Selangor should not 'repossess' a H2O industry, as what you think is starting to happen. Instead, a sovereign supervision should 'repossess' H2O from ALL a states in Malaysia. Then a H2O placement complement needs to be softened as good as a NRW contingency be marked down from some-more than 40% to less than 20%. Then, in a meantime, while this is being done, that might take 30 years or longer, a consumers should not be finished to compensate for a H2O loss. It is a income that is being lost in to a ground.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Not usually contingency governing body as good as sacrament be separated, governing body as good as H2O should additionally be separated. But if you leave it to a politicians from both sides of a domestic divide, they will politicise race, religion, H2O as good as a rights of a gay village to live a lifestyle of their choice.
In fact, even 'First Lady' Rosmah Mansor's handbags is being politicised, that you contingency confess is quite a good domestic emanate (whichMalaysia Todayis guilty of doing) when she has a pick up of scores of handbags that run in to millions of Ringgit. She really gives 'First Lady' Imelda Marcos a run for her money.
And that is given you can't trust politicians to solve a H2O 'problem' in Selangor. That is given they do not assimilate what a complaint is. What is a real problem? Who was a a single who privatised a H2O concession? Was it Pakatan Rakyat? Or was it Barisan Nasional? Why is Pakatan Rakyat being blamed for something that Barisan Nasional did?
Hence you need a civil society movements or NGOs or 'third force' (whatever you wish to call it) to take up this issue. Politicians can't be trusted to conduct this issue. Politicians usually wish t! o win a election. Politicians have been usually interested in power. And Malaysian politicians in sold usually wish to run down their opponents, both within a celebration as good upon a other side.
While politicians upon both sides of a domestic order have been personification a blame game (and a blame would be to Barisan Nasional who privatised a H2O concessions) no a single is addressing a some-more important issue, as good as that is a non-revenue H2O or NRW.
The acceptable NRW, according to a United Nations, is 20%. That is a limit tolerable NRW. In Malaysia, however, it is some-more than 40% -- some-more than stand in a acceptable NRW.
What is a supervision you do about this? Nothing! They privatise a diagnosis of water. But a placement of H2O is still a government's problem. Hence a concessionaires do not need to address this problem. And given a supervision is not addressing this emanate that equates to no a single is you do anything about it.
In 2008 as good as 2009, RM1.6 billion a year was lost to NRW. In 2010 as good as 2011 a NRW increased to RM1.7 billion a year. This means, over a final 4 years alone given a 2008 General Election, an estimated total of RM6.6 billion was lost.
RM6.6 billion is usually over a final 4 years given a 2008 GE. If a initial half of this year (up to June 2012) were included, a figure would come to some-more than RM7.5 billion.
And this is usually given a 2008 General Election, mind you. But a NRW complaint has not been around usually given a final 4 years. It has always been around given Merdeka. Hence, if you take a figures for a final 40 years instead of usually over a final 4 years, your guess is as good as mine. And you would guess you would easily be seeking during some-more than RM50 billion. Let a H2O engineers tell me if you am wrong about my 'guesstimation'.
In short, given a 2008 General Election, roughly RM18 billion value of H2O was 'manufactured' as good as usuall! y RM10.5 billion was 'sold'. RM7.5 billion was lost.
And who pays for this loss? Why, we, a consumers, of course. Someone has to compensate as good as for sure a businessmen who have been making income from a H2O privatisation have been not starting to compensate for that loss. We have been paying for that detriment to help a businessmen make money.
Selangor faces a top NRW followed by Johor (Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin's home state) as good as Sabah. Selangor looses about RM600 million a year or an estimated RM2.7 billion given Pakatan Rakyat took over a state.
Is Anwar Ibrahim, a Economic Adviser of Selangor, or Khalid Ibrahim, a Menteri Besar, aware of this? Do Ronnie Liu or Rafizi Ramli know about this? And if they do given has this emanate been swept underneath a carpet?
To be fair to Anwar, Khalid, Ronnie as good as Rafizi, though, it is not their fault. They did not privatise Selangor's water. Barisan Nasional did. And this is not a four-year aged problem. It is a 100 year-old problem, given before Merdeka.
Hence a supervision should not usually privatise a diagnosis of water. In fact, a H2O diagnosis plants should not even be privatised in a initial place. Water is a vital attention so it should remain in a hands of a government.
Unfortunately, H2O is a state resource, as was oil as good as gas. Since they nationalised oil as good as gas in 1974 by Act of Parliament (Petroleum Development Act 1974) then they should additionally nationalise H2O (Water Development Act 2012, maybe?).
Then all a state H2O resources should come underneath Air Nasional Berhad (AINAS sounds as good as PETRONAS, no?). Oil as good as gas, electricity, security, defence, unfamiliar policy, etc. have been all 'strategic industries' and, hence, have been all nationalised. Water is additionally a vital industry. But given have been a states still managing a H2O resources? Should not H2O additionally be underneath sovereign con! trol?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Selangor should not 'repossess' a H2O industry, as what you think is starting to happen. Instead, a sovereign supervision should 'repossess' H2O from ALL a states in Malaysia. Then a H2O placement complement needs to be softened as good as a NRW contingency be marked down from some-more than 40% to less than 20%. Then, in a meantime, while this is being done, that might take 30 years or longer, a consumers should not be finished to compensate for a H2O loss. It is a income that is being lost in to a ground.
you know not usually Selangor will remonstrate with this. All a states will disagree. But let's face it: a states will not be able to revoke a NRW. To do so will take years as good as during good cost to a states (with income they do not have). Maybe some-more than RM100 billion or RM200 billion (I am usually guessing) will be required to shift all those AC pipes that were laid 50 or 100 years ago as good as that have given deteriorated. The supervision needs to reinstate a antique AC pipes with plastic iron pipes. And that is starting to cost a bomb. The states, or a H2O concessionaires, will not have a income to do this.
That is my reply to a tussle between Barisan Nasional as good as Pakatan Rakyat per a H2O complaint in Selangor, that is actually a pan-Malaysian problem. And let a H2O engineers tell me if you am wrong. This is not about politics. This is about good governance.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment