So, if you wish to revoke a 3 million 'foreign population' of Malaysia afterwards a plantations, building a whole companies, SMI factories, etc., should stop employing them. And to do which you need a smallest income of during slightest RM1,200-RM1,5000 (or thereabouts) a month. With which income turn Malaysians would be prepared to work as good as as a result you do not need to occupy foreigners as good as afterwards give them Malaysian citizenship.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Subra: Minimum income to avoid nonessential employing of foreigners
(The Star) - The smallest income policy, which came in to outcome this year, is to avoid a nonessential employing of unfamiliar workers, pronounced Human Resources Minister Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam.
For e.g. during motor fuel stations, he said, people have to accept a idea of self-service when filling up their cars.
Petrol dealers have implemented a smallest income as of January 1, throwing a little 50,000 foreigners out of work.
"The change which you have been looking for will not happen overnight," Dr Subramaniam pronounced adding which a smallest income process was additionally implemented to channel workers to alternative sectors which have been in need of labour.
He pronounced there were no provisions in a stream law to concede companies to delay implementing a policy.
"Employers need to understanding with a new process yet if they have problems, they can brazen their concerns to us as good as you will try as good as help them," he said.
The smallest income process requires companies to pay a smallest income of RM900 in a peninsula as good as RM800 in Sabah, Sarawak as good as Labuan.
Subramani! am prono unced a ministry was additionally discussing with employers upon issues relating to levy as good as allowances for housing as good as transportation of a unfamiliar workers.
"Employers wish a levy as good as allowances to be innate by a workers. The emanate is up to a Cabinet to decide upon what action to be taken," he pronounced upon Sunday.
*****************************************
you used to live in Bukit Rahman Putra (BRP5) in Sungai Buloh, Selangor -- from end-December 1996 to end-February 2009. One day you beheld which around midnight or so there would be a tainted smell in a air. We outlayed days trying to track a source of this smell yet failed to do so.
We afterwards met up ('we' definition a residents' committee) with a officers from Jabatan Alam Sekitar (the Department of a Environment) to plead this have a difference as good as to try what they could do about what was assumingly a bad box of air pollution -- as good as you suspected most poisonous as good given this happens usually past midnight as good as not in a daytime when it could be detected easily.
What a officers told us surprised us. Most of those factories during a bottom of a hill where you live have been not licensed, they told us. Hence, given they have been not licensed, a Department of a Environment cannot do anything about them. They can usually take action against protected factories. They have no jurisdiction over bootleg factories as good as businesses.
Who afterwards can take action? Well, this comes underneath a jurisdiction of a land bureau as good as a internal council. So you need to raise this have a difference with a land bureau as good as a internal council. However, given these two agencies have been amongst a most corrupted agencies (and they still have been even yet Pakatan Rakyat has been statute Selangor for roughly 5 years now) you should not design any action to be taken.
The Department of a Envi! ronment should know since they as good have faced problems in trying to solve this matter. The bureau owners usually pay 'under-the-table' income to a officers from a land bureau as good as internal legislature as good as they can most get away with murder. (In fact, you can literally additionally get away with attempted murder in Malaysia a same way).
you afterwards did a tour of a area from a Sungai Buloh KTM railway station right up to a old leprosy settlement/new Sungai Buloh Hospital. you detected which a area was 'infested' with unfamiliar workers, often from Indonesia, Bangladesh, Myanmar, etc. And a infancy of these people were either bootleg immigrants or were holding Malaysian temperament cards, which means they have been Malaysian citizens.
From my severe estimate you concluded which a comparative measure of 'foreign' race to locals was probably two-to-one -- yet given they owned Malaysian temperament cards they would be regarded as Malaysian adults rsther than than foreigners. It seems it is not which difficult for these 'foreigners' to become Malaysian citizens. All it needs is money, which their employers would gladly pay as good as afterwards concede a volume from their salaries later.
you afterwards did a 'census' of a most Sungai Buloh factories during a feet of Bukit Rahman Putra (next to a Hong Leong Yamaha factory) as good as you found which all these factories have been Chinese-owned. There have been no Malay- or Indian-owned factories (except for one Indian carpet dealer, which is not a bureau yet a warehouse). And all their workers have been foreigners (except for a managerial postions, who have been Chinese), yet not necessarily bootleg workers, as most owned Malaysian temperament cards.
you additionally detected which not usually is a area from a KTM railway station up to a old leprosy settlement/new Sungai Buloh Hospital 'infested' with 'foreigners'. When you gathering in a conflicting direction towards Tasek Biru, it is a same thi! ng, none theless a comparative measure there is not as high as two-to-one. Nevertheless, there is a outrageous 'foreign' village there as well.
Why is there such a high unfamiliar village (both bootleg as good as those with Malaysian temperament cards) in Sungai Buloh? Well, which is since a most Chinese-owned factories as good as building a whole companies pay low salary as good as usually foreigners would wish to work during these pathetically low wages. No Malaysians wish to do a labourer's pursuit in a factories as good as upon a building a whole sites.
And which is why a SMIs as good as building a whole companies have been opposed to a smallest wage. If you can remember, last year they spoke up against a implementation of a smallest wage. If there is no smallest income as good as salaries have been kept low afterwards these businesses have some-more money. But which would additionally meant usually foreigners from Indonesia, Bangladesh, Myanmar, etc., would wish to do such work. Malaysians would not wish to work for a small few hundred Ringgit.
The same goes for camp companies. They occupy foreigner workers since Malaysians do not wish to do backbreaking work during such low wages. And most of these plantations have been multi-national companies, a little even GLCs (government-linked companies).
In fact, you spoke to one GLC oil palm camp association (state government-owned) to endorse this. They occupy foreigners since they can't get Malaysians to work during those low wages. And for certain no Malaysian Chinese would wish to work in plantations for RM700 a month. They would rsther than sell pirated CDs as good as DVDs (they even do so in Manchester, surprisingly).
Today, you complain about a millions of 'illegal immigrants' in Malaysia. Actually they have been not bootleg immigrants given they have been given Malaysian temperament cards. And a reason this estimated 3 million 'foreigners' have been in Malaysia is since you occupy them dur! ing real ly low wages. And since of a really low salary usually these 'illegals' would wish to work. Malaysians have been not meddlesome to suffer during such low wages.
you have bumped in to most Malaysian Chinese here in a UK operative as chefs as good as waiters/waitresses. Why do they work here in a UK as good as not behind in Malaysia? That is since in Malaysia afterwards can't even consequence RM1,000 a month since in a UK they consequence some-more than RM5,000 a month. And you can tarry in a UK with RM5,000-RM6,000 a month yet not in Malaysia with a small RM800-RM900 per month.
So, if you wish to revoke a 3 million 'foreign population' of Malaysia afterwards a plantations, building a whole companies, SMI factories, etc., should stop employing them. And to do which you need a smallest income of during slightest RM1,200-RM1,5000 (or thereabouts) a month. With which income turn Malaysians would be prepared to work as good as as a result you do not need to occupy foreigners as good as afterwards give them Malaysian citizenship.
And a usually people who can do this would be a Chinese building a whole companies as good as SMI bureau owners plus a GLCs as good as multi-national camp companies. It is no use screaming about a complaint when you have been a source of which problem.
The capitalists wish to have some-more money. So they underpay their workers. And since they underpay their workers a jobs go to a foreigners. And these foreigners move their family groups to Malaysia as good as their children school in Malaysia. They additionally tax Malaysia's health system.
It is a capitalists who have been a cause of Malaysia's amicable problems involving foreigners. And since you need cheap work you need to move in 3 million unfamiliar workers from a neighbouring countries.
Yes, most of these workers from Indonesia, Bangladesh, Myanmar, etc., have been Muslims. However, do you consider a Christian Filipino girls would wish to work fo! r RM700 a month upon a building a whole site when they can consequence RM2,500 or some-more as a lassie in Singapore (food as good as camp free as well)?
Capitalism works upon a law of supply as good as direct (just like prostitution). When there is a direct for cheap unfamiliar work afterwards a supply would emerge. And a people formulating this direct have been a SMI factories, building a whole companies as good as plantations. And who have been a owners of these SMI factories, building a whole companies as good as plantations?
Then you censure a supervision for this. And when you point out a reality of this incident you get angry. And this is since of a Malaysian culture ofwhat do you call itkiasu, is it?
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment