This e-mail fromBeruang Biruis worth read. I don't know who a bard is though he/she has been sending me series of 'sensational' comments of late. After a minimal editing, this is a rested version:
"If you are to equate a number of summons made by Anwar to certain individuals within these years, it is simply thoughts blowing. What I meant thoughts floating is a number of summons as well as a amount (of money) Anwar demanded.
"If you are to equate a number of summons made by Anwar to certain individuals within these years, it is simply thoughts blowing. What I meant thoughts floating is a number of summons as well as a amount (of money) Anwar demanded.
"This alone shows which Anwar seems similar to a man who obeys a law as well as would only refer to a justice if he feels which someone made defamation statements opposite him.
The keyword here is obeying a law. But in matters of attending to justice as a witness for a polite fit in between a businessman Low Thiam Hoe as well as Hong Leong Bank, Anwar was seen to be land his laugh. Bernama reported which a counsel for plaintiff D Paramalingam followed Anwar for two days during a Parliament though he still failed to palm over a serve to Anwar.
The keyword here is obeying a law. But in matters of attending to justice as a witness for a polite fit in between a businessman Low Thiam Hoe as well as Hong Leong Bank, Anwar was seen to be land his laugh. Bernama reported which a counsel for plaintiff D Paramalingam followed Anwar for two days during a Parliament though he still failed to palm over a serve to Anwar.
The initial day was since he could not find Anwar. He did find Anwar upon a second day though Anwar refused to accept a summon.
Another person referred to in a case, Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan perceived a summons though will request to reject it. Why can't Anwar do a same thing, makes it look weird. With mythological lawyers around him, why is it so tough for him to simply take a summons as well as request to reject it?
Another person referred to in a case, Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan perceived a summons though will request to reject it. Why can't Anwar do a same thing, makes it look weird. With mythological lawyers around him, why is it so tough for him to simply take a summons as well as request to reject it?
This make a difference reminded bard to a summons which was made by Anwar's counsel to a Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak as well as his wife during a case where Anwar was indicted of sodomising Saiful Bukhari. The Prime Minister perceived a summons though afterwards deserted it.
What did Anwar as well as his 'gang' said back then? Najib was a wuss, right? Now Anwar would not even take a subpoena, what should you call him? Chicken?
What did Anwar as well as his 'gang' said back then? Najib was a wuss, right? Now Anwar would not even take a subpoena, what should you call him? Chicken?
The s! ame thin g happened with a RM100 million serve he filed opposite Datuk Nallakarupan as well as Utusan Malaysia. Up to now, there is still no pointer of a writ of serve which was ostensible to be handed to a two defendants which he stated.
How can they proceed with a trial if a writs are still not there? Why is he scared?
It is believed which all this proofs which Anwar is not unequivocally interested to obey a law. He just want to be seen as a person which unequivocally 'obeys a law' when a actuality is, he is more seductiveness in abusing a routine of law so which he could strech his aspiration - to become a next Prime Minister.
The issue of KBBGate is not a small matter. A sum of RM445 million was paid for a contract which never took place. Anwar contingency reply to this.
The RM445 million is part of rakyat's income as a government paid a bank which amount as an effort to restore our economy during a economic crisis from year 1998 to 2000. It was additionally meant to make firm a banking zone as they did not have a genius to yield loans during which time.
By comparison, which value of income is not a same in 1998 as well as a benefaction time. Umno contingency additionally examine a matter. Before Anwar puts a blame upon a party, you need to be very careful here. Anwar was Umno emissary boss when a 'transaction' took place'..."
The RM445 million is part of rakyat's income as a government paid a bank which amount as an effort to restore our economy during a economic crisis from year 1998 to 2000. It was additionally meant to make firm a banking zone as they did not have a genius to yield loans during which time.
By comparison, which value of income is not a same in 1998 as well as a benefaction time. Umno contingency additionally examine a matter. Before Anwar puts a blame upon a party, you need to be very careful here. Anwar was Umno emissary boss when a 'transaction' took place'..."
Posted bybujai
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment