Police must explain tardiness in taking action

YOURSAY'The video patently shows a intrusion caused by a outsiders as well as nonetheless a military said zero happened?'

Six nabbed over intrusion of ABU ceramah

Not Confused:This incident, as well as a following statements by Selangor military arch Tun Hisan Tun Hamzah shows patently how a comparison military officers in this nation have been so out of touch with reality as well as hopelessly undeveloped of open sentiments, or worse, don't really care.

He patently doesn't assimilate how acts by thugs similar to this can go viral upon a Internet in minutes. To state which zero happened is crass stupidity.

The contribution have been transparent for a rest of us to see in our own homes. The earlier a upper echelons of a PDRM (Royal Malaysian Police) have been consigned to retirement, a better for this country.

So a organisers have to inform a military in advance of such events "... so which they can be prepared, as well as respect local sensitivities upon a subject matter of speeches to equivocate anyone from being unfortunate with their event".

Let me get this right, if an eventuality is organised which doesn't encounter a capitulation of local residents, afterwards it cannot proceed? Is which right?

The organisers thus have to canvass local opinion (or worse still, a military will have to), prior to any eventuality can be held.

How many residents have! to obje ct, as well as how many have to authorize prior to a military have been happy t! shawl it p roceeds? What about freedom of organisation as well as speech?

Pemerhati:Umno seems to follow a same modus operandi when it wants to create difficulty as well as tension.

It substantially has a organisation of thugs upon its payroll, who, prior to starting any sort of incident or demonstration, have been many substantially briefed by Umno ring leaders together with a military as to how they should act.

Notice during all a nasty incidents in a past such asApcet II, a cow-head incident, etc, a military would possibly usually show up after a Umno thugs had caused massacre or if present, they would allow them to means some massacre prior to sanctimonious to stop them.

In this particular case, a military usually arrived after a thugs had caused massacre as well as serious injury.

The impasse of a military here is patently indicated because Selangor CPO Tun Hisan lied blatantly to strengthen a thugs by saying which zero happened, even yet thevideo evidenceclearly showed a massacre caused by a thugs.

Ferdtan:It is viewable which a role of a difficulty makers in a ABU (Anything But Umno) ceramah in Shah Alam was to induce racial conflict; in this case against a minority - a Indians.

The reason is which this is not a initial time such political plan was being used - remember a cow-head protests in 2009 whereby Muslim protesters threatened carnage over a building a whole of a Hindu temple in Section twenty-three of Shah Alam?

There were usually twenty rowdies, some were seen wearing Umno T-shirts, not usually causing ruckus though injur! ed one p erson. The reactions of a early crowd of pacific Malays as well as Indians were magnificent in a face of such provocation.

The ABU members, generally those from a Hindraf deserved praise - they remained cool. If a military do not detain as well as assign a intruders quickly, generally a fat male who was so patently identified in YouTube to be abusive, afterwards this will endorse a political plot by Umno with a connivance of a police.

PB Win:The military have been always trapped by their own words. Why were a organisation incarcerated as well as allegedly being charged under Section 148 (possession of weapons, including sticks, in a riot)?

So a military do determine which there was a riot-like atmosphere imagining from a pro-Umno group. Then they ought to have also well known which there was a pre-planned ceramah as well as a probability of a demonstration or a ruckus being instigated.

Were a organisation incarcerated for holding sticks as well as erratic aimlessly around a area? What subsequent - a fat male (who was held upon video) accidentally walked into a wrong 'dewan' (hall) as well as disrupted a wrong ceramah?

Changeagent: How can detaining 6 youths who were "not partial of a incident" be of any benefit in a military investigations?

I may have zero policing experience, though my usual clarity tells me which detaining a culprits who were essentially partial of a incident could assist a military more.

This ineffective, dull as well as insipid response by a Selangor military really demonstrates a lack of usual sense, honesty, justice as well as ethical standards in a force.

Onyourtoes:What happened to a rest who were directly related to a incident? The military have been blatantly inefficient, foolish as well as biased.

They can't see a pain of injustice committed upon ot! hers. Th e military have been nurturing as well as inculcating a hooligan enlightenment which will come back to haunt them, just you watch.

Dingy:Why should ordinary people interrupt a ABU (Anything But Umno) ceramah? It doesn't make sense.

It has to be pro-Umno or Umno members who did it. Many Umno youths have been fanatics. They will do whatever their Umno large brother asks them to do.

PM Najib Razak had called upon Umno to defend Putrajaya during all costs. we am not astounded if BN were to fall in GE13, Najib would deploy a army, police, Umno Youth, Perkasa as well as silat groups to stop Pakatan Rakyat as well as a rakyat from marching to Putrajaya.

Hopefully Anwar will not applaud a victory as well as remain calm to equivocate clashes with pro-Umno troublemakers. Najib needs an excuse to declare emergency rule should Pakatan come to power. - Malaysiakini

Read More @ Source

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz