Dr Mahathir Mohamad's comment aboutdevils as well as angelshad commentators as well as politicians starting to town similar to headless chickens, proof once as well as for all who is a master of a game.
Ultimately, his point was very clear. In counts mercantile as well as social, a BN has an imperfect jot down yet during slightest a strain is familiar. There have been nightclubs in a cities, outrageous factories converted in to churches for a "born again", as well as even gay clubs for those so inclined.
In a rural areas, if a infancy have been Muslims, a approach of hold up can be very "traditional". Only if you purport to worship Teapots will your lifestyle be curbed. If which rural community so chooses, they can tell their members which a sexes will have to be segregated in theatre halls as well as which a lights must not be dimmed.
The on top of is a "devil you know"; a lifestyles will not shift as well as you can go about being Malaysian in whichever approach you choose. This is a guarantee of a Barisan Nasional government, standing quo circa 1957 with teenager adjustments following May 13, 1969. Malaysia can call itself an Islamic country - by trait of a fact which a infancy of Malaysians have been Muslims - yet retain a physical lifestyle.
Instead of a robust egghead evidence as to why sustaining Malaysia's singular lifestyle - a single which is balanced, estimable as well as singular - critics have left for a literal: Dr Mahathir admits to being a devil; a BN is a party of devils as well as Anwar! Ibrahim is an a! ngel. Re ally, how shallow can people get?
What is more appropriate is to disagree which a BN has not kept to a promises done in 1957 as well as 1969. Society is not more equitable, supervision is not fit and, as a result of a amicable engineering, you right away have a ubiquitous decrease in standards in all a institutions. If a BN does not shift things radically, you have been headed for "failed state status".
This afterwards brings us to a Government Transformation Programme (GTP) as well as either which raft of reforms have been essentially being carried out? Here a antithesis is having a margin day for a single elementary reason - a PM has not been means to get all his cupboard ministers as well as a civil servants to his approach of thinking. Without his own mandate, a GTP will not happen as well as Najib Abdul Razak knows which he has to win convincingly to get his way.
PM using against a clock
Not given a days rught away after independence has a Malaysian supervision been so open as well as accessible to new ideas. Yet, without a claim cooperation from those holding office, these ideas will not be translated in to action. In this case, as mentioned by this bard on a day Najib came in to office, a PM was using against a clock. He keeps jumping up as well as down yet stays in a same spot.
So most for a "devil you know" yet what about a "angel you don't"? Dr Mahathir was being treasonable when he asked this subject since it went true to a heart of a matter: will Malaysia become less physical with Pakatan Rakyat in government?
Almost immediately, a focus went onto a issue of hudud as yet it is a usually thing which defines Islam as well as a purported "Islamic state" issue. Surely, by now, politicians as well as their spo! kesperso ns should assimilate which hudud is usually a single aspect of Islam. Yes, most of us do not wish to see people starting around a streets without hands yet you certitude you will not be saying a implementation anytime soon.
What you would similar to to see is Pakatan's idea of a Malaysia underneath their administration. Will it be similar to Penang underneath Pakatan? Will it be similar to Kelantan, Selangor or Kedah? Obviously, Malaysia needs to be governed as well as a little clarity of federal-led policies with regards to national unity, defence as well as foreign family will have to be agreed upon. Here is Pakatan's Achilles Heel, you unequivocally do not know either it can hold it together after it defeats a BN.
Who will lead a Pakatan cabinet? What will a complexion be like?
What about leadership?
We have a Buku Jingga, which tells us rounded off which it will be a welfare-oriented state which is still very most entrepreneur in policies; you know from their lane jot down especially in Penang as well as Selangor which it is critical about dealing with corruption; as well as which it will go on to have a kind of duality, withdrawal Muslim infancy states similar to Kedah as well as Kelantan to go about their commercial operation in their own way, yet what about leadership?
To date, there is no shade cupboard as well as a challenges to current BN policies have been a! d-hoc and! reactionary. Of course, a expectations may be too tall as well as a little have pronounced which you should try to assimilate which Pakatan is underneath consistent BN "attacks". But which is a nature of a beast.
One Pakatan politician once pronounced "if you cannot stand a heat, get out of a kitchen" as well as it goes both ways. As such, it is not too most to design to know what arrange of supervision you will be removing when as well as if a BN is voted out.
In fact, which is a most appropriate reply to Dr Mahathir's statement: "Better a demon you know as wel! l as a a ngel you don't". By creation explicitly transparent what arrange of supervision you can expect, Pakatan will allay fears from all communities in Malaysia.
Ultimately, his point was very clear. In counts mercantile as well as social, a BN has an imperfect jot down yet during slightest a strain is familiar. There have been nightclubs in a cities, outrageous factories converted in to churches for a "born again", as well as even gay clubs for those so inclined.
In a rural areas, if a infancy have been Muslims, a approach of hold up can be very "traditional". Only if you purport to worship Teapots will your lifestyle be curbed. If which rural community so chooses, they can tell their members which a sexes will have to be segregated in theatre halls as well as which a lights must not be dimmed.
The on top of is a "devil you know"; a lifestyles will not shift as well as you can go about being Malaysian in whichever approach you choose. This is a guarantee of a Barisan Nasional government, standing quo circa 1957 with teenager adjustments following May 13, 1969. Malaysia can call itself an Islamic country - by trait of a fact which a infancy of Malaysians have been Muslims - yet retain a physical lifestyle.
Instead of a robust egghead evidence as to why sustaining Malaysia's singular lifestyle - a single which is balanced, estimable as well as singular - critics have left for a literal: Dr Mahathir admits to being a devil; a BN is a party of devils as well as Anwar! Ibrahim is an a! ngel. Re ally, how shallow can people get?What is more appropriate is to disagree which a BN has not kept to a promises done in 1957 as well as 1969. Society is not more equitable, supervision is not fit and, as a result of a amicable engineering, you right away have a ubiquitous decrease in standards in all a institutions. If a BN does not shift things radically, you have been headed for "failed state status".
This afterwards brings us to a Government Transformation Programme (GTP) as well as either which raft of reforms have been essentially being carried out? Here a antithesis is having a margin day for a single elementary reason - a PM has not been means to get all his cupboard ministers as well as a civil servants to his approach of thinking. Without his own mandate, a GTP will not happen as well as Najib Abdul Razak knows which he has to win convincingly to get his way.
PM using against a clock
Not given a days rught away after independence has a Malaysian supervision been so open as well as accessible to new ideas. Yet, without a claim cooperation from those holding office, these ideas will not be translated in to action. In this case, as mentioned by this bard on a day Najib came in to office, a PM was using against a clock. He keeps jumping up as well as down yet stays in a same spot.
So most for a "devil you know" yet what about a "angel you don't"? Dr Mahathir was being treasonable when he asked this subject since it went true to a heart of a matter: will Malaysia become less physical with Pakatan Rakyat in government?
Almost immediately, a focus went onto a issue of hudud as yet it is a usually thing which defines Islam as well as a purported "Islamic state" issue. Surely, by now, politicians as well as their spo! kesperso ns should assimilate which hudud is usually a single aspect of Islam. Yes, most of us do not wish to see people starting around a streets without hands yet you certitude you will not be saying a implementation anytime soon.What you would similar to to see is Pakatan's idea of a Malaysia underneath their administration. Will it be similar to Penang underneath Pakatan? Will it be similar to Kelantan, Selangor or Kedah? Obviously, Malaysia needs to be governed as well as a little clarity of federal-led policies with regards to national unity, defence as well as foreign family will have to be agreed upon. Here is Pakatan's Achilles Heel, you unequivocally do not know either it can hold it together after it defeats a BN.
Who will lead a Pakatan cabinet? What will a complexion be like?
What about leadership?
We have a Buku Jingga, which tells us rounded off which it will be a welfare-oriented state which is still very most entrepreneur in policies; you know from their lane jot down especially in Penang as well as Selangor which it is critical about dealing with corruption; as well as which it will go on to have a kind of duality, withdrawal Muslim infancy states similar to Kedah as well as Kelantan to go about their commercial operation in their own way, yet what about leadership?
To date, there is no shade cupboard as well as a challenges to current BN policies have been a! d-hoc and! reactionary. Of course, a expectations may be too tall as well as a little have pronounced which you should try to assimilate which Pakatan is underneath consistent BN "attacks". But which is a nature of a beast.
One Pakatan politician once pronounced "if you cannot stand a heat, get out of a kitchen" as well as it goes both ways. As such, it is not too most to design to know what arrange of supervision you will be removing when as well as if a BN is voted out.
In fact, which is a most appropriate reply to Dr Mahathir's statement: "Better a demon you know as wel! l as a a ngel you don't". By creation explicitly transparent what arrange of supervision you can expect, Pakatan will allay fears from all communities in Malaysia.
NEIL KHOR finished his PhD during Cambridge University as well as right away writes occasionally on counts which he thinks requires improved historical treatment. He is sensitively confident about Malaysia's future.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment