The problem with Opposition supporters Ooi Kok Hin


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhkUB7OSgZtZuFLnOSVny6AcoQUei6eleI8U_TQ8aeiQGuqkTwlEVe_A5g14mrDH31mNixHX109lxZLYscbMVJJZyauzOJs2KsmnO72QlStl8x56_40gbPTdh3YxUjvbwvWgWiol9P4nLA/s1600/logo+umno.jpg
Look during the "Comments" section inMalaysiakini, Malaysia TodayandMalaysian Insider.
They have sum contempt for the investiture as well as all compared with the investiture is wrong. They have this ideal thought which by becoming different the supervision as well as leave it to the politicians, things will be better.


The top form of nationalism is dissent.
This allude to is mostly used to describe the incident in which you criticism opposite something you love, even during the risks of harming ourselves, when it goes in the wrong direction. Opposition supporters attribute their gainsay to their adore for the country, which is the great thing. However, most of them see things differently when this allude to is practical to them.
Opposition enthusiasts don't appreciate it when you criticism their wrongdoings.
They'd call you "pengkhianat, katak, turncoat, UMNO dogs etc."
They see their leaders as saints as well as the alternative side as devils. For them, political contest is as simplistic as the choice in in between great as well as evil.
Like it or not, your favorite politicians have been not saints. They have mistakes as well as take risks; most evidently give their words upon as well most populist promises.
Two Wrongs Don't Make One Right
Take the Malay members' defeat during DAP's Central Executive Committee (CEC) election. When criticism poured in, DAP's hardcore su! pporters brushed in reserve those criticism as well as forked during UMNO's mono-ethnic composition. They merely conflict their critic's characters as well as not the argument; this is known as ad hominem. That is not the actuality for DAP delegates' secular preferences.
We already know which none of UMNO, MCA as well as MIC is an inclusive Malaysian party. Their secular foundation is the contradiction to their mission; this is an omen to their failures to combine Malaysians.
Perhaps, race-based parties were needed in the early 20thcentury, though for distant as well prolonged given then, they have been impediments to unity. DAP's membership is open to all though its delegates have been still some-more gentle in guileless people of their own race.
Unless DAP wants to go upon which pathway, DAP leaders as well as members need to demeanour during themselves in the mirror instead of keeping the blind eye to their own secular preferences.
you am not observant which the Malay possibilities should win due to their race, though as the national party, the DAP should have enough Malays who have been as capable as the others.
If this is not true, afterwards the DAP's goal of an inclusive Malaysian multitude is far-fetch, given the celebration itself is unable to be multiracial 47 years after its formation. And if this goes on, Pakatan Rakyat's governing body is just similar to Barisan Nasional; DAP will take care of non-Malays as well as PAS will go to the Malay areas.
Take politicians who jump ships. Opposition supporters welcome those who jump to their side. They have been treated similar to heroes. "He realizes the truth during last! He's cordial as well as assimilated the struggle!" Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as well as his men have been trying hard to partisan some-more of such heroes in Sabah as well as Sarawak.
But when their own men jumped to the alternative side, all hell breaks loose.
"She's the square o! f crap! He betrayed the people's trust! He has been bought!"
It's comical to see people's hypocrisy in action. As you see it, people elect their YB to paint their interests which have been in line with the YB's party. If the YB decides to jump ship, (it's your freedom to associate), he or she can do though must resign as well as mount as the new candidate. It doesn't matter which direction he or she jumps to.
you stop which Karpal Singh was the usually one who spoke out when the barbarous Trojan horse jumped to Pakatan. It took the fall of the state supervision to have the others collect up the beliefs they deserted when the waves favors them.
Check your contribution prior to you shoot
A recent video as well as an essay held my attention. Both have been widely misinterpreted by antithesis supporters who trumpeted which Malaysia is the worst-ranked nation in corruption.
This video is misleading. Look during the title as well as the description.
Compare it to what Transparency International actually did. It usually compares thirty countries, not the 200 in the world.
And 3,000 executives in thirty countries next to 100 samples per country.
That is approach as well tiny to produce conclusive findings. (A full of health sample is 1,000, the customary research criteria.) This is called Hasty Generalisation.
Check the contribution prior to you cheer upon when alternative people impugn the country. You hate BN all you want, though you shouldn't let which view ruin what you feel about your country. Corruption is bad though there have been times you can't let the political partisanship blinds the judgment.
Look during the "Comments" section inMalaysiakini, Malaysia TodayandMalaysian Insider.
They have sum contempt for the investiture as well as all compared with the investiture is wrong. They have this ideal thought which by becoming diffe! rent the supervision as well as leave it to the politicians, things will be better.
These people need to take the demeanour during Egypt, Libya as well as Japan, which experienced the shift in supervision after the prolonged period.
Most people don't realise which series is the easy part. What happens after the series is the hardest part. Political gridlock as well as stagnancy have been commonplace as partners have been unable to decide what to do.
Aftermath
The antithesis supporters have been as well keen to worship their celebration as well as reject all others who impugn or remonstrate with them.
Opposition parties have usual goals as well as usual enemies, though which doesn't stop which the actuality which they must sort out their differences as well as agree upon usual policies. So far, Pakatan's Common Policy Platform as well as the Orange Book have been rhetorical promises such as the aforementioned populist actions as well as eradication of corruption.
There have been no specifics as well as detailed planning upon how to achieve all their promises. Also, notice which DAP as well as PAS have been two ends of the political spectrum: the form of governance in in between secularism as well as theocracy.
How secular or how Islamic will you be underneath the Pakatan federal government?
We merit to know, as well as you should care enough to ask tough questions. Instead of happily echoing the voices of those in the bandwagon, you must ask: Where have been the horses receiving us to?
you once asked the couple of people about Raja Petra. you asked them what they consider about his writings as well as ideals.
"He is unpredictable," they said.
"You never know what he is going to say; suddenly he'd be aggressive the celebration he supports. you consider he is being used by BN now." you am disappointed.
They just wish to hear what the! y wish t o hear.
They just wish RPK to always conflict BN. If he criticises the opposition, he is indeterminate as well as he is the puppet.
Folks, the top form of nationalism is dissent.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: