Anwar took the bait again



Pressured by the inflection since in the mainstream media, Anwar finally came up with an answer to dispel the perception combined which he exclude to be subpoena.

It means he is willing to be summons as well as crop up in justice in the legal case by Hong Leong Bank upon the participants in the excercise to takeover Kewangan Bersatu Berhad.

Whether he delay the justice date by 50 times, it will not matter. Just similar to he did upon Dato Nalla's, he has taken the bait.

He was hoping which the emanate would not benefit inflection though it is as well good for Raja Petra as well as me to pass off.
Old players similar to us can smell shit even if wrapped under ten layers of plastic. Or we can defend it.

As always with RPK or Pet, there have been things we determine as well as most things which we do not agree. Sometimes we determine upon an emanate as well as upon alternative days as well as the same issue, we do not agree.

Oh yes ...Pet. Allow me to extend this message.

It is the not the priority emanate for us right away though our common blogger crony is not happy which your British adult hermit is the leading Kumpulan Darul Ehsan Berhad.
The Hong Leong Finance legal case is gaining inflection in open as well as Anwar knows it. And he knows additionally it's implication.

Hopefully it is the good catch. It will remind the public, generally the vounger naive electorate which Anwar is as hurtful if not some-more than the Malaysia Politics he credit off.

At least, hurtful Malaysia Politicsleaders have been being dealt by the authorities. No suicide, no drama, as well as no SELCAT or DAP Disciplinary Committee to do cover-ups.

The open should be reminded of the list of privatisation projects released by Tun Dr Mahathir during the Malaysia Politics General Assembly in the late 90s to uncover Anwar's cronyism.

It was Anwar, his pinkish forms as well as monthly bank-ins which was responsible for corrupting Malaysia Politics grassroot. He is as hurtful as his despicable outline of corruption upon Malaysia Politics is.

By his logic, if Malaysia Politics does not deserve to rule, he is similarly or some-more undeserving.

Tan Sri Kadir Sheikh Fadzir should have blamed his mislaid for the Malaysia Politics Supreme Council chair to Anwar for bringing up income governing body in the big way.

Along the way, do not be ashamed to blame yourself too, Kadir.

You were the celebration to it!


If the justice box blow open, it would describe former the denial of Assistant Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, Dato Murad to the orthodox stipulation he made during the reformasi as irrelevent.

The box would uphold the story of Arus Murni, Hong Leong as well as Faiz Abdullah in the orthodox declaration. See how Soh Chee Wen-funded Free Malaysia Today present the story:


Read ithere.

Another from The Choice directly points during him:



Readhere.

The Choice wrote that:
"These allegations could prove bomb for Anwar as well as his bid to spin Prime Minister during GE13. His sales representation to electorate is formed upon presenting himself as the purify alternative to his Umno colleagues of the past."

"Now he stands indicted of regulating his power as well as influence to receive income by the syndicate of lenders allegedly for make use of to fund his political machinations."
However, Anwar is wakeful of the exchanges in the justice room. We can bet upon Anwar sending his man to take notes.

The FMT inform in full:

Anwar's 'cronies' declared in court

Teoh El Sen| Mar 29, 2012
Businessman Low Thiam Hoe told the justice which he was the 'victim' of the 'larger scheme' involving Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim as well as Hong Leong authority Quek Leng Chan.
KUALA LUMPUR: Businessman Low Thiam Hoe, who is being sued by Hong Leong Finance Bhd (HLFB) in the crack of amends fit involving RM445 million syndicated loans since in 1997, currently declared multiform individuals whom he identified as "cronies" of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.
Taking the mount during the Commercial High Court here today, Low pronounced which he was "the victim" in the understanding in which he was assisting Anwar as well as HLFB executive authority Quek Leng Chan.
However, when cross-examined by the bank's lawyer, Andrew Chiew, Low certified which he had zero in ! black as well as white to prove which he was simply used as the "nominee" of Anwar the then monetary apportion as well as deputy prime apportion as well as Quek.
"Sometime in Mar 1997, dual individuals by the name of Hamzah Harun as well as Mohd Faiz Abdullah (Anwar's debate writer), both from the company known as Arus Murni Sdn Bhd (AMSB), told me which they were behaving upon interest of Anwar as well as Quek," Low pronounced during examination-in-chief by lead counsel, D Paramalingam.
Low pronounced which HLFB, by Quek, was then pulling to take Kewangan Bersatu Bhd (KBB), which was during the time acquired by Arus Murni Corporation Bhd (AMCB) from the single Ishak Ismail for RM390 million.
He pronounced he concluded to be the nominee, or "conduit", for the syndicated loan transaction.
The alternative individuals as well as companies used as nominees were Hood Osman, Nik Hussain Nik Mohamed, AMSB as well as Mekuritek Sdn Bhd, whom he described as "cronies" of Anwar.
Paramalingam: How have been these companies as well as individuals related?
Low: From what we know, they have been all cronies of Anwar Ibrahim.
Low pronounced he did not request for the loan as "the whole thing was arranged by Hong Leong's representative, namely Seow Lun Hoo".
Quek's right-hand man
He additionally pronounced which he was informed which Seow, who was president as well as CEO of Hong Leong Credit & Leasing Bhd during the time, was "essentially Quek's right-hand man".
Low pronounced the loan since to him was RM30.161 million though the credit comment was never finished upon him during all.
"It was all pre-approved. we only had to spin up to sign the required documents, that's all. we was impoverished during which indicate in time."
Low additionally pronounced which he sealed the applicable loan papers during t! he road house in Singapore in Mar 1997 as HLFB "wanted to equivocate profitable stamp duty".
"Syndicated loans were additionally since out to the alternative nomiees as well to strech the plantiff's target of RM445 million for the acquisition of AMCB. A total of RM80.1 million was since to Hood, RM80.1 million to Nik Hussain, RM30.161 million since to Mekuritek as well as RM224.478 million to AMSB," he said.
However, he pronounced which the plan to purchase KBB did not take place by the end of 1997.
"It was usually during which indicate in time which we discovered which Seow, upon interest of Quek, was the mastermind of the whole transaction. The plantiff by Seow upon purpose sabotaged the scheme"
Low pronounced which the plaintiff, HLFB, had "acted in bad faith" when it breached the fiduciary duty, as well as he as well as alternative nominees were "clearly deceived by them".
"We were left tall as well as dry," he added.
Bigger picture
During cross-examination by Chiew later, Low was aggressively grilled upon his credibilty.
Chiew: The dual individuals told we they were behaving for Anwar as well as Quek. Did we take any steps to check?
Low: Yes.
Chiew: Did we speak to Anwar?
Low: No.
Chiew: Did we speak to Quek?
Low: we was in no position to hit Quek.
Chiew: If they were to surprise you, they could have, couldn't they?
Low: No. we had no reason not to hold (them) Faiz was Anwar's debate writer
Chiew: But what about Quek? The indicate is this. You were told about this deal. Any papers to work out how this understanding is to be srtructured? Was it presented to we by Faiz?
Low: we had no reason to believe
Chiew: My question is Was there any paper in writing?
Low: No, though it was all arranged during top level
Chiew: You have been the director of the public-listed company, with knowledge in financing. Is which your position: we believed these dual persons about this deal, which seems 'phantom in nature' by your own answers? When we entered the deal, we knew what we were starting into
Low: we knew what we was removing into. we was only the nominee. But can we add it was upon the bigger picture. It was linked to Anwar as well as Quek.
Chiew additionally regularly asked why Low did not lift this "bigger picture" fourteen years ago when the box was first filed.
"Fourteen years after we suddenly have an inspriration. I'm putting to we this was finished in bad faith," Chiew said, to which Low denied.
Chiew additionally asked Low to insist as well as explain multiform statements he made together with claim about Anwar's cronies, the meetings which took place as well as the credit comment finished upon him as well as the claim which HLFB longed for to purchase KBB during RM350million.
Low certified which it was Hamzah who supplied him with those information.
Chiew: This row which we have this representation/collateral contract it doesn't exist. It never existed. It is really an afterthought.
Low: Of march formed upon all the papers here there is zero to await my contention.
Chiew: we am putting it to we which we have been putting up this fantastic story about Anwar as well as Quek. Correct? You got this from strange publications found upon the Internet? Hence we have been stringing this counterclaim together? There is no basis to your row about this supposed larger scheme?
Low: No.
Full confidence
Duri! ng revie w by Devanandan S Subramaniam, Low pronounced his reason for raising this emanate fourteen years after was which initially, he had full certainty which Hamzah would "take care" of the case.
On Mar 19, High Court decider Hadhariah Syed Ismail dismissed Low's duplicate to rectify his counterclaim matter to include Anwar as "the person behind the deal".
In rejecting his application, Hadhariah pronounced it was made during the "eleventh hour" as well as had come as well late in the march of the trial.
However, the justice had last week authorised the counterclaim to summons four individuals namely Anwar, Quek, Hamzah as well as Faiz.
Six witnesses of the plaintiff had already taken the stand.
In 1998, Hong Leong Finance filed the fit opposite Low, Merkuritek as well as Arus Murni over non-payment of the syndicated loans amounting to RM445 million.
The loans were since to the parties in the bid to take monetary establishment AMCB which owns KBB.
Each defendant was sued for over RM28 million as well as interest for the non-repayment of the loans.
In 1999, Low filed the counter-claim opposite HLFB, HLG Capital Markets Sdn Bhd as well as Hong Leong Credit Bhd's former CEO Seow Lun Hoo asking for damages for purported wrongful or negligent advice.
Hong Leong additionally filed an additional fit opposite Mekuritek as well as three guarantors Hussin Abdul Karim, Agus Salim Mohd Dom as well as Abdullah Abd Karim Bajerai as defendants for the similar claim of RM28 million.
He knows there is zero legally proven which can joint the dots to him. However he cannot tahan reports similar to the a single by Bernama. He has been coward to exclude questions upon most instances, though with the box still sincerely safe, this plea insults him.


Read it in fullhereor in Tunku's here.

Anwar had Latheefa Koya emanate the matter below:

We impute to press reports where the counsel for the Defendant in the box of Hong Leong vs Low Thiam Hoe, warn D. Paralingam had indicted Anwar Ibrahim of purportedly refusing to accept the summons served upon him upon 28th Mar 2012. The summons is to compel Anwar to support the justice in the legal case opposite Hong Leong Finance Berhad, filed in 1998.

We have been repelled during the ignorance displayed by the counsel upon simple as well as fundamental Parliamentary rules as well as privileges i.e. no summons nor justice processes can be affected upon any Members of Parliament in the premises of the Parliament. The lawyer's action to offer the summons during the Parliament premises was the wrongful action as well as might entice contempt of Parliamentary proceedings.

Anwar Ibrahim has no conflict to reception the pronounced summons as well as is eveready to crop up in justice if the relevant, required as well as not an abuse of the justice process. Anwar's lawyers would similar to to suggest D Paralingam which there have been proper etiquette to offer the summons upon the Member of Parliament, what some-more the Opposition Leader. D. Paralingam might hit Messrs Daim & Gamany to repair an appointment in sequence to offer the summons if he is indeed meddlesome to call Anwar as the declare as well as not resort to unwarranted sensationalism.

Released by,

Latheefa Koya
Legal Bureau Director
Parti Keadilan Rakyat
The parliamentary previlages were only an excuse. Anwar took the bait.

The "lawan tetap lawan" Anwar fell for it, only similar to he fell for the plea by Dato Nall! a as wel l as the squad of former PKR leaders as well as activists, except for Dato Salehuddin Hashim.

If it is indeed Tan Sri Quek Leng Chan doing the foster for Najib to allow him to do business undisturbed, the cranky examination of Anwar Ibrahim by Low Thiam Hoe's lawyer, D. Paramalingam should be something to demeanour forward.

How much can he make Anwar sp! sick out? Will it be enough to fall short Anwar's reputation as well as campaign once as well as for all?

The justice to reconvene upon Apr 12th. Put which in your Blackberry or Smartphone reminder.


- Another Brick in the Wall
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: