In a Pekida website, a single of a mission statements read as such: "Kami berjanji mematuhi peruntukkan perlembagaan sebagai dan menjadi ahli yang berdaftar dan terus berusaha mencapai objektif pertubuhan supaya menjadi sebuah organisasi Melayu yang terulung." Can any one find error with it? What if an Indian or Chinese classification states just a same thing (replacing a word Melayu with India or Cina)?
By Hakim Joe
Pekida is an acronym for Pertubuhan Kebajikan dan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia, as well as it has such a low form which even Wikipedia does not have an entrance upon it.
Pekida did not aspect from a self-imposed hermitage until a dissemination of an SMS w! arning a bout a entertainment of Malay extremists in Kuala Lumpur in reply to a Hindraf issue in 2007. Pekida is additionally known as "Tiga Line" as well as their dwindle consists of three colours; red, yellow as well as green, mimicking a traffic lights.
Pekida is not a brand new classification as well as has been around for utterly a little time. It was formed immediately after a May thirteen Race Riots in 1969 as well as a main objective was to emanate a frontline in a eventuality of another competition riot, as well as because of a perplexing ties to a government, Pekida's major role has been somewhat diluted to include a retention of BN as a GOM as well as henceforth a pointed impasse as a major force to interrupt a Opposition as with a Perak Political Crisis in 2008 as well as Ops Lalang in 1987.
Pekida is not an removed classification either. Since a pregnancy forty as well as some-more years ago, a web of members include many highly placed domestic as well as military figures including prime ministers, cupboard members, supervision officials as well as tall ranking military as well as military
personnel. As such, it is a ! well-fun ded as well as well-org! anized g roup of paramilitary people as well as is seen to be a "fifth BN column", as well as since a Razak Administration all Menteri Besars as well as State "Pakatan Rakyat" Chiefs have been high-ranking members of Pekida.
personnel. As such, it is a ! well-fun ded as well as well-org! anized g roup of paramilitary people as well as is seen to be a "fifth BN column", as well as since a Razak Administration all Menteri Besars as well as State "Pakatan Rakyat" Chiefs have been high-ranking members of Pekida.
Both a Social Contract as well as Ketuanan Melayu principles were originated from Pekida. In a 2009 talk with a Pekida president, Jamaluddin Yusof, he said, "Ketuanan Melayu is critical because if you do not become tuan (masters) you become hamba (servants)." Does this meant which all Malays should become tuans as well as all other races exist as hambas to offer them? If such is a case, what is opposite between Ketuanan Melayu as well as Apartheid?
Pekida, like Umno, MCA as well as MIC have been all about competition segregation, utterly identical to a South Africa apartheid of before. In a 2011 address to a Pekida ubiquitous assembly, PM Najib pledged which his party, Umno, would not concede a Malay competition to be oppressed in a own land, "We will not obey even an inch!" As such, a competition issue becomes an necessary formula for BN to attempt to keep power; not social, economic! or othe r some-more critical factors.
In a Pekida website, a single of a mission statements read as such: "Kami berjanji mematuhi peruntukkan perlembagaan sebagai dan menjadi ahli yang berdaftar dan terus berusaha mencapai objektif pertubuhan supaya menjadi sebuah organisasi Melayu yang terulung."
Can any one find error with it? What if an Indian or Chinese classification states just a same thing (replacing a word Melayu with India or Cina)?
Can any one find error with it? What if an Indian or Chinese classification states just a same thing (replacing a word Melayu with India or Cina)?
For an classification which declares a defence of Malay Rights as their singular priority, it henceforth does not make much clarity when they gave official warning to a organizers of a Free Anwar 901 rally, an eventuality which has nothing to do with Malay Rights. Similar
harsh warnings were since to a BERSIH convene organizers. The subject begets right away whether Pekida is actually safegua! rding Ma lays or Umno.
harsh warnings were since to a BERSIH convene organizers. The subject begets right away whether Pekida is actually safegua! rding Ma lays or Umno.
In a recently expelled film KL Gangster, it was exposed which a film producers used utterly a few of Pekida's "secret codes" in their scenes as well as which a KL Gangster hierarchy was additionally formed upon a Pekida own power pyramid. Kumpulan 77, Kumpulan Merah, Semerah
Padi as well as Pewaris have been all gangs formed by Pekida members of whom has gone rogue, so says Pekida (after a recover of a movie, not before) as well as hence their house cleaning these days.
Padi as well as Pewaris have been all gangs formed by Pekida members of whom has gone rogue, so says Pekida (after a recover of a movie, not before) as well as hence their house cleaning these days.
So, is Pekida an organized group of ratified gangsters (RM13 membership fees), a Malay Rights guardian (are they absconding a Sultans' job?), an Umno associate or a non-racist (even yet they only accept Malays), non-political (even yet a majority of their
leaders have been from Umno) as well as non-government organization?
Read More @ Source leaders have been from Umno) as well as non-government organization?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment