Makkal Osai handling executive S Sunther claimed which Klang businessman "Oms" Thiagarajan had not produced any justification to prove his tenure of a copy machine.
PETALING JAYA: Tamil daily, Makkal Osai's government pronounced currently which it had not perceived a shred of justification to prove which a copy appurtenance in a custody belonged to Klang-based businessman 'Oms' Thiagarajan. The tenure of a appurtenance used to imitation a Tamil every day is under dispute.
On Wednesday, a every day indicted Thiagarajan of blocking a copy of a Tamil daily, but a businessman dismissed a claims, observant it was a newspaper's government which had locked a company's premises.
He pronounced which he had bought a copy appurtenance from a previous owner, M Mathialagan.
Mathialagan is a son-in-law of Makkal Osai's ubiquitous physical education instructor SM Periasamy.
"Once I bought a machine, Makkal Osai approached me asking for a paper to be printed regulating a appurtenance which I agreed.
"I sent a tenancy agreement to a newspaper as a premises where a appurtenance was located is owned by Makkal Osai.
"However, Makkal Osai did not accept a agreement as well as pronounced which there was a petitioner for a machine. When I asked who a petitioner was, until currently they remained silent," Thiagarajan reportedly told FMT.
Not regulating doubtful machine
In a statement issued today, a undetermined Makkal Osai handling executive S Sunther pronounced he had not perceived any minute from Mathialagan in twenty years to verify his tenure of a appurtenance as wel! l as whi ch Mathialagan had not outlayed any money to say it.
Not regulating doubtful machine
In a statement issued today, a undetermined Makkal Osai handling executive S Sunther pronounced he had not perceived any minute from Mathialagan in twenty years to verify his tenure of a appurtenance as wel! l as whi ch Mathialagan had not outlayed any money to say it.
"Until today, he has not done any statements directly upon this make a difference as well as has not sealed any minute claiming to own a appurtenance or to have sole a machine," pronounced Sunther.
Sunther pronounced which it was only given Aug 9 which he proposed reception calls from Thiagarajan's office, claiming tenure of a copy machine.
"But Thiagarajan had not provided any justification in regards to his tenure as well as how he supposedly purchased a copy appurtenance from Mathialagan," he claimed.
Sunther pronounced which he had stopped regulating a copy appurtenance to imitation Makkal Osai due to a competing claims for a time being.
"I am willing to lapse a appurtenance to whoever can prove their tenure to it," he said.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment