FIRST we contingency make it clear which we await any beginning to assistance the poor, regardless of race as well as religion. Which equates to which upon this score I'm upon the same wave-length with former finance apportion Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah.
I was also understanding of anything underneath the New Economic Policy which was dictated to assistance urge the overall economic incident of the Malays/Bumiputras in general though again this was obligatory upon helping usually those who indispensable help.
The big difference between Tengku Razaleigh a.k.a. Ku Li as well as Aziz Hassan is which whilst the prince had sufficient platforms whilst the apportion as well as the comparison member of the Umno supreme legislature to try as well as scold any imbalance or unilateral policies, we did not.
I right away allude to the relevant paragraphs from the report in the Malaysian Insider currently upon Ku Li's speech during the "Breakfast Meeting" forum.
In highlighting the NEP as the major source of disunity, Ku Li pronounced this: "If we visit supervision departments or universities, we consternation where all the non-Malays have gone. After 1969, suddenly there was this try to partisan mostly Malays in to the polite service.
"It is comfortless which the polite use does not reflect the secular composition of the Malaysian population, as the predominant participation of usually one race tends to engender the sub-culture which is antithetical to the expansion of the dynamic as well as efficient polite administration in the country."
After 1969? Forget Tunku Abdul Rahman since by which time it was during large well known which Tunku was upon the way out, which leaves us with Tun Razak Hussein as well as Tun Hussein Onn, both deceased. The man many people love! to hate , Tun Mahathir Mohamed, became our CEO usually in 1981.
Ku Li was rarely regarded by Razak as well as had the PM's ears too. The problem is Malaysians above 50 cannot recollect Ku Li as the Umno man/minister who fought to scold what was wrong with the government's policies which he thought were favouring the Malays. At least we don't recollect him publicly advocating consistently as well as diligently the different approach.
He could have spoken out during the Umno supreme legislature to try as well as make the difference. He positively could have done which as well during the cupboard whilst serving underneath three PMs. Did he?
Ku Li headed Pernas, the right away self-existent Bank Bumi as well as Petronas, detached from holding two cupboard portfolios. Did he partisan differently from alternative Malay bosses as well as politicians during these places? Bank Bumi was the very Malay bank in conditions of the staffing. Petronas as well has always been well known to be heavily Malay.
But Pernas takes the baked sweat bread since it was set up in November 1969 following the fortitude during the second Bumiputra Economic Congress. It's objective was to assistance usually the Malays as well as Bumiputras as well as Ku Li was the first chairman. Not usually the policies were closed as well as to illustrate favoured usually the Malays as well as Bumis, so as well was the stated r! ecruitme nt policy. So what does this meant in conditions of favouring one race? Wasn't Ku Lii as well obliged for this biased, unilateral incident during the responsibility of the non-Malays?
As authority of the Umno-owned Fleet Group from 1972 to 1982, who were Ku Li's appointees to conduct the companies within the organisation as well as to make up the comparison management? Was secular change ever the consideration?
< br>Didn't Ku Li realize the unsteadiness of the government's policies then? If he did as well as felt strongly enough, the decent thing to do would have been to resign. He didn't as well as since he didn't, Ku Li contingency be held collectively obliged for being partial of which government.
Or did the realisation come about usually recently? If this in truth is the case, then we contingency supplement the right away vocal former Umno minister, the late comparison decider as well as the late comparison cop to the list of people who blubber as well as groan the loudest about everything which is wrong about this nation as well as the leaders -- though usually after leaving office.
I was also understanding of anything underneath the New Economic Policy which was dictated to assistance urge the overall economic incident of the Malays/Bumiputras in general though again this was obligatory upon helping usually those who indispensable help.
The big difference between Tengku Razaleigh a.k.a. Ku Li as well as Aziz Hassan is which whilst the prince had sufficient platforms whilst the apportion as well as the comparison member of the Umno supreme legislature to try as well as scold any imbalance or unilateral policies, we did not.
I right away allude to the relevant paragraphs from the report in the Malaysian Insider currently upon Ku Li's speech during the "Breakfast Meeting" forum.
In highlighting the NEP as the major source of disunity, Ku Li pronounced this: "If we visit supervision departments or universities, we consternation where all the non-Malays have gone. After 1969, suddenly there was this try to partisan mostly Malays in to the polite service.
"It is comfortless which the polite use does not reflect the secular composition of the Malaysian population, as the predominant participation of usually one race tends to engender the sub-culture which is antithetical to the expansion of the dynamic as well as efficient polite administration in the country."
After 1969? Forget Tunku Abdul Rahman since by which time it was during large well known which Tunku was upon the way out, which leaves us with Tun Razak Hussein as well as Tun Hussein Onn, both deceased. The man many people love! to hate , Tun Mahathir Mohamed, became our CEO usually in 1981.
Ku Li was rarely regarded by Razak as well as had the PM's ears too. The problem is Malaysians above 50 cannot recollect Ku Li as the Umno man/minister who fought to scold what was wrong with the government's policies which he thought were favouring the Malays. At least we don't recollect him publicly advocating consistently as well as diligently the different approach.
He could have spoken out during the Umno supreme legislature to try as well as make the difference. He positively could have done which as well during the cupboard whilst serving underneath three PMs. Did he?
Ku Li headed Pernas, the right away self-existent Bank Bumi as well as Petronas, detached from holding two cupboard portfolios. Did he partisan differently from alternative Malay bosses as well as politicians during these places? Bank Bumi was the very Malay bank in conditions of the staffing. Petronas as well has always been well known to be heavily Malay.
But Pernas takes the baked sweat bread since it was set up in November 1969 following the fortitude during the second Bumiputra Economic Congress. It's objective was to assistance usually the Malays as well as Bumiputras as well as Ku Li was the first chairman. Not usually the policies were closed as well as to illustrate favoured usually the Malays as well as Bumis, so as well was the stated r! ecruitme nt policy. So what does this meant in conditions of favouring one race? Wasn't Ku Lii as well obliged for this biased, unilateral incident during the responsibility of the non-Malays?
As authority of the Umno-owned Fleet Group from 1972 to 1982, who were Ku Li's appointees to conduct the companies within the organisation as well as to make up the comparison management? Was secular change ever the consideration?
< br>Didn't Ku Li realize the unsteadiness of the government's policies then? If he did as well as felt strongly enough, the decent thing to do would have been to resign. He didn't as well as since he didn't, Ku Li contingency be held collectively obliged for being partial of which government.
Or did the realisation come about usually recently? If this in truth is the case, then we contingency supplement the right away vocal former Umno minister, the late comparison decider as well as the late comparison cop to the list of people who blubber as well as groan the loudest about everything which is wrong about this nation as well as the leaders -- though usually after leaving office.
Posted byAziz
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment