Hopping, hullabaloo, humbug

Malaysiakini -CM defends due 'anti-hopping law'

Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng pronounced his administration's skeleton to order a law to forestall state assemblypersons from switching domestic devotion mid-term is to strengthen citizens from a crack of open certitude as well as protecting democracy. []

"For any inaugurated deputy inaugurated upon a celebration ticket to bound or cross over is an immoral, reprobate as well as unprincipled act which shows complete contempt for a democratic preference of their voters."

"If they were inaugurated upon a celebration they represent, they should resign their chair as well as find a uninformed charge from a people if they chose to leave a celebration height upon which they were inaugurated on," pronounced Lim in a press recover today.

He argued which democracy meant which electorate should be given an additional opportuni! ty to ju dge whether a preference by a inaugurated deputy to switch devotion is acceptable, or not.

Precisely my mount all these years, as well as since you depreciate you-know-who, with a plural in 'you-know-who'.

But alas, Koh Tsu Koon somehow found his voice (and balls) to discuss it Guan Eng off upon this, as reported by MKINI in a news articleAnti-hopping law: Koh slams Lim for double-standards.

Our dear Headmaster deputy Headmaster upon NKRA asked Guan Eng since a latter didn't contend a word about a dual Sabah frogs, Lajim Ukim as well as Wilfred Bumburing, withdrawal BN to form brand new parties which have allied themselves to Pakatan?

Koh squeaked:"Where is a consistency? you did not see (DAP stalwart) Lim Kit Siang as well as Lim Guan Eng protest when dual MPs (members of parliament) from a Sa! bah BN j umped into a Pakatan fold."

"So, since rehearse double-standards now. Is he you do this for (merely for) show?"

I can answer which for Guan Eng. Lajim as well as Bumburing have NOT leaped into any Pakatan component parties, as they have formed their own parties. If they instruct for their brand new parties to support Pakatan, you won't contend that's of a frog-ological nature.

Okay lah, you admit you sound technically (and defiantly)correct though in being implicitly f* diseased in my attempted defence of Guan Eng.

That's a f* trouble when DAP patronises aMaster-Chefwho insists upon se! rvingles cuisses de grenouilles.

les cuissee de grenouilles

Also, you learnt which frogs have been haram for a Shafi'i, Hanafi as well as Hanbali (though okay for Maliki) schools of Islam - hmmm, there contingency be an Islamic moral in this for a Muslim politicians upon both sides, not which they care dual figs.

Previously, DAP sweetie Hannah Yeoh, not unlike Guan Eng, had suffered fromthesamediarrhoeicaffliction in 'consuming' a dish ofles grenouilles de 916.

But it's a abuse which DAP needn't have to suffer as a spiritual leader, my hero Karpal Bhai, has repetitively warned opposite eating non-halal stuff.

The problems surrounding defection have been done upon purpose worse by an progressing BN-dominated council legislating to demarcate those, who resig! ned from their positions as MP or ADUN before their inaugurated terms have run out,form station as (respectively sovereign or state) choosing candidates for 5 years. It's this rule which has effectively prevented Dr Wan Azizah from re-contesting in a sovereign constituency.

Malaysiakini reported in a articleEx-PM decries DAP's anti-hopping lawthat Dr Mahathir asserted:"We have been free ... you contend you instruct to liberalise, to be able to verbalise one's thoughts as well as criticize people as well as what not; which i! s a fr eedom. So what is it right away in wanting to forestall people from celebration hopping?"

MCA boss CSL done some-more or less a same matter about a sovereign constitution guaranteeing a leisure of association, as if a BN has ever respectedtheconstitution, having changed it some-more than 200 times in a a final 30 years of rule to fit a domestic purposes.

Besides, sincewe all know a general Malaysian choosing by casting votes preference ofelecting arepresentativeon a strength of his/herpoliticalparty rather than a claimant as an individual, what about a rights ofvoters whovoted Party A usually to find their votes have left to Party B?

So CSL, what about a voters' rights? Would this be a usually way which MCA can mental condition of ever having a MP or ADUN after a subsequent election?

But then, shouldn't Dr Mahathir's explain of liberalness be additionally applicable to a instruct of a MP/ADUN who may instruct to resign upon domestic beliefs to re-contest again? So since had a (earlier) UMNO-led government legislated to forestall this by commanding a mandatory interregnum of 5 years?

Don't discuss it me a bullshit it's to forestall wasting open money in land a by-election, since permitting a rakyat to elect or re-elect their preferred deputy should be their elemental rights, as well as where by preventing a MP/ADUN who has resigned upon a matter of domestic element to re-stand, would effectively deny a rakyat their preference of re-electing pronounced candidate. Rights, choice, beliefs -! these a re issuesfar some-more important than saving a few dollars, tax-payers' dollars, notthegovernment's.

So, Dr Mahathir, you can't explain it's 6 upon a single while denying half a dozenontheother, since that's hypocrisy as well as stand in standards. And don't discuss it us abouttheMaster-Chef as his heart, soul as well as proclivities have been similar to yours, still in/of UMNO wakakaka.