The article successive was sent to me by a source who was really close to a parties which authored Malaysia's Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. The sender has requested anonymity ...
The Rafizi Ramli expos of a National Feedlot Centre (NFCorp) Scandal: The Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 [Act 711] Point of View
Background
The National Feedlot Centre(NFCorp)is afirm which runs a Federal Government's cattle farming project, which was awarded to a organisation in 2006
Linked toformer Minister Datuk SeriShahrizat Jalil's family.
Probe into monetary mismanagement of NFCorp beganlate final year, as a outcome of a Auditor-General's 2010 report which NFCorp usually achieved 41% of its target of 8000 cattle in 2010.
Since a liaison pennyless in October 2010, PKR has been demanding Datuk Seri Shahrizat for explanation upon a purported monetary mismanagement as great as corruption, in addition to phenomenon further allegations of monetary misappropriation by NFCorp.
The Charge
Mr.Rafizi Ramli, a plan director of PKR, who additionally happens to be a Petaling Jaya Utara MPwas charged under subsection 97(1) of BAFIA for disclosing 4 patron form papers regarding to a balance summary of NFCorp, National Meat as great as Livestock Sdn. Bhd., Agroscience Industries Sdn. Bhd. as great as Datuk SeriMohama d Salleh Ismail(Datuk Seri Shahrizat's husband) totwo individuals, namely
o
A media consultant namedYusuf Abdul Alim; and
o
A journalist namedErle Martin Carvalho,
At a PKR domicile in Merchant Square, Jalan Tropicana Selatan 1 upon 7 Mar 2011.
Conviction will outcome in a fineup to RM3milliom as great as jail up to 3 years.
A conviction will additionally severely jeapordize Mr. Rafizi's possibility of standing as a candidate in a successive ubiquitous electionsand fortifying his seat.
Mr. Rafizi's detain as great as successive chargeis being touted by certain quarters as victimization of a whistleblower as great as would usually serve to deter "future whistleblowers", as great as would deal a serious blow to a public's notice upon a government's earnest in combating corruption.
Mr. Rafizi'splightfrom Act 711's point of view
Careful celebration of a mass of Act 711 obviously shows thatMr. Rafizi does not fall within a ambit of a whistleblowerenvisaged by a Act, for several reasons
o
The disclosure was not made to any enforcement agencybreachof territory 6of WBPA
o
The report disclosed was made publicbreachof territory 8of WBPA
o
His temperament is known to all as great as sundrybreachof terr itory 8 of WBPA
o
Looking during a players concerned in this play it is clear which a actions of Mr. Rafizi as great as a people coming to his counterclaim have been clearexamples of strategy of a letters of a law to fit one's domestic agenda.
The Opposition willnever stop politicking each pierce of a Government, even to a border of utilizing a tenets of a law as great as supplies of legislations to fit their agenda.
Their lax interpretation of a tenure "whistleblower" is obviously used as a apparatus to attack as great as ridicule a bid as great as great goal of a Government in introducing Act 711 in a first place.
The reasons a whistleblower should remain unknown have been
o
1.Protection of a report contained in a disclosure
o
2.For his insurance as great as safety, as great as a safety of a persons associated to him;
o
3.Protection of a person accused of a wrongdoing, should review exhibit him to be trusting after all; and
o
4.Protection of any person declared in a report disclosed, who may be harmed if a report is made publ! ic.< /div>
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Mr. Rafizi's control is a pure case of impression gangland slaying as he would bob to despicable means to acquire report in order to contaminate a reputation as great as great name of certain individualsorhis domestic rivals.
The action of a people coming to his counterclaim in claiming which he is a whistleblower who isbeing victimized for being a member of a Opposition, despite knowing which he did not come with purify handsis additionally aclearcase of utilizing as great as distorting a supplies of a law to upset andinfluence a public, or rather, pretending to be undeveloped of a letters a law or just solid irrationality upon their part.
The control as great as perspective of a Opposition is shameful, insane as great as contemptuous towards a spirit of a Act, as great as it would be a contrition for them to find insurance under this Act when it is appallingly clear which goodwill as great as raise of a republic was a final thing they had in thoughts when makingsuch claims.Instead, all which they have to offeris criticism ofthe government's bid in combatingcorruption as great as claimingtheir brute acts as a category actin phenomenon corruptpracticesandknowing which such report is taboo by law from open disclosure, yet unashamedlyclaiming to a total universe which theydeserve theprotection under a really Act which they havebeen criticizing.
- rocky's bru
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment