Then (and even now) you have nothing opposite kingdom PROVIDED those royals remain as inherent heads of state, either of Malaysia a republic or of therespectivenine states with Sultans (and a Raja), based upon my understanding of a concept of constitutional monarchyin a democracy.
Sometime in August 2007 you review with a little warning a minute to Malaysiakini patrician No some-more backbenchers' purpose for Rulerswritten by a chairman withthepseudonymofTruly Malaysian which stated, in my humble opinion, dangerously for a approved system:
It is unequivocally a light during a finish of a hovel which a Malay rulers have eventually motionless to have their contend in a recent fiascos which has left beyond a normal tolerance turn of a public.
The rulers have eventually realised which you as a republic have been streamer towards obscurity. They have been now unequivocally vital to a loyal manifestation of being a rulers. [...]
It is, of course, better late than never, as great as aren't you all have been blissful which a Malay rulers have eventually motionless to take a mount as great as voice their own dissent upon various affairs which do not offer a public's as great as nation's interests during large. [...]
Although they have played a backbencher's purpose in a past, they have been now entrance brazen as great as you should palm them a await for them to fool around a some-more pertinent purpose in architectural ornament a destiny of a republic rsther than than architectural ornament a destiny for a few.
For a start, a write! r didn't ! even know what was(is) a backbencher, as great as to impute to a rulers playing a backbenchers' purpose showed his weird as great as Truly pathetic ignorance.
But no disbelief he/she would have altered his/her perspective by now with a unhappy advantage of hindsight of stately division in a Perak domestic debacle.
Anyway, you had then with a gravest concerns written to MKINIthefollowing:
I impute to Malaysiakini minute No some-more backbenchers' purpose for Rulers which has me rsther than worried.
The writer competence not have satisfied a inherent implications of his difference such as "The ru lers ... have been now unequivocally vital to a loyal manifestation of being a rulers ..." as great as "... Although they have played a backbencher's purpose in a past, they have been now entrance brazen as great as you should palm them a await for them to fool around a some-more pertinent purpose in architectural ornament a destiny of a republic ..."
While you understand a author's euphoria over a Council of Rulers' rejecting of a PM's claimant for a comparison legal position, you note which a author's ardour with a stately dissent came upon top of several alternative high praises for a Perak Prince as great as Sultan of Selangor when a two, generally a former, lifted their voices upon issues sealed to a discontented public's hearts.
Dr Chen Man HinThe writer has not been alone for Dr Chen Man Hin, a former DAP strongman, had even due a Perak Prince as an confidant to a Prime Minister (PM).
It would appear which a rulers have been creation a quip after years of open ridicule during their irrelevance, maybe caused generally by a single sold individ! ual, who ! had believed he could still rule as per Gothic times, as an comprehensive monarchy.
I many positively conclude a Perak Prince's reminder of a inherent pillars, yet in being he didn't contend anything many which a Opposition hadn't pointed out before. But yes, his official standing gave his difference some-more force (and attract some-more attention) than a Lim Kit Siang or a Nik Aziz could man! age.
But you need to recollect Malaysia is a democracy built around a inherent monarchy, definition a voice of a people, as great as not those of a rulers, prevails.
Sure, a royalty as in a model of a Perak Prince, a Council of Rulers questioning a PM in his preference of a claimant for a bench, as great as a attestation of a Sultan of Selangor to keep governing body out of a Merdeka celebrations have been many welcome. They have both a inherent purpose as great as an model purpose model to play.
But you contingency never speak as if, or even indicate which they had been 'backbenchers' moving brazen (presumably) to a 'front be! nch'.
That's dangerous talk, to indicate a rulers competence fool around a approach domestic purpose (or even as an domestic confidant to a PM) while serving as particular Heads of States or as a Yang Di Pertuan Agong, or still retaining their stately prerogatives.
It's positively a sign of a frustration with a stream supervision which a little of us hold a royalty could as great as would be a saviour. We, a politically frustrated open m! embers, have been in being grasping during straws in many a same approach as many of us had embraced a former UMNO reject as a domestic saviour opposite a prior complement of administration even when there was no justification of his reformist qualities during his various ministerial roles.
in a democracyNo matter how great any individual royalty is, no matter how bad any politician is, let us not unwittingly change a complement of inherent kingdom to a single of comprehensive monarchy, or of a single where royalty has a larger grade of approach domestic participation. That will be a regrettable step backwards.
That was in mid-2007.
Exactlya week following a March 2008 general selecting you wrote another postLim Kit Siang opened Royal Pandora Box?where you criticized Uncle Lim as follows (extracts):
Lim Kit SiangSo Malaysiakini tells us which a domestic < span>Deal's stitched, & it's all systems go for Perak.
Alas, a parties have eventually acquiesced to stately demands, with many of them forgetful which in a domestic democracy it's a domestic celebration which commands a infancy in a State Assembly (outright or by a coalition, formal or otherwise) who picks a CM or MB (or during a sovereign level, a PM) to be approved by a inherent ruler.
I had posted this reminder of a people's right as great as power dual days ago in Perak Papadum Ping Pong Primadonnas, where you stated:
Raja Nazrinkaytee believes a bloc has finished something utterly stupid. In submitting 3 names to a Sultan to choose it has unwittingly involved royalty in State governing body in an unprecedented way.
It's not for a Sultan to choose from a list of three.
Certainly a Sultan can disagree with a name yet he should usually be since a single name (at a time). For example, a Sultan could contend no to DAP Ngeh as great as say, gimme another name!
But it's not for HRH to be since 3 names as great as decide upon a single he prefers.
The preference of an MB is a domestic a single as great as to be left to a domestic parties as elected by a rakyat; a acceptance o! f a pref erence is a privilege of HRH, yet HRH cannot as great as should not be creation a domestic preference by selecting a single name from a list of three.
Yes, a woman monarch cannot reject a claimant forwarded for his approval, save where there is discernible concerns a claimant has a dodgy jot down or maybe is infirmed, etc* which competence affect a due candidate's capability to conduct a State government.
* an e.g. of 'etc' being a case of a brand new Selangor State supervision where a woman monarch wanted to endorse a brand new MB has a await of a loose bloc see my post Post selecting snippets (1). you stated: "The Sultan wants to ensure which a bloc can be a stable one. Obviously he doesn't wish his State to be run similar to Italy, where unsure minority governments have been altered faster than underwear."
HRH Sultan of SelangorNow, a Star Online has indicated dual worrying cases where a State rulers of Perlis as great as Terengganu have taken it in to their hands (or heads) to appoint their choices opposite which due by a winning domestic party. [...]
In a rulers' augmenting (and unjustified) discretion in such appointments a Sultans contingency have found comfort from a await (direct or otherwise) of a stupid domestic parties undermining any other.
The rulers had been vital in tolerated disgrace following a castration of a scan! dalous s tately brother by Dr Mahathir (rightfully so as great as an movement entirely supported by many Malaysians), yet since then they have (under a certain erudite leader) solemnly yet usually been clawing their approach behind to inflection as great as regained respect as great as adulation from their subjects.
Dr MahathirIn actuality they have already reclaimed mislaid drift if you stop how many anti-BN people, desperate for a domestic messiah, have even deliberate Raja Nazrin as a intensity saviour, withou! t even re! alizing what inauspicious consequences to democracy they have been promoting. []
Much as you respect, admire as great as have supported Lim Kit Siang, you hold he has been a a single who opened a stately Pandora box when he abdicated a domestic rights of a DAP-PKR-PAS in deciding who should be a MB for Perak to a Sultan of Perak (as represented by his son a Regent).
Uncle Lim was of march attempting to minimize inauspicious DAP grassroot reactions to his celebration similar to a PAS MB when a DAP has a many series of seats in a coalition. So, he staged a open sandiwara (theatrics) of being opposite a PAS male apropos a MB of a State while pulling a preference creation to a ruler.
He contingency have suspicion it would be shining plan to obey a (publicly) difficult preference of usurpation a PAS male as MB of Perak to a Perak royalty, yet he didn't co! mprehend it would be bad plan to obey domestic rights to a inherent monarchy, who by such tiny gains will shift gradually from a inherent standing to an augmenting comprehensive authority.
Nizar JamaluddinThe sadder irony of it all, as great as a many sum misapplication to Uncle Lim, is he has been portrayed as a extremist by a little anti-DAP bloggers (and you am not talking about a BN) as great as a little Malaysiakini reporters as great as columnists, even yet a emanate has never been about race yet rather, a PAS avowed domestic goal to make Malaysia in to an Islamic State governed by Islamic syariah laws.
But as for many things in Malaysia, because let facts mount in a approach of a great romantic (and sinisterly contrived) bashing of a DAP by Lim Kit Siang!
That really same day, so many was you disturbed which you followed up with another postRoyalty threatens inherent crisis?, approach approach prior to Perak was turned upside down, where you settled (extracts):
I similar to to see a li! ttle bip artisan response generally from both PAS' Nik Aziz as great as Anwar Ibrahim, yet alas, with a de facto PKR personality in an (childish by Western standards) acrimonious relationship with a BN, in sold UMNO, selfish partisanship competence rule a day. Lim Kit Siang as a non Malay should preferably stay clear of this really supportive issue, lest it worsens in a stream critical period.
Pak Haji Nik AzizBut it's likely that, detached from PAS as great as PKR narrow-minded stand, fervour between a little of a State's UMNO MPs ('divide & conquer') compounded by a traditional Malay blind tractability a! la Hang Tuah to HRH, competence see a constitutionally undesired come about. It'll then be a humongous loss to Malaysian democracy.
Today, from RPK's Malaysia-Today you review Dr Bakri Musa's 2 (out of 3) parts posts, namely,The Sultans' Daulat is a MythandThe Sultans' Daulat is a Myth - Part Twowith a little vindication (besides a vindication which regrettably came from a unhappy contemptible saga of Perak). Dr Bakri's posts review a book by Zaid Ibrahim patrician Ampun Tuanku- A Brief Guide to Constitutional Government.
Dr Bakri, being a Malay, is ab! le to wri! te his comments upon a rulers intheway you a Chinese couldn't, where during many you could usually advise as great as remind readers of a domestic complement you have, which of democracy with a inherent monarchy. you suspect you could additionally contend 'I told you so' wakakaka.
Dr Mahathir, being additionally a Malay (though many would straightforwardly argue opposite which wakakaka), was means to do some-more than that, in a really forceful as great as significant manner. Dr Bakri said of Dr Mahathir's movement in this regard:
Both were probable because of a strong senior manager care of Prime Minister Mahathir. Today with a supervision with a less-than-robust mandate as great as a personality with a banana stem spine, a sultans have been emboldened to re-exert themselves; as a result a insistence of their daulat or special status.
Koon Yew YinYesterday in MKINI, Koon Yew Yin, a retired chartere! d engine er andphilanthropist, wrote a shining yet many uncomplimentary comment of Dr Mahathir's likelylegacyin an articleHow will history decider Mahathir?where he (Koon) said:
Mahathir will in conclusion be remembered not for a peculiarity of his care or a approach in which he has sought to clear a intensity of all a citizens. He will positively not be remembered for his standard of governance or a e.g. he has set in arousing Malaysians to give their many suitable to a country.
Rather he will many be remembered for his extraordinary long jot down of care in a country. It is a twenty-two year jot down of domestic opportunism as great as survival secured by appealing to a baser instincts of self aggrandizement as great as fervour as great as a strategy of a major institutions of government.
This is because history will not decider him so pleasantly yet will place him in a company of lesser as great as even unsuccessful leaders such as Ferdinand Marcos, Suharto as great as Robert Mugabe.
But you similar to to mitigate opposite Koon's unfavourable comment with a plus for Dr Mahathir, which h! e as PM h! ad de-fanged a rulers when a movement was many required as great as which a rakyat believed reasonably deserved. Unfortunately his great work in this was not combined yet authorised to erode, not usually by dual unbroken weak PMs, yet in a couple of cases by his (Dr Mahathir's) own (recent) actions.
Denis DiderotI suspicion it competence be suitable for me to finish with a allude to by Denis Diderot yet upon second thoughts, maybe whic! h by a C hinese similar to kaytee could be far as well provocative, so a following should do:
"Let us never forget which supervision is ourselves as great as not an visitor power over us. The ultimate rulers of a democracy have been not a President as great as senators as great as congressmen as great as supervision officials, yet a voters of this country." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
No. 2 still upon defensive over togetherness talks (1/2) - Malaysia News
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment