Syahredzan Johanasks during this holy month, have been Malay-Muslims entitled to better rights than others?
Photo credit: http://www.techwithus.com/2012/07/6-ways-to-survive-16-hours-of-ramadan-fasting/ | Is it time to have which sandwich?
So we have been fasting. The sun is temperament down on you, your go through is growling as well as your throat is parched. It is usually 12.30 in the afternoon; we still have hours to go prior to we might break your fast. All of the sudden, the non-Muslim person appears prior to you, enjoying an icy cold can of your favourite cola. He looks similar to he is savouring the cola. You could suppose the prodigy of which very same cola filling your throat with diabetes-inducing caffeine goodness. So we flare up. How dare this person splash in front of you? Does he have no respect for the holy month of Ramadhan, to be wantonly quenching his thirst in full perspective of Muslims? Does he not know which Muslims form the infancy of this nation as well as therefore must be respected?
This is the basic premise prevalent amongst most Malay-Muslims in this country. Muslims form the infancy as well as therefore they have been entitled to be respected. Malay-Muslim sensitivities must not be offended; the Malay-Muslim open must be stable from harm, confusion as well as most alternative bad as well as guileful things which might threaten theummah. In recent times, these deep rooted sentiments have been brought to the front by opportunistic politicians. Thus it appeared as if Malay-Muslims have become more as well as more intolerant of minorities.
Malay-Muslims have been entitled not to have the Hindu temple in the closeness of their housing estate. Malay-Muslims have been entitled to foreordain what names others might plead the Creator. Malay-Musli! ms have been entitled to stop the sale of alcohol beverages as well as deny the establishment of the cinema in Malay infancy areas.
Every Friday, Malay-Muslims have been entitled to abandon their civic alertness as well as park all over the place as if the streets belong to them. Malays-Muslims have been entitled to blare religiousceramahsto each corner of the neighbourhood as well as into the wee hours of the night.
The budding minister must be Malay-Muslim, the civil use must be filled with Malay-Muslims as well as government bodies have been seen as Malay institutions, tasked initial as well as inaugural to safeguard Malay as well as Muslim interests.
This premise of desert has additionally been used to justifythe harm as well as taste opposite sexual as well as eremite minorities, purportedly since Article 3 provides which Islam is the sacrament of the Federation. So we say which LBGTs do not suffer protection of the Constitution since their sexual orientations have been opposite Islam, nonetheless we conveniently forget which alternative things, similar to gambling, have been additionally banned in Islam but have been still authorised in this country. Books have been seized as well as banned andfatwasare made absolute. In the recent decision, the Federal Court went so far to say which the firmness of the sacrament needs to be safeguarded at all costs. Does 'at all costs' include the supremacy of the Federal Constitution as the top law of the land?
Make no mistake, this is not about Islam. It is about how we clear the discrimination, harm as well as blatant negligence for elemental liberties, all in the name of religion. It is how we perspective as well as treat others as defective to us since we believe which we have been entitled to do so. We permit transgressions since we labour under this presumption which Malay-Muslims, by trait of being Malays as well as Muslims, have been entitled to the most appropriate of the nation a! s they t ake up the higher station than the rest of therakyatout there.
There is no authorised or constitutional basis for this. Article 3 does not have Malaysia an Islamic state as well as Article 4 expressly provides which the Federal Constitution is the autarchic law of the land. Article 8 provides which each adult is next to prior to the law as well as enjoys next to protection of the law. The oft quoted Article 153 does not have Malay-Muslims superior in law or fact, it usually provides for the advance booking of quotas for Malays as well as locals of Sabah as well as Sarawak in certain matters.
So what if Muslims have been the majority? We have such the flawed understanding of democracy; as if in the democracy, the rights of minorities have been defective to the rights of the majority. That is why we have the Constitution, which protects as well as guarantees the elemental liberties of citizens from the restraint of the majority.
We find ourselves up in arms at the predestine of Muslims minorities in alternative countries similar to Thailand, Philippines, Myanmar as well as China. We plead freedom of sacrament when we listen to of minarets being banned in Switzerland orburqasbeing banned in France. But if the rights of Muslim minorities should be stable in the face of the majority, why is it which we do not have the same effect to protect the rights our non-Muslim minorities? Why must the rights of others here usually be exercised if we deem those rights as exercisable?
So prior to we take corruption at someone who is drinking in front of we while we have been fasting, take the step behind as well as think of your religion. Put aside your clarity of desert as well as think; only since we have been fasting, does it mean which everyone else around we must reserve divided their food as well as drinks?
Remember what Islam has instilled in you, not what Muslims have told you. - Loyarburok
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment