I serve related which Najib offering to emanate a special post for Mohd Yusof -- Solicitor-General II. That post, we explained, did not exist yet as good as would be 'personal to holder' (you know what which means, right?). we additionally pronounced which Mohd Yusof concluded to stay upon as good as lead a Prosecution for Sodomy 2 if he can be since an declaration which he would have a giveaway palm as good as there would be no domestic interference. Furthermore, a AG contingency be told to behind off as good as not interfere.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
we notice which most of we have been right away singing a praises of former Solicitor-General II, Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden. Some of we sound similar to we would similar to to siphon his dick. Doesn't this have we feel downright stupid? Just a reduced whilst ago we were cursing him, a complete Malay race, Islam as good as Prophet Muhammad all in a same breath.
we suspect this proves which most Malaysians suffer from a illness of a mouth relocating faster than a brain. They shoot their mouths off prior to they can think -- which is even if they have been able of thinking in a first place. Hence, a single day we shove your dick up somebody's arse as good as a next day we siphon which person's dick, or vice versa.
Now, prior to we all froth as good as foam during a mouth, ease down, sit back, as good as equate to three. For those of we who have been able of counting to some-more than that, we have my permission to equate to ten. Oh, by a way, this essay is meant for those people who a Malays would say,makan cili rasa pedas. If we did not eat any chili afterwards we can jump over this essay as good as go review something else.
Do we remember, in a new interview, we pro! nounced which Anwar Ibrahim was reception a satisfactory hearing when we was asked my perspective regarding a Sodomy 2 case? And do we recollect we additionally pronounced which we believe he would be found guilty?
Well, actually we pronounced most alternative things as well. But let us concentration upon just those two issues since most of we will get your panties all twisted into knots if we upset we by talking about as well most issues in a single article. Later we can speak about a others issues. But let which be in an additional article.
Now, reflect upon what we have already pronounced in my earlier articles. And we have pronounced this some-more than once. Nevertheless, if we do not repeat what we have already said, by right away most of we will be blur. So we am going to repeat it.
According to British law, which Malaysia has adopted, in a criminal indictment, a responsibility of explanation is upon a Prosecution. The Prosecution has to infer a shame of a accused. The Defence has to do zero alternative than lift doubts. And if a Defence can successfully lift doubts, afterwards a good of a disbelief contingency be since to a Defence.
Have we heard this phrase before: good of a doubt? we am sure most of we would have unless we went to a Malay, Chinese or Tamil school. (Now do we know since mother-tongue education is bad? They don't learn we phrases similar to 'benefit of a doubt').
However, nonetheless Malaysia is ostensible to practice British law -- with someShariahlaw thrown in for those who cannot keep their peckers in their pants or their panties from dropping to their ankles -- there is a certain flaw in application. And this flaw would be in cases which have been domestic in nature. Then it is a Defence which needs to infer ignorance as good as not a Prosecution which needs to infer guilt.
Hence, people considered enemies of a statute celebration would most likely get sent to prison since they unsuccessful t! o infer their ignorance rsther than than since a Prosecution successfully proved their guilt.
Is which first point very clear, children?
Hence, also, there is a strong odds of Anwar being found guilty for Sodomy 2. And a actuality which Malaysia has abolished trials by a jury of your peers and, therefore, usually a single man, a judge, decides a case, as good as a actuality which this a single man, a judge, can be blackmailed (with sex scandals) or bribed (with promotions), most likely he or she would rule in foster of a statute party.
This is, of course, small speculation, though speculation formed upon chronological justification -- a Corruption-Sodomy 1 hearing being a single such chronological evidence. In a Corruption-Sodomy 1 trial, a decider clearly pronounced which Anwar is guilty since he unsuccessful to infer his innocence. And Anwar was sentenced to a total of fifteen years prison for those two verdicts.
Okay, which settles a emanate of since we pronounced which Anwar would be found guilty. Nevertheless, we was wrong. Somehow, a decider did not do what he was expected to do as good as even most in Umno were shocked. Why did a decider not do a 'right' thing as good as send Anwar to jail?
Did Anwar buy off a judge? Is a decider corrupted? Did Anwar promise a decider which he would be made a Chief Justice once Pakatan Rakyat takes over a Federal government? Or is a decider merely a God-fearing male who is worried which if he does not do a right thing he might finish up in ruin once he dies?
Okay, right away let's speak about a second point -- a partial which we pronounced Anwar would receive a satisfactory trial.
Again, if we can remember, we pronounced which Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden as good as a Attorney-General (AG), Abdul Gani Patail, were during loggerheads. we referred to which Mohd Yusof wanted to resign though Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak assured him not to.
This is since Najib wanted ! Mohd Yus of to lead a Prosecution in a Sodomy 2 trial. Once which is over afterwards Mohd Yusof can resign as good as go into in isolation practice.
we serve related which Najib offering to emanate a special post for Mohd Yusof -- Solicitor-General II. That post, we explained, did not exist yet as good as would be 'personal to holder' (you know what which means, right?). we additionally pronounced which Mohd Yusof concluded to stay upon as good as lead a Prosecution for Sodomy 2 if he can be since an declaration which he would have a giveaway palm as good as there would be no domestic interference. Furthermore, a AG contingency be told to behind off as good as not interfere.
Najib concluded to Mohd Yusof's terms as good as Mohd Yusof, in turn, concluded to stay upon as good as lead a Prosecution as a Solicitor-General II.
When we was in Australia, we spoke to a good crony of mine, a Malaysian lawyer who privately knows Mohd Yusof. This crony of cave pronounced which Mohd Yusof was a God-fearing male as good as my friend's perspective was which Mohd Yusof would give Anwar a satisfactory trial. My crony felt which Mohd Yusof would never fix Anwar up similar to they did in a Sodomy 1 trial.
we do not privately know Mohd Yusof. But my crony does. And we certitude my friend. And if my crony says which Mohd Yusof would never supply Anwar's hearing afterwards we would certitude what my crony said. After all, we have to certitude someone. And if we can't certitude your friend, afterwards who can we trust?
Hence we opined which Anwar would get a satisfactory hearing formed upon my friend's 'endorsement' of Mohd Yusof. And we additionally opined which Anwar would be found guilty formed upon how Malaysian courts adopt a 'guilty unless we can infer we have been innocent doctrine'.
we had confidence in Mohd Yusof. But we did not have confidence in a judge. we suspected which Mohd Yusof would not supply a trial. But we suspected wh! ich a de cider would do a 'politically correct' thing by sending Anwar to jail.
we was right upon a single equate as good as wrong upon a other.
So we see, whilst most of we allow your emotions, sentiments, prejudices, perceptions, etc., to guide your judgment, we weigh a facts as good as try to arrive during an educated guess. we might still be guessing, no doubt, though it is a forecast formed upon taking a pluses as good as minuses as good as seeing what ends up during a bottom-line.
In alternative words, we do correct 'accounting' to get to a answer. And we am prepared go against gathering as good as renouned ideology if we think which a justification proves otherwise.I do not caring about a herd. The flock can pierce a single way, as herds normally do. we am prepared to go a conflicting citation if we think which a flock is wrong.
And, today, a flock which had all changed a single approach has changed citation as good as has changed a alternative approach right away which Mohd Yusof has assimilated Anwar's Defence team. we am still relocating in a same citation which we changed from a commencement whilst all of we have been right away trailing behind me in a same citation which we am moving.
There have been usually two sorts of people in this world, a leaders as good as a followers. 99% have been supporters whilst usually 1% have been leaders. Which group do we think we have been in?
Ooh.. it is so nice to be able to say, 'I told we so'.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment