High price of proxies

One week end eventuality as well as a late night tip-off.

One lesson from a dual to immature wannabees fervent to be proxies to a little corporate players or politicians, be careful of easy money.

Thinking which it is a single way to earn which easy discerning income to lead a hold up of oppulance or which collateral indispensable to fund one's pursuit, wannabees - immature as well as aged - get sucked in to traps which get dragged in to long justice conflict or monetary ruins.

Remind ourselves, if it is discerning money, since would those corporate players as well as politicians share with you? Have which demon advocate inside of ourselves to ask as well as disbelief our simply done up decisions.

Over a weekend, you met up with someone tighten to Dato Eskay, a leading Dato of a triumvirate Dato T, which exposed a sex tapes of Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

As far as you have been concerned, a video is Anwar's. It is only as well convincing. Anwar's responses as well as refusals to response substantiate it further.

The attempt to spin by Haji Hadi to contend video is not excusable declare underneath syaria law since it is inanimate objects, sign it up. Off march it is not a declare though evidence.

With Eskay confessing as well as describing in person, it is enough for us.

After which week end night, now you know since Anwar was walking front as well as behind prior to a main actress calls, "Action!"

Our purpose to hear out this man was for something else. It was upon something a ! antithes is had used to slander behind opposite Eskay.

We wanted to know since is a man who does not morally decider his friends as well as he befriends everyone, irrespective upon which side of a domestic divide, eventually had a job to display Anwar wrongdoings.

Also, you were wakeful of a justice box in between Eskay as well as Dato Yahya Jalil, a controversial office worker who was not long ago held in a array of pay off to integrate of politicians by a blog called The Whistleblower.

Yahya or Pakya to most Johoreans, is held in most monetary commitments with most groups, including a part of of a stately family which he cannot deliver. He might have stretched himself thin.

Readherefirst this Malaysian Insider's slanted inform to twist it in to a story of crooks as well as cronies, which in tangible actuality have been part as well as parcel of a lobbying routine in any open work plan procurem! ent any where in a world:

Businessman's story of how he won 'crooked bridge' deal

By Yow Hong Chieh

KUALA LUMPUR, Mar 10 A office worker offering a glimpse in to how supervision contracts have been cumulative when he told a High Court currently his entrance to senior officials as well as successful ministers cumulative him a rights to a Malaysia-Singapore International Gateway bridge project, improved well known as a "crooked bridge".

"It was all based upon my effort," Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah told a justice today.

Shazryl Eskay pronounced that, in further to coming a late Tan Sri Megat Junid Megat Ayub for help, he had additionally helped second defendant, Datuk Yahya A. Jalil, benefit entrance to then-deputy budding apportion Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

But Shazryl Eskay was discerning to stress which he did not have any power over either Megat Junid or Anwar, as well as insisted which ! he got a stipulate through a merits of a plan as well as a companies involved.

"I did not influence them, though assured them," Shazryl Eskay said.

He had filed a authorised box in Jan 2002, claiming breach of stipulate by Merong Mahawangsa Sdn Bhd as well as Yahya for failing to pay him RM20 million after he procured a plan for them.

In his statement of claim, Shazryl Eskay pronounced Yahya, executive executive as well as vital shareholder of Merong Mahawangsa, had enlisted his assistance to gain a plan from a supervision as well as to secure RM640 million in unfamiliar funds for a project.

He claimed a second suspect had sought his assistance for his "discretion as well as great relations" with a government.

Shazryl Eskay pronounced a second suspect suggested RM20 million in remunerations for his services, which has not been paid.

The "crooked bridge" plan was consummated by a Abdullah administration department in 2006.

Shazryl Eskay is seeking a RM20 million remuneration from a defendants as well as interest, costs as well as other relief deemed fit by a court.

Yahya, however, in his defe! nce stat ement denied regulating a plaintiff's tighten ties with a supervision as well as Megat Junid's family as it was "against open policy, wild as well as illegal".

The justice was additionally told currently which Shazryl Eskay as well as Yahya had proposed talks to solve a make a difference out of justice to avoid "embarrassing a little personalities involved".

Justice VT Singham, however, ordered a hearing to continue until such a allotment is reached.

He additionally rejected a request by Yahya's warn to adjourn a make a difference until a latter returns from a commercial operation trip to Jeddah with former budding apportion Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

The hearing continues tomorrow at 8.30am.

Naturally Yahya has to repudiate as well as conflict it out in court.

What happened was Eskay as well ! as Yahya were partners in a association bidding for a "jambatan bengkok".

Then Yahya brought in a part of of a stately family as shareholders as well as incited to Eskay to buy up his s! hares. H e might have told Eskay which it ie improved than him carrying to understanding with a stately family.

It turns out which Eskay's shares in a association might not be only of Eskay's though additionally of Anwar's. Yahya had paid Eskay in installments until he stopped few years ago.

According to a source, Eskay has a usual warn with Anwar as in Dato Phabakaran. Eskay had asked Phabakaran to ask Anwar though was told which a income was paid long time ago to Anwar.

Yahya had celebrated his understanding though did not know which a RM20 million was Eskay's apportionment as well as not Anwar which he had since to.

As a substitute of Anwar, Eskay was cheated out.

Naturally Anwar will repudiate he has commercial operation proxies as he once challenged to name his cronies in Aug 2008. Read The Starhere.

Oh pleaseee... only since it is not easy to explanation in court, it does not mean he doesn't have crony, in actuality lots of cronies.

Just recall a list of names which cumulative privitasation projects which Tun Dr Mahathir put up at a 1998 UMNO General Assembly. Anwar was speechless as most saw his cronies as well as corporate boys were removing quite a fai! r share.

Read Rocky Bruhere

Picture: Khalid Jaafar, Faiz Abdullah as well as Aasil Kazi Ahmad

All you need to do to call Anwar's bluff is to refer to a Statutory Declaration by former Deputy Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia, Dato Abdul Murad garbage bin Khalid dated October 26, 1999 [read in fullhere].

Our seductiveness is upon 12 e, where Murad described a corporate understanding involving Faiz Abdullah, Arus Murni, KUBB as well as Hong Leong, below:

(e) I was directed by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to assistance Encik Faiz Abdullah (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's spook writer), together with Seow Lun Hoo of Hong Leong to buy in to Kewangan Usaha Bersatu Berhad (KUBB), afterwards owned by ldris Hydraulic Berhad. The scheme involved regulating Arus Murni Berhad formerly well known as Timuran Berhad, a association listed upon a Main Board of a KLSE as a holding company. I approached a following banks to assistance syndicate a loan for a squeeze of KUBB shares costing upon top of RM400 million: 1. Hong Leong Bank. 2. Hong Leong Finance. 3. Sime Bank 4. RHB Bank. 5. Southern Bank. 6. BSN Commercial Bank. Faiz Abdullah is a verv crafty spook bard as well as domestic user for Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. He is additionally a lawyer, ex-joumalist as well as ex-SpecialBranch military officer.

Since Anwar's released, Murad has incited around to repudiate his Statutory Declaration. It's essentially a crime to shift one's Statutory Declaration. Let which be for awhile.

Raja Petra has another version of it, a spinned version claiming a little impression forced Murad to admit. Read Malaysia Todayhere.

Alas ... it's as well late.

Except for a contribution to various NGOs as well as Think Tank, a inform tallies with w! shawl a market talk as well as development behind then.

Anyone meddlesome can read this 2004 researcher inform upon Arus Murnihere. Sounds rosyhehehe ...

The upon top of excercise occurs in 1995 to 1996.

We remembered how! they pl ayed up a shares regulating a ridiculous rumour of Nova Scotia Bank selling their Kuala Lumpur bend to Arus Murni in 1994. That way a shares rose amply for them to encounter their margin.

By 1997, they couldn't lift a fiancial burden of KUBB as well as additionally KUBB's problem.

They cut a understanding with Hong Leong Finance Berhad to take KUBB from Arus Murni in 1998 though might have been rejected by BNM since KUBB was acquired by BNM from Arus Murni a following year.

That might have been a barganing thinly slice used to gangling Hong Leong from being acquired by other Bank in a initial round of Bank consolidation exercise. It was Anwar which eventually helped a Hong Leong to take Mui Bank Berhad. They have been denied promissory note permit by both a Malasysian as well as Singaporean Government since time immemorial.

Arus Murni had done several merger associated to their core activities. But by 2001, Arus Murni was underneath PN4 as well as were sold off. It is currently Naim Indah Corporation Berhad.

The shareholders of Arus! Murni h ave been still held in a authorised conflict with Hong Leong Finance for loans owned, often to buy Arus Murni shares behind then. The latestFree Malaysia Todayreport from a High Courts this morning, below:

Trade dispute: Judge rejects bid to include Anwar

G Vinod, Mar 19, 2012

The High Court dismisses businessman's application saying it's as well late to include Anwar Ibrahim in his case.

KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court currently discharged an application by a office worker to include former emissary budding apportion Anwar Ibrahim in a fit involving a unsuccessful merger routine in 1998.

In her verdict, Justice Hadhariah Syed Ismail told a authorised warn for businessman, Low Thiam Hoe, which a proposed amendment had come as well late in a march of a trial.

In 1997, Hong Leong Finance Bhd filed a fit opposite Low, Mekuritek Sdn Bhd as well as Arus Murni Sdn Bhd over non-payment of loans amounting to RM445 million.

The loans were since to a parties in a bid to take monetary institution, Kewangan Bersatu Bhd.

Anwar was serving as a finance apportion at which indicate of time as well as a single of Arus Murni's directors, Mohd Faiz Abdullah, was supposed to be Anwar's speech writer.

Each suspect was sued for over RM28 million as well as seductiveness for a non-repayment of a loans.

On since a box was being listened now when ! it was f iled in 1998, a warn serving for all 3 defendants, D Paramalingam, pronounced Hong Leong had not pursued a make a difference since 2005.

"All of a sudden, a plaintiff (Hong Leong) motionle! ss to pr oceed with a case," pronounced Paramalingam.

The hearing of a box would resume upon Mar 28.

Has Hong Leong motionless which Anwar is a mislaid means as well as it is time to pitch something for BN?

Ask additionally since is Anwar being deliberate for lawsuit? He must be involved as well as possibly like Eskay's case, he additionally has a cut. Otherwise, since would a 3 defendents want to draw towards him now?

He might be relieved from being called to court. The poser will dawdle upon though it is a 3 alleged proxies which will be saddled with a loan to pay up.

By a way, it is believed Eskay is starting to draw towards him to justice too. He should summons Anwar.

Now, did Anwar contend he has no associate as well as proxy?


- Another Brick in a Wall

Read More @ Source

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz