YOURSAY'If this is what a Malay village has come to, afterwards a non-Malays will have to quarrel for their right to profess their religion.'
Residents oppose rebuilding of Hindu tabernacle in Sepang
P Dev Anand Pillai:What nonsense is this Taman Seroja Residents Association boss Kamarulzaman Mat Zain articulate about?
The temple is inside of a devalue of a house; it is not upon a open road, so it is good inside of a jurisdiction of a residence owners to urge inside his/her own house, which includes a outer part till a main front gate.
MIC Youth is right here, if an illegal temple is constructed upon a private land, which is not a dwelling, afterwards a authorities might intervene. But this is a right to ceremony inside of a bounds of one's own house.
So it looks similar to a schemers have been up to it again. What does this mean, which Christians, Hindus as well as Buddhist can't keep shrines in their own homes?
If this is what a Malay village has come to, afterwards a non-Malays will have to quarrel for their right to profess their religion. If a Malays do not wish any alternative eremite sites in a republic solely which of their own, afterwards start demolishing everything.
Mr Kalai:Any tabernacle in ! a Hindu residence should be inside a residence as well as not outside. It should not be in a permanent building built similar to a mini-temple.
Once a temple or shrine, however tiny it is, is built, Hindus will not remove it believing! which a deity has staid down there.
What happens if a residence is sole as well as a new owners does not wish a shrine? Let us apply oneself God. Give him a correct place.
Southpaw:Why do we have a strong feeling which this is BN member parties' play act, particularly in between MIC as well as Umno.
KPNG:"She (neighbour Zurina Muhammad) conceded which a enlargement of a tabernacle might have caused a little Muslims feel uncomfortable.''
But it is entirely inside of a Indian owner's residence compound. Why have been a Muslims in which locality feeling uncomfortable, we don't understand.
Can't they accept others' leisure to their religion? The Sepang Municipal Council (MPS) must explain.
Don't make make use of of a argument of a tiny series of Indian race there, which sounds similar to bullying. We have been articulate about leisure of to rehearse a religion.
Residents oppose rebuilding of Hindu tabernacle in Sepang
P Dev Anand Pillai:What nonsense is this Taman Seroja Residents Association boss Kamarulzaman Mat Zain articulate about?The temple is inside of a devalue of a house; it is not upon a open road, so it is good inside of a jurisdiction of a residence owners to urge inside his/her own house, which includes a outer part till a main front gate.
MIC Youth is right here, if an illegal temple is constructed upon a private land, which is not a dwelling, afterwards a authorities might intervene. But this is a right to ceremony inside of a bounds of one's own house.
So it looks similar to a schemers have been up to it again. What does this mean, which Christians, Hindus as well as Buddhist can't keep shrines in their own homes?
If this is what a Malay village has come to, afterwards a non-Malays will have to quarrel for their right to profess their religion. If a Malays do not wish any alternative eremite sites in a republic solely which of their own, afterwards start demolishing everything.
Mr Kalai:Any tabernacle in ! a Hindu residence should be inside a residence as well as not outside. It should not be in a permanent building built similar to a mini-temple.
Once a temple or shrine, however tiny it is, is built, Hindus will not remove it believing! which a deity has staid down there.
What happens if a residence is sole as well as a new owners does not wish a shrine? Let us apply oneself God. Give him a correct place.
Southpaw:Why do we have a strong feeling which this is BN member parties' play act, particularly in between MIC as well as Umno.
KPNG:"She (neighbour Zurina Muhammad) conceded which a enlargement of a tabernacle might have caused a little Muslims feel uncomfortable.''
But it is entirely inside of a Indian owner's residence compound. Why have been a Muslims in which locality feeling uncomfortable, we don't understand.
Can't they accept others' leisure to their religion? The Sepang Municipal Council (MPS) must explain.
Don't make make use of of a argument of a tiny series of Indian race there, which sounds similar to bullying. We have been articulate about leisure of to rehearse a religion.
ACR:This residents' organisation only represents 95 percent of a residents? The five percent non-Muslim residents have no representation?
The evident Malay/Muslim next door next door neighbour does not have problems with a altar. The tabernacle is not for open use.
Why bring into a fray a residents' organisation as though open space is being abused to a detriment of a residents?
Louis:Kamarulzaman, does this meant which when Hindus form a minority in an are, they need not rehearse their religion? How would a Muslims feel if they have been denied places of ceremony in areas or countries where they represent a tiny minority?
Islam is reasonable as well as expects Muslims to be passive to alternative eremite practices. Allowing a tiny Hindu tabernacle to be built does not meant debility in Islam. On a contrary, it shows a strength of Islam, which comes what may, will weather all alternative influences.
Fair Play:Is this a Malaysian Malaysia concept after some-more tha! n 50 ove r years vital together in harmony?
Frankly, as a Malaysian, we adore to be surrounded by mosques, churches, temples as well as any praying place. Such places give a clarity of peace to ease one's mind.
Bumiasli:Another example of superiority complex. Does a residents' organisation have a right to meddle in peoples' private matters?
Thisia:I only don't assimilate what is so wrong having a tabernacle inside a house? Even if there is 99.99 percent Muslims in a area, what is a problem? It! 's similar to saying in a non-Muslim majority area, a surau is not allowed. Grow up, guys.
Tpn:Don't speak this crap about "our sensitivity". we stay in a area where some-more than 90 percent of a people have been non-Muslims. However, we have never made an emanate about a surau enlargement nor a azan prayer call.
We show apply oneself to a internal Muslim village as we have been Malaysians who apply oneself a single another, irrespective of a religion. Kamarulzaman sounds similar to he can be converted out of Islam if he sees a temple in his area. Please cut out stupid crap.
Imran:I am an Indian Hindu as well as we really consider a Indians have been starting overboard with their temples. It seems a fact which there is a Hindu temple at every corner.
These so-called temples have been many often put up by tiny groups as well as over a years there have been thousands around a country.
I consider Indian Hindus should be supportive to a internal population. As for a altars constructed in their gardens, we consider these as well should be controlled. Altars have been meant to be inside a house. we was repelled to see a residence in Sungai Buloh having a outrageous tabernacle in their porch.
I am a Hindu as well as well as we am abashed of these actions by a little people in a Indian community. The Indians consider they can politicise anything to do with temples. The ! authorit ies should not give in to these tiny groups. Most educated Indians have been share a same perspective we have only expressed.
MK:You have a right to have a tabernacle in your own house. But make sure to imitate with internal legislature regulations. Very simple.
Shemc2:I am not pro or opposite this issue, though a part which is unfortunate is, despite a many years of vital in a multiracial society, we have been still a long approach from usurpation a multiracial society.
I wonder if a situation was reversed, many likely a war would have damaged out by now.
Enlightened:Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim's noisy silence upon a emanate is starting to expel a little doubts in a lot of Hindus' as well as Buddhists' minds as to Pakatan Rakyat's stand upon eremite tolerance.
Mohd Mazlan Khamis:Please do a background check as well as charge all those who have been protesting here as they could incite diseased race family upon a shores.
It's improved to be protected than sorry. We do not need extremists in a country. The military should action quickly opposite these people instead of wasting time with a Bersih group.
Kalaiselvam Palaniappan:If people could set up a rock grassed area in a devalue of a house, why can't we set up an altar?
We have processed altars made of timber as well as stone (large ones) yet we can't set up one? A chairman can't ceremony God in their own home?
The law states which every residential area should have a mosque as well as non-Muslims apply oneself it, so why can't a same gesticulate be extended to us?
These racist bigots should assimilate which this tabernacle is built inside of a devalue of a house, period.
Ferdtan:I still consider it is ! alright t! o have a Hindu tabernacle inside a devalue for private prayers. My next door next door neighbour has a Taoist tabernacle built inside his co! mpound.< br>
I additionally have a surau a single hundred metre away, with trade jams every Friday as well as a daily prayers' calls, though we have no objections. What have been a couple of minutes of nuisance for tolerance?
The fault primarily lies with a town legislature officers, who obviously up to no good as well as torn down a Hindu altar. However, M Thanalechemy's family should not politicise it by getting MIC to get involved.
They gave as well most inflection to a mainstream media to strike at Pakatan, as well as right divided we get these Umno-backed supporters personification a eremite emanate again, similar to those in Shah Alam who started the'cow-head'demonstration.
LittleGiant:Malaysia is a republic which relies upon a strength as well as solidarity of a 3 major races - a Malays, a Chinese as well as a Indians - for a progress as well as development.
It is extremely disappointing as well as frustrating which a rakyat have to declare these ugly incidents.
Can Malaysians indeed hold in 'unity in diversity'? Can we ever achieve racial as well as eremite toleration as well as acceptance? Fifty-five years after Merdeka, it seems some-more unfit than possible. It is sad, very sad. - Malaysiakini
Read More @ Source The evident Malay/Muslim next door next door neighbour does not have problems with a altar. The tabernacle is not for open use.
Why bring into a fray a residents' organisation as though open space is being abused to a detriment of a residents?
Louis:Kamarulzaman, does this meant which when Hindus form a minority in an are, they need not rehearse their religion? How would a Muslims feel if they have been denied places of ceremony in areas or countries where they represent a tiny minority?
Islam is reasonable as well as expects Muslims to be passive to alternative eremite practices. Allowing a tiny Hindu tabernacle to be built does not meant debility in Islam. On a contrary, it shows a strength of Islam, which comes what may, will weather all alternative influences.
Fair Play:Is this a Malaysian Malaysia concept after some-more tha! n 50 ove r years vital together in harmony?
Frankly, as a Malaysian, we adore to be surrounded by mosques, churches, temples as well as any praying place. Such places give a clarity of peace to ease one's mind.
Bumiasli:Another example of superiority complex. Does a residents' organisation have a right to meddle in peoples' private matters?
Thisia:I only don't assimilate what is so wrong having a tabernacle inside a house? Even if there is 99.99 percent Muslims in a area, what is a problem? It! 's similar to saying in a non-Muslim majority area, a surau is not allowed. Grow up, guys.
Tpn:Don't speak this crap about "our sensitivity". we stay in a area where some-more than 90 percent of a people have been non-Muslims. However, we have never made an emanate about a surau enlargement nor a azan prayer call.
We show apply oneself to a internal Muslim village as we have been Malaysians who apply oneself a single another, irrespective of a religion. Kamarulzaman sounds similar to he can be converted out of Islam if he sees a temple in his area. Please cut out stupid crap.
Imran:I am an Indian Hindu as well as we really consider a Indians have been starting overboard with their temples. It seems a fact which there is a Hindu temple at every corner.
These so-called temples have been many often put up by tiny groups as well as over a years there have been thousands around a country.
I consider Indian Hindus should be supportive to a internal population. As for a altars constructed in their gardens, we consider these as well should be controlled. Altars have been meant to be inside a house. we was repelled to see a residence in Sungai Buloh having a outrageous tabernacle in their porch.
I am a Hindu as well as well as we am abashed of these actions by a little people in a Indian community. The Indians consider they can politicise anything to do with temples. The ! authorit ies should not give in to these tiny groups. Most educated Indians have been share a same perspective we have only expressed.
MK:You have a right to have a tabernacle in your own house. But make sure to imitate with internal legislature regulations. Very simple.
Shemc2:I am not pro or opposite this issue, though a part which is unfortunate is, despite a many years of vital in a multiracial society, we have been still a long approach from usurpation a multiracial society.
I wonder if a situation was reversed, many likely a war would have damaged out by now.
Enlightened:Selangor MB Abdul Khalid Ibrahim's noisy silence upon a emanate is starting to expel a little doubts in a lot of Hindus' as well as Buddhists' minds as to Pakatan Rakyat's stand upon eremite tolerance.
Mohd Mazlan Khamis:Please do a background check as well as charge all those who have been protesting here as they could incite diseased race family upon a shores.
It's improved to be protected than sorry. We do not need extremists in a country. The military should action quickly opposite these people instead of wasting time with a Bersih group.
Kalaiselvam Palaniappan:If people could set up a rock grassed area in a devalue of a house, why can't we set up an altar?
We have processed altars made of timber as well as stone (large ones) yet we can't set up one? A chairman can't ceremony God in their own home?
The law states which every residential area should have a mosque as well as non-Muslims apply oneself it, so why can't a same gesticulate be extended to us?
These racist bigots should assimilate which this tabernacle is built inside of a devalue of a house, period.
Ferdtan:I still consider it is ! alright t! o have a Hindu tabernacle inside a devalue for private prayers. My next door next door neighbour has a Taoist tabernacle built inside his co! mpound.< br>
I additionally have a surau a single hundred metre away, with trade jams every Friday as well as a daily prayers' calls, though we have no objections. What have been a couple of minutes of nuisance for tolerance?
The fault primarily lies with a town legislature officers, who obviously up to no good as well as torn down a Hindu altar. However, M Thanalechemy's family should not politicise it by getting MIC to get involved.
They gave as well most inflection to a mainstream media to strike at Pakatan, as well as right divided we get these Umno-backed supporters personification a eremite emanate again, similar to those in Shah Alam who started the'cow-head'demonstration.
LittleGiant:Malaysia is a republic which relies upon a strength as well as solidarity of a 3 major races - a Malays, a Chinese as well as a Indians - for a progress as well as development.
It is extremely disappointing as well as frustrating which a rakyat have to declare these ugly incidents.
Can Malaysians indeed hold in 'unity in diversity'? Can we ever achieve racial as well as eremite toleration as well as acceptance? Fifty-five years after Merdeka, it seems some-more unfit than possible. It is sad, very sad. - Malaysiakini
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment