Utter confusion.
If you have perceived a notice of speeding underneath a AES system, do you right away pay up or not? What about if you perceived a notice underneath AES as well as then a summons from military for a same offence, what recourse do you have?
The government has pronounced which it is merely studying a authorised aspects of a AES complement as well as not suspending it. But what if a authorised issues cannot be resolved? If which is a case, will a Parliamanet rectify existent laws only for a sake of AES?
If there are authorised issues as well as these cannot be resolved, what about those who have been summoned to court as well as paid up, do they get a refund?
We have listened which a complement has been underneath study for most years. From a mouths of those Highers-up (and as if correct people), you would consider which this complement is almost perfect. Why haven't a authorised issues been deliberate during a supposedly consummate study period?
Aren't those obliged too reckless to defend a complement when not every aspect has been entirely studied? (If they have been entirely studied, a AG would not have to review to reviewing). Are they not making fools of themselves?
I am all for stricter enforcement, as posted in my previous post on AES. But i have been saying which coercion should not be outsourced, as well as it should be done by a military as well as JPJ officers, as well as not outsourced to private companies whose especially role is to have money.
So now, amidst these confusion, you await further clarifications from all those 'wise' people.
(courtesy of piggybankblog)
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment