to have weak points enough for spies to examine or buy. Was Johari paid handsomely to extract the report during the expense of losing his job of 17 years, if caug! ht?
Whose code did Johari make use of to entrance the trusted bank accounts?
Another interesting facet is which BNM has not charged PKR vice president as well as MP for Lembah Pantai Nurul Izzah Anwar, as well as MP for Ampang Zuraida Kamaruddin. Both had presided with Rafizi in concert during the 7 March news conference in an orchestrated move to exhibit the trusted bank information. Legally both would be considered celebration to the crime as acessories. (http://www.malaysiakini.tv/video/23239/more-properties-in-bangsar-bought-by-nfc-directors.html).
Wikipedia describes an appendage as the authority who assists in the elect of the crime, but who does not actually participate in the elect of the crime as the corner principal. The distinction between an appendage as well as the principal is the subject of actuality as well as degree. The principal is the a single whose acts or ommission, accompanied by the applicable mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind"), have been the many immediate cause of the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act"). If dual or some-more people have been without delay responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as corner principals. The exam to heed the corner principal from an appendage is whether the suspect independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalized and/or limited assistance as well as encouragement.
Yet another interesting facet in the BAFIA saga is the absolute overpower upon the partial of Public Bank Berhad. The bank is ranked the top class award-winning bank. HRH Raja Nazrin Shah once teased the bank's authority during an dusk organised by the Institute of Public Relations Malaysia which he contingency have the vaultful of awards.
For the bank which prides in such winning accomplishments as well as glorious repute, it is peculiar which it ha! s not co mmenced legal movement opposite Rafizi for the repairs caused to the argent reputation. Does this not make the single wonder why? Would the move to sue Rafizi compromise the position? Is the bank aroused of open snub if it did pursue Rafizi? Did the bank's outmost vendors with entrance to the sytems trickle it which creates for the large story? Or have been the bank's managers in cahoots with Rafizi which creates for an even bigger story?
All the mixture for the Frederick Forsyth novel have been here. The plot is looking complex as well as convoluted. Until the hearing starts upon Rafizi as well as Johari in the Shah Alam Sessions Court, you will all be kept in poser as to what BNM investigations will reveal.
Selangor MB Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim as well as his executive legislature have authorized supports to support Rafizi Ramli to the tune of RM500,000. A endangered citizien has oral up which nowhere in the constitution says which the state should pay for such wrong actions. It thus creates it strange. Even some-more bizarre is which Rafizi is an ex CEO of the Selangor State Economic Adviser's office no longer in office since June. In box you have been wondering - Rafizi is not even the Selangorean. He is from the state of Terengganu. He is deemed the lawbreaker. Why should open money be used during the expense of taxpayers for the lawbreaker? Does this not tell us something of the PKR antithesis which hopes to take Putrajaya?
But Rafizi is the crown valuables for the opposition. He would be protected as well as discovered during all costs. It appears this is the approach starting forward with the opposition. While Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim has set in reserve supports which run hundreds of thousands for Rafizi, no mention is done for Rafizi's accomplice Johari Mohamad.
Will Johari finish up as the sacrificial lamb? Or is there the stickier web of amour to indicate which Johari, Rafizi as well as the bank might be in collusion?
Is ! there th e lot some-more starting upon than BNM primarily suspected?
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment