Just similar to in a box of religion, you reason sure views per politics. And only similar to in a box of religion, you have already motionless which is a right trail to follow as good as which is a wrong path. If you have motionless which Barisan Nasional is a right path, this is a trail you will follow never thoughts what you say. And if you have motionless which Pakatan Rakyat is a right path, this is a trail you will follow never thoughts what you say.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
In a spirit of this holy month ofRamadhan, it is my avocation as a Muslim to speak to you about Islam. It is imperative for any Muslim to dodakwah(missionary) work so as a Muslim you am only fulfilling my duty
Islam is a loyal sacrament as good as is a sacrament which replaces all progressing religions of a People of a Book. (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, etc., have been not enclosed in this difficulty of a religions of a Book).
Although Islam recognises a progressing religions of a Book, those religions have been right away abrogated as good as replaced by Islam especially since those progressing religions have over time been twisted as good as have changed as good as have been no longer a strange religions as suggested by those Prophets prior to a entrance of Muhammad.
No doubt Islam regards those progressing religions of a Book as carrying a 'Book'. However, those Books no longer exist as good as what stays today have been 'Books' orkitabswritten by male as good as have been not from God. The Qur'an, however, is a word of God since a Qur'an was suggested to Muhammad directly by a Angel Gabriel.
The law trail is Islam, a Prophet of Islam is Muhammad, as good as a usually Book from God, referred to as Alla! h, is a Qur'an. Hence your salvation is Islam as good as not any of a alternative fake religions. And by embracing Islam you have been guaranteed heaven. By rejecting Islam you have been cursed for an perpetuity in hell.
It is my duty, therefore, to invite you to welcome Islam, a loyal religion. Whether your heart opens to Islam is quite up to Allah. My avocation is only to broach this summary of Islam to you as good as it is Allah's will to pierce you in to usurpation Islam.
******************************************
Okay, which is part a single of my article today. How most of you from a hundreds of thousands ofMalaysia Todayreaders can accept my message? Have you convinced 10,000 of you who have been non-Muslims to right away welcome Islam? What about 1,000 then? Okay, has even only a single of you seen a light as good as have right away motionless to turn a Muslim?
Chances are, most of you already have a clever opinion upon either Islam is a right sacrament for you. Most likely, if you hold in Islam, you would have already turn a Muslim by now. The actuality which you have been not a Muslim is since you do not accept what you have written in part a single of this article above.
Can you shift your thoughts about Islam? No doubt you already have clever views per Islam though is there anything you can contend which will have you shift your perspective as good as remonstrate you to welcome Islam as good as turn a Muslim?
you doubt it. you suspect there is really tiny you can contend to have you turn a Muslim. You have already motionless what you wish to be as good as a Muslim is certainly not what you wish to be.
you can speak compartment a cows come home as good as write an article a day for a next 10 years as good as still this is not starting to lean you as good as have you shift your view. If you have already motionless you have been not starting to turn a Muslim you have been substantial! ly never starting to turn a Muslim never thoughts how most you try to remonstrate you otherwise. That is a being of a matter. And it would be a good achievement if you can finally get even only a single of you to turn a Muslim. And if 10 of you welcome Islam, which would be almost a miracle.
The long as good as a short of it is you all already have sure views. And these views have been really clever views. And it will be really difficult, if not impossible, for me to get you to shift these views. you can try, of course, though you will not succeed. The effort you need to put in to a pursuit of perplexing to have you shift your perspective will be colossal whilst a result will be dismal. So improved you do not bother since it is starting to be a sum waste of time as good as an effort which will only offend you.
Let us interpret which to your views per alternative matters, governing body as an example. You competence contend which sacrament is another issue altogether as good as should not be alike to politics. Hence you cannot compare sacrament to politics. you am not comparing sacrament to politics. you am articulate about how you reason sure views as good as how it is not which easy to lean you as good as remonstrate you to shift your view.
Just similar to in a box of religion, you reason sure views per politics. And only similar to in a box of religion, you have already motionless which is a right trail to follow as good as which is a wrong path. If you have motionless which Barisan Nasional is a right path, this is a trail you will follow never thoughts what you say. And if you have motionless which Pakatan Rakyat is a right path, this is a trail you will follow never thoughts what you say.
you will of march continue to broach my summary of Islam to you. And you do this not since you am perplexing to modify you to Islam, which you consider would be a futile exercise, though since you wish you to assimilate Islam. Why do you wish you to assim! ilate Is lam? Well, for two reasons.
Firstly would be since Islam is a sacrament of a Federation, as stipulated in a Constitution of Malaysia. Hence it is my duty, not as a Muslim, though as a Malaysian, to assistance you assimilate a 'official' sacrament of a nation which you have been a citizen of.
Secondly would be since Muslims themselves have been not setting a right e.g. of what a good Muslim should be similar to as good as most times they contend as good as do things which confuses people as good as gives a bad clarity of Islam. Hence you should correct this perception of Islam, as good as you have said most times which Muslims have been Islam's biggest enemy.
In governing body it is a same. You have already motionless which supervision you wish as good as zero you can contend is starting to have you shift your mind. So you speak about what sort of supervision you should be seeking for not to 'convert' you though to assistance you assimilate a concept of 'good government'.
The result of a entrance ubiquitous choosing has some-more or less already been decided. Most people have already motionless whom they have been starting to opinion for. The order of a thumb you normally make use of is 30:40:30 -- definition 30% will await a government, 30% will await a antithesis as good as 40% will be a fence-sitters or 'floating' voters.
you hold those who wish to opinion for Barisan Nasional have already done up their minds whilst those who wish to opinion for Pakatan Rakyat have also already done up their minds as good as a fence-sitters is right away a really tiny minority -- nonetheless you honestly can't discuss it you how most commission it is.
you have said this prior to as good as you will contend it again. The entrance ubiquitous choosing is not about who is starting to win though about who is starting to lose. If Pakatan Rakyat wins a choosing it is not since Pakatan Rakyat won though since Barisan Nasional lost. That is what! it is s tarting to be.
Those who have been starting to opinion for Pakatan Rakyat will do so not since they await Pakatan Rakyat though since they only wish change. It is since they no longer wish a same supervision they've been carrying since 1955. Many countries have seen this happen when a electorate kicked out a same supervision which they have been carrying for 50 years or some-more only to see a change.
Will Pakatan Rakyat be a improved government? Most people who have already motionless to opinion for Pakatan Rakyat do not care. This is not about either Pakatan Rakyat is starting to be a improved government. Never thoughts if it is not starting to be a improved government. Voting in Pakatan Rakyat is starting to see a different supervision to Barisan Nasional. It will see a shift of supervision never thoughts either improved or not.
We competence argue which shift does not necessarily mean better. Some countries opted for shift though they did not see a improved government. Sometimes they saw worse. But those who have already motionless to opinion for shift have been not endangered about that. They wish shift initial as good as after will work upon 'better', after a shift happens.
And this is what Barisan Nasional is up against. It is no make use of perplexing to rationalise this logic. Some competence even argue which there is no proof at all in this sort of thinking. This is not about logic. This is about sentiments as good as emotions. If proof can override sentiments as good as emotions would you be quarrelling about which sacrament is improved as good as which sacrament is a loyal sacrament when all religions can similarly not be proven as good as have been formed upon ideology as good as not reasoning?
Hence both sides, Barisan Nasional as good as Pakatan Rakyat, need to play upon our emotions as good as sentiments only similar to how Christianity as good as Islam engage any alternative in winning coverts. Do people modify since o! f a just ification any sacrament offers or since of a convictions it is selling to potential converts? It is not reasoning which wins converts though faith.
Hence if you have faith which voting for Pakatan Rakyat would invite shift you will opinion for Pakatan Rakyat. Is there any justification which voting for shift would interpret to voting for a improved government? Faith does not need evidence. Faith is formed upon belief. And idea does not need evidence.
Barisan Nasional may not realize this though this is what it is up against. And unless Barisan Nasional can remonstrate a electorate which it is a engine for shift afterwards a electorate have been starting to opinion Pakatan Rakyat. And there is zero Barisan Nasional can do about it.
And what is my pursuit in all this? Well, my job, as you have said most times before, is to throw a cat amongst a pigeons as good as stir a shit. Sometimes you need to raise a peoples' annoy since annoy is a good motivating factor. And a single approach you can annoy people is to discuss it them which they have been wrong as good as you have been right. Tell them which they have been foolish as good as foolish. No a single likes to be told which he or she is an idiot. This will force them to urge their position as good as to do so they will need to think. You cannot win an evidence but initial thinking.
Back in a 1980s, a Malaysian batch marketplace used to be called 'the second casino'. That was where a people went to gamble. They did not caring about fundamentals or PE ratios. They 'played' a marketplace formed upon rumours as good as upon following a herd.
When there was a gossip which Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's daughter eloped with an Indian male a marketplace fell. The gossip was proven fake in a finish as good as a marketplace went up again. But since should a marketplace rise as good as tumble formed upon rumours? And so what if Dr Mahathir's daughter eloped? Why should which affect a market?
No comments:
Post a Comment