Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim had upon December 19 posted his media have a difference upon his blog, demanding Minister of Information, Communication as well as Culture Rais Yatim apologize to BJ Habibie for a 'bombs'Zainuddin Maidindropped upon a former Indonesian president.
What ZAM wrote in Utusan Malaysia drew criticism from both side of a Strait of Malacca, generally in Indonesia.
However, a essay is personally his as well as didn't reflect a government's view. Some contents of it were too harsh though ZAM must have his own valid reasons in you do so.
And if there is someone whoshould apologize to Habibieand a Indonesians, its ZAM... as well as not Rais. So, Anwar's demand for Rais' reparation was all absurd as well as undoubtedly was meant to dramatise a issue.
I don't know is a have a difference was discussed by PM Najib as well as PresidentBambang Susilo Yudhoyonoduring a latter's visit to Malaysia a couple of days ago though as distant as a government-to-government ties go, family are stillvery much intact.
Anwar has been criticising Rais for being austere of ZAM's article, not realising it was all an individual's perception of Habibie. Unless ZAM is still with a Cabinet, afterwards reparation from a supervision is mandatory as it caused a little st! irs to a diplomatic relation.
And why should Rais apologise? He didn't have accusations like 'pengkhianat bangsa' of any sorts?
My reading of a issue is, it was morally as well as diplomatically wrong for Habibie to come as well as secrete an oppositional viewpoint to a supervision as well as statute BN...but no personality or a padt personality should label any one as 'pengkhianat bangsa', generally being a Muslim as such.
I additionally consider ZAM owes Habibie a personal reparation nonetheless not a made at home one. ZAM acted upon his own as well as a supervision played no partial in it.
At a other end of a spectrum, Anwar felt ineffective in his onslaught against BN leaders! hip, hence indispensable a walking hang from a former boss of Indonesia. ZAM should have bloody both personalities though not by labeling Habibie 'pengkhianat'.
And you consider Malaysians would determine which Habibie deserves a made at home spanking by nosiness in a made at home politics. We had, all a while stayed away from stepping into a Indonesian politics. As much as you do not interfere with theirs, they should additionally keep out of ours!
However, Habibie went a bit overboard by entrance to Malaysia as well as 'team up' with Pakatan Rakyat leaders. When he was boss as well as visited Malaysia, he was such an darling as well as much respected for his standpoint which governing body aside, both countries should concrete all ties to move a peoples together.
Even as an ex president, he shouldn't be you do so - engaging himself with PR as well as display open await for them. If he wants, do it in discreet!
ZAM got a little certain points, except for calling Habibie 'pengkhianat' as well as 'a dog of imperialism', a terminologies which won Habibie sympathy back home.
Now a round is at ZAM's feet... not Rais' or Najib's or others!
What ZAM wrote in Utusan Malaysia drew criticism from both side of a Strait of Malacca, generally in Indonesia.
And if there is someone whoshould apologize to Habibieand a Indonesians, its ZAM... as well as not Rais. So, Anwar's demand for Rais' reparation was all absurd as well as undoubtedly was meant to dramatise a issue.
I don't know is a have a difference was discussed by PM Najib as well as PresidentBambang Susilo Yudhoyonoduring a latter's visit to Malaysia a couple of days ago though as distant as a government-to-government ties go, family are stillvery much intact.
Anwar has been criticising Rais for being austere of ZAM's article, not realising it was all an individual's perception of Habibie. Unless ZAM is still with a Cabinet, afterwards reparation from a supervision is mandatory as it caused a little st! irs to a diplomatic relation.
And why should Rais apologise? He didn't have accusations like 'pengkhianat bangsa' of any sorts?
My reading of a issue is, it was morally as well as diplomatically wrong for Habibie to come as well as secrete an oppositional viewpoint to a supervision as well as statute BN...but no personality or a padt personality should label any one as 'pengkhianat bangsa', generally being a Muslim as such.
I additionally consider ZAM owes Habibie a personal reparation nonetheless not a made at home one. ZAM acted upon his own as well as a supervision played no partial in it.
At a other end of a spectrum, Anwar felt ineffective in his onslaught against BN leaders! hip, hence indispensable a walking hang from a former boss of Indonesia. ZAM should have bloody both personalities though not by labeling Habibie 'pengkhianat'.
And you consider Malaysians would determine which Habibie deserves a made at home spanking by nosiness in a made at home politics. We had, all a while stayed away from stepping into a Indonesian politics. As much as you do not interfere with theirs, they should additionally keep out of ours!
However, Habibie went a bit overboard by entrance to Malaysia as well as 'team up' with Pakatan Rakyat leaders. When he was boss as well as visited Malaysia, he was such an darling as well as much respected for his standpoint which governing body aside, both countries should concrete all ties to move a peoples together.
Even as an ex president, he shouldn't be you do so - engaging himself with PR as well as display open await for them. If he wants, do it in discreet!
ZAM got a little certain points, except for calling Habibie 'pengkhianat' as well as 'a dog of imperialism', a terminologies which won Habibie sympathy back home.
Now a round is at ZAM's feet... not Rais' or Najib's or others!
Posted bybujai
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment