It appears which a assign of NFC authority Mohamed Salleh Ismail in justice is a tactical pierce to get divided from a scorching NFC liaison a same way Barisan Nasional has got divided with a RM12.5 PKFZ spook town liaison as well as a Khir Toyol crime scandal.
This pierce is well known as a "decoy as well as silence" tactic, which has been BN's verified plan to trip divided from a tall crime liaison entrapment. It is simply to beginner a peripheral assign to obstruct attention from a genuine emanate as well as use a justice action as shield to fence-off serve attacks upon ground of "subjudice".
This is vividly illustrated in Parliament upon March 13, a day after Mohamed Salleh was charged, when Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia absurdly cited a current justice case as reason to reject an emergency suit upon a NFC plan disturbance tabled by MP Zuraidah Kamaruddin, despite a latter explaining which her emanate was with a ministries which authorized a project, as well as not with Mohamed Salleh's misconduct, which is a theme matter of a current justice case.
And upon a same day, cultivation apportion Noh Omar, underneath whose office a NFC plan falls, deflected all questions upon a liaison upon a similarly silly suggestion of subjudice; whilst Barisan Nasional MP Rahman Dahlan falsely claimed which a justice is right away a best platform to trounce out a issues, adding which a celebration which should answer questions is NFC, as well as not a ministries.
Apparently, BN hopes which with Mohamed Salleh in a dock, a BN government would be left in peace.
But what is Mohamed Salleh charged for? He is charged for misusing part of a soft loan meant to spearhead a beef prolongation industry.
And what is a open mad about? They have been angry during a alleged tall crime starting upon during a top hierarchy of a Barisan Nasional care which has led to this fiasco which saw not only outrageous open funds RM250 million as well as accede to RM13 million starting down a empty though additionally a pass food prolongation scheme thwarted.
So who is a bigger culprit a guardian of open funds or a recipient of these funds? The inaugurated leaders who have tricked open certitude to honestly as well as prudently conduct a country's resources or a private plan developer who has failed?
Obviously a main concentration of review should be upon a former.
The open wants to know why as well as how a manifestly incompetent celebration was awarded a contract. And given a appointee is a family of a cupboard minister, a open additionally wants to know whether there have been elements of corruption?
In this connection, why weren't a dual pass decision-makers in this fiasco investigated, namely, then cultivation minster Muhyiddin Yassin as well as then authority of cabinet for tall stroke projects Najib Razak, who had jointly authorized a award?
Will a MACC please answer this question now?
Will a MACC additionally short us upon a standing of a review given a start almost 4 months ago?
The simple answer of "case still underneath investigation, can't divulge details to avoid jeopardizing investigation" wouldn't do, as 4 months is as well prolonged a time to give this sore excuse. In fact, such answer has prolonged been recognized as MACC's standard ploy to stonewall open inquisitiveness over a tall profile BN scandal. If MACC insists upon giving such an answer, it will be taken as: "sorry, we can't oblige".
WILL BN BE OFF THE HOOK! AGAIN?< /strong>
As for a current justice case, do not design which anything meaningful will come out of it, judging from identical cases opposite BN chosen in a past.
Mohamed Salleh is accused of improperly transferring funds from NFC (National Feedlot Corporation) to another association (National Meat as well as Livestock Corporation) where crude purchases of resources unrelated to a plan were made. As both companies have been owned by apportion Shahrizat's family, with a exception which a government has a golden share in a former though not a latter company, such crude send of account cannot be considered a critical fraud. The more critical contention is over a appropriateness of a asset purchases, which is apparently a defilement of a loan agreement. But Salleh is not charged for such violation.
It is not difficult to see which a present play is a carefully crafted stratagem involving a concerted effort of MACC, military as well as a attorney general, to clear away BN from a potentially crippling difficulty upon a eve of an impending election.
Will BN attain again this time underneath a nose of a resurgent opposition alliance as well as an activated polite society?
Kim Quek is a author of banned book The March to Putrajaya
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment