Finally, the loyal colours of the esteemed Dr M have been revealed.
At the new forum, Dr M was reported to have touted his thought of what the clever supervision is as well as is not. He was quoted to have said which the clever supervision contingency be brave to make use of force as well as which being magnanimous is the weakness. He attributed the loss of the dual thirds majority by the BN supervision to the miss of certainty the adults had towards the then BN leadership.
He also lamented the actuality which the energy of the BN supervision is being destroyed since of diseased leadership. The actuality is which the source of energy of the supervision lies with the citizens, not with the political party. No political party has hereditary rights to oversee - 55 years in supervision notwithstanding. When it comes to the energy to govern, the adults giveth as well as the adults taketh. The adults righteously have the expectation which the energy so giveth contingency be exercised for the citizens' betterment. Most of all, the energy contingency be practice wisely, or the adults have every right to taketh it away.
Of course, supervision leaders have to be daring. But adventurous to do what is the large question. Surely it is not adventurous to do things which have been unjust, not accountable, fraudulent or officious criminal. When they do that, they no longer merit the certainty of the adults as well as with it, the right to govern.
Dr M seemed to suggest which the stream supervision care is afraid of the people. Frankly, I'd rather have the supervision which is 'afraid' of the people than the single which rides roughshod over the people. As long as the supervision has the strength of the self-assurance to do the right things by the people as well as be under obligation for the action, fright does not come in to the equation.
Dr M seemed to also suggest which the stream diseased care has ! resulted in people severe supervision policies like the AES. Weak care or not, the people did not plea the AES per se. They challenged the way the enforcement of the AES is privatized, yet again at the back of closed doors.
Dr M asked because you have been so abashed of the ISA. We have been not abashed of the ISA. We have been abashed of the way ISA has been used as the apparatus by the BN supervision to stifle criticism as well as to stop the people severe the unfair actions of the government. A approved supervision should be gallant of criticism. It should inspire feedback from the people, for usually with feedback, as well as receiving movement in reply to the feedback, can the republic can take steps to urge itself.
Dr M's punch line was which if BN wins GE13 with fewer seats than it did in 2008, it is the vale victory. To me, the vale victory is when the single wins with unscrupulous means such as cheating or coercion. It is not totalled by how most seats the single wins.
To call the marked down majority in the Parliament the vale victory is the height of arrogance. It shows how much Dr M has taken for postulated the BN government's right to oversee Malaysia.
we have news for Dr M: Be grateful for any majority, for the right to oversee is sacrosanct as well as cannot be treated as the political game for BN.
* Uncle Nick reads The Malaysian Insider.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment