"Politicians as well as diapers should be changed frequently, as well as for a same reason." - Ea de Queirs
Well, it seems blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin (RPK) is in a news again. you have no idea how a "he said, he said" game in between private eye P Balasubramaniam as well as him is newsworthy, except which it proves my indicate which online broadcasting has which observable tinge of yellow in it.
you still can't assistance yet be vacant during a vitriol spewed RPK's approach by a former faithful. I've created about RPK prior to as well as have no seductiveness in indicating out a hypocrisy of his former devout admirers or a inlet of his shit-stirring posts.
When he is not feeding a sure territory of a wired Malaysian open with his carnal yet entertaining concoctions of a decrepit underbelly of a powers-that-be, which right away embody Pakatan Rakyat, he's digging around in a secular muck underneath a muhibbah spirit, gangland slaying dedicated cows of a Chinese as well as Indians (well, mostly Chinese) much as he did in his excellence days with a Malays with blog posts such as'The art of silat'and'On which sahabat karib thing again'.
Then there is something like'It is not about government, ! it is ab out us', which is another in a prolonged line of attempts to repudiate his intensely narrow-minded former in front of as well as place himself resolutely in a centre of a Malaysian body politic.
Educated readers would have regularly viewed what RPK said in his messiah days with a full of health sip of doubt as well as you hold it is they who still regularly visit his blog as well as form a majority of his readers, right away which he has managed to piss off both sides of a domestic divide.
Near eremite showdown
So yet you have no seductiveness in his feud with Balasubramaniam, you did find his blog post'An counter impossible to beat'meandering yet in conclusion enchanting if flawed. No doubt for most Pakatan supporters whatever he writes (now) is verboten by their alliance groupthink, yet you consider he raises a little enchanting points about a inlet of a BN-Pakatan dispute yet he misses distant too most along a way.
The central topic of his justification is which a Najib Razak regime's first adversaries have been a conviction as well as idea which Pakatan has managed to strap for their domestic benefit.
you still can't assistance yet be vacant during a vitriol spewed RPK's approach by a former faithful. I've created about RPK prior to as well as have no seductiveness in indicating out a hypocrisy of his former devout admirers or a inlet of his shit-stirring posts.
When he is not feeding a sure territory of a wired Malaysian open with his carnal yet entertaining concoctions of a decrepit underbelly of a powers-that-be, which right away embody Pakatan Rakyat, he's digging around in a secular muck underneath a muhibbah spirit, gangland slaying dedicated cows of a Chinese as well as Indians (well, mostly Chinese) much as he did in his excellence days with a Malays with blog posts such as'The art of silat'and'On which sahabat karib thing again'.Then there is something like'It is not about government, ! it is ab out us', which is another in a prolonged line of attempts to repudiate his intensely narrow-minded former in front of as well as place himself resolutely in a centre of a Malaysian body politic.
Educated readers would have regularly viewed what RPK said in his messiah days with a full of health sip of doubt as well as you hold it is they who still regularly visit his blog as well as form a majority of his readers, right away which he has managed to piss off both sides of a domestic divide.
Near eremite showdown
So yet you have no seductiveness in his feud with Balasubramaniam, you did find his blog post'An counter impossible to beat'meandering yet in conclusion enchanting if flawed. No doubt for most Pakatan supporters whatever he writes (now) is verboten by their alliance groupthink, yet you consider he raises a little enchanting points about a inlet of a BN-Pakatan dispute yet he misses distant too most along a way.
The central topic of his justification is which a Najib Razak regime's first adversaries have been a conviction as well as idea which Pakatan has managed to strap for their domestic benefit.
He characterises a intensely narrow-minded inlet of this dispute as a near eremite showdown in between those who have conviction which their idea in Pakatan would result in changes for a better (even yet they have no genuine justification of this) if Pakatan ever came in to federal power as well as those who wish to maintain a standing quo, desiring a devil you know is better than a a single you don't.
In his'It is not about government, it is about us'post, he articulates sure contradictions of a lack of 'idealism' (which ironically is a categorical promotion apparatus of a Pakatan machine) with regards to sure elemental issues as well as policies in Pakatan supporters as well as their realpolitik idea which a usually approach for 'change' is kicking out BN as well as afterwards operative out a simple framework with a idea which any problems would be handled by Pakatan in an egalitarian manner.
In alternative words, they (Pakatan supporters) do not want to put in a effort for fighting for common principles or policies which differentiate them from BN, all a while coasting on a corruption scandals which feed a need for 'change'. Any attempt to indicate this out is perceived as possibly a Machiavellian workings of pro-BN trolls or contrarian opinions which hamper a swell to Putrajaya.
While you do hold which conviction as well as idea have been adversaries of a Najib regime, you hold they have been delegate in nature. you consider a first counter is hate. There is a sure section, maybe a sizeable territory of a voting open who hates BN as well as has no genuine seductiveness in questioning a ideological foundations or lack thereof of their elite domestic alliance, except as a vehicle to replace BN on a Putrajaya throne.
Ironically it is RPK which brought to bring to boil this hatred with his shit-stirring posts in his messianic heyday. By gangland slaying Malay dedicated cows as well as exposing in a most polemical of demeanour a malfeasances of BN as well as positioning Pakatan as a white knight which would banish a BN immorality from a land, he set up a personification house which he finds so frustrating now.
As Helen Ang (left), a bte noire of most DAP supporters, points out in her various contrarian posts (which is a great thing), Pakatan supporters have no complaint indicating out a 'hate' spewing onward from BN, yet have no qualms about enchanting in hatred of their own.
Indeed cruise a comments territory ofMalaysiakiniand you would be surprised (or maybe you won't be) of a hateful debate which passes most often though notice since it's possibly directed during BN or during ideas which don't sit comfortably with Pakatan supporters.
Her'Haram sokong DAP not counterpart design of ABU, meh?'and'Kafir rating downgraded'posts have been in my perspective problematic (seeing as how you am narrow-minded in nature) yet yet illuminating on a hypocritical inlet of oppositional governing body yet also for aged timers similar to me with some-more than a passing laxity with opposition parties prior to their revamped image, intensely perceptive.
Seething resentment
Before there was 'PAS for all', you used to hang out with a "bad old" PAS boys who had no complaint calling for a tumble of a "maha firaun" as well as his inhuman silencing of opponents regulating a ISA as well as his regime's systemic corruption, yet had no complaint commanding Islam regardless of a objections of a non-Muslims.
These same constant (sic) Muslims have been partial of a 'new' PAS, swapping in between seething resentment during being accused of being pro-BN lackeys if they voice their agree for hudud or any alternative Islamic preoccupations as well as rabid mania of ejecting Umno by any equates to required even if it equates to carrying an undeclared ceasefire with a heathens unt! il a tim e is developed for a eremite revival.
Ang's Pakatan baiting'Logo Hari Merdeka Pakatan ada elemen-elemen Kristian'post was a much indispensable master category in Internet trolling if usually because it brought out a infamous undercurrents of Pakatan (DAP specifically) hatred mongers who view any Chinese not understanding of a aims of DAP (or Pakatan) as self-loathing cretins - a common attempted murder fantasies were spewed her approach - as well as a renouned canard which usually non-Umno Malay/Muslims were acceptable in this brand new Malaysia.
Indeed any Malay 'intellectual' who engages in open self-flagellation all a while partaking in broadsides against Umno is welcomed as an enlightened Malay yet anguish to a Malay who points out a actuality which a so-called systemic injustice goes palm in palm with a ubiquitous injustice which afflicts this nation or makes a defence of Umno ideology, which is not distant off from Pakatan's own convictions except though a decades of abuse. This final partial is an critical point, which would explain a 'faith" aspect in RPK's argument.
This is because you have a "why can't they get on with a programme" attitude when it comes to standing quo agitators similar to Hindraf. This is because these groups have been demonised by a zealots secure in their multiracial/cultural camouflage yet displaying no genuine joining to a ideal.
Of course, there will regularly be those who self-righteously scream down those who pull courtesy to this actuality as carrying finished nothing for 55 years (how absurd), yet do not seem to have a complaint with a inmates using a haven in their brand new found purpo! se as li berators. Frogs not usually leap, they breed.
Umno, of course, has already proven which it is incompetent in these power/perception games. So prolonged being used to locking up those who disagree with them as well as relying solely on their promotion collection has left them unable to form a awake plan of traffic with Pakatan as well as a wild west frontier of a brand new media. "Blunder after fumble as well as still standing by dodgy means" should be their Merdeka Day slogan.
So, in my perspective RPK has got it rather wrong. you consider both a arguments paint a bleak design of a domestic landscape of Malaysia. Each side is peddling a opposite thing, personification on a sentiments. Umno is peddling fear, while Pakatan hope.
There have been most who would censure Umno for this, as well as righteously a large apportionment of a censure should go to them, yet this piece really isn't about Umno or BN. And this might be a reason because most would find it unpalatable.
In his'It is not about government, it is about us'post, he articulates sure contradictions of a lack of 'idealism' (which ironically is a categorical promotion apparatus of a Pakatan machine) with regards to sure elemental issues as well as policies in Pakatan supporters as well as their realpolitik idea which a usually approach for 'change' is kicking out BN as well as afterwards operative out a simple framework with a idea which any problems would be handled by Pakatan in an egalitarian manner.In alternative words, they (Pakatan supporters) do not want to put in a effort for fighting for common principles or policies which differentiate them from BN, all a while coasting on a corruption scandals which feed a need for 'change'. Any attempt to indicate this out is perceived as possibly a Machiavellian workings of pro-BN trolls or contrarian opinions which hamper a swell to Putrajaya.
While you do hold which conviction as well as idea have been adversaries of a Najib regime, you hold they have been delegate in nature. you consider a first counter is hate. There is a sure section, maybe a sizeable territory of a voting open who hates BN as well as has no genuine seductiveness in questioning a ideological foundations or lack thereof of their elite domestic alliance, except as a vehicle to replace BN on a Putrajaya throne.
Ironically it is RPK which brought to bring to boil this hatred with his shit-stirring posts in his messianic heyday. By gangland slaying Malay dedicated cows as well as exposing in a most polemical of demeanour a malfeasances of BN as well as positioning Pakatan as a white knight which would banish a BN immorality from a land, he set up a personification house which he finds so frustrating now.
As Helen Ang (left), a bte noire of most DAP supporters, points out in her various contrarian posts (which is a great thing), Pakatan supporters have no complaint indicating out a 'hate' spewing onward from BN, yet have no qualms about enchanting in hatred of their own.Indeed cruise a comments territory ofMalaysiakiniand you would be surprised (or maybe you won't be) of a hateful debate which passes most often though notice since it's possibly directed during BN or during ideas which don't sit comfortably with Pakatan supporters.
Her'Haram sokong DAP not counterpart design of ABU, meh?'and'Kafir rating downgraded'posts have been in my perspective problematic (seeing as how you am narrow-minded in nature) yet yet illuminating on a hypocritical inlet of oppositional governing body yet also for aged timers similar to me with some-more than a passing laxity with opposition parties prior to their revamped image, intensely perceptive.
Seething resentment
Before there was 'PAS for all', you used to hang out with a "bad old" PAS boys who had no complaint calling for a tumble of a "maha firaun" as well as his inhuman silencing of opponents regulating a ISA as well as his regime's systemic corruption, yet had no complaint commanding Islam regardless of a objections of a non-Muslims.
These same constant (sic) Muslims have been partial of a 'new' PAS, swapping in between seething resentment during being accused of being pro-BN lackeys if they voice their agree for hudud or any alternative Islamic preoccupations as well as rabid mania of ejecting Umno by any equates to required even if it equates to carrying an undeclared ceasefire with a heathens unt! il a tim e is developed for a eremite revival.
Ang's Pakatan baiting'Logo Hari Merdeka Pakatan ada elemen-elemen Kristian'post was a much indispensable master category in Internet trolling if usually because it brought out a infamous undercurrents of Pakatan (DAP specifically) hatred mongers who view any Chinese not understanding of a aims of DAP (or Pakatan) as self-loathing cretins - a common attempted murder fantasies were spewed her approach - as well as a renouned canard which usually non-Umno Malay/Muslims were acceptable in this brand new Malaysia.Indeed any Malay 'intellectual' who engages in open self-flagellation all a while partaking in broadsides against Umno is welcomed as an enlightened Malay yet anguish to a Malay who points out a actuality which a so-called systemic injustice goes palm in palm with a ubiquitous injustice which afflicts this nation or makes a defence of Umno ideology, which is not distant off from Pakatan's own convictions except though a decades of abuse. This final partial is an critical point, which would explain a 'faith" aspect in RPK's argument.
This is because you have a "why can't they get on with a programme" attitude when it comes to standing quo agitators similar to Hindraf. This is because these groups have been demonised by a zealots secure in their multiracial/cultural camouflage yet displaying no genuine joining to a ideal.
Of course, there will regularly be those who self-righteously scream down those who pull courtesy to this actuality as carrying finished nothing for 55 years (how absurd), yet do not seem to have a complaint with a inmates using a haven in their brand new found purpo! se as li berators. Frogs not usually leap, they breed.
Umno, of course, has already proven which it is incompetent in these power/perception games. So prolonged being used to locking up those who disagree with them as well as relying solely on their promotion collection has left them unable to form a awake plan of traffic with Pakatan as well as a wild west frontier of a brand new media. "Blunder after fumble as well as still standing by dodgy means" should be their Merdeka Day slogan.
So, in my perspective RPK has got it rather wrong. you consider both a arguments paint a bleak design of a domestic landscape of Malaysia. Each side is peddling a opposite thing, personification on a sentiments. Umno is peddling fear, while Pakatan hope.
There have been most who would censure Umno for this, as well as righteously a large apportionment of a censure should go to them, yet this piece really isn't about Umno or BN. And this might be a reason because most would find it unpalatable.
S THAYAPARAN is Commander (rtd) of a Royal Malaysian Navy.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment