"DAP as good as Pakatan Rakyat suggest to co-operate as good as work closely with "Pakatan Rakyat" as good as Barisan Nasional to safeguard which there will be no repeat of May thirteen in a subsequent ubiquitous election, as good as Malaysians have been entitled to ask how there could be a repeat of a May thirteen tragedy if both domestic coalitions - Barisan Nasional as good as Pakatan Rakyat - unquestionably oath to work together in a inhabitant interest to forestall any such recurrence?" --Lim Kit Siang
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
@font-face { font-family: "Cambria"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; }
Have you review these pieces yet?
Now review (below) what Lim Kit Siang pronounced in his speech final night.
It is unquestionably engaging to note which these people have been observant what you had been observant over a final 4 year! s given 2008. The only problem is you pronounced all this BEFORE a fact. Hence not many people listened given many people have been fundamentally hard during discussion (hence a pretension of my essay today). Others have been right divided observant a same thing. But they have been observant it AFTER a actuality -- hindsight as opposed to foresight.
Furthermore, it all depends upon who is observant it. If which chairman who says it is your crony or someone you can determine with afterwards you will listen. If not you will reject what he or she says. You will regard is as mere conjecture as good as rumour mongering.
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad says, "Melayu mudah lupa." you say, "Malaysians, not only Melayu, mudah lupa." Anyway, it does not matter. you additionally adore to say, "I told you so." And you have pronounced prior to -- which it might take five years or more, though in a destiny what you contend gets proven as fact. And currently you have been observant which happen.
Okay, what was it which you pronounced over a final 4 years given 2008?
First, you pronounced which Dr Mahathir is a de facto Prime Minister as good as which he will be guiding a outcome of Malaysian politics. Hence if you wish to strategise you contingency assimilate how Dr Mahathir thinks. Whatever you might consider of Dr Mahathir, you contingency admit a single unquestionably simple fact, he is a unquestionably intelligent domestic strategist. And he has a capability to move things from during a behind of a scenes without his hands being seen.
Pakatan Rakyat's focus, however, is upon Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. That, to me, is a wrong target. Pakatan Rakyat is perplexing to outthink Najib. But it is not Najib who you contingency outthink. You have to outthink Dr Mahathir. And to outthink Dr Mahathir you contingency initial of all know what is in his mind. And unless you 'wo! rk' with Dr Mahathir how in heaven's name have been you starting to be means to outthink him?
And this is a bone of row which Matthias Chang lifted in a couple of articles which he wrote whacking me. you know many of you exclude to review what Matthias writes given you cruise him a Dr Mahathir stooge. But if you do not review what he writes how would you know how he thinks?
Basically, what Matthias pronounced was which it was dangerous for Ummo to trust me as good as which you am a Trojan horse. He did not meant you am an Umno Trojan horse in a opposition. He meant it a other proceed around. He additionally pronounced which you am raising secular issues by articulate about a 'Three Rs' -- race, religion as good as royalty. Matthias was utterly pissed about that.
Last year you gave a members ofFriends of Pakatan Rakyatin London ataklimat(briefing) during a home of a single of a members. you laid out my plan as good as explained what you am up to. Unfortunately they deserted what you pronounced as good as spoken me an rivalry of Pakatan Rakyat.
you can assimilate they as good would be hard during discussion given many of them have been brand new kids upon a block as good as became politically active only given 2007-2008. Hence they do not have a proper comprehension of governing body similar to those of us who have been in a diversion from some-more than 35 years given a 1970s. So currently you have no some-more links withFriends of Pakatan Rakyat, not which this was my choosing.
Anyway, during a behind of in 2008, you brought a little non-Malay friends to attend a couple of Umno functions so which they can listen to for themselves what was being discussed. At which time a Prime Minister was Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
At initial these people did not wish to go. They did not as! similate since you was inviting them to an Umno event. In a finish they went as good as thereafter understood since you had longed for them to go.
Two unquestionably vicious points were lifted amongst a many issues discussed. One was which a March 2008 General Election was a repeat of a May 1969 General Election. Hence they will need to request a May 1969 'formula' to solve a choosing 'disaster' of March 2008.
Now, what do you consider this means? Then they explained how they addressed a May 1969 choosing mess -- such as a strategies they adopted to get during a behind of Malay domestic energy mislaid to a non-Malays.
Okay, a single unquestionably vicious point of concern, during least to me nonetheless no a single else shares these concerns, is which a little of a people who spoke during these events have been right divided in Pakatan Rakyat. My regard is which those who spoke as good as pronounced they need a May 1969 'solution' have been right divided in a opposition. Are these people Trojan horses? Why is Anwar Ibrahim courting them as good as is perplexing to tempt them into Pakatan Rakyat?
This you am unquestionably disturbed about.
Then Perkasa was created. Do you consider Perkasa was an 'independent exercise' as good as has nothing to do with a May 1969 solution discussed in 2008? Do you consider this is merely coincidental? Then you all go as good as whack Najib regarding Perkasa.
Do you unquestionably consider Najib is during a behind of Perkasa as good as which his 'silence' translates to justification which he is either during a behind of Perkasa or supports Perkasa? Or is Najib an 'innocent bystander' who has no energy to do anything about it? In which box who afterwards is a genuine energy during a behind of Perkasa?
Some of you imagine which you have right divided 'swung! ' to Naj ib. And you credit this to Najib buying me off as good as which you am right divided in Najib's pocket. Well, which is how simple-minded people would think. That is a lazy person's proceed of entrance to a conclusion. You do not need to tax your brain in entrance to which conclusion.
Maybe you have 'swung' to Najib, yet not in a proceed you might think. But do you not all contend which you contingency select a obtuse of a dual evils? That is a domestic philosophy of many Pakatan Rakyat supporters -- select a obtuse of a dual evils. Isn't this your 'guiding light'?
Well, you as good reason in a obtuse of a dual evils. And a obtuse of a dual evils would be to opinion for Pakatan Rakyat rsther than than Barisan Nasional. But what if Pakatan Rakyat cannot reject Barisan Nasional? What if Barisan Nasional still retains a sovereign supervision with Umno as a dominant partner in a ruling coalition? Which afterwards would be a obtuse of a dual evils?
Yes, many of you confine your choice of a obtuse of a dual evils as in between Pakatan Rakyat as good as Barisan Nasional. That would be a simple-minded proceed of looking during things. But you consider over that. you demeanour during what if Barisan Nasional still retains a sovereign government. What afterwards will be a obtuse of a dual evils?
Yes, many of you confine your choice of a obtuse of a dual evils as in between Pakatan Rakyat as good as Barisan Nasional. That would be a simple-minded proceed of looking during things. But you consider over that. you demeanour during what if Barisan Nasional still retains a sovereign government. What afterwards will be a obtuse of a dual evils?
We cannot only have Plan A. We additionally need Plan B. If Plan A fails afterwards you contingency have a Plan B as an alternative. Most Pakatan Rakyat people only concentration upon Plan A without thinking either there should be a Plan B in box Plan A fails.
And that's what creates me a improved domestic strategist than many of you. And you can't assistance braggadocio about this given if you have been good you have been good, what some-more can you say? You all only have a single plan, Plan A. you have Plan B, as good as devise B is who do you wish as a Prime Minister, Najib or someon! e who up holds Malay Supremacy as good as a 'ideals' of May 13?
Of course, if Pakatan Rakyat takes over, afterwards what you am observant becomes quite academic. But it will be extremely insane as good as catastrophic if you do not have a backup devise as good as afterwards a Plan A fails.
you explained this to a members ofFriends of Pakatan Rakyatin London though they all went divided unquestionably confused. Being novices they could not learn a need for a Plan B as good as how Plan B should be a obtuse of a dual evils. To them, a obtuse of a dual evils would be to select Pakatan Rakyat. They could not see which a obtuse of a dual evils can additionally meant a magnanimous organisation in Umno as opposed to a in advance group.
you regularly contend which if you need to be colonised afterwards it is improved which you have been colonised by a British rsther than than a French, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, etc. Now, you never pronounced it is good to be colonised. Ideally, you should never be colonised. But if you can't equivocate being colonised afterwards a British creates a improved colonial master than a others. That is what you meant as good as what you contend should never be interpreted in any other way.
In short, colonisation is evil as good as should be avoided, though if it cannot be avoided afterwards a British have been a obtuse of a many evils. And you need to only compare post-independence Malaysia to post-independent Indonesia, a Philippines, Vietnam, etc. to see what you mean. Look during India as good as Hongkong as other examples. Of course, Burma is an disproportion to a rule.
Okay, so right divided a antithesis is observant which Dr Mahathir is a de facto Prime Minister.And a antithesis is additionally disturbed about all this speak regarding May 13. Now they have been worried. But you warned them 4 years ago ab! out this same point. And they were not disturbed then. In fact, they pooh-poohed what you pronounced as good as pronounced you am observant ghosts in my own shadow. Do they still consider which now?
you know my comrade Haris Ibrahim (Sam) felt a same proceed as Matthias Chang. Sam felt which you should no longer be articulate about competition as good as which Malaysians should be addressed as Malaysians as good as not as Malays, Chinese, Indians, etc. Ideally which is what should happen. But have been you vital in an ideal society or is race, religion as good as royalty still unquestionably manly domestic weapons?
you have been accused of being as good idealistic in looking a undiluted government. No supervision is perfect, you am told.Granted, which is true. But you can be reduction idealistic as good as some-more unsentimental when a situation final it. Of march you am looking a undiluted supervision as good as you whack Pakatan Rakyat when they demonstrate reduction than undiluted conduct. What is wrong with that?
Seeking soundness is not a crime. It is what you would similar to to see. But what you find as good as what you request as a domestic plan have been dual opposite animals. While you might be looking a undiluted government, you can additionally be unsentimental in a application of a domestic strategy. And this is what many of you cannot differentiate, a disproportion in between an end as good as a practicalities of war. And this is given you have been domestic novices masquerading as experts.
you had motionless some-more than a year ago which it is no longer prolific in perplexing to work inside of a system as good as in perplexing to educate you in a have a disproportion of domestic plan as good as about a realities of Malaysian politics. you did try a 'backdoor' proceed during a behind of in 2010 by rising a Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) in Lo! ndon.
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
you afterwards perceived a phone call from a single of a PAS leaders in assign of domestic strategy. you explained during good length what you were perplexing to do. He appeared to have understood what you had explained though afterwards after when he met Sam he told Sam which 'Raja Petra has to be created off'. Apparently he did not reason in what you were perplexing to do.
you afterwards perceived a phone call from a DAP personality who told me which a little people in DAP upheld what you were perplexing to do though they had perceived instructions from their HQ telling them not to cooperate with MCLM.
Another PAS personality met me as good as pronounced which his celebration is not means to work with MCLM unless Anwar Ibrahim endorses MCLM given they do not wish to dissapoint Anwar as good as it appears similar to Anwar is not supportive of MCLM.
One of a PKR leaders afterwards told me which his celebration had been educated to undermine MCLM as good as which a debate had been launched to allegation MCLM as good as instil which MCLM is an Umno 'weapon' to hurt a antithesis so which Barisan Nasional can win a subsequent ubiquitous election.
From these assorted communications it was transparent which Pakatan Rakyat had spoken fight upon MCLM as good as which MCLM was being treated with colour as a enemy. As many as you tried to explain, they still spun stories which MCLM's bulletin is to trigger three-corner contests to assistance Barisan Nasional win a election. The some-more you tried to insist a some-more they pronounced MCLM is an Umno stooge
Okay, you thought, if this is a diversion they wish to fool around afterwards let us fool around which game. you can additionally fool around this game. In fact, you might even be improved during it. A couple of months after you did my TV3 interview. A couple of months! later, you did my second talk with a mainstream media. In fact, you requested a second interview, they did not proceed me similar to a initial time.
Then all hell pennyless loose. It appears Pakatan Rakyat can dish it out though they can't take what they dish out. They motionless to undermine MCLM. But when you strike during a behind of regulating a TV stations as good as mainstream media they can't take it. What losers these Pakatan Rakyat are. They wish to be giveaway to strike you though they get unquestionably dissapoint when you request their same strategy to strike them back.
Hey, when you attack someone afterwards you have to design which chairman to counter-attack. And which is what you am doing. you am not attacking Pakatan Rakyat. you am counter-attacking. And which is a right of anyone who is under attack. That is called DEMOCRACY.
Of course, a little of my ex-comrades such as Haris Ibrahim as good as Malik Imtiaz do not await what you am doing. So they have distanced themselves from me as good as have additionally been plainly vicious of what you am doing. Once upon a time you all shared a same ideals. Hence MCLM was launched.
People similar to Haris as good as Malik have been wakeful of how MCLM was undermined. But they quietly corroborated off as good as 'toed a celebration line' whilst you chose to counter-attack. And a attacks have been still coming, which you can review in a pro-PKR websites. They have been observant a little genuine nasty things about me. And as prolonged as they continue to attack me you shall continue to counter-attack. And some-more shit regarding a little people in Pakatan Rakyat have been starting to be suggested over a subsequent couple of months. you shall not stop as they as good have not stopped.
Nevertheless, a bigger bulletin will not be forgotten. The bigger agenda, of course, is to see change. This can! be achi eved by a shift in government. But if a supervision is not starting to change, if you have been starting to see a same supervision take office come a subsequent ubiquitous election, afterwards you need to concentration upon Plan B. And Plan B would be to have sure which this supervision is some-more magnanimous as good as not a supervision which will feat race, religion as good as royalty as good as take Malaysia down which path of an additional 'May 13'.
Certainly accountability, transparency, good governance, etc., have been vicious as good as should be what you seek. But if you can't have which afterwards during least assent as good as fortitude as good as an avoidance of secular misunderstanding should be objectives as well.
There have been sure forces in Umno who wish to see Najib ousted. And only as May thirteen in 1969 was used as a matter to reject Tunku Abdul Rahman, they goal which a 'May 1969 solution' can see story being repeated as good as used as a matter for Najib's downfall.
Yes, you as good wish to see Najib ousted. But if he is suspended by a shift of supervision which is good as good as fine. It would meant which Pakatan Rakyat would afterwards be in power. But if Pakatan Rakyat fails to take energy as good as they reject Najib, it would only meant you have been starting to see a single Umno Prime Minister replaced with an additional Umno Prime Minister.
That is, of course, additionally good as good as excellent with me. But if in ousting Najib they need to do a 'May thirteen Version 2' as good as many Malaysians need to die as good as Malaysia would regress rsther than than progress, afterwards which is not good as good as excellent with me. In which box you will need to select a obtuse of a dual evils, a Malaysia giveaway of bloodshed.
you do not design you to assimilate what you am saying. you do not even design you to d! etermine with what you am saying. All you goal is which you would not, a little time in future, be essay an additional 'I told you so' article. If you do afterwards it can only meant a single thing: which is what you am observant contingency not happen has happened.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenge to Muhyiddin to infer he is obliged domestic personality as good as Malaysian jingoist when raising a spook of May thirteen wanting to forestall any regularity as good as not indulging in irresponsible, unscrupulous as good as cowardly stand in governing body of fright as good as race
Lim Kit Siang
you plea a Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin to infer he is a obliged domestic personality as good as Malaysian jingoist when raising a spook of May thirteen wanting to forestall any regularity as good as not indulging in a low- class, irresponsible, unscrupulous as good as cowardly stand in governing body of fright as good as competition to preserve "Pakatan Rakyat"/Barisan Nasional in energy during all costs in a subsequent ubiquitous election.
It has been reported which during a inhabitant girl discussion held in Parliament yesterday, Muhyiddin called upon a young generation to be united in order to safeguard a nation remains stable as good as pacific as good as to equivocate a repeat of a May 13, 1969 tragedy.
Muhyiddin was quoted as dogmatic during a conference: "We don't wish May thirteen repeated."
On behalf of DAP as good as Pakatan Rakyat, let me officially reply by dogmatic which you in DAP as good as Pakatan Rakyat additionally do not wish a repeat of a May thirteen tragedy as good as you oath to do all you can to forestall any such re! currence .
DAP as good as Pakatan Rakyat suggest to co-operate as good as work closely with "Pakatan Rakyat" as good as Barisan Nasional to safeguard which there will be no repeat of May thirteen in a subsequent ubiquitous election, as good as Malaysians have been entitled to ask how there could be a repeat of a May thirteen tragedy if both domestic coalitions - Barisan Nasional as good as Pakatan Rakyat - unquestionably oath to work together in a inhabitant interest to forestall any such recurrence?
you confess you am endangered during a proceed Muhyiddin lifted a spook ofMay 13, which had been used in a past decades to create fright among electorate as partial of a shock strategy to force electorate to opinion for "Pakatan Rakyat" as good as BN, as it raises a question either a DPM was giving an assurance which there would be no May thirteen regularity or he was subtly melancholy which there could be an additional May thirteen if "Pakatan Rakyat" loses power!
Could there be an additional May thirteen in a subsequent ubiquitous election? My answer would be a strong NO.
Without starting into a debate as to who should be held obliged for a May thirteen tragedy in 1969 (and there have been diametrically opposing accounts as good as versions of who should be held obliged as good as this is since right from a beginning after a May thirteen riots, DAP as good as you had called for an independent Royal Commission of Inquiry into a causes) a circumstances currently have been utterly opposite from those prevalent 43 years ago in 1969.
The many vicious disproportion in between 1969 as good as a 13th ubiquitous choosing is a emergence of a multiracial multi-religious inhabitant bloc represented via a nation to peacefully as good as democratically plea "Pakatan Rakyat"/BN's reason to energy in Putrajaya - as a Pakatan Rakyat bloc of PKR! , PAS as good as DAP is a Malaysian bloc of all races, religions as good as regions in Malaysia!
Only a many irresponsible, anti-national as good as fraudulent elements in a nation can try to distort as good as misrepresent a Pakatan Rakyat victory in a 13thGE as a victory of a single competition against another, as to clear furious thoughts tinkering with a thought of anther May 13, when any victory for Pakatan Rakyat will be a Malaysian victory representing all races.
Is Muhyiddin frank when he declared, "We don't wish May thirteen repeated"?
If so, a Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak should mangle his silence as good as answer a question you had posed to him many times in a past 3 years - either he would acknowledgement obviously as good as unquestionably which he would accept a verdict of a people in a 13GE, including a choosing of a Pakatan Rakyat supervision in Putrajaya to replace a Barisan Nasional as good as which he would privately safeguard as good as facilitate a pacific passing from one to another of sovereign energy for a initial time in a nation's history, to tell a universe which Malaysia has turn a normal democracy as good as even en route to become, in Najib's own words, "the most appropriate democracy in a world"!
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment