Not even the clergyman or an imam will 'serve God' if they have been not being paid the salary. It's all about money, even those who explain to be serving God. So get off your high equine as well as stop all this self-righteous bullshit. Every singular the singular of we does things for money. So stop slandering this chairman as well as which chairman as we do things for money. You as well have been as most money-motivated as the alternative chairman we have been accusing.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
we can't understand whyMalaysia Today's readers have been foaming during the mouth as well as whacking Hudud. Some have even left over usually attacking Hudud as well as have even whacked Muslims as well as Islam. A military inform has already been done againstMalaysiakini.Do we additionally wish the military inform to be done againstMalaysia Today?
Most of we might think which Malaysia allows leisure of expression. Well, Malaysia might concede leisure of countenance up to the sure extent though which leisure is not absolute. There have been limits. And which is why Malaysia has most laws which have been directed during 'ensuring the peace as well as stability' of the nation, the Sedition Act being the singular of them.
This equates to we cannot simply contend what we like, not even in America or Britain. For example, if we begin articulate about Muslim terrorists, Jihad as well as bombs whilst in the craft we can get in to trouble anywhere in the world. You might argue which it is your elemental right to speak about whatever it is we wish to speak about. The police, however, will not agree with we as they drag we divided in handcuffs. Try it if we do not hold me.
So decay the suspicion ! per comp rehensive leisure of expression. It does not exist. There have been boundaries as well as we contingency navigate inside of these boundaries. I, for one, can discuss it we which this is positively true. I, too, have learned which we cannot contend everything which is upon your mind. There have been the little things we can contend as well as there have been most things we cannot say. And if we violate this order we will get vilified similar to hell. we am speaking from experience here.
Look during what happened to Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim. His celebration voiced support for the Bersih 3.0 rally whilst he pronounced which although he is for purify elections he does not feel which violation the law is the approach to send the message to the government. And for observant which he was whackedkaw-kawuntil he felt so hurt he left the party. we suppose any the singular who is called foul names would feel the approach he felt. we meant people do have feelings, even Pakatan Rakyat leaders.
In the initial place, Tunku Aziz should not have joined the domestic party. He is not the politician, period. And he should have realised which once we stick upon the domestic celebration we contingency toe the celebration line. You cannot do what the people would view as violation ranks. They will kill you, figure of speech, of course. And once we stick upon the domestic celebration as well as afterwards resign, we will be accused of being bought off, of offered out, as well as all arrange of foul things. It is better we had not joined in the initial place. Then we can contend what we like.
Once we stick upon the domestic celebration we need to scapegoat sure freedoms for the consequence of celebration unity. Even when we speak in closed-door meetings or unaccepted meetings we need to watch what we say. In governing body everybody is an enemy, even the chairman sitting next to we in the meeting. And what we contend will be leaked to embarrass you. And the Penang PKR chie! f, Datuk Dr Mansor Othman, has found out the hard approach what damage these leaks can do.
Of course, Dr Mansor has denied observant what he is purported to have said. The minutes, though, appear to infer otherwise. But mins can be forged. After all, usually those who attended the assembly would know.
No doubt, nothing of the others who attended which assembly have come brazen to exhibit which they had attended the assembly as well as which the mins had been fake as well as which no such thing was ever pronounced in the meeting. Nevertheless, whether the people hold which rejection is another thing. After all, politicians repudiate allegations all the time. Clinton denied. Nixon denied. And in the finish it was proven which these denials were all lies. In fact, Najib Tun Razak has additionally denied the allegations against him though we all do not hold his denials -- am we not correct?
The golden order in governing body is when cornered repudiate or contend 'no comment'. Of course, most people have been of the opinion which when politicians repudiate it afterwards it contingency be loyal as well as when they contend 'no comment' which equates to they have been admitting the allegation. But the most critical thing is no the singular can infer it. And this is what matters in the end. Can we infer the allegation?
What we need to do, prior to they even repudiate it or contend 'no comment', is to challenge them to infer which the explain is false. Under normal circumstances the singular is assumed trusting until proven guilty. But if we wish to corner the statesman we spin it the alternative way. You ask them to infer which the explain is false. That is essentially quite unfit to do.
Anwar was convicted as well as sentenced to the total of fifteen years prison given he could not infer his innocence. The Federal Court after overturned which self-assurance upon drift which the Prosecution failed to infer his guilt. Nevertheless, Anwar had already se! rved six years of the fifteen years prior to he saw freedom. Thus, sometimes, the guilty until proven trusting order does work in sure cases.
New laws have been being introduced in Malaysia where we will need to infer we have been trusting or else we have been presumed guilty. We had 52 years of the Internal Security Act where an estimated 10,000 people had been detained though hearing upon which same arrogance -- guilty until proven innocent. They catch we initial as well as afterwards after we need to remonstrate them which we deserve to be released. It is unfit to infer we deserve to be expelled when your apprehension is upon the basement which the singular man, the Minister, believes we have been the hazard to inhabitant security.
we meant how do we infer the idea wrong? You have the belief, as well as which idea is we am the hazard to inhabitant security. How do we infer this idea wrong? How do we infer any of your ideology wrong? You hold which Hudud is God's law as well as is mandatory. You hold which the Qur'an came though delay from God as well as is God's word. You hold the Bible is the Holy Book of God (in fact, we swear an oath upon the Bible although it might have been printed by the printer in Jalan Chan Sow Lin). You hold Jesus Christ is the Son of God as well as was crucified as well as died for the sins. How do we infer all these ideology wrong?
So, we can't infer any of your ideology wrong, even the idea which we am the hazard to inhabitant security. And which equates to we will sojourn underneath apprehension though hearing until your ideology change as well as we now hold which we have reformed as well as have turned over the brand new leaf as well as am no longer the hazard to inhabitant security.
Such have been beliefs. And ideology have been unfit to infer wrong. If we had to infer your idea right, which would be another thing altogether. To infer your idea right we will need evidence, which we might or might not have. But for me to i! nfer you r idea wrong is the non-starter never mind what which idea might be. Beliefs do not need evidence. Hence we can hold something even if there is no evidence. And for me to infer your idea wrong when your idea is void of justification would meant we would not have the justification to infer your idea wrong.
Can we see how it works?
Many friends have been in hold with me to ask me to clear the air upon what people have been observant about me. These friends discuss it me which people hold we am this or we am which or we have done this or we have done that. But which is usually it. This is what people believe. How do we infer this idea to be false?
Most of those people who hold these things about me additionally hold in God as well as hold in the religion. Is there any basement for these beliefs? Is there any justification to support these beliefs? Can they infer which their ideology have been facts as well as not myths?
Of march they can't. They usually hold it, that's all. There is no basement for these beliefs. They heard stories as well as they hold these stories. These have been all stories though evidence. Then they support these stories as well as clear their ideology by display us the Holy Book, which they pronounced came from God though was printed by the printer in Jalan Chan Sow Lin who himself does not hold in God as well as is copy this 'Holy Book' usually to make income from the copy contract
Thus this is the mindset of these sorts of people. They have been receptive to desiring things which cannot be proven. And these same people additionally hold sure things about me. So how do we speak to such people when they have been already disposed to desiring things which they imagine to be loyal even when it cannot be proven true?
Can we see the futility in perplexing to spin these people? It is as formidable as perplexing to remonstrate the Catholic which Prophet Muhammad is the Prophet of God or perplexing to remonst! rate Mus lims which Jesus is the Son of God -- or perplexing to remonstrate readers ofMalaysia Todaythat Hudud is God's authority as well as is mandatory for all Malaysians.
The best would be to usually let people hold what they wish to believe. Most of these people hold which they have been frank as well as eminent whilst all the rest have been scumbags anyway. Only they have been true. All others have been false.
Look during the celebration hopping issue as the singular example. Most hold which it is wrong for people to leave their celebration to stick upon the alternative side. But it is not wrong for those from the alternative side to leave the alternative side to stick upon their party.
If they leave the alternative side to stick upon their side afterwards it is the frank as well as eminent gesture. But if they leave their side to stick upon the alternative side it cannot additionally be given of the frank as well as eminent gesture. It can usually be given of income as well as for no alternative reason.
This is the belief.
You do things out of sincerity as well as for eminent reasons. Others have been not eminent or frank as well as do things merely for money. You do not do things for money.
As we said, this is the idea as well as they hold which their idea is right. But is it?
Their parents sent them to propagandize to embrace an education. we have Chinese friends who discuss it me which preparation is during the tip of the Chinese priority list. Education comes initial as well as everything else comes after. This is what my Chinese friends discuss it me as well as given so most appear to discuss it me the same thing we am inclined to hold it.
Then we ask them, why? To the Malays, sacrament comes first. That is approach during the tip of the priority list of the Malays. Go ask the Malays as well as see what they say. But why do Chinese put preparation as well as not sacrament during the ! tip of t heir priority list?
And they discuss it me it is given we need the great preparation to be ensured the great future. Only the great preparation can ensure the great future. And most Malaysians, after they have received which great education, choose to stay abroad to work. They have spent so most income upon their preparation which they need to work abroad given the income they will consequence behind in Malaysia would be as well low as well as they will never be able to redeem the cost of their education.
So people get an education. But they go as well as get an preparation not given they seek knowledge. They go as well as get an preparation so which they can get the great job which pays great money.
Everybody works. And they all work given they wish money. Only with income can they buy things as well as live the great life. They wish the house. They wish the car. They wish to get married. They wish power, position, prestige, recognition, as well as whatnot. And all this requires money.
Why do they wish all these? Are these not all for selfish reasons? You can go live in the jungle as well as not starve. There is food everywhere. You can live off the land. You can build the roof tiles over your head from what we find in the jungle. You can use the streams as well as rivers to wash as well as bathe. You do not need money. You do not need the job. You do not need to outlay so most income getting educated.
So, yes, everybody does things for money, even those of we who hold we have been frank as well as noble. Do we need money? Actually we do not. You do not need money. You usually wish money. And we wish income given we wish the great things in life.
Are we prepared to renounce from your job as well as go work in the singular of the African countries for no salary? They will yield we the tent to nap in as well as 3 meals the day. They will additionally yield we with khaki uniforms. But alternative than which we will embrace ! no money .
Is which not the eminent as well as frank thing to do? You work for no income though usually to serve humankind. You get to eat as well as nap in the tent, that's all.
Not even the clergyman or an imam will 'serve God' if they have been not being paid the salary. It's all about money, even those who explain to be serving God. So get off your high equine as well as stop all this self-righteous bullshit. Every singular the singular of we does things for money. So stop slandering this chairman as well as which chairman as we do things for money. You as well have been as most money-motivated as the alternative chairman we have been accusing.
At slightest the prostitute is honest about what he or she is. That is some-more than we can contend for you.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment