Monyet King speaks of religion and imbeciles

I am not a large fan of orderly sacrament as good as politics. This is especially because, in this country, these dual unequivocally successful platforms have been led mostly by morons. However they affect me in many ways so we have to write something lah. BTW, my writing subsequent is not unequivocally orderly only a little randoms thoughts as good as ideas.I am presumption which all we folks determine which we all contingency reside by a laws of a country.Since this is ostensible to be a "sensitive" subject, we will try to write in a way which a many freakin imbeciles have been not annoyed (ooops we consider we already annoyed some).
1 st pointless point
Islam is a official sacrament of a country. It is stated in a Constitution. Whether we similar to a actuality or not, either we determine to it or not, it doesn't unequivocally matter. It is in a Constitution. [BTW, a Constitution does not contend which Islam is superior to alternative religions all it says is Islam is a official sacrament of a country].

Given a special position, it is natural which a Government gives prominence as good as allocates funds for Islamic institutions as good as associated activities. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to know that, since Islam's special in front of as good as a actuality which over 60% of a race have been Muslims, supervision allocations for Islamic institutions as good as associated activities will be vastly greater [it is exponential] than those supposing for alternative religions. This is a complement in Malaysia. Respect it.

If we do not similar to a complement or consider it is unfair, we can try changing it.You can always run your elected member to shift a system. Until then, we need to stop fussy as good as apply oneself a system. [If two-thirds of MPs determine as good as a Malay! rulers await it, afterwards these things can be changed. But afterwards again we as good as we know this is subsequent to impossible. Stop dreaming].

[I privately do not similar to a supervision to get concerned in eremite matters. But we will apply oneself a complement since which is what is in a Constitution].


2 nd pointless point
Proselytization (it is such a *#*^?* formidable word to pronounce). It is wrong to propagate alternative religions to Muslims in Malaysia. It is opposite a laws. It is however okay for muslims to evangelise about Islam to non-muslims. It is not opposite a laws. Whether we determine to it or not, either we consider it is astray or not, it doesn't unequivocally matter. It is opposite a Malaysian law to propagate alternative religions to muslims in Malaysia.

As law abiding people (which we pretence we all are), apply oneself a law. So all we Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Kardashians, Ewoks as good as Gungans, do not evangelise to muslims in Malaysia. Period. If we do, we consider we deserve to go to prison. It is a law.

If we do not similar to a complement or consider it is unfair, we have your avenues. You can always run your elected member to shift a system. Until then, we need to stop fussy as good as apply oneself a law.


3 rd pointless point
Accusing others of proselytization. In a past few months, a series of politicians (who occur to be Muslims) have indicted others, particularly Christians, of perplexing to shift Muslims in a country. Accusing others of proselytizing muslims is a critical matter (well essentially accusing any one for anything is a critical matter). To people similar to Hassan Ali, we have got this to contend "I utterly ! determin e with we YB which proselytizing to muslims is a critical offence. If we can uncover me a chairman who is doing it, we will total heartedly assistance we to take to court which person. After all, we all contingency reside by a law".

However what annoys me is which people similar to Hassan Ali as good as a likes have not constructed a shred of justification connected with these accusations nor have they identified a culprits. Nothing. Zero. Zilt. Telur ayam. we do not know about we guys though my bargain is which Islam (as good as alternative religions) prohibits we from creation accusations when we do not have evidence. It causes a good understanding of uneasiness, frustrations as good as tension in this country. To Hassan Ali as good as his merry-men, we contend "when we contend which people have been proselytising muslims, greatfully produce a evidence. Otherwise shut a $ #%^#$ % up".

Don't get me wrong. we am not saying which there have been positively no attempts to proselytize muslims in this country. we guess there may be. But we do not know any one doing it. we have got no evidence. So a dignified of a story no evidence, shut up. Got evidence, greatfully take to court quickly. After all, we have been law abiding citizens, aren't we ?

[BTW, if we have during slightest an ounce of brains, we will know which it is tighten to unfit for a Christian to turn a Prime Minister. It is unfit for Christianity to turn a offical sacrament of a land. So, a subsequent time we listen to someone expressing regard which Christians have been taking over a country, greatfully smack him/her in a face. He/she is sim! ply tryi ng to gain recognition during a expense of eremite harmony]


4th pointless point
Support for non-Islamic eremite institutions. The supervision could improve a level of await supposing for religions besides Islam. [note : we have progressing pronounced which we do not ! determin e with governments removing concerned in religion, we stand by it]. When we contend support, we mean things similar to creation it easier for people to acquire capitulation to erect as good as work churches andtemples.

Although we am not concerned in these things, we assimilate it is unequivocally really formidable for any one to acquire capitulation from Local Councils to build churches or temples. This leads to frustrations, as good as often hatred for a supervision of a day as good as hardens influence about Islam. Why, since many folks in a Local Councils have been muslims as good as it gives a sense which Islam is odious (which we know is not). It is not unequivocally nice to see churches handling out of factory buildings as good as shop-lots.


5 th pointless point
All eremite organizations in this nation could do with some-more smart people in their folds. Religion is such an successful platform. People have gone to war over religion. For such an successful platform, a peculiarity of people operative in it is pathetic.

Based upon my (limited) observations, there have been not many smart people operative as priests, imams, muftis, rabbis or monks. Go to any school or college in Malaysia as good as ask a brightest students " do we wish to turn a priest, imam, mufti, rabbi or priest when we grow up?". What arrange of answer do we consider we will get?. we consider we will get a flattering large NO. Okay, let's try again. Go to any school or college in Malaysia as good as ask a lower ranked students a same question. What arrange of answer do we consider we will get?. we consider we will get a same flattering large NO. Even in a eremite schools (sekolah agama), we am prett! y sure t he brightest of a lot will wish to turn doctors, engineers, astronauts, pharmacists, etc, etc. we have not unequivocally met any kids (bright kids, which is) who have told me which they wish to turn a clergyman or imam or a! priest when they grow up.

The complaint with a complement is which many (not all) of a time, a slightest efficient people finish up as priests, monks or imams or muftis. [Note : there have been exceptions]. Take a monyet challenge. Go to your internal JAIS bureau or a nearest Hindu or Buddhist temple. Try to find out what arrange of educational backgrounds a people who work there have. Very often (not all a time), people who work in these places have been not a thickk cream de la cream. You will find school drop-outs. You will find folks who hardly upheld their SPM. You will find graduates who hardly scrapped by while during a university. Again, let me qualify by saying there have been exceptions. There have been a little unequivocally splendid eremite leaders though they have been a minority. [I consternation if MENSA was to control a IQ test, how many of a eremite "leaders" will make a cut?]

Across all religions, there is a miss of efficient people.That's since we find a supposed eremite leaders regularly creation reticent statements. That's since eremite leaders similar to to tell people off for questioning their views they have been frightened of debating since they miss a knowledge. So they censor behind a "religious" curtains, evoke God's name when they have been questioned. A bunch of imbeciles rule a religions, all religions.

Society needs to put a brightest to lead sacrament (and politics).

6th pointless point
Finally, dialogue. we hold in dialogue. A lot of problems, prejudice, misconceptions, etc, etc have been caused by a miss of understanding, a miss of empathy. Hindus do not assimilate a Muslims, Muslims do not assimilate a Buddhists, Buddhists do not assimilate a Christians, Christians do not assimilate a Sikhs, a Sikhs do not assimilate a Jains, a Ewoks ! do not a ssimilate a Gungans, a Siths hate a Jedis as good as we do not assimilate a Kardashians. We contingency inspire dialogues as good as some-more dialogues to concede people of different religions to assimilate a alternative religions better.

I do not assimilate since a little people have been so frightened of dialogues. I consider one of a best things which a supervision can do to revoke eremite tension in this nation is to organize some-more dialogues.


There we go, folks.6 pointless points about sacrament in Malaysia.
[If we have been an imbecile as good as we have been annoyed by this article, we am sorry].

Anyway, we consider a little of we may similar to these dual quotes.

In a long-term we can hope which sacrament will shift a inlet of man as good as revoke conflict. But story is not encouraging in this respect. The bloodiest wars in story have been eremite wars. Richard Nixon

Humanity but sacrament is similar to a serial torpedo but a chainsaw unknown Read More @ Source

New Justice Bao 2007 - Case 3 (END) - partial 04 of twenty-one - Indonesian & Chinese Subtitle

New Justice Bao 2007 Family name: Bo () Given name: Zhng () Courtesy name: Xrn () Posthumous name: Xios () Other names Bo Gng (; "Lord Bao") Bo Qngtin (; "Bao a Blue Sky") Bo Lngt (; "Bao of a Dragon Image") Bo Dizh (; "Edict Attendant Bao") Born eleven April 999 Died twenty May 1062 (aged 63) Cast - Jin Chao Qun () as Bao Qing Tian - Fan Hong Xuan () as Gongsun Ce - Kenny Ho as Zhan Zhao Bao Zheng (Hanzi: ) (999-1062) adalah seorang hakim dan negarawan terkenal pada zaman Dinasti Song Utara. Karena kejujurannya dia mendapat julukan Bao! Qingtia n () yang berarti Bao si langit biru, sebuah nama pujian bagi pejabat bersih. Musuh-musuhnya menjulukinya Bao Heizi () yang artinya si hitam Bao karena warna kulitnya yang gelap. Nama kehormatannya adalah Xiren (). Disebutkan juga bahwa kaisar menganugerahi Bao tiga gilotin (alat penggal) dalam tugasnya sebagai hakim. Ketiga gilotin itu mempunyai dekorasi yang berbeda dan digunakan untuk menghukum orang sesuai statusnya. Guilotine kepala anjing untuk menghukum rakyat jelata, kepala macan untuk menghukum pejabat korup, dan kepala naga untuk menghukum bangsawan jahat. Dia juga dianugerahi tongkat emas kerajaan oleh kaisar sebelumnya untuk menghukum kaisar sendiri bila bersalah dan pedang pusaka kerajaan sebagai tanda berhak untuk menghukum siapapun termasuk anggota kerajaan tanpa melapor atau mendapat persetujuan dulu dari kaisar ...

Video Rating: 0 / 5

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: