Prime Minister Najib Razak's refusal to disclose a donor of a S$ sixteen million prohibited income seized at a Hong Kong International airport, following his minister's progressing acknowledgement of a income as concession to Sabah Umno, has usually heightened guess over a web of deceit as well as cover up of tall crime in a corridor of power.
His apportion Nazri Aziz had progressing (Oct 11) given a created reply in parliament denying that a pronounced S$ sixteen million income was Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman's money, claiming that it was a concession to Umno celebration in Sabah instead, even though a conduit of a cash, Michael Chia Tien Foh, was a well well known personal representative as well as close join forces with of Musa Aman, as will be elaborated later.
In a serve try to boot a notion of any incorrectness over a episode, apportion Nazri added in his statement that a Malaysian Anti-Corrupition Commission (MACC) has resolved that "no element of crime was proven".
However, this statement has glaringly contradicted MACC's latest stance upon a issue, aired usually a few days earlier.
Answering questions by reporters upon a sideline of a recently resolved Sixth Conference of a International Association of Anti-Corruption Authorities (IAACA) in Kuala Lumpur, MACC deputy arch government official (operations) Shukri Abdul pronounced upon October 5: "The review opposite Musa is upon crime as well as you have completed a investigation, though a row has educated us to get some-more evidence."
By "the panel", Shukri Abdul was referring to MACC's operatio! ns revie w panel, that educated a operation division to collect serve justification opposite Musa after being presented with a report upon a box during a panel's last sitting in May.
While MACC's head of review is claiming that it is still in a surrounded by of investigation, how could apportion Nazri claim in a same exhale that MACC has resolved that there was no justification of corruption?
DISHONEST ANSWERS
Nazri is unlikely to have told a truth, as he couldn't have well known some-more than a head of investigation.
As for Shukri, how critical can you take his word that MACC couldn't come to a end despite 4 prolonged years of review in to a simple box of someone held red-handed while bootlegging an huge sum of laundered cash? After all, justification galore in a Internet of a perplexing network of income upsurge originating from joist crime in Sabah with Michael Chia as a single of a focal points of a trail that eventually ends up in Musa Aman's personal account in UBS AG in Zurich.
In fact, a upsurge draft display these income movements complete with account sum was constructed by a Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), a duplicate of that has been conveyed to MACC, according to Sarawak Report website, that has additionally posted a draft in http://www.sarawakreport.org/2012/04/hold-on-trust-for-aman-more-devastating-evidence-from-the-icac-investigation/. It is not formidable to see from this elaborate network of bank accounts as well as income exchange that a S$ sixteen million situation is usually a tip of a iceberg of a clandestine operation to siphon massive joist crime income from Sabah.
! Apparently, ICAC has additionally forwarded a findings to MACC, as well as requested for inter-country co-operation to wrap up a case, though such try was reportedly blocked by Attorney General Gani Patail.
Can MACC deny that it is in embrace of a fruits of ICAC's difficult investigations in to a box together with a pronounced income upsurge draft that conclusively crucifies Musa Aman? Perhaps a parliamentary select cabinet upon crime should serve MACC arch government official Abu Kassim to answer this question.
MUSA'S LIES EXPOSED
Responding to Sarawak Report's various allegations that between others, Musa's dual sons study in Australia continually received joist kickbacks from bank accounts tranquil by Chia, Musa flatly denies these in a created statement upon Apr 12, 2012 that reads:
"I deny all these allegations. I wish to put it upon jot down once again that I have no business organisation whatsoever with an particular named Michael Chia".
Musa's denial, however, was contradicted by banks statements constructed in a Singapore High Court in a civil suit (Suit No.752 of 2010/N) in Jun that was brought by Chia's former join forces with as well as right away counter involving a income dispute.
To urge a position in a dispute, UBS AG constructed bank statements that clearly showed that Musa's sons Mohammed Hayssam Musa as well as Hazem Musa Hazem Mubarak Musa were unchanging recipients of income remitted from accounts of companies that Chia claimed to be underneath his control. These British Virginia purebred untrustworthy companies with large volume of unaccounted for income continually flowing mys! teriousl y through their accounts have been viewable vehicles of income laundering.
Thus both UBS AG as well as Chia, out of a necessity to urge their respective positions, had unwittingly constructed in court evidences that tell us that Musa Aman has told a blatant distortion that he has no couple whatsoever with Michael Chia. More than that, these bank documents additionally combine documents in Sarawak Report's embrace (including a abovementioned upsurge chart) that continually aspect in a visit bearing of Musa Aman's sinful ventures as a notorious joist nobleman of Sabah.
Interestingly, according to Sarawak Report, these tip reports have been leaked documents from not usually ICAC, though additionally from MACC, that has carried out a together review upon Sabah joist corruption, following a arrest of Michael Chia in Hong Kong upon fourteen Aug 2008 for income bootlegging as well as laundering.
Judging from MACC's prolonged overpower as well as inaction despite a wealth of justification of Sabah joist crime in a hands, it is not formidable to daydream a limitations underneath that it has to operate.
UMNO INCRIMINATES ITSELF
It unequivocally boggles a mind to ! cruise t hat a Prime Minister could cruise such bizarre conform of conveying concession as "the proper way".
May you remind a Prime Minister that income bootlegging as well as income laundering have been critical criminal offences, for that Michael Chia would have been prosecuted, convicted as well as locked up as well as a income confiscated, if not for a Malaysian government's refusal to extend a co-operation to a Hong Kong authorities.
And since Michael Chia is usually a courier, a master for whom he serves Umno is even some-more guilty.
In any democratic country, law enforcers would have swung in to movement following a prime minister's open acknowledgment of such organisation of breach of law; though of course, in Boleh Land, this is business as common nothing to have a fuss about?
This latest liaison is usually a single of most that have been ceaselessly popping up newly despite a imminence of a consequential election. It usually serves to strengthen a tough actuality that our contentious "reformist" Prime Minister's most "transformations" he claimed to have brought to a republic have been some-more illusion than substance.
As for his vision of "best democracy" as well as "developed nation" standing in a nearby future, is it not a land too distant to reach?
Kim Quek is a writer of criminialized book The Mar to Putrajaya
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment