Rais has just buried Umno


What Rais is observant is which a non-Malays, in sold a Chinese, have been a enemy. And for a Malays to strengthen themselves from this rivalry they contingency opinion for Barisan Nasional. If Pakatan Rakyat instead of Barisan Nasional wins a ubiquitous election, afterwards a Malays have been in low shit. Furthermore, Rais is observant which a non-Malays, in sold a Chinese, have been not important. Only a Malays have been important. The supervision does not need to care most for a non-Malays.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
When it became public hold which His Highness a Sultan of Johor had participated in an open tender for a automobile registration number, WWW 1, there was a hue as well as cry. Some commented which it was a rubbish of income as well as which a income could have been improved outlayed building houses for a poor.
These are, of course, valid arguments. The bad do need housing. And a supervision should do some-more for a poor. But possibly His Highness a Sultan of Johor should be tasked with a pursuit of upon condition which houses for a bad or possibly this is a inaugurated government's pursuit is an issue which needs debating.
Just to warp a bit, do you know which a prior Prime Minister, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, gave a late Sultan of Johor JKR 1? JUA 1 as well as JUY 1 were additionally since to a Sultan, as were most alternative series '1's with 'J' letters in front of them. And these were all since free. His Highness did not need to tender for them or pay some-more than RM500,000 to get them.
As you pronounced in an progressing article, normally, numbers 1 to 10 have been indifferent for a palace. Only if a house does not wish them will they be tendered out to Chinesetowkaysor Malay politicians. For a! Federal Territory, these numbers have been indifferent for Ministers as well as comparison politicians. This has been a use since way during a back of when automobile registration numbers started to become fashionable as well as a status symbol.
Anyway, there was an snub as well as most people whacked all kingship as well as a establishment of a monarchy. Some people even referred to which a kingdom be abolished in favour of a republic. Well, right divided you have a Chinese apportion who used a government's money, not his own income similar to a Sultan, to buy a automobile registration number.
So what have been you starting to propose here? Should you additionally call for Chinese ministers to be abolished? Because Sultans outlay their own income shopping automobile registration numbers, a kingdom should be abolished. Hence, since Chinese ministers outlay a people's income to buy automobile registration numbers, afterwards Chinese ministers should be abolished as well.
We should be careful how you disagree a box as sometimes which same justification can be used opposite us. We complain about boring up 'old issues' afterwards you go as well as drag up even comparison issues. We contend which no claim should be done but a justification afterwards you go as well as make allegations but any evidence. We contend you contingency toe a celebration line afterwards you foam during a mouth as well as refuse to toe a celebration line when something is not to a liking.
We crop up to be inconsistent as well as wishy-washy in a arguments. We should avoid which lest you have been seen as feigned as well as hypocrites. That can usually harm a cause.
Anyway, read what Rais Yatim pronounced in a news item below. If a electorate have been as smart as you goal they have been -- but unfortunately they have been not -- you can see which Rais has only buried Umno. But can a electorate analyse what Rais pronounced with an open as well as smart mind? Can they see ho! w Rais h as only shot Umno in a own feet?
you fright not. And a antithesis is not doing a pursuit possibly in educating a electorate as well as assistance them to see what they cannot see unless you reason their hand as well as spell it out to them similar to you have been talking to a first school kid.
Therefore, allow me to walk you through what Rais pronounced so which you can improved learn a implications of his statement.
"The Malays contingency combine for a Barisan Nasional win in a upcoming ubiquitous election," pronounced Rais. So what does this mean? This equates to Barisan Nasional needs to rely upon a Malays as well as not a non-Malays to be equates to to win a subsequent election. It is crucial, therefore, which a Malays 'unite'. And 'unite' here equates to combine during a back of Umno, not during a back of PAS.
Hence a non-Malays have been not consequential to Barisan Nasional. Only a Malays are. And even if it were an MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP, or whatever, candidate who is contesting, these non-Malay possibilities would still need Malay votes to be equates to to win a election. Without a Malays, even a non-Malay possibilities cannot win.
Rais afterwards went upon to say, "To ensure their rights have been not taken divided by a opposition." This equates to if Pakatan Rakyat instead of Barisan Nasional were to win a ubiquitous election, afterwards a Malays have been starting to suffer. Their rights have been starting to be taken divided from them.
What rights have been these as well as in what demeanour will they be taken away? This, Rais did not say. He only generalised it by observant which a Malays have been starting to lose their rights if Pakatan Rakyat were to win a ubiquitous election. What these rights have been as well as in what demeanour they have been starting to be taken divided needs no explanation. The Malays know what these are. Rais needs not insist a sum since a Malays have been clever enough to under! stand.
"Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim did not adore a Malays, a kingdom or Malay culture," added Rais. Now, this is a most interesting statement. Can Rais insist this part of his statement? There contingency have been something which Anwar did or pronounced which shows he does not adore a Malays, a kingdom or Malay culture.
Rais afterwards lengthened this claim to Pakatan Rakyat by observant which a Pakatan-ruled states have been neglecting a gratification of Malays. Again, no sum have been given. In what way have been a Pakatan-ruled states neglecting a gratification of a Malays? There contingency be some specific incidences.
Many credit me of being toocheong hei(long-winded). That is certainly true. My essay assignments routinely have a 500-word extent so you need to keep inside of which extent or else you will destroy my paper. But afterwards this is a extent set as well as you have no choice but to keep inside of which limit. Furthermore, those reading my essays have been Oxford tutors who know what you am observant as well as they wish to see possibly you am articulate enough to cover all a points in a mere 500 difference as well as not leave anything out.
But when traffic with Malaysian electorate you can't afford to keep inside of a 500-word limit. you need to becheong heiand write 2,000 or some-more words. If not afterwards most people would not get a point. And in a box of Rais, he additionally needs to becheong heiand insist what he equates to by what he said. As it is, it is not clear what he means.
"Malays contingency assimilate who they have been as well as know their rights," pronounced Rais. Now, what does this mean? Does Rais meant which a Malays do not know who they have been as well as do not know their rights? What Rais meant was Malays contingency know which they own a nation (know who you are) as well as a Malays contingency know which they have special privileges which a non-Malays do not have (know ! their ri ghts).
And his subsequent statement improved explains what is in Rais's mind. "In a opposition, there is no Malay domestic force." Yes, which is a crux to a whole thing, Malay domestic force. This justification is strengthened when Rais said, "For a community to stay in power, they contingency assimilate governing body of numbers, which states when most come together you can establish something."
And his shutting remark tells it all. "Though new polls uncover which Chinese await is low, do not worry, as prolonged as Malays use governing body of numbers, you will benefit."
Okay, how do you analyse what Rais said? Actually, if you need to go on with mycheong heipiece as well as insist it to you afterwards you have been as well stupid as well as as a result you merit a supervision which you opinion for. But you will insist it to you anyway.
What Rais is observant is which a non-Malays, in sold a Chinese, have been a enemy. And for a Malays to strengthen themselves from this rivalry they contingency opinion for Barisan Nasional. If Pakatan Rakyat instead of Barisan Nasional wins a ubiquitous election, afterwards a Malays have been in low shit. Furthermore, Rais is observant which a non-Malays, in sold a Chinese, have been not important. Only a Malays have been important. The supervision does not need to care most for a non-Malays.
This whole thing has right divided been marked down to a 'them' as well as 'us' situation. 'Us' have been a Malays as well as 'them' have been a non-Malays. This is war. This is about survival. The presence of a Malays depends upon Barisan Nasional winning a election. If Pakatan Rakyat wins a choosing afterwards a Malays have been as good as dead.
Do you hold all this? you do not know possibly you do, but possibly you do or not do not matter. What matters is a 60% of a electorate who have been Malays. And if a infancy of a 60% of a electorate hold this, afterwards Barisan Nasional will be a! ssured a win.
The actuality which 20% of a electorate paint 50% of a seats as well as a actuality which all these seats have been in a rural areas as well as as a result have been predominantly Malay creates it really critical which a Malays hold what Rais has said.
Never mind possibly a readers ofMalaysia Todayor a electorate in a civic areas hold what Rais said. They usually paint 30% of a seats. Even if 100% ofMalaysia Today's readers or 100% of a urbanites opinion Pakatan Rakyat it does not make a difference as prolonged as a infancy of a Malays opinion Barisan Nasional.
Not most of you understood what you was trying to contend in my Sunday's article,'To see shift you need to see change'. My question in which article, which to me is a some-more consequential issue, was how have been you starting to grasp this? In alternative words, as you said, to see shift you need to see change. But how have been you starting to see change? Unfortunately, no one got my point.
Most of you commented: to see shift you need to see a shift of government. That, as you explained, is similar to saying: to get abounding you need to have copiousness of money. you know you need copiousness of income to get rich. That is elementary. But how do you get this money? Do you rob a bank? Do you protection your mother for RM10 million as well as afterwards murder her? How do you get this income so which you can get rich?
Hence, if all you can contend is 'to see shift you need to shift a government' which is not a solution. You have not told us how you can shift a government.
But Rais knows how to make certain which a supervision does not change. Hence, whilst you do not know how to shift a government, Rais knows how to keep a government. And this would be by creation certain which a Malays fright for their future as we! ll as wh ich a Malays regard Pakatan Rakyat as a Chinese victim as well as which a Malays regard a Chinese as a rivalry as well as which a Malays feel which if Pakatan Rakyat takes over afterwards a Malays have been as good as dead.
And if some-more than half a 60% of a Malays who control some-more than 50% of a seats buy this argument, afterwards Barisan Nasional will stay in energy whilst Pakatan Rakyat will remain a opposition. And Anwar Ibrahim's forecast of winning during least 105 Parliament seats will not come true as well as instead they will win reduction than 80 seats in a entrance ubiquitous election.
Rais says Anwar has no adore for Malays, urges opinion for BN
(The Malaysian Insider) - The Malays contingency combine for a Barisan Nasional win in a upcoming ubiquitous choosing to ensure their rights have been not taken divided by a opposition, a comparison Cabinet apportion pronounced currently whilst hitting out during Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim whom he pronounced did not "love Malays, a kingdom or Malay culture."
In a pointer of moves to consolidate await from Malay electorate for a ruling coalition, Information, Communications as well as Culture Minister Datuk Seri Utama Dr Rais Yatim additionally accused Pakatan-ruled states of neglecting a gratification of Malays.
He pronounced Malays "must assimilate who they are" as well as "know their rights".
"In a opposition, there is no Malay domestic force," Rais pronounced currently when launching a 1 Malaysia Social Media Convention in Selangor.
He claimed Opposition Leader Anwar "does not adore Malays, a kingdom or Malay culture" for a latter "had never once talked about Malay welfare".
"Mr DSAI, when was a last time you talked about strengthening a Malay language?" he asked to applause from a 1,000-strong crowd.
Rais ! called f or Malays to combine as well as opinion for leaders who cared about their special rights as well as welfare.
"The reason you mislaid so most seats in a 2008 choosing is since a Malays have forgotten themselves," he said.
"For a community to stay in power, they contingency assimilate governing body of numbers, which states when most come together you can establish something," he added.
Rais told a Malays not to be concerned over a ultimate survey by independent pollster Merdeka Center which found await for BN between a Chinese was waning.
"Though new polls uncover which Chinese await is low, do not worry, as prolonged as Malays use governing body of numbers, you will benefit."
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: