Buzz Sociopolitics Malaysia: The Law favours the Opposition, says Le Dictateur

The Law favours the Opposition, says Le Dictateur

June 5, 2012

www.malaysia-chronicle.com

Le Dictateur Incroyable Malaisienne: The Law favours a Opposition

by M.Mahathir Mohamad

One of a nonsense which we hold in is equivalence prior to a law. Of course this is a single of a great fictions which democracy is pronounced to uphold. But afterwards democracy itself is often not even democratic.

The people, a typical adults never really oversee themselves. But which is an additional story.

Now, about equivalence prior to a law which democracy is pronounced to uphold. It is not upheld during all. Some people have been essentially upon top of a law as well as a small have been far next it, i.e. they do not really get a benefit or a protection of a law.

Smart lawyers

I will deal with those who do not benefit first. The approved legal system gives a power to a courts to confirm upon disputes in between individuals or organisations. The courts have been presided over by legally qualified but really human judges. The contestants have to remonstrate a presiding judge of their innocence.

Not being friendly with with a laws a complainant as well as a suspect sinecure lawyers to disagree their cases for them. Now a small lawyers have been crafty as well as smart, but a small might be only plain stupid. But both price money. The smarter lawyers would of course price much more than a not-so-good ones.

Some lawyers have great reputations. In actuality a small might even be great politicians. Some of these domestic lawyers can be frightening to a judges.

The outcome of a inequality of illustration by shining as well as fearsome lawyers upon a a single palm as well as a typical run-of-the-mill lawyer! s is mos t expected to be victory for a rarely paid, shining as well as fearsome lawyers. The rights as well as wrongs of a case have been of small consequence.

Rich favored, not a poor

Effectively a law almost regularly favours a rich as well as not a poor. There is obviously no equivalence prior to a law. Get a great costly counsel as well as we can get away with murder. Get a bad cheap counsel as well as we might be hanged for someone else's murder.

International law is no better. If we lead a powerful nation we can massacre a couple of millions as well as all which happens is a statue, as a war hero, will be put up in your honour.

If we lead a bad diseased nation as well as we act opposite assault by a opposition, afterwards we might be indicted of hardship as well as tolerating Police brutality. The Opposition, when they have been crafty enough to guarantee a accumulation of freedoms, can do no wrong even when they make use of assault to incite a police in to so-called acts of brutality.

Nobody cares a Police were knocked about up

If we have been a prime claimant of unfamiliar powers for system of administration change, we can do what we like, as well as any Governmental movement opposite we would be labelled as uncalled for oppression. If an choosing is nearby as well as a prime is going to be a claimant as well as move about system of administration change, afterwards Government movement opposite this absolved chairman would be regarded as attempts to criticise his chances of overthrowing a Government.

That a prime purposely timed his assault only when elections have been nearby would be ignored. That a irritation of a police is counsel as well as meant to elicit "police brutality'" will additionally be ignored. That a poli! ce have been knocked about up, which police cars have their glass windshields smashed as well as a police car is overturned in full perspective of TV cameras all these have been inconsequential.

Opposition leaders have been 'privileged' people

The main thing is a movement opposite a lucky Opposition by a Government will be deemed domestic rsther than than an practice in legal equivalence by a Government.

The roar is for a police to be charged for crimes opposite a people. Actions by a Police to make a law contingency not be allowed. These contingency be regarded as rapist acts.

But blatant rapist acts by a Opposition leaders contingency be regarded as permissible. In law they contingency be deliberate as absolved people.

There really is no equivalence prior to a law. Instead there is blatant inequality; there is bias in foster of a small people especially a aspirants for system of administration change.

M.Mahathir Mohamad was a Malaysian Prime Minister from 1981 to 2003