Will Hindraf fool around a spoiler as it has voiced a goal to do so in a little constituencies, with a result of Pakatan possibilities losing to BN in a three-corner contest?
But in any case of a choosing outcome,wouldn'tit be Hindraf or for which matter, anybody's democratic rights to mount as an choosing candidate, even in Pakatan contested constituencies?
So given have been Pakatan supporters condemning Hindraf? What? Both Pakatan as well as Hindraf will remove in such a three-corner fight?
But Hindraf said:'So what! F* we Pakatan greedy bastards ... as well as of march (being subsequent to event people) ... bitches.'
Who have been a people at a back of Hindraf?
We have positively heard of a brothers Waythamoorthy and'I am God'Uthayakumar wakakaka, yet what about M Manoharan as well as V Ganabatirau.
The latter dual have been DAP members.M Manoharan became a 3rdperson in Malaysian story to win an choosing while detained underneath a ISA. He stood as a DAP claimant in a Kota Alam Shah state chair on 08 March 2008 as well as won magnificently, despite bei! ngbehind bars then.
In which subdivision dominated by racial Chinese voters, Manoharan garnered 12,699 votes to trounce Gerakan's Ching Su Chen (5515 votes)kau kauby a majority of 7,184 votes.
Yet whenever Uthayakumar or a little people in his stay talked about Hindraf, it's as if their No 1 enemy is DAP, when a actuality is which half of Hindraf's strange care have been or have been DAP members. That's a unfortunate lie to a genuine domestic picture a so-called Hindraf people have been (mis)representing.
Even sweetie Helen Ang has unfortunately walked down which same path, adopting so-called Hindraf's postulation, maybe given a DAP has given turn her most disliked domestic party.
And given has Helen taken a BN's 'road to Damascus' a singular might ask, when she was previously well known to be anti BN?
I won't explain to be a usually a singular to know a reason yet we positively do, maybe usually a singular of a rare few, yet sorry, I'll never ever reveal a secret. Even among adversaries (and lamentably Helen as well as I, once great friends, have turn so) there contingency be honour (of confidentiality).
Today Helen wrote an interesting essay inFree Malaysia Todaywith a familiar title ofHindraf in slipstream of two-race system.
Disregarding for a moment a incorrect as well as inappropriate explain by a little ! to sole ownership of a Hindraf name, Helen's essay in a roundabout way alluded to a 3 race struggle, with Hindraf's Hindu Indians (mind, not Christian Indians or Muslim Indians or Buddhist Indians yet Hindu Indians) struggling in a Malay-Chinese domestic arise or in a in front of to cause turmoil to an already violent Malay-Chinese roiling vortex. So with Hindraf as an angry critical spoiler, it'll be a three-race as well as not two-race system.
Though at times we don't determine with Helen's views (in her articles), we have regularly dignified as well as reputable her papers (with a singular previous difference wakakaka), yet she has once again spoiled her ultimate by a invincible disposition she binds opposite DAP. While we all have a prejudices (and everyone knows cave wakakaka) we should regularly endeavour as far as possible to hang to substantiated facts. Alas, Helen didn't when she wrote:"Looking into a future, a Indians will necessarily have to pick sides as well as their preference will bring to boil down to siding possibly with a Malays or a Chinese,the latter dominated politically by Christian Anglophiles."
The Chinese dominated by Christian Anglophiles? Puhleeeze lah, my darleeeng!
Of march when Helen mentioned Chinese being dominated by Christian Anglophiles, have no mistake, she was referring to a DAP.
Okay, let us leave out DAP's Charles Santiago as well as Joe Fernandez, both of whom, yet not Chinese, contingency be Christians as well as possibly Anglophiles as alleged by Helen Ang, as well as to illustrate not loyal Hindu Indian representatives. But what contend a rest, people similar to Bai Karpal as well as sons Gobind Singh Deo & Jagdeep Singh, Chong Eng (marriedto ar tist Gunabalan Krishnasamy), M Manogaran,cilipadiFong Po Kuan, M Kula Segaran, A Tanasekharan, S Veerapan, R Sanisvara Nethaji Rayer, K Arumugam, P Gunasekaran, A Sivasubramaniam, V Sivakumar, Sivanesan Achalingam, as well as a host of others?
I am not usually asking aboutChinese yet also Christian as well as Anglophilic dominations in DAP.
Nonetheless a 'convincibility' (kaytee's new word wakakaka) of Helen Ang's well-penned essay (notwithstanding a little obvious as well as highly biased inaccuracies) has been seized upon by Hindraf's National Advisor, N Ganesan, in a letter toMalaysia-Today. RPK has published it underneath a titleHindraf's Challenge to Pakatan as well as to BN, whereGanesan wrote:
... it has turn required knowledge which given Indians do not form a majority in any singular constituency, as well as have been an economically vexed village it will be nigh impossible to gain loyal illustration for Indian socio-economic interests which implies which it will continue to be contingent on a philanthropy of a celebration in power.
I consternation given Indians do not form a majority in any singular constituency. we disbelief this is by design, as a insinuation had alluded, as MIC has been a loyal poodle to UMNO for 50+ years, whichwould have done Indian dominated constituencies practical BN strongholds. The elementary actuality remains which racial minorities have been some-more approaching to remain as minorities in an electoral subdivision by virtue of their small numbers.
In fact, it's at large well known which a pro opposition Chinese have been on purpose sardine-ized into humongously large constituencies where they afterwards won't enjoy equivalent authorization as, say, Putrajaya's residents. So being a racial majority in a singular subdivision is not regularly a great thing as well as has proven to be counter-productive to subsequent to illustration in Parliament.
HINDRAF challenges these 3 assumptions as well as a initial stones were expel with a 2007 HINDRAF rally. HINDRAF has been unrelenting in this plea ever since.
... temperament in thoughts of march most Hindraf leaders have been or have been members of DAP.
Effectively what HINDRAF is looking for a Indian minority village is a some-more equitable power sharing formula which addresses these elemental weaknesses of a complement as far as minorities have been concerned. What HINDRAF is looking is a some-more usually Malaysia, where a adults value or rights is not dynamic by their ethnicity or their mercantile status, yet by some-more elemental as well as healthy rights as citizens. HINDRAF functions for a incomparable cause of a some-more usually Malaysia, in any case of what HINDRAF's detractors have to say.
... precisely what DAP is doing which might insist given Manoharan, Ganabatirau as well as most in Indraf have assimilated DAP.
Given a workings of a electoral complement a leading parties contingency yet win a Indians votes, so they can continue to rule.
... maybe might be inestimable here to discuss which Karpal Singh as well as sons, Kula S! egaran, Ramasamy, Manoharan etc have all won handsomely opposite BN Chinese possibilities (including Gerakan's President Koh TK wakakaka) with massive Chinese (and not usually Indian) support.
They therefore resort to a far-reaching operation of dishonesty to garner a Indian votes. One key technique is to have Indians in their ranks in a State Assemblies as well as in a Parliament as well as tout it as Indian representation. They try very hard with Makkal Sakthi, MIC as well as a ultimate further to this motley list, Indraf to achieve this deception. Truly deputy policies for a socio-economic interests of a Indians have been non-existent on both sides of a domestic spectrum. This has been defacto BN process for 55 years as well as settled (yes, stated) Pakatan process in a final 4 years.
So, according to Nadesan's weird argument, it would be wrong to explain there'sIndian illustration by merely carrying Indians as ADUNs as well as MPs. And presumably in line with Uthayakumar's ideology, these Indians would be a despisedmandores.
But urge afterwards what would be 'true' Indian representations? Only Hindraf candidates? Hey, DAP already has them, so what's next, my dear Ganesan?
Furthermore, Ganesan in groaning as well as moaning about'representative policies for a socio-economic interests of a Indians' has effectivelyback-flippedon his earlier explain of Hindraf'seeking ... a some-more usually Malaysia, where a adults value or rights is not dynamic by their ethnicity or their mercantile status, yet by some-more elemental as well as healthy rights as citizens'.It would seem Ga! nesan ca n't have up his mind, not unlikeUthayakumar.
But from there, Ganesan quoted Helen Ang's essay again as well as altered Hindraf's arguments from race-base into a class-base struggle, stating:
So it is between a Chinese chosen as well as a Malay chosen which a Indian bad have to choose from. The knowledge with a Malay chosen has been a singular of systematic discrimination, injustice as well as marginalization for a Indian poor. The knowledge with a Chinese chosen as well as a not as big territory of a Malay chosen has been similarly a catastrophic for a Indian bad in a most shorter space of time if we look at a knowledge of a bad Indians in Kedah, in Penang, in Perak, as well as in Selangor. If we have been examination a issues we have raised in Pakatan tranquil States in these columns, a story is clear.
Two observations here:
Firstly, Ganesan has unrealistically, yes, unrealistically approaching Pakatan to fully address 52 years of slight in usually a four years Pakatan has come into power in Penang as well as Selangor, as well as afterwards with usually State level power.
Please do not include PAS'controlled Kedah as even a Chinese have been disadvantaged, carrying lost their usually abattoir for slaughtering pigs as well as suffering less access inbuying houses as a PAS stategovernmentraisedtheMalay share from thirty to 50%, while in Kelantan, developers contingency now ensure building architecture follows Islamic character, whatever this means (perhaps minarets as well as domesof1001 Arabian Nights' fantasy?), and
Secondly, Ganesan is a wee as well late to change his goalpost to a category struggle, a domain prolonged occupied competently by Dr Jeya as well as his PSM (or even PRM who has been there for eons).
Obviously, Ganesan contingency have been wakeful of condemnations opposite Uthayakumar's Hindraf as being as well sincerely as well as overly race-base, as well as has now attempted by secrecy to change a campaign into a category struggle, yet still retaining a extremist overtones by mentioning:
In a subsequent GE a preference for a Indians as Helen Ang puts it in her article(HINDRAF in slipstream of two-race system- June 3, 2012 FMT)isnotbetween a Chinese as well as a Malays,it is unequivocally between a Chinese chosen as well as a Malay elite.Being a elite, similar to chosen everywhere else in a world, their primary preoccupation is to carry out a levers of policy, so they can usurp a incomparable partial of a resources of this nation. Ethnicity counts usually to a extent of gaining which control. The row between a Chinese chosen as well as a Malay chosen is intensifying.
It's quite painful reading Ganesan's surreal (kafkaesque, wakakaka) evidence which a Chinese -now, usually who would be a Chinese elite? CSL? Vincent Tan? Robert Kuok?- wish to usurp a incomparable partial of Malaysia's resources. One could be forgiven for observant N Ganesan contingency have been handed, as well as reading from, Dr Mahathir's notes seeThose full of blood rich Chinese!
POSTED BY KTEMOC
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment