PKR leaders slammed a Attorney General for refusing to interest against a exculpation of Razak Baginda, a close friend of Prime Minister Najib Razak, charged for aiding a attempted murder of Mongolian nation Altantuya Shaaribuu.
"It is amazing how Gani Patail (the Attorney General) refused to interest such a argumentative decision. More than a dual cops who have been condemned to hang, there was strong ground upon Baginda's partial to kill Altantuya. Whether Baginda did unequivocally abet a attempted murder or not would have been best assessed in a conference by pursuit for his defense. Why was this not finished - was it to help defense sure politicians in Umno?" PKR clamp boss Tian Chua toldMalaysia Chronicle.
"Yet, you see in alternative clear-cut cases of flimsy justification such as a Bersih protesters as well as a sodomy conference of Anwar Ibrahim, Gani rushes to appeal. Is it since it benefits Umno for these people to be found guilty? It has become a big joke as well as creates a Malaysian judiciary a laughing stock. The more they conspire, a more it bolsters a suspicions of a people as well as a general village which Najib is partial as well as parcel of a Altantuya murder."
Slanted conference with clear intention to defense 'someone'
From day one, a conference against dual of Najib's former bodyguards as well as Baginda, who were charged for killing Altanutya as well as blowing up her body with explosives in a jungle clearing in Selangor state in 2006, was clearly slanted. Recent US cables from a KL mission to Washington as suggested upon WikiLeaks showed which US observers following a conference had been aghast during a peculiarity of a justice meted out.
Portions of military statements wherein one of a accused had pronounced he was paid to kill Altantuya was ignored. Defense lawyers were additionally prevented from asking sure questions touching upon a ground for a killing, which is glaring since which both men were special unit cops during which time as well as usually met Altantuya upon a night of her murder.In alternative words, they had no ground of their own to kill Altantuya.
Neither were there any attempts done by a assign to ask who had offering to pay a cops to kill Altantuya, as well as any questioning in this line by a defense was skilfully deflected by a judge. The dual cops had pronounced they were introduced to Baginda by Najib's aide-de-camp Musa Safri, who told them to help Baginda over a Altantuya nuisance problem. Yet, no attempts were done by a assign to call Musa as a witness, notwithstanding his being a pass figure. Was this since he was too close to Najib, pundits have asked.
It must additionally be remarkable which Malaysian immigration annals had startled a nation when it was suggested which a authorities had no record during all of Altantuya ever entering a country, again boosting a guess which someone 'high-up' was concerned as well as a cover in p! rogress.
Former lover, blackmail, corruption, covering up for Najib - isn't this motive?
Baginda has additionally admitted Altantuya was his lover as well as had in truth been blackmailing him - dual factors which form a strongest ground amongst a contingent for wanting to kill her. Shortly after a acquittal, Baginda rught away left overseas for London. The dual cops, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri as well as Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, were later condemned to cling to in Apr 2009 but are still upon genocide quarrel tentative an interest conference which has been conspicuously delayed.
Perhaps a 'consolation' in a distribution of a created visualisation - which is bound to be hotly challenged by a troubled authorised fraternity - is which it might help to speed up a interest hearing. However, for which to happen, a created judgments for both Azilah as well as Sirul would additionally have to be issued. Mar 9 has been bound as a next box management date to capacitate Azilah's lawyer, J Kuldeep Kumar, to obtain a complete set of records.
Did Najib emanate any orders?
In his created judgement, Judge Mohd Zaki pronounced there was noprima fa! cie case to answer a assign of aiding dual Special Action Squad officers. He pronounced a notes created Baginda as well as Azilah's bag with Baginda's full residential address, together with a name of his father, Abdullah Malim Baginda, were unconditionally unchanging with an trusting male asking for assistance from a military to unit a closeness of his house since Altantuya's nuisance as well as threats. Pundits have however questioned, because did a learned decider not wonder, how come dual ranking as well as elite cops were detailed for a slight pursuit when unchanging cops could have been deployed. They additionally asked because did a Judge not ask for further information from Musa Safri, as well as either Najib had systematic his aide-de-camp to help Baginda, as well as why?
In his 70-page judgment, Mohd Zaki additionally pronounced which even if Baginda could be unspoken as having any "motive" in a light of Altantuya's blackmailing letters, it was still deficient as a basement for his conviction.
"I am confident which there is no prima facie for him to answer his charge. I, accordingly, find a third accused not guilty as well as sequence him to be acquitted as well as discharged," he pronounced in his visualisation done available to a media.
Malaysia Chronicle
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment