You can damn with gloomy praise; you can also grasp the same with an aria of it.
An e.g. of the initial was when George Bernard Shaw lengthened dual tickets to the opening night of the single of his plays to Winston Churchill. "One for you as good as an additional for the friend, if you have one," jibed the playwright.
Britain's wartime leader volleyed back: He pronounced he would similar to to attend the opening night's programme though official duties prevented him; however, he would be giveaway to attend the second night's staging, "if there is one."
Private eye P Balasubramaniam's lawyer, Americk Singh Sidhu, laid it upon copiously whenhe praisedfellow authorised practitioner Cecil Abraham's integrity which he pronounced was the scapegoat between lawyers in the latter's 40 years of service to the Malaysian Bar.
Americk (right) pronounced he could not conceive which someone of Abraham's vaunted stature would aspect the sketch up of the false orthodox stipulation such as carpet trader Deepak Jaikishan had indicated was the box with Balasubramaniam's second SD which topsy-turvy the sensational avowals contained in his first.
Given the sobriety of the contents of his initial SD, elements of which strew light upon the 2006 attempted murder of the Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu, there was no taking the make the difference lightly.
Days ! have passed given Americk unequivocally vouched for Abraham's probity, though Abraham himself is seemingly unruffled by the brouhaha, lan! d his co unsel in the face of the accost of imprecations.
The chairperson of the single of the panels within the ambit of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commissioninterjectedin the maturation play of the paradoxical orthodox declarations as good as the attendant issue of shortcoming for them by revealing which Abraham had zero to do with the MACC's decision to tighten the review of Balasubramaniam's opposing declarations. Abraham (left) is the member of the row tasked with reviewing the MACC's operational procedures.
Here was the box of pithy individuals rising to verbalise up for someone who assumingly opts for the overpower which is not of the kind which purveyor of aphoristic maxims, La Rochefoucauld, hold was the symbol of the male who distrusts himself.
This overpower is presumably the choice of the single who seems intent upon tiptoeing through the frightful thicket, aware or not of what the poet Dante pronounced about the hottest places in ruin being indifferent for those who in times of great dignified crisis say their neutrality (read: silence).
The law is the charged field
Lawyers have been lerned to deal with complex situations by anticipating both precedents as good as innovative pragmatic ! procedure! s for traffic with them.
The deeper their believe of precedents, both inside as good as outward of the law, the likelier it is which their exertions would outcome in the protection of tellurian values - similar to allowing the trusting to go giveaway as good as punishing the guilty.
But if it's usually the law they know as good as small else, they would shortly find which the law is the charged field where beliefs migh! t be tra duced by interests, as good as interests might be disguised as principles.
Knowing many law but, some-more importantly, the philosophic matrix from which emerged the Greco-Roman statues which shaped the basement of English common law, the famed American fury member Oliver Wendell Holmes done this regard upon contrasting dispositions individuals might move to the use of the profession:
"If you want to know the law as good as zero else, you contingency look during it as the bad man, who cares usually for the material consequences which such believe enables him to predict, not as the good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, either inside the law or outward of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience."
Troubling small scruple which - "the vaguer sanctions of conscience."
These valid no difficulty during all to the counsel Vernon Jordan, Bill Clinton's amoral chum whose recommendation was sought in the days when the latter was readying for the run for the US presidency.
According to the autobiography of Clinton by David Maraniss, Jordan, renowned polite rights advocate, proffered the simple recommendation when the grapevine began to hum with legends of the Arkansas governor's womanising as good as the discuss between Clinton's advisers revolved around either he should wait for jou! rnalists ! to raise the make the difference or simply preempt them.
Jordan's recommendation was, "Screw 'em! Don't discuss it 'em anything!"
Some years later, when an additional sex scandal occurred upon Clinton's watch during the White House (1992-2000), Jordan was purported to have told Monica Lewinsky, an novice suspected to have had an affair with the president: "They can't prove anything. Your answer is, 'It didn't happen. It wasn't me.' "
At least, Jordan's inclination for rejection pertained to cases involving infidelity, not murder.
A attempted murder many foul
But you know which for an reliable customary to hold, it! conting ency dissuade lying in all circumstances, in any box of the bulk or lack of the dignified misdemeanour entailed.
Whither the reliable customary when you have been faced with the overpower of peripheral players in the box of the attempted murder many foul, as was Altantuya Shaariibuu's (left) killing.
The overpower is lawyerly; it is not impugnable. In the end, it creates the indicate which law alone, no make the difference how comprehensive, cannot assure use of what is implicitly imperative.
Back in the 17th century, Hugo Grotius, the father of modern law, quoted with approval the recommendation which the classical Greek playwright Euripides in 'The Trojan Woman' put in the mouth of Aga! memnon ad! sauce Pyrrhus: "What the law does not dissuade then let contrition forbid."
This counsel retains the dignified worth. While the law as good as the practitioners have been intensely important for the existence of polite society, they cannot be deliberate sufficient guarantees of tellurian decency.
The grant Dr Samuel Johnson, the many quotable of writers after Shakespeare, done for his element of not speaking ill of the male at the back of his back was good taken.
On the single occasion, the sage was derisive about the male who had just left his company though Johnson pronounced he believed which the male he was referring to was an attorney.
An e.g. of the initial was when George Bernard Shaw lengthened dual tickets to the opening night of the single of his plays to Winston Churchill. "One for you as good as an additional for the friend, if you have one," jibed the playwright.
Britain's wartime leader volleyed back: He pronounced he would similar to to attend the opening night's programme though official duties prevented him; however, he would be giveaway to attend the second night's staging, "if there is one."
Private eye P Balasubramaniam's lawyer, Americk Singh Sidhu, laid it upon copiously whenhe praisedfellow authorised practitioner Cecil Abraham's integrity which he pronounced was the scapegoat between lawyers in the latter's 40 years of service to the Malaysian Bar.Americk (right) pronounced he could not conceive which someone of Abraham's vaunted stature would aspect the sketch up of the false orthodox stipulation such as carpet trader Deepak Jaikishan had indicated was the box with Balasubramaniam's second SD which topsy-turvy the sensational avowals contained in his first.
Given the sobriety of the contents of his initial SD, elements of which strew light upon the 2006 attempted murder of the Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu, there was no taking the make the difference lightly.
Days ! have passed given Americk unequivocally vouched for Abraham's probity, though Abraham himself is seemingly unruffled by the brouhaha, lan! d his co unsel in the face of the accost of imprecations.
The chairperson of the single of the panels within the ambit of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commissioninterjectedin the maturation play of the paradoxical orthodox declarations as good as the attendant issue of shortcoming for them by revealing which Abraham had zero to do with the MACC's decision to tighten the review of Balasubramaniam's opposing declarations. Abraham (left) is the member of the row tasked with reviewing the MACC's operational procedures.Here was the box of pithy individuals rising to verbalise up for someone who assumingly opts for the overpower which is not of the kind which purveyor of aphoristic maxims, La Rochefoucauld, hold was the symbol of the male who distrusts himself.
This overpower is presumably the choice of the single who seems intent upon tiptoeing through the frightful thicket, aware or not of what the poet Dante pronounced about the hottest places in ruin being indifferent for those who in times of great dignified crisis say their neutrality (read: silence).
The law is the charged field
Lawyers have been lerned to deal with complex situations by anticipating both precedents as good as innovative pragmatic ! procedure! s for traffic with them.
The deeper their believe of precedents, both inside as good as outward of the law, the likelier it is which their exertions would outcome in the protection of tellurian values - similar to allowing the trusting to go giveaway as good as punishing the guilty.
But if it's usually the law they know as good as small else, they would shortly find which the law is the charged field where beliefs migh! t be tra duced by interests, as good as interests might be disguised as principles.
Knowing many law but, some-more importantly, the philosophic matrix from which emerged the Greco-Roman statues which shaped the basement of English common law, the famed American fury member Oliver Wendell Holmes done this regard upon contrasting dispositions individuals might move to the use of the profession:
"If you want to know the law as good as zero else, you contingency look during it as the bad man, who cares usually for the material consequences which such believe enables him to predict, not as the good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, either inside the law or outward of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience."
Troubling small scruple which - "the vaguer sanctions of conscience."
These valid no difficulty during all to the counsel Vernon Jordan, Bill Clinton's amoral chum whose recommendation was sought in the days when the latter was readying for the run for the US presidency.
According to the autobiography of Clinton by David Maraniss, Jordan, renowned polite rights advocate, proffered the simple recommendation when the grapevine began to hum with legends of the Arkansas governor's womanising as good as the discuss between Clinton's advisers revolved around either he should wait for jou! rnalists ! to raise the make the difference or simply preempt them.
Jordan's recommendation was, "Screw 'em! Don't discuss it 'em anything!"
Some years later, when an additional sex scandal occurred upon Clinton's watch during the White House (1992-2000), Jordan was purported to have told Monica Lewinsky, an novice suspected to have had an affair with the president: "They can't prove anything. Your answer is, 'It didn't happen. It wasn't me.' "
At least, Jordan's inclination for rejection pertained to cases involving infidelity, not murder.
A attempted murder many foul
But you know which for an reliable customary to hold, it! conting ency dissuade lying in all circumstances, in any box of the bulk or lack of the dignified misdemeanour entailed.
Whither the reliable customary when you have been faced with the overpower of peripheral players in the box of the attempted murder many foul, as was Altantuya Shaariibuu's (left) killing.The overpower is lawyerly; it is not impugnable. In the end, it creates the indicate which law alone, no make the difference how comprehensive, cannot assure use of what is implicitly imperative.
Back in the 17th century, Hugo Grotius, the father of modern law, quoted with approval the recommendation which the classical Greek playwright Euripides in 'The Trojan Woman' put in the mouth of Aga! memnon ad! sauce Pyrrhus: "What the law does not dissuade then let contrition forbid."
This counsel retains the dignified worth. While the law as good as the practitioners have been intensely important for the existence of polite society, they cannot be deliberate sufficient guarantees of tellurian decency.
The grant Dr Samuel Johnson, the many quotable of writers after Shakespeare, done for his element of not speaking ill of the male at the back of his back was good taken.
On the single occasion, the sage was derisive about the male who had just left his company though Johnson pronounced he believed which the male he was referring to was an attorney.
TERENCE NETTO has been the journalist for tighten upon 4 decades. He likes the function since it puts him in contact with the venerable without being under the prerequisite to admire them. It is the preferred function for the spirit which finds energy erotically appealing as good as the practice abhorrent.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment